J6 Committee now claiming they never had access to any security footage

[JackOfNoTrades]

So you’re nose-blind to the truth.

It happened. It wasn't peaceful. It wasn't a sightseeing trip.
It was a violent insurrection by Trump supporters. Can't just show the highly edited footage and call it peaceful.
Don't work that way, Leo.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

of course you did

and you had access to hundreds of cameras, inside and out, so you could see everything going on.

Keep digging, snowflake. Maybe you'll get there. Again, no one who saw what went on that day will change their minds about what happened.
Just as I don't expect you humpers to change your mind either. This is going to blow up spectacularly for Fox. And I'm gonna enjoy every minute of it.

 

[WEATHER53]

If the Dems had engaged in full disclosure as required by law then this Part 2 would never had bitten them in the ass.
The flailing at this point is unprecedented.

 

[BlindBoo]

The rest of the story is what we are now getting.

By cherry picking a few clips and narrating a false premise, rather than give access to the entire video and letting the viewer decide?

Sounds par for the flock.

 

[scruffy]

The lies keep coming. They're shitting their pants now that the media has access to all the footage. LOL!

The entire committee needs to be investigated and prosecuted if this is true. He's basically saying they made rulings and conclusions without examining any evidence.

See?

We all knew from the very beginning this was nothing but a leftard dog and pony show, and now it's proven in the public domain.

The Democrat leadership is SCUM. Weasel is way too nice a word for what they do.

 

[jotathought]

The January 6th committee wasn't a court determining guilt of individuals.

It was portraying how the riot occurred, which involved a lot of crime. With 41,000 hours of video, it was always going to be the case that the vast majority of it was not going to be seen in the committee. Showing video of Chansley aimlessly wandering the hallways provides no utility. Showing the violence that occurred does.

The committees primary objective was to investigate the January 6th event, and this was a select committee dedicated to this responsibility. With the volume of footage to review, it is common to outsource responsibilities to divide and conquer, and one would expect reviews by the committee members to ensure its appropriate interpretation and gain expertise in the investigation. How would the committee know if the video footage accurately reflected the series of events?

Naturally, this would not have happened had Pelosi created the committee with a well balance of partisanship and skeptics. How many opportunities were missed with calling witness? cross-examination of witnesses?

As many already knew .. this only further demonstrates the true intent of the January 6th Committee and this is 3 months after their recommendations have been reported and the committee was dissolved. Way to go Pelosi!

 

[jknowgood]

I'm surprised that it was sealed so quickly and never breached again. I guess the MOB-O-MOROONIES surged in elsewhere. like where that Captain Coco Puffs (with the Horns) came in.

Why haven't they redacted all the security shit from the videos and released it all to us. It's ours. Then we can cherry pick it to our hearts content.

The new footage showed Capitol Police walking around escorting the guy with the horns around. Also his attorney was not shown the footage. This could backfire on you loons.

 

[jknowgood]

 

[jknowgood]

It happened. It wasn't peaceful. It wasn't a sightseeing trip.
It was a violent insurrection by Trump supporters. Can't just show the highly edited footage and call it peaceful.
Don't work that way, Leo.

Its security carmera footage. Hopefully Pelosi goes to jail over it.

 

[LeftofLeft]

So when prosecuting a rapist is the prosecution obligated to mention all the time they observed the perp not raping someone, or can the limit the evidence they present to the actual crime committed.

At the same time, can a prosecutor shut down Defense mentioning actions leading up to the rape? The problem is that this is not about one person, one crime. I don’t deny the violence took place nor am I saying the peaceful videos make it so that the violence did not happen. I am saying that the new video raises questions as to whether ALL were violent that day as well as security and breach breakdowns that no one wants to talk about or want to cover up.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

I didn't need a J6 committee to tell me what went on that day.

Sounds religious or supernatural.. is your faith strong? Do you have a god that gives you secret knowledge? Do voices tell you things such as what REALLY happened on January 6th, 2021?

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Sounds religious or supernatural.. is your faith strong? Do you have a god that gives you secret knowledge? Do voices tell you things such as what REALLY happened on January 6th, 2021?

Sorry, my quota for attempting to fix stupid has been reached for today.

Again, those of us who saw on live TV, aren't going to change our minds.
Flail away...you've already lost.

 

[BlindBoo]

The new footage showed Capitol Police walking around escorting the guy with the horns around. Also his attorney was not shown the footage. This could backfire on you loons.

Walking around the building with the cop tailing him simple does nothing to absolve him from the crime he committed as part of the MAGAMOB that halted the Joint Session of Congress.

 

[Billiejeens]

By cherry picking a few clips and narrating a false premise, rather than give access to the entire video and letting the viewer decide?

Sounds par for the flock.

Is it?

Any reason that your people would not have done that in the last 2 years?

 

[Billiejeens]

Sorry, my quota for attempting to fix stupid has been reached for today.

Again, those of us who saw on live TV, aren't going to change our minds.
Flail away...you've already lost.

You exhaust your quota trying to fix yourself you ignorant fuck.

 

[BlindBoo]

At the same time, can a prosecutor shut down Defense mentioning actions leading up to the rape? The problem is that this is not about one person, one crime. I don’t deny the violence took place nor am I saying the peaceful videos make it so that the violence did not happen. I am saying that the new video raises questions as to whether ALL were violent that day as well as security and breach breakdowns that no one wants to talk about or want to cover up.

I have no problem with a review of all the footage and a thorough investigation into any and all allegations of funny business......by more than one media source.

 

[BlindBoo]

Is it?

Any reason that your people would not have done that in the last 2 years?

I never said they wouldn't. But the cherry picking of the violent attacks on police outweighs any of the scenes with the same people not violently attacking the police. If they are recorded committing a crime, then no amount of footage of them not committing a crime while wandering aimlessly about or whatever, will exonerate them.

 

[Billiejeens]

I never said they wouldn't. But the cherry picking of the violent attacks on police outweighs any of the scenes with the same people not violently attacking the police. If they are recorded committing a crime, then no amount of footage of them not committing a crime while wandering aimlessly about or whatever, will exonerate them.

They had two years
Obviously they wanted it hidden.

 

[JustAGuy1]

It's very simple, you've been had and lied to but your pride won't allow you to admit it.

 

[jknowgood]

Walking around the building with the cop tailing him simple does nothing to absolve him from the crime he committed as part of the MAGAMOB that halted the Joint Session of Congress.

Lol, if they thought he was a threat, why didn't they apprehend him in the beginning?