Jack Smith Seeks Supreme Court To Review To Keep Trump Criminal Case Moving Toward March Trial.

[BackAgain]

Is "strained nonsense" a legal term or did you just pull that out of your ass?

Zzzz

Damn, you’re dull.

 

[Clipper]

Zzzz

Damn, you’re dull.

Thd real "strained nonsense" is what comes out whenever you try to think straight, BOZO.

But keep trying & kindly leave out the grunting.

 

[Father O'Blivion]

OR Smith is hoping the SCOTUS throws the whole thing out so he can save face and shut it down.

Right. That makes the most sense.

 

[BluesLegend]

No. They are looking at it. Just heard it on the tv

They have not ruled on it Demwit.

 

[Arlette]

They have not ruled on it Demwit.

I didn't claim they did. If by some miracle they agree with Trump's brainfart, Biden will have Trump immediately shot, cause he would be immune too.

 

[BluesLegend]

I didn't claim they did. If by some miracle they agree with Trump's brainfart, Biden will have Trump immediately shot, cause he would be immune too.

Will Dems demand again that the SCOTUS be rigged by adding a bunch more liberal justices like they did the last time they were unhappy with a ruling?

 

[Clipper]

Right. That makes the most sense.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

We still believe in limited government. We still believe in the rule of law.

It’s all you left wing fubars who don’t.

And this motion by the Special Persecutor won’t lead to a test of anything. It is bound to be rejected, with no ruling either way.

Our courts don’t render advisory opinions.

Now conservatives oppose limited government; seeking to increase the authority of the state at the expense of individual liberty – in this case the authority of the president above that of the rule of law.

And conservatives are enemies of the rule of law; their support and defense of Trump’s crimes and corruption is further proof of that.

 

[Arlette]

Will Dems demand again that the SCOTUS be rigged by adding a bunch more liberal justices like they did the last time they were unhappy with a ruling?

You go on and think about post #45 some more.

 

[BackAgain]

Thd real "strained nonsense" is what comes out whenever you try to think straight, BOZO.

But keep trying & kindly leave out the grunting.

STD Clap. Your next original thought would be your first.

But there’s no prospect of you ever reaching that height.

I don’t care if you grunt or not. Just leave.

 

[BackAgain]

Now conservatives oppose limited government; seeking to increase the authority of the state at the expense of individual liberty – in this case the authority of the president above that of the rule of law.

And conservatives are enemies of the rule of law; their support and defense of Trump’s crimes and corruption is further proof of that.

Repeating false claim leaves it still false.

No libs support limited government. And nothing said in this thread suggests that conservatives have changed in their full support of limited government.

Adam_Clayton, you’re a nit wit.

 

[BackAgain]

IMH (Canadian) O, the Scotus is corrupt but not quite as corrupt as Trump needs it to be. They obviously understand that America is going to try to return to normal after Trump is dead.

Your opinion isn’t humble. It should be.

You’re quite retarded.

 

[BackAgain]

You will be wrong, but at least you're back on topic!

I’m the one who has remained on topic despite your efforts to deflect.

And whether my surmise is right or wrong isn’t known by a moron like you.

 

[jknowgood]

Federal judges believed there is. Grand juries believe it too. You have not seen what they have, have you? Neither have I, but I go with what we do factually know .. Trump is out on bail and is facing multiple trials.

Trump's claims of absolute immunity are defense tactics being used to try and stall outcomes, so he can pardon himself -- and that will go to courts too, if it comes about.

You do realize weaponizing the system will only hurt you in the long run? You loons never learn.

 

[Crepitus]

So, if the SC(r)TUS rules that being president is the ultimate "get out of jail free card" then what is to stop Joe Biden from doing the world a favor sending someone to assassinate tRump? Or for that matter just shooting him himself?

 

[Crepitus]

You do realize weaponizing the system will only hurt you in the long run? You loons never learn.

Good thing we stopped that from happening then, isn't it?

 

[Catsnmeters]

You do realize weaponizing the system will only hurt you in the long run? You loons never learn.

Claiming the president is above the law is weaponizing the system.

You kooks never learn.

 

[Clipper]

Repeating false claim leaves it still false.

No libs support limited government. And nothing said in this thread suggests that conservatives have changed in their full support of limited government.

Adam_Clayton, you’re a nit wit.

Oh look! More "strained nonsense" How's that workin' out?

 

[BackAgain]

Oh look! More "strained nonsense" How's that workin' out?

Oh look. More of the same plodding dishonesty from Clap. Zzzz

 

[scruffy]

You do realize weaponizing the system will only hurt you in the long run? You loons never learn.

These leftard morons think they're being clever.

They're too clever for their own good.

Or ours.