James Woods to sue over DNC for telling Twitter to ban him from Twitter

No, not bullshit.

His career has been on the decline for years. The last live action film he did was in 2014. Everything else, with the exception of two episodes of Andrew "Dice" Clay's Showtime television show DICE, has been a voice work for one poorly received animated film, cartoons and video games. Except for one video game in 2019, all that predates the Hunter Biden fiasco.

Look, I am and have been a fan of James Woods for decades. But the truth is, he was a very good actor with a handful of very good starring roles to his credit. Except for those, his resume consists of secondary roles in some television movies and some not so good films. As for being an award winning actor, with the exception of a couple of Emmy Awards and a Golden Globe, the rest of his awards are from competitions no one has ever heard of.

Yes, he was a very good actor at one time. But a series of poor role choices, primarily, combined with his open conservatism are the reasons for the decline of his career. Not some posts on Twitter that offended the DNC. A conservative in Hollywood must steer the waters carefully in order to succeed. It's not right, but it is what it is. Nothing you or I or anyone else will say or do is going to change that any time soon.


You are confused.

His career was in decline because of being blackballed by the DNC and Limousine Libtard filth..

Here is a list of his awards and nomination. A very good actor that was a pain in the ass to the DNC because he criticized Democrats so Liberal turds blackballed him.

I hope he wins his lawsuit.

Here is a list of his awards, by the way.

 
Wrong.

‘Free speech’ is not ‘restricted’ because there are ample other opportunities for one to self-express – that Woods is being discussed on USMB, which is social media, and likely other online venues, is proof of that, having nothing to do with ‘free speech.’

Now, if Congress were to pass a law penalizing social media for discussing Woods, or penalizing Woods himself for accessing social media, that would be preempting and restricting free speech because there would be no other online venue for Woods to use, since all social media would be equally subject to the same penalties and refuse to accommodate Woods in an effort to avoid being penalized by government.

Indeed, that’s a criterion the courts use to determine if government has acted contrary to the First Amendment – are there ample other channels of communication afforded to the speaker with this government restriction in place, and if not, then the courts would invalidate the government’s restriction.

The right to free speech is not ‘absolute,’ it is not a right to say anything you want anywhere you want and at any time – the right is subject to reasonable limits and restrictions by government consistent with First Amendment jurisprudence; and with regard to the private sector – private social media, private political parties, and private individuals – the doctrine of free speech doesn’t apply at all.
Twitter is none of those things. You are stuck on stupid. Go away.
 
You are confused.

His career was in decline because of being blackballed by the DNC and Limousine Libtard filth..

Here is a list of his awards and nomination. A very good actor that was a pain in the ass to the DNC because he criticized Democrats so Liberal turds blackballed him.

I hope he wins his lawsuit.

Here is a list of his awards, by the way.

And I repeat an amazingly intelligent individual. Who here has an IQ of 184?
 
Uhm, with one post you look a total partisan hack. Who was it Twitter banned prior to Musk?

Don't give me leftist BS, for once own it

Several laws in Florida have been overturned by federal judges because they violate free speech rights. You are the one giving us BS.
 
Several laws in Florida have been overturned by federal judges because they violate free speech rights. You are the one giving us BS.
The Supreme Court overturned most of Obama's unconstitutional initiatives and are about to do the same for Potatohead.

What is your point?
 
And what would those be? This should be precious considering the Ist amendment we have, or are supposed to have. Let us have it.

Try going to a Walmart store and make political speeches. They can toss you out and have them arrested if you refuse to leave. You have to have their permission.
 
The Supreme Court overturned most of Obama's unconstitutional initiatives and are about to do the same for Potatohead.

What is your point?

There was nothing unconstitutional about Obama's initiatives. Obamacare is still here.

The point is that Republicans are attacking free speech rights and using the power of the government to enforce it. Judges have found this is a violation of free speech rights. No Democrat laws have been found to violate free speech rights.
 
The question is did the DNC bring pressure on the Limousine Libtards in Hollywood and in the social media to undermine Woods. An accomplished actor that had a great award winning career.

That is for a jury to decide after hearing the evidence and if the answer is yes then they have to pony up.

Lets hope Wood's wins. He did a great job of pointing out Democrat corruption and stupidity and he shouldn't be punished for it.
 
Sure I do. You lack the intelligence to understand, so that’s all I’ll say about that.
No you don't... you know what people alive today say was how your ancestors felt... and with the biases that come with people of today...
 
Liberals can't stand anybody that is smart. Their Socialist policies are designed to appeal to the lowest IQ rung of our society and they hate anybody that can think for themselves.
It’s not just that their socialist policies are designed to APPEAL to the lowest IQ rung. They DEPEND on the lowest IQ rung to get their destructive policies through. Nobody stands in their way more than an intelligent, tenacious conservative who points out how destructive they are.
 
What laws




Disney circulated a memo to employees opposing Florida's attacks on transgenders and gays. DeSantis went after Disney for exercising their free speech rights with their employees. Now Republicans are seeking a way out.


"Keeping Reedy Creek in place will also let lawmakers avoid a potentially hefty tax burden from being put on Florida residents. Orlando-area officials said after Reedy Creek was targeted that dissolving it could be “catastrophic” for local taxpayers near Walt Disney World, as the special district allowed Disney to directly fund things like road improvements, fire department services, and other infrastructure costs that taxpayers would now instead have to shoulder. Unless the policies governing Reedy Creek were restructured before the special district was dissolved, its dissolution would also force Orange and Osceola counties—where Walt Disney World is located—to assume the special district’s debts, which total nearly $1 billion. “I don’t think [DeSantis] understood how badly this could go for the state of Florida and the counties and the cities” when he moved to get rid of Reedy Creek, Stewart told the FT."
 

Forum List

Back
Top