Jan. 6 participant Ashli Babbitt's husband, conservative group file a wrongful death suit against U.S. government

It was a horrific riot. Everyone in that Capitol was experiencing intense fear for their own lives.
As horrific as this?
It was a horrific riot. Everyone in that Capitol was experiencing intense fear for their own lives.
Screenshot_20220621-195927_Chrome.jpg
 
We will see about that, I see victories coming our way.

The record of your Big Lie lawsuits is 0-60. Literally a perfect record of failure with even the Supreme Court refusing to touch his nonsensical Big Lie gibberish.

With Trump under 90+ indictments, all of which have stood his every attempt to have them dismissed. With Trump having lost the NY civil suit, his defamation suit with Carroll, Gulliani having lost his suit, Fox having settled for hundreds of millions with THEIR suit, with Kari Lake having lost every single solitary claim she's brought before the court.

But this time its gonna be different, huh? Yeah, reality is not friend, is it?
 
The record of your Big Lie lawsuits is 0-60. Literally a perfect record of failure with even the Supreme Court refusing to touch his nonsensical Big Lie gibberish.

With Trump under 90+ indictments, all of which have stood his every attempt to have them dismissed. With Trump having lost the NY civil suit, his defamation suit with Carroll, Gulliani having lost his suit, Fox having settled for hundreds of millions with THEIR suit, with Kari Lake having lost every single solitary claim she's brought before the court.

But this time its gonna be different, huh? Yeah, reality is not friend, is it?
Pretty shocking huh.
 
And all the other rioters behind the door are just going to wait politely while they arrest her?

Or are they going to form a little line so that the police can arrest them one at a time?
There was no reports of gunfire or any report of armed protestors outside or inside.... they all can't climb through that small window at once... arrest her don't kill her....
 
In some ways less and some ways more. The January 6th rioters were not engaging in random violence, they were targeting Congress specifically.
It's unbelievable they left their weapons at home when they went to take over the government. That really is stupid huh
 
Why not? This is a court of public opinion. We are not in a courtroom and bound by their rules. Use your head for once
Thanks. That answers my question.

You want to be unencumbered by legal requirements so your thots and feels can run wild.

Likely it is an effect of cognitive dissonance. You are trying to protect your beliefs by rejecting legal facts.
 
There was no reports of gunfire or any report of armed protestors outside or inside.... they all can't climb through that small window at once... arrest her don't kill her....
Arresting her would take at least minutes, during which time a few dozen would already be through that window.

So they’re just going to stand around and watch?
 
It's unbelievable they left their weapons at home when they went to take over the government. That really is stupid huh
Didn’t stop them from seriously injuring dozens of officers, sometimes by using baseball bats they brought from him, sometimes with the batons and shields they had ripped away from the police, sometimes with their bare fists.

The police had justifiable fear given how many of their friends and coworkers had been beaten by the mob.
 
Pretty shocking huh.

Not at all. MAGA files nonsense lawsuits based on absurd pseudo-legal gibberish and fantasy as evidence. Of course they're laughed out of court.

Look at Gulliani. He promised us 'comprehensive evidence' of election crimes committed by the Georgia poll workers after he lost the case. And delivered....

Jack. Shit.

Which wasn't shocking at all. Trump's team paid for two private investigations into the election. Neither found any fraud that would have changed the outcome, with the trivial instances that they did find evenly split between democrats and republicans.

Trump's own DOJ found no evidence of fraud that would have changed the outcome of the election.

Trump's own cyber security team found no evidence of fraud that would have changed the outcome of the election.

And yet the MAGA dipshits still believe. If only faith were admissible as evidence. Alas, and unshockingly, it isn't.
 
Thanks. That answers my question.

You want to be unencumbered by legal requirements so your thots and feels can run wild.

Likely it is an effect of cognitive dissonance. You are trying to protect your beliefs by rejecting legal facts.
You have a strong imagination that our discussion is even close to something that is admissible in a court of law. I think the cognitive dissonance is more evident on your part. Joe Biden is a criminal and there is enough evidence that points to the criminality obviously. Do you know the difference between a civil suit and a Criminal suit? Evidence and judgments can be completely different.
 
Not at all. MAGA files nonsense lawsuits based on absurd pseudo-legal gibberish and fantasy as evidence. Of course they're laughed out of court.

Look at Gulliani. He promised us 'comprehensive evidence' of election crimes committed by the Georgia poll workers after he lost the case. And delivered....

Jack. Shit.

Which wasn't shocking at all. Trump's team paid for two private investigations into the election. Neither found any fraud that would have changed the outcome, with the trivial instances that they did find evenly split between democrats and republicans.

Trump's own DOJ found no evidence of fraud that would have changed the outcome of the election.

Trump's own cyber security team found no evidence of fraud that would have changed the outcome of the election.

And yet the MAGA dipshits still believe. If only faith were admissible as evidence. Alas, and unshockingly, it isn't.
Strong indicators point to a rigged election
 
There was no reports of gunfire or any report of armed protestors outside or inside.... they all can't climb through that small window at once... arrest her don't kill her....

Dude, a violent mob had breached the barracade after screaming FUCK THE BLUE! FUCK THE BLUE! and frantically beating their way through the door.



This after the mob that attacked the capitol had brutally and viciously attacked police officers, even roaming the halls of the capitol building calling for Mike Pence to be hung.

You can ignore all of that if you want. But there's no reason a rational person ever would. And the capitol police didn't, the investigation of the shooting didn't, nor did every prosecutor with jurisdiction.

MAGA just sucks in court.
 
Strong indicators point to a rigged election

Nope. Every count, recount, hand count, machine count, state count, audit, forensic audit, certified result and electoral vote all show the same thing:

A Biden landslide.

With Trump's own cyber security experts confirming it was the most secure election in US history.

With Trump's own DOJ admitting there was no evidence of fraud that would have changed the outcome of the eleciton.

And BOTH of Trump's private investigations showing the exact same thing.

Of course the Big Lie is going to perform pathetically in court. As MAGA tears are not legal evidence. Nor are unfounded accusations backed by jack shit.

0 for 60 in Big Lie cases. A record of perfect failure. As it should be.
 
You have a strong imagination that our discussion is even close to something that is admissible in a court of law.

It should be but it's not because you hid your inability to produce legal evidence.

I think the cognitive dissonance is more evident on your part. Joe Biden is a criminal and there is enough evidence that points to the criminality obviously.

More court of public opinion.

Do you know the difference between a civil suit and a Criminal suit? Evidence and judgments can be completely different.
Relevance?
 
You have a strong imagination that our discussion is even close to something that is admissible in a court of law. I think the cognitive dissonance is more evident on your part. Joe Biden is a criminal and there is enough evidence that points to the criminality obviously. Do you know the difference between a civil suit and a Criminal suit? Evidence and judgments can be completely different.

Trump's organization lost both its civil AND its criminal cases. Gulliani is under both criminal indictment AND lost his civil suit. Trump is under 90 criminal indictments AND lost his defamation case against Carroll. Powell has lost her criminal case AND is under a civil defamation suit.

Civil or criminal.....MAGA fucking sucks in court because they keep trying to use belief, conspiracy and unfounded accusation as evidence. That cultist shit may work with your ilk.

But in court, they keep pathetically and predictably losing.
 

Forum List

Back
Top