Blisterfinger
Platinum Member
- May 15, 2021
- 7,090
- 2,817
Well then bail dumb shit LOLI don't care about the court of public opinion.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well then bail dumb shit LOLI don't care about the court of public opinion.
What’s more pathetic is that you don’t know the difference between woman and women.officer Byrd was scared of a 110lb unarmed women
he is a pathetic coward
We will see about that, I see victories coming our way.
In some ways less and some ways more. The January 6th rioters were not engaging in random violence, they were targeting Congress specifically.
Pretty shocking huh.The record of your Big Lie lawsuits is 0-60. Literally a perfect record of failure with even the Supreme Court refusing to touch his nonsensical Big Lie gibberish.
With Trump under 90+ indictments, all of which have stood his every attempt to have them dismissed. With Trump having lost the NY civil suit, his defamation suit with Carroll, Gulliani having lost his suit, Fox having settled for hundreds of millions with THEIR suit, with Kari Lake having lost every single solitary claim she's brought before the court.
But this time its gonna be different, huh? Yeah, reality is not friend, is it?
There was no reports of gunfire or any report of armed protestors outside or inside.... they all can't climb through that small window at once... arrest her don't kill her....And all the other rioters behind the door are just going to wait politely while they arrest her?
Or are they going to form a little line so that the police can arrest them one at a time?
It's unbelievable they left their weapons at home when they went to take over the government. That really is stupid huhIn some ways less and some ways more. The January 6th rioters were not engaging in random violence, they were targeting Congress specifically.
The court of public opinion doesn't care about youI don't care about the court of public opinion.
Thanks. That answers my question.Why not? This is a court of public opinion. We are not in a courtroom and bound by their rules. Use your head for once
That doesn't make any sense.The court of public opinion doesn't care about you
Arresting her would take at least minutes, during which time a few dozen would already be through that window.There was no reports of gunfire or any report of armed protestors outside or inside.... they all can't climb through that small window at once... arrest her don't kill her....
Didn’t stop them from seriously injuring dozens of officers, sometimes by using baseball bats they brought from him, sometimes with the batons and shields they had ripped away from the police, sometimes with their bare fists.It's unbelievable they left their weapons at home when they went to take over the government. That really is stupid huh
Pretty shocking huh.
You have a strong imagination that our discussion is even close to something that is admissible in a court of law. I think the cognitive dissonance is more evident on your part. Joe Biden is a criminal and there is enough evidence that points to the criminality obviously. Do you know the difference between a civil suit and a Criminal suit? Evidence and judgments can be completely different.Thanks. That answers my question.
You want to be unencumbered by legal requirements so your thots and feels can run wild.
Likely it is an effect of cognitive dissonance. You are trying to protect your beliefs by rejecting legal facts.
Strong indicators point to a rigged electionNot at all. MAGA files nonsense lawsuits based on absurd pseudo-legal gibberish and fantasy as evidence. Of course they're laughed out of court.
Look at Gulliani. He promised us 'comprehensive evidence' of election crimes committed by the Georgia poll workers after he lost the case. And delivered....
Jack. Shit.
Which wasn't shocking at all. Trump's team paid for two private investigations into the election. Neither found any fraud that would have changed the outcome, with the trivial instances that they did find evenly split between democrats and republicans.
Trump's own DOJ found no evidence of fraud that would have changed the outcome of the election.
Trump's own cyber security team found no evidence of fraud that would have changed the outcome of the election.
And yet the MAGA dipshits still believe. If only faith were admissible as evidence. Alas, and unshockingly, it isn't.
There was no reports of gunfire or any report of armed protestors outside or inside.... they all can't climb through that small window at once... arrest her don't kill her....
Strong indicators point to a rigged election
You have a strong imagination that our discussion is even close to something that is admissible in a court of law.
I think the cognitive dissonance is more evident on your part. Joe Biden is a criminal and there is enough evidence that points to the criminality obviously.
Relevance?Do you know the difference between a civil suit and a Criminal suit? Evidence and judgments can be completely different.
You have a strong imagination that our discussion is even close to something that is admissible in a court of law. I think the cognitive dissonance is more evident on your part. Joe Biden is a criminal and there is enough evidence that points to the criminality obviously. Do you know the difference between a civil suit and a Criminal suit? Evidence and judgments can be completely different.