Jan. 6 participant Ashli Babbitt's husband, conservative group file a wrongful death suit against U.S. government

Trump's organization lost both its civil AND its criminal cases. Gulliani is under both criminal indictment AND lost his civil suit. Trump is under 90 criminal indictments AND lost his defamation case against Carroll. Powell has lost her criminal case AND is under a civil defamation suit.

Civil or criminal.....MAGA fucking sucks in court because they keep trying to use belief, conspiracy and unfounded accusation as evidence.

And they keep pathetically and predictably losing.
He/she doesn't care about real legal decisions.

He/she assertions exist in the court of public opinion where his/her thots and feels are given free reign.
 
Dude, a violent mob had breached the barracade after screaming FUCK THE BLUE! FUCK THE BLUE! and frantically beating their way through the door.



This after the mob that attacked the capitol had brutally and viciously attacked police officers, even roaming the halls of the capitol building calling for Mike Pence to be hung.

You can ignore all of that if you want. But there's no reason a rational person ever would. And the capitol police didn't, the investigation of the shooting didn't, nor did every prosecutor with jurisdiction.

MAGA just


It should be but it's not because you hid your inability to produce legal evidence.



More court of public opinion.


Relevance?
Relevance?
More circumstantial evidence is allowed in civil court along with more opinionated evidence.
 
How were cops supposed to know she wasn't armed?
There was a deadly insurgency taking place.
Now, if she had yielded to their commands they could have sorted it out and just arrested her.
When a violent mob of thousands of peole threatens the congress, it doesn't much matter if they are armed.

That cop was prepared to empty his mag and hold his ground against a mob that would surely have overtaken him. It was very brave of him.

The coward hillbilly insurrectionists put an unarmed woman at the tip of their spear, like the cowards they are. Then they turned tail and squealed when it got real, like the cowards they are.

The contrast couldn't be more stark.
There was no reports of gunfire or any report of armed protestors outside or inside.... they all can't climb through that small window at once... arrest her don't kill her....
What terrible advice. Just incredibly stupid.
 
He/she doesn't care about real legal decisions.

He/she assertions exist in the court of public opinion where his/her thots and feels are given free reign.
Actually they didn't lose any cases, judges refused to hear the cases and look into it. They didn't want to get involved in politics for some reason. It was pretty much a sham
 
When a violent mob of thousands of peole threatens the congress, it doesn't much matter if they are armed.

That cop was prepared to empty his mag and hold his ground against a mob that would surely have overtaken him. It was very brave of him.

The coward hillbilly insurrectionists put an unarmed woman at the tip of their spear, like the cowards they are. Then they turned tail and squealed when it got real, like the cowards they are.

The contrast couldn't be more stark.

What terrible advice. Just incredibly stupid.
The coward cops snuck in from the side and did his duty to his master's by murdering a trump supporter without warning
 
He/she doesn't care about real legal decisions.

He/she assertions exist in the court of public opinion where his/her thots and feels are given free reign.
The court of public opinion is the only one that counts here. Try not to be so butt hurt
 
More circumstantial evidence is allowed in civil court along with more opinionated evidence.

I don't think you understand what circumstantial evidence is.

We have actual video of the mob violently and frantically smashing down the door and barricades of the Speaker's lobby that was protecting members of congress from the mob.

That's not circumstantial. That's direct evidence. Circumstantial is indirect evidence.

But thank you for demonstrating the kind of meaningless pseudo-legal gibberish and failure to comprehend even basic legal principles that so consistently define the useless dogshit that MAGA tries to fling in court.

And why they so predictably fail in a court of law.
 
It should be but it's not because you hid your inability to produce legal evidence.



More court of public opinion.


Relevance?
The only one that counts here. Maybe you should head downtown and file a suit against me and what I said." The criminal Biden" 🤣
 
Of course you do. Because Trumpism has turned your morality to diahrrea. For shame.

Was it ever more than rectal incontinence? Conservatives have never really believed in much. And now, even less.

Family values? They grabbed those by the pussy.

Fiscal Responsibility? Trump holds the single term record for the greatest addition to the national debt.

Transparency? Trump's ilk are still trying to keep evidence of alleged crimes away from both prosecutors and the people.

What is the conservative moment now but butthurt, fantastical conspiracies, fraud and an unquenchable desire for revenge?
 
Actually they didn't lose any cases, judges refused to hear the cases and look into it. They didn't want to get involved in politics for some reason. It was pretty much a sham
No. They lost legal cases.

Some cases didn't have standing but not many.

Even Trump's own investigators didn't find anything but Trump didn't publicize those investigations because they didn't support his lies.
 

Forum List

Back
Top