Jan 6th and this is chilling

[XponentialChaos]

If they cannot reveal anything why are they sitting in front of Congress? LOL

Grow up

Not my problem

Not complicated

To answer questions. But it’s understandable that they can’t answer anything related to undercover agents.

It’s very simple.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Because I enjoy seeing your triggered. You're so cautious as to take a position you won't even opine on the Niners. You're a total pussy.

Grow up

Not my problem

Not complicated

So you won’t answer for him. Fine with me.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

To answer questions. But it’s understandable that they can’t answer anything related to undercover agents.

It’s very simple.

They can’t answer anything you mean? Lol

Grow up

Not my problem

Not complicated

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

So you won’t answer for him. Fine with me.

I did. Same way you answered me when you could not decipher between if and how. I did Answer you. Learn to read.

Grow up

Not my problem

Not complicated

 

[jc456]

They NEVER say who is and who isn’t undercover .

If they did the next time someone asks that question and gets it right and they refuse to answer… they confirm a positive

Or, failure to say no really means one is!

 

[jc456]

Because they don’t want to state anything, whether confirming or denying, anything related to undercover agents.

Not complicated.

Naw

 

[Lesh]

Or, failure to say no really means one is!

Which is why they never respond to such questions.

 

[schmidlap]

Red wave coming in November. Hopefully you live long enough to see it

The asinine Epps silliness will have gone the way of the Cesar Sayoc "red flag!" nonsense, and the "Sandy Hook grieving Parents are all fakes!" fantasy long before November, but I'm sure Trump's weird worshipers will contrive spanking new delusions while they await the return of Trump's intrepid investigators from Hawaii. "They can't believe what they're finding!" doncha know?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

The asinine Epps silliness will have gone the way of the Cesar Sayoc "red flag!" nonsense, and the "Sandy Hook grieving Parents are all fakes!" fantasy long before November, but I'm sure Trump's weird worshipers will contrive spanking new delusions while they await the return of Trump's intrepid investigators from Hawaii. "They can't believe what they're finding!" doncha know?

You mention Epps not I. I asked You to opine on the question asked at second 20. You didn’t. You’re a fat coward.

 

[WEATHER53]

Trump continues his silence on the issues being brought forward by the committee. He appears to be acknowledging his guilt as are his colleagues in Congress who also remain silent.

ABC reports, "Former President Donald Trump on Monday responded in a lengthy statement to the House's ongoing Jan. 6 committee hearings, assailing the panel as illegitimate and their presentation as one-sided -- but rather than refute their evidence, he reiterated the same baseless claims about the 2020 presidential election that are at the center of the proceedings and the group's case that he had attempted a "coup."

"Trump's 12-page statement, sent to reporters on Monday night, comes after the second public hearing held by the House select committee investigating last year's deadly Capitol attack. His statement, marked by characteristic exclamations and insults, called the hearings "a smoke and mirrors show" that failed to include "all exculpatory witnesses, and anyone who so easily points out the flaws in their story."

"The statement, however, did not directly respond to the specifics laid out by the committee to the public thus far -- including testimony earlier Monday from Trump's inner circle that he knew he had lost the last presidential race and had no legitimate reason to claim widespread fraud, instead choosing to listen to Rudy Giuliani to falsely claim victory over Joe Biden."

Trump is clueless. He has no idea what is happening. Let's examine what he said.

"Their presentation is one-sided." "Failed to include "all exculpatory witnesses, and anyone who so easily points out the flaws in their story."

Trump seems unaware that he refused to appear before the committee to explain his innocence. He is unaware that the Republican leader in the House, Kevin McCarthy, refused to appoint Republicans to the committee. Trump's close associates who could possibly defend him refused to appear before the committee.

"Their presentation is one-sided." "Failed to include "all exculpatory witnesses, and anyone who so easily points out the flaws in their story." Rural Trump Republicans with their limited awareness will believe him. Like Trump, they are clueless.

Not answering a call to the ruse is sure sign of guilt
Lib 101

 

[WEATHER53]

That's why she could not answer NO to the question if he didn't?

You are a braindead hack and you know it. Loser.

Didn't expect an answer cause you can't, but you resort to nannynanny boo boo response.

Loser

She could not say No because she knows that’s a lie and when the lie is proven later then she would be liable

 

[schmidlap]

I cannot believe there are people who take one fact, turn it's meaning around and ignore a preponderance of the evidence, to come up with a crazy conclusion.
I feel these people are mentally ill. The good news is there is much that can be done to help those with mental illness. Will these sad people seek help or let their mental illness dominate their life.

The invariably-irritable fantasists place their blind faith in frauds, including repeatedly-discredited propaganda media, and never seem to distinguish show business nonsense from the reality that our system of jurisprudence authenticates by the presentation of credible evidence.

They never fail to fall for the injunction to

 

[Lesh]

The NY Times is reporting that these exchanges took place five days after Trump told his supporters to attend the Stop The Steal rally at the Ellipse on Jan 6th which led to the US Capitol riot.

“So the odds are not based on the legal merits but an assessment of the justices’ spines, and I understand that there is a heated fight underway,” Mr. Eastman wrote, according to the people briefed on the contents of the email. Referring to the process by which at least four justices are needed to take up a case, he added, “For those willing to do their duty, we should help them by giving them a Wisconsin cert petition to add into the mix.”
The pro-Trump lawyer, Kenneth Chesebro, replied that the “odds of action before Jan. 6 will become more favorable if the justices start to fear that there will be ‘wild’ chaos on Jan. 6 unless they rule by then, either way.”

What these correspondences show is not only was the insurrection on January 6 at the US Capitol targeted at members of Congress and at Mike Pence specifically, but also at the "spines" of the Supreme Court justices.

Q) And how would Eastman know about a heated fight in the Supreme Court over these cases?

A) Ginni Thomas

 

[schmidlap]

You’re a fat coward.

You are clearly a courageous svelte person in your mind.

Given your demonstrated penchant for embracing reality, well ...

Again, the cogent, documented exchange concerning what had you so verklempt:

Cruz: “Did federal agents or those in service of federal agents actively ​

........encourage violent and criminal conduct on Jan. 6?”​

​

Jill Sanborn: “Not to my knowledge, sir.”​

 

[Clipper]

Why the refusal to answer questions?

Lyin Ted is an attention grabbing jerkoff.

 

[Clipper]

seems to me if he isn't a Federal agent she could easily say that in public. If Feds didn't incite violence she could easily say that in public.

Why couldn't she answer any of those questions? The only logical conclusion (this is where you get lost) is that she is covering something up.

Too bad she can't cover up Trump trying to get Mike Pence whacked. Although you Trump asseaters would have been fine with it as long as that pile of shit Trump stayed in power.

Btw, why the silence from Trump's asslickers like McCarthy, Graham, Jordan & the rest of those bastards who still support that racketeer Trump?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

You are clearly a courageous svelte person in your mind.

Given your demonstrated penchant for embracing reality, well ...

Again, the cogent, documented exchange concerning what had you so verklempt:

Cruz: “Did federal agents or those in service of federal agents actively ​

........encourage violent and criminal conduct on Jan. 6?”​

​

Jill Sanborn: “Not to my knowledge, sir.”​

And I listed my exchange that you cannot refute. “Criminal conduct”…lol

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Lyin Ted is an attention grabbing jerkoff.

I do Not care if you’re gay. We are discussing the FBI and why they refuse to answer questions. I know It’s pride month but not everything is about you

 

[schmidlap]

And I listed my exchange that you cannot refute. “Criminal conduct”…lol

The feeble fantasy you have been force fed collapses outside the fatuous realm of ideological media propaganda that exploits partisan paranoia.

It cannot endure the fair and equable evidentiary standards of our institutions of justice.

Stop fretting over that.

It's a good thing.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

The feeble fantasy you have been force fed collapses outside the fatuous realm of ideological media propaganda that exploits partisan paranoia.

It cannot endure the fair and equable evidentiary standards of our institutions of justice.

Stop fretting over that.

It's a good thing.

There is no fantasy. He asked a simple yes or no question and it wasn’t answered. You’re a sanctimonious prick. Fat boy.