JD Vance’s Debate Performance Shows This Guy Is a Conservative Superstar

Billiejeens

Diamond Member
Jun 27, 2019
38,906
25,731
1,845
One thing is clear – after Tuesday, JD Vance is the Republican Taylor Swift, except he’s not mediocre, insufferable, or incapable of maintaining a long-term relationship.

But does that matter for November? They say that vice presidential debates don’t mean anything and that’s usually true.

Still, this one conclusively demonstrated that JD Vance is an outstanding speaker – calm, cool, capable, and in charge of the facts.

Let’s be objective about his opponent. Tim Walz was not terrible. In some ways, he was effective. Vance did not totally destroy him, though he could have if he chose to.

Walz was competent but overshadowed by a giant 20 years his junior.

Walz spewed Democrat talking points and did it while wearing his centrist suit.

Except it is an ill-fitting suit.

He’s no centrist.

He’s a straight-up commie weirdo all on-board with the left’s bizarre, perverted agenda. He’s all in with the Democrat Party on everything from abortions up to puberty and trans idiocy to redistributing the wealth and confiscating the guns. But on Tuesday, he managed to present himself as innocuous, like an annoying neighbor you look out your door for before leaving to make sure he’s not in the yard so you don’t have to talk to him.

It’s now beyond any serious dispute that JD Vance was a terrific choice for vice president.

He’s very smart and he’s adaptable. He knows how to connect with an audience. Sure, there were a hundred things I would’ve liked him to say to counter the arguments made by Walz and his two other opponents, the generic CBS crones who were moderating. They tried to get uppity, but their awkward fact checking failed. They behaved themselves after JD Vance cracked the whip and imposed his iron discipline upon them. Except for some passive aggressive catty comments, they pretty much behaved after that. It was a nice display of power.


BJ -

Nice commentary
Accurate

Vance will parlay his 4 years as VP into a dynamic 8 years as President.
 
You forgot to add he’s completely owned and controlled by billionaire fuck face Peter Thiel. Trump picked him for VP to obtain Thiel’s money.

It’s always about the money.
 
One thing is clear – after Tuesday, JD Vance is the Republican Taylor Swift, except he’s not mediocre, insufferable, or incapable of maintaining a long-term relationship.
He does wear more eyeliner than she does.

Vance is Nikki Haley in Florsheims. He’ll say whatever he needs to say to whatever audience is in front of him. Completely without convictions or character.
 
He does wear more eyeliner than she does.

Vance is Nikki Haley in Florsheims. He’ll say whatever he needs to say to whatever audience is in front of him. Completely without convictions or character.
Agreed. Just like K, and nearly all politicians.
 
J.D. Vance showed in the debate that he is no Mike Pence. He has no core and that his one job, his sine qua non for being picked Trump’s VP, is that he is Trump’s chief groveler. No one likes a groveler.
 
J.D. Vance showed in the debate that he is no Mike Pence. He has no core and that his one job, his sine qua non for being picked Trump’s VP, is that he is Trump’s chief groveler. No one likes a groveler.
Pence is a warmongering neocon elitist asshole. No one in the know likes that cocksucker.

Not that Vance is any better.

I bet you NOW love the Cheney’s, but you hated them not long ago. Whichever way the wind blows…..Are you one of those who dutifully abides by whatever government controlled media tells you?
 
One thing is clear – after Tuesday, JD Vance is the Republican Taylor Swift, except he’s not mediocre, insufferable, or incapable of maintaining a long-term relationship.

But does that matter for November? They say that vice presidential debates don’t mean anything and that’s usually true.

Still, this one conclusively demonstrated that JD Vance is an outstanding speaker – calm, cool, capable, and in charge of the facts.

Let’s be objective about his opponent. Tim Walz was not terrible. In some ways, he was effective. Vance did not totally destroy him, though he could have if he chose to.

Walz was competent but overshadowed by a giant 20 years his junior.

Walz spewed Democrat talking points and did it while wearing his centrist suit.

Except it is an ill-fitting suit.

He’s no centrist.

He’s a straight-up commie weirdo all on-board with the left’s bizarre, perverted agenda. He’s all in with the Democrat Party on everything from abortions up to puberty and trans idiocy to redistributing the wealth and confiscating the guns. But on Tuesday, he managed to present himself as innocuous, like an annoying neighbor you look out your door for before leaving to make sure he’s not in the yard so you don’t have to talk to him.

It’s now beyond any serious dispute that JD Vance was a terrific choice for vice president.

He’s very smart and he’s adaptable. He knows how to connect with an audience. Sure, there were a hundred things I would’ve liked him to say to counter the arguments made by Walz and his two other opponents, the generic CBS crones who were moderating. They tried to get uppity, but their awkward fact checking failed. They behaved themselves after JD Vance cracked the whip and imposed his iron discipline upon them. Except for some passive aggressive catty comments, they pretty much behaved after that. It was a nice display of power.


BJ -

Nice commentary
Accurate

Vance will parlay his 4 years as VP into a dynamic 8 years as President.
Vance is miserable since he sold out to Trump.
 
Allan Lichtman, the pollster dubbed the “Nostradamus of presidential predictions”, has delivered his verdict on last night’s vice presidential debate.

Speaking on a YouTube livestream, the 77-year-old described JD Vance as “very personable” and “slick” but concluded Tim Walz “finally found his voice” on a key issue, which then tipped the debate in the Democrat’s favor.

Lichtman, who has correctly predicted the result of nine out of 10 presidential elections since 1984, said that Walz came into his own when the moderators questioned the candidates about abortion.

“I thought it was kind of bipolar debate,” he said.

“The first 20 minutes I thought Vance had a slight edge… Walz looked a little bit nervous, he looked a little bit rattled even on a couple of issues that should have been very good for Democrats.

“But there was then a tipping point in this debate, a trigger, and that’s when they got to reproductive freedom. Finally, Tim Walz found his voice and was very persuasive and very eloquent about reproductive freedom for women,” Lichtman said.

 
This is a loss the democrats truly deserve! :cool:

their assassinations
their weaponizing the legal system
puling in Taylor Swift, Liz Chaney, etc...
mandating killer COVID vaccines

all of their wicked and dirty tricks pilled high
 
They called Vance weird because he was spotless and they had nothing to pick on him about and to them that is weird.

What's weird is the democrats putting a Kamala Harris loser from the beginning of 2020 on their main 2024 presidential ticket.
 
J.D. Vance showed in the debate that he is no Mike Pence. He has no core and that his one job, his sine qua non for being picked Trump’s VP, is that he is Trump’s chief groveler. No one likes a groveler.
Pence disappointed. He may have been different when he started in politics are talking politics. He had a chance to question the system he at one time questioned. It is tough. It takes cajónes when you are David to the Progressives Goliath. Many would fail.
 

Forum List

Back
Top