But then you just described Jesus (a created image Rome speaks through) insecure in his own beliefs that he dedicated himself to trashing the Pharisee and TEMPLE Priests.No just some jews that bash all Christians and claim Jesus is the antichrist even when they have no clue what they are bashing. They dance naked around their own fires oblivious of the spirit who bears witness of them.Actually I have read enough of your diatribe to know already that you are one lost puppy that doesn't know how nasty much of the shit you post is. Others may eat of your dung and you may like the taste of your own dung but I am not interested in it at all.1)you proved my point, you don't understand what it means, which you weren't meant to until it's time.
2)you don't understand what the word Lord means otherwise you would never call your idol "lord" since his image never achieved such kingship or MASTERy .
3)even the character in your story claims the son of man as another one to come (third person tense) in his own new name.
Even he declares "the Name" that is written on a pebble. You basically made fun of your own lores.
Trolling rubbish, probably a Guno sock.
I have no idea what motivates some fully dedicated religious Jews to be antagonistic towards Christians. This was a new thing to me. I lived 40 years on the Earth and taught Sunday School in Reform Temple. Had Hasidic relatives and Ortho grandparents and NEVER encountered this. Until I picked up the message board habit.
Just seems to me that some folks are SO insecure in their own beliefs that they dedicate themselves to trashing Jesus and Christians.
So you basically trashed Jesus and it's founders Rome who speak through that image. Proving my point, these RodISHI excuses to not answer the evidence are only exposing a deflection that Christianity is merely an antagonism of Judaism to convert Jews to Baal worship and the seed harvest scam the mythology tries to pull through the prosperity pitch of it's priest/pastors of greed.
I am not all that sure of the BAAL worship thing------but even secular born and bred and very naïve me-------was able -----on reading the NT, to see it PRECISELY as Rome's answer to DA JOOOOS. The jews were HOLD OUTS against the imperialist agenda of Rome. In order to
understand the NT-----one MUST grasp the extreme antagonism that Rome had towards jews-----
In order to understand Jesus----------a person I DO BELIEVE EXISTED as a kind of cult leader----ONE OF HUNDREDS OF JEWISH CULT LEADERS at that time------digest this-----he was entirely
misrepresented in the NT-----He was a PHARISEE-------a Pharisee of Pharisees. He was not the Jesus that the roman shill MATTHEW, presents. How do I know?--------easy-----he attacked the
money changers of the temple-----and HOW does that Christian establishment interpret that VERY PHARISEE action----------well-----face facts, rodishi-------in a very typical and nefarious and
MURDEROUS libel--------"sweet jesus hated da BANKER JEWS----lets kill them" ----here is some really bad news for you------like Matthew---the money changers of the temple courtyard were ROMAN SHILLS-------the Pharisees hated them for that reason------the ROMANS LOVED THEM