Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He didn't lie about her.After lying about an African American Congresswoman, John Kelly called the pro- slavery man in charge of trying to break up the USA an "honorable man".
Axios on Twitter
This sure will dispel the belief that Kelly is racist.
^ Lie.Not to mention that Lee freed his slaves before Grant...If you are judging Lee by the standards of today he's not if you are judging him by the standards of the time he lived in he is. Trying to judge people who lived 150 to 200 years ago by todays standards is pretty dumb.
That's stupid.Lincoln had chosen Lee because the both of them had the same view or opinion on slavery.
That's stupid.Lincoln had chosen Lee because the both of them had the same view or opinion on slavery.
" Each states was like a country. Lee did not want to abandoned the state that he loved, Virginia."
No, we were the UNITED States, and though loyalty to state was stronger in the earlier years, they all recognized they were not sovereign entities.
They lie about it.Lefties undermine American history as part of attacking modern Patriotism.
How so? How are "leftists undermining history"?
Oh please.
Just once, have the balls to admit the truth here - You resent the left because they tell the truth.
No it wasn't because it wasn't a legal sucession.Lincoln cannot invade Virginia, it is his country. You can't invade your own country, fool.Idiot! They "levied war" against the US. They didn't accomplish a succession within the law or with diplomacy, they fought their own government. That is treason.What is "full secession never happened" supposed to mean? Of course it did. The Confederacy told the North to take their Union and go fuck themselves. That isn't treason. The Constitution defines treason, and secession doesn't fit the definition.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort
Did the Confederacy invade any state of the Union? Nope. Lincoln invaded the Confederate states. He's the traitor.
"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them,"
They defended themselves against Lincoln's invasion, moron. Lincoln invaded Virginia, not the other way around.
You claim that secesion wasn't legal has no factual basis to support it. None whatsoever.
Note that it says Treason shall consist on "levying war against them. [plural]" That means making war against any state is treason. Lincoln is the only one who did that.
Wrong. After secession, Virginia was a foreign country. Nevertheless, the Constitution says it's treason to make war on a state of the union.
You#No it wasn't because it wasn't a legal sucession.Lincoln cannot invade Virginia, it is his country. You can't invade your own country, fool.They defended themselves against Lincoln's invasion, moron. Lincoln invaded Virginia, not the other way around.
You claim that secesion wasn't legal has no factual basis to support it. None whatsoever.
Note that it says Treason shall consist on "levying war against them. [plural]" That means making war against any state is treason. Lincoln is the only one who did that.
Wrong. After secession, Virginia was a foreign country. Nevertheless, the Constitution says it's treason to make war on a state of the union.
Prove it, douche bag.
You are an idiot. Did you go to school in the South? They don't teach correct history, do they?
Referring to the moral standards of that era, what punishment would you recommend for runaway slaves (presuming you owned a few). And please don't evade the question with some specious diversion such as, "I wouldn't have owned slaves." Because there were Blacks who owned Black slaves. (Probably whipped them, too.)[...]
Men of honor would not have whipped a person who just sought not to be a slave. Lee attempted to find honor is acting as a typical slave owing elite of the South. No way that works.
That's stupid.Lincoln had chosen Lee because the both of them had the same view or opinion on slavery.
" Each states was like a country. Lee did not want to abandoned the state that he loved, Virginia."
No, we were the UNITED States, and though loyalty to state was stronger in the earlier years, they all recognized they were not sovereign entities.
Every single confederate state saw soldiers who went off to fight for the Union, and 40% of Lees' own Virginia regiment stayed loyal to the US Government.
It's unbelievably stupid to ask someone a question like that. The past is the past. What people think about it today is irrelevant to what people thought then.Referring to the moral standards of that era, what punishment would you recommend for runaway slaves (presuming you owned a few). And please don't evade the question with some specious diversion such as, "I wouldn't have owned slaves." Because there were Blacks who owned Black slaves. (Probably whipped them, too.)[...]
Men of honor would not have whipped a person who just sought not to be a slave. Lee attempted to find honor is acting as a typical slave owing elite of the South. No way that works.
As I plainly stated, slavery became unacceptable in proportion with the growth and social sophistication of the Nation. Initially it was a widely and thoroughly acceptable practice. Advancing sociological and technological sophistication, such as high-level (Humanities) education and development of the cotton gin, made slaves far less useful or morally acceptable entities.[...]
Do you believe slavery only became a contentious issue with the start of the war?
Have you tried Preparation-H? It might solve your problem.It's unbelievably stupid to ask someone a question like that. The past is the past. What people think about it today is irrelevant to what people thought then.
I was just wondering. My dad was in the pacific in wwii, and didn't talk about the japanese the way you talk about southerners.
I don't believe your father served in the US Army or Navy in WWII.
Kind of makes your drama look like bullshit.
What a moron you are.
Your precious feelings are of no concern to me. This post of yours is just your ham-fisted attempt to lash out at me in order to make yourself feel better.
You do not matter. You are not important. You are not significant. You have no authority. You have no credibility. You're a nobody.
LOL!! 16 million americans wore an uniform during wwii. All that is required for that to be true is for me to be older and my father to have been older when I was born.
The Civil War was long ago. NO ONE is personally involved. THis is a historical discussion.
TYOu are pretending to be upset to avoid discussing the issue seriously and honestly.
That was not "my feelings" that was my correct judgement on the level of intelligence indicated by your post.And I stand by that. YOu are a moron.YOu keep trying to make this about me.Standard dishonest lefty crap.
YOur debating tactic is noted and dismissed.Also, FUCK YOU.
LOL!! 16 million americans wore an uniform during wwii. All that is required for that to be true is for me to be older and my father to have been older when I was born.
I think you're just making this shit up because you think it lends your garbage argument credibility it doesn't otherwise have. I think the only army your father may have fought for in WWII was the Wehrmacht. It's a pattern with you people; you make outlandish claims, then invent scenarios or imaginary people that magically corroborate what you're saying when the facts don't. You know you have no way to prove that your father served in WWII, so why do you make the claim? Simple; you think it lends credibility to your argument. Well, let me be the first to tell you...it doesn't.
The Civil War was long ago. NO ONE is personally involved. THis is a historical discussion.
TYOu are pretending to be upset to avoid discussing the issue seriously and honestly.
That was not "my feelings" that was my correct judgement on the level of intelligence indicated by your post.And I stand by that. YOu are a moron.YOu keep trying to make this about me.Standard dishonest lefty crap.
YOur debating tactic is noted and dismissed.Also, FUCK YOU.
Whoa man...now I've really broken this Russian post-bot.
You're the one who made it about you. You're the one who invoked all these personal anecdotes and feelings. You're the one who invoked imaginary relatives. You're the one who does all this just so you don't have to admit to a stranger on an anonymous message board that you're wrong about something.
Everything is about you people. You make everything about yourselves. You do that because you obviously had shitty parents who did a shitty job raising their shitty children.
