Judge Merchan's Letter to Trump Trial Lawyers Raises Eyebrows

[Procrustes Stretched]

You’ll just lie about anything won’t you?

Struggling with things?

Your link does not support your claim.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

You’ll just lie about anything won’t you?

"It really is the perfect crime."

from the link

 

[j-mac]

"It really is the perfect crime."

from the link

Oh, cherry picking are we?

how about these quotes from my article…

”…had in 2020, using biased algorithms which skewed search results towards positive links for Biden and negative links for Trump, as well as Get Out The Vote messaging on Google’s home page targeted primarily at Democrat voters.”

and

“Google is renowned for its liberal bias.

You can see that in political donations by employees of Google, YouTube, and other subsidiaries of parent company Alphabet which went 94 percent to Democrats in 2016.

Hillary Clinton’s largest donor was Google/Alphabet.


Google’s boss of almost two decades, the $25 billion man, Eric Schmidt, played a crucial role in Hillary’s campaign, as emails released by Wikileaks showed.

He also was Barack Obama’s 2012 campaign tech adviser. Obama’s analytics director, Elan Kriegel, told psmag.com that he credited that tech team for up to half of Obama’s four point winning margin in 2012: nearly 2.5 million votes.“

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Oh, cherry picking are we?

how about these quotes from my article…

”…had in 2020, using biased algorithms which skewed search results towards positive links for Biden and negative links for Trump, as well as Get Out The Vote messaging on Google’s home page targeted primarily at Democrat voters.”

and

“Google is renowned for its liberal bias.

You can see that in political donations by employees of Google, YouTube, and other subsidiaries of parent company Alphabet which went 94 percent to Democrats in 2016.

Hillary Clinton’s largest donor was Google/Alphabet.


Google’s boss of almost two decades, the $25 billion man, Eric Schmidt, played a crucial role in Hillary’s campaign, as emails released by Wikileaks showed.

He also was Barack Obama’s 2012 campaign tech adviser. Obama’s analytics director, Elan Kriegel, told psmag.com that he credited that tech team for up to half of Obama’s four point winning margin in 2012: nearly 2.5 million votes.“

Crime?

Yawn.

stop using Google

next

 

[j-mac]

Crime?

Yawn.

stop using Google

next

Fuck you! Why can’t you people tell the truth?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Fuck you! Why can’t you people tell the truth?

Why couldn't FOX, about the 2020 election? You are upset at Google search results for a supposed (not proven) bias, and not upset at FOX for lying?

Hmm...

Faux outrage on steroids.

 

[j-mac]

Why couldn't FOX, about the 2020 election? You are upset at Google search results for a supposed (not proven) bias, and not upset at FOX for lying?

Hmm...

Faux outrage on steroids.

Oh, it’s proven to anyone with a functioning brain, and is not a liar like you.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Throw the verdict out!

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

LOL

Mistrial? On what?

Trump is guilty. We all know it. Even f true how would somebody knowing how the jury will vote a case for mistrial? LOL

The stench of desperation coming out of Magadonia is nauseating.

The OP's own link -- the part some of you are allergic to:

Attorney Neama Rahmani told Newsweek Friday that defense lawyers typically can't use jury conversation as a reason for seeking a new trial.

"Jury deliberations are sacred, and the defense usually can't use juror discussions as a basis for a new trial or to appeal, even if the jurors misunderstood the facts or the law," Rahmani said via email.

"One exception, however, is if outside influences are brought into the jury deliberation room," he added. "That may be a basis for a new trial."

Rahmani added: "The burden for a new trial is high, though. The defense must show both an improper outside influence and prejudice."

"A stray comment on social media is not enough for a new trial," he wrote.

It's called "juror misconduct " and it's a class A misdemeanor in New York. It also violated the defendant's right to a fair and impartial jury. Violating someone's civil rights is a Federal felony

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Well, this is interesting.

If true, it should lead to a mistrial. Merchan took it seriously enough to give a heads-up to both sides.

Or is there something else out here and this is the old three card monte at work?

​

Questions have surfaced regarding the jury in former President Donald Trump's New York City hush money trial after the presiding judge flagged a post to social media alleging that a juror had spoken about Trump's verdict before it was handed down.​

​

According to New York State Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan's letter, which was sent to Trump lawyer Todd Blanche and Manhattan District Attorney Prosecutor Joshua Steinglass, a comment was left on the New York State Unified Court System's Facebook page by a user under the name "Michael Anderson," who wrote, "My cousin is a juror and says Tump is getting convicted. Thank you folks for all your hard work!!!!"​

​

The comment was in response to a post by the court on May 29, a day before the former president was convicted of 34 felony counts in connection to hush money paid to adult-film actress Stormy Daniels during Trump's 2016 presidential campaign. Merchan wrote that as of Friday, Anderson's comment was "labeled as one week old."​

​

It is unclear if Anderson is related to one of the 12 jurors who served on Trump's case, or if the comment was posted online prior to the former president's conviction on May 30. Several Trump supporters suggested on social media that the comment was grounds for a mistrial.​

​

Nothing but MAGA flim-flam. Nothing at all to see. Move along, all of ye gullible.

 

[Delldude]

Where you desperate people picked up this talking point is irrelevant. Trump has been convicted -- by a jury. He is a convicted felon.

You having fun?

This is definitely a keeper post because this the type of thing you people are well known to always run away from later.

Yale Law Professor Jeb Rubenfield, who teaches Advanced Constitutional Law, counseled the Trump legal team on a course of action that could potentially see his 'guilty' verdict overturned before the 2024 election."Now, when is sentencing scheduled for? Well, Judge Merchan has set it for July 11th."

"Will something happen between then and now? Yes. Trump's team will ask for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict.""They'll ask for Judge Merchan to throw out the jury's verdict and find Trump innocent despite the verdict, and Judge Merchan will turn that down."

"Then there will be arguments about what the sentence should be briefing on both sides, possibly even a hearing. Then on July 11th, sentencing will be announced. And at that point, that triggers the Trump team's right to appeal."
_______________________

"Well, is that where we are? So are we stuck with that possibility? Well, believe it or not, there is one other avenue that the Trump lawyers could pursue. They could sue in federal court and ask for an emergency temporary restraining order."

"Restraining order of what? Well, let me tell you something that you might not know. You've probably been reading in the press if you've been reading about this case. The Trump is already a "convicted felon." The jury has convicted him. He's a "convicted felon."

"Well, guess what? THAT'S NOT TRUE."

"You're not a convicted felon because of a jury verdict. You're not convicted unless the judge enters a judgment of guilt against you. The judge still has the power, as I told you before, to throw out that verdict and enter a judgment of acquittal. You are not convicted until the judge enters that judgment of guilt."

"Now in New York, it's very likely that Judge Merchan will enter that judgment of guilt against Trump on the same day that he issued sentencing. That'd be July 11th."

"So what would this federal case be about in this federal action? Trump would sue District Attorney Bragg and other state actors and ask the judge, the federal judge, for an emergency temporary restraining order halting Judge Merchan from entering that judgment of guilt until the federal courts have had an opportunity to review and rule on the serious constitutional arguments that exist here."

 

[WEATHER53]

LOL

Trump is a convicted felon. I believe Trump will be reporting to the Probation Office even before the sentencing. Mr. Trump had bail waved. He's out on his own personal cognizance while he awaits sentencing. He's a convicted felon.

Wishfulness gets you nowhere which is why you are nowhere nobody

 

[WEATHER53]

You having fun?



Yale Law Professor Jeb Rubenfield, who teaches Advanced Constitutional Law, counseled the Trump legal team on a course of action that could potentially see his 'guilty' verdict overturned before the 2024 election."Now, when is sentencing scheduled for? Well, Judge Merchan has set it for July 11th."

"Will something happen between then and now? Yes. Trump's team will ask for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict.""They'll ask for Judge Merchan to throw out the jury's verdict and find Trump innocent despite the verdict, and Judge Merchan will turn that down."

"Then there will be arguments about what the sentence should be briefing on both sides, possibly even a hearing. Then on July 11th, sentencing will be announced. And at that point, that triggers the Trump team's right to appeal."
_______________________

"Well, is that where we are? So are we stuck with that possibility? Well, believe it or not, there is one other avenue that the Trump lawyers could pursue. They could sue in federal court and ask for an emergency temporary restraining order."

"Restraining order of what? Well, let me tell you something that you might not know. You've probably been reading in the press if you've been reading about this case. The Trump is already a "convicted felon." The jury has convicted him. He's a "convicted felon."

"Well, guess what? THAT'S NOT TRUE."

"You're not a convicted felon because of a jury verdict. You're not convicted unless the judge enters a judgment of guilt against you. The judge still has the power, as I told you before, to throw out that verdict and enter a judgment of acquittal. You are not convicted until the judge enters that judgment of guilt."

"Now in New York, it's very likely that Judge Merchan will enter that judgment of guilt against Trump on the same day that he issued sentencing. That'd be July 11th."

"So what would this federal case be about in this federal action? Trump would sue District Attorney Bragg and other state actors and ask the judge, the federal judge, for an emergency temporary restraining order halting Judge Merchan from entering that judgment of guilt until the federal courts have had an opportunity to review and rule on the serious constitutional arguments that exist here."

Too many facts for these wishful feelings freaks

 

[WEATHER53]

Fuck you! Why can’t you people tell the truth?

It does not help them
They are very unfamiliar with it

 

[Foxfyre]

Well, this is interesting.

If true, it should lead to a mistrial. Merchan took it seriously enough to give a heads-up to both sides.

Or is there something else out here and this is the old three card monte at work?

​

Questions have surfaced regarding the jury in former President Donald Trump's New York City hush money trial after the presiding judge flagged a post to social media alleging that a juror had spoken about Trump's verdict before it was handed down.​

​

According to New York State Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan's letter, which was sent to Trump lawyer Todd Blanche and Manhattan District Attorney Prosecutor Joshua Steinglass, a comment was left on the New York State Unified Court System's Facebook page by a user under the name "Michael Anderson," who wrote, "My cousin is a juror and says Tump is getting convicted. Thank you folks for all your hard work!!!!"​

​

The comment was in response to a post by the court on May 29, a day before the former president was convicted of 34 felony counts in connection to hush money paid to adult-film actress Stormy Daniels during Trump's 2016 presidential campaign. Merchan wrote that as of Friday, Anderson's comment was "labeled as one week old."​

​

It is unclear if Anderson is related to one of the 12 jurors who served on Trump's case, or if the comment was posted online prior to the former president's conviction on May 30. Several Trump supporters suggested on social media that the comment was grounds for a mistrial.​

​

​

​

...​

Judge Merchan's letter to Trump trial lawyers raises eyebrows

The judge flagged a comment made to the New York Court System's Facebook page regarding Trump's conviction in his hush money trial.

www.newsweek.com

As nearly as I can determine, Merchan was advising them of the meme out there on social media and assuring them it was not one of his jurors but related to another entirely different case.

 

[WEATHER53]

As nearly as I can determine, Merchan was advising them of the meme out there on social media and assuring them it was not one of his jurors but related to another entirely different case.

Doubt Trumps name would have been in there if it’s a “different case”

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

It's called "juror misconduct " and it's a class A misdemeanor in New York. It also violated the defendant's right to a fair and impartial jury. Violating someone's civil rights is a Federal felony

What misconduct?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

You having fun?



Yale Law Professor Jeb Rubenfield, who teaches Advanced Constitutional Law, counseled the Trump legal team on a course of action that could potentially see his 'guilty' verdict overturned before the 2024 election."Now, when is sentencing scheduled for? Well, Judge Merchan has set it for July 11th."

"Will something happen between then and now? Yes. Trump's team will ask for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict.""They'll ask for Judge Merchan to throw out the jury's verdict and find Trump innocent despite the verdict, and Judge Merchan will turn that down."

"Then there will be arguments about what the sentence should be briefing on both sides, possibly even a hearing. Then on July 11th, sentencing will be announced. And at that point, that triggers the Trump team's right to appeal."
_______________________

"Well, is that where we are? So are we stuck with that possibility? Well, believe it or not, there is one other avenue that the Trump lawyers could pursue. They could sue in federal court and ask for an emergency temporary restraining order."

"Restraining order of what? Well, let me tell you something that you might not know. You've probably been reading in the press if you've been reading about this case. The Trump is already a "convicted felon." The jury has convicted him. He's a "convicted felon."

"Well, guess what? THAT'S NOT TRUE."

"You're not a convicted felon because of a jury verdict. You're not convicted unless the judge enters a judgment of guilt against you. The judge still has the power, as I told you before, to throw out that verdict and enter a judgment of acquittal. You are not convicted until the judge enters that judgment of guilt."

"Now in New York, it's very likely that Judge Merchan will enter that judgment of guilt against Trump on the same day that he issued sentencing. That'd be July 11th."

"So what would this federal case be about in this federal action? Trump would sue District Attorney Bragg and other state actors and ask the judge, the federal judge, for an emergency temporary restraining order halting Judge Merchan from entering that judgment of guilt until the federal courts have had an opportunity to review and rule on the serious constitutional arguments that exist here."

Bullshit opinions

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

You having fun?



Yale Law Professor Jeb Rubenfield, who teaches Advanced Constitutional Law, counseled the Trump legal team on a course of action that could potentially see his 'guilty' verdict overturned before the 2024 election."Now, when is sentencing scheduled for? Well, Judge Merchan has set it for July 11th."

"Will something happen between then and now? Yes. Trump's team will ask for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict.""They'll ask for Judge Merchan to throw out the jury's verdict and find Trump innocent despite the verdict, and Judge Merchan will turn that down."

"Then there will be arguments about what the sentence should be briefing on both sides, possibly even a hearing. Then on July 11th, sentencing will be announced. And at that point, that triggers the Trump team's right to appeal."
_______________________

"Well, is that where we are? So are we stuck with that possibility? Well, believe it or not, there is one other avenue that the Trump lawyers could pursue. They could sue in federal court and ask for an emergency temporary restraining order."

"Restraining order of what? Well, let me tell you something that you might not know. You've probably been reading in the press if you've been reading about this case. The Trump is already a "convicted felon." The jury has convicted him. He's a "convicted felon."

"Well, guess what? THAT'S NOT TRUE."

"You're not a convicted felon because of a jury verdict. You're not convicted unless the judge enters a judgment of guilt against you. The judge still has the power, as I told you before, to throw out that verdict and enter a judgment of acquittal. You are not convicted until the judge enters that judgment of guilt."

"Now in New York, it's very likely that Judge Merchan will enter that judgment of guilt against Trump on the same day that he issued sentencing. That'd be July 11th."

"So what would this federal case be about in this federal action? Trump would sue District Attorney Bragg and other state actors and ask the judge, the federal judge, for an emergency temporary restraining order halting Judge Merchan from entering that judgment of guilt until the federal courts have had an opportunity to review and rule on the serious constitutional arguments that exist here."

Ha, ha,, ha...

"Yale Law Professor Has Brilliant Plan for Trump Legal Team to Overturn 'Guilty' Verdict Before the Election" A guilty verdict.
Your post is masturbation of the mental kind.

You're not a convicted felon because of a jury verdict.

You're not convicted unless the judge enters a judgment of guilt against you.

throw out that verdict and enter a judgment of acquittal
That's like saying until all appeals there is no guilt. There was a verdict of guilt.


and here's the link ... forget the Tweet. For all practicable purposes Trump is a convicted felon. He will be reporting for sentencing. He will report for probation.

The stench of desperation coming from you people is overwhelming.

I suggest everyone here wear -- gulp -- a mask!

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Too many facts for these wishful feelings freaks

The stench of desperation coming from you people is overwhelming.

Trump is a convicted felon. You are arguing a technicality that ignores the inevitability. A procedural argument? That's no defense. You people are not legal scholars. You people are desperate followers in a cult-of-personality