AceRothstein
Gold Member
- Sep 8, 2012
- 5,978
- 1,441
- 245
I might have to take the day off work when the Supreme Court makes their decision. The number of conservatives with exploding heads will be epic.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Marriage isn't a civil right.It's stupid to put civil rights up for a popular vote, the people who organized such unconstitutional initiatives had to know they were eventually doomed.Ignorance isn't exclusive to the deep south. It's just more prevalent.I don't think it's being discussed much because not a single person in the world is surprised that Alabama, the butthole of America, is on the wrong side of history yet again.I'm surprised this isn't blowing up all over the web. It's such a hot topic, whether you agree or disagree. In Alabama, a same-sex marriage fight is upon us. Last month, a federal judge struck down the state's law against the unions. But Sunday night, "in a dramatic show of defiance toward the federal judiciary, Chief JusticeRoy S. Moore of the Alabama Supreme Court ordered the state’s probate judges not to issue marriage licenses to gay couples on Monday, the day same-sex marriages were expected to begin."
The Phantom Diaries Alabama Objects to Gay Marriage
And when blacks and Hispanics voted no to gay marriage in California? I mean come on I could see that happening in Alabama but how do you explain that in California the liberal freak show state in the union.
Ahem the number of people who voted to ban gay marriage in California is greater than the entire population of Alabama. Further, in California 70% of blacks and 54% of Hispanics voted to ban gay marriage. So if the left or gay community has some issue with Alabama on gay marriage I think they need to speak to their own Democratic party base down there. KABOOM!!
States have an interest in maintaining the nuclear family.On sexual preferences? I call bull.That isn't in the Constitution. States have always defined who could get married. There's no reason three or more couldn't marry if we are going to let marriage be defined as people want. Gay marriage activists are hypocritical to reject traditional marriage while staking their claim to the aspects of traditional marriage they want.I don't need to dispute anything. Marriage is the joining of two people.
Change the Constitution to include sexual orientations of individuals to be protected like race, religion or gender and you'll at least have an honest argument.
States have always had the right to define marriage- subject to constitutional guarantees.
The Supreme Court has overturned State marriage laws at least 3 times- all based upon equal treatment claims.
Call whatever you want.
You are obsessed about sexual preferences- the Supreme Court was focusing on equal treatment before the law, and that marriage is an individual right that can only be denied when the State can demonstrate a specific State interest that is accomplished by denying that right.
The supreme court is wrong.There never has been a right to marriage.
That's what you say. This is what the Supreme Court says:
Marriage is one of the basic civil rights of man
Loving v. Virginia
You v. the USSC on what is a right has the same winner ever time. And its not you.
The supreme court has ruled otherwise. So yes it is.Marriage isn't a civil right.It's stupid to put civil rights up for a popular vote, the people who organized such unconstitutional initiatives had to know they were eventually doomed.Ignorance isn't exclusive to the deep south. It's just more prevalent.I don't think it's being discussed much because not a single person in the world is surprised that Alabama, the butthole of America, is on the wrong side of history yet again.
And when blacks and Hispanics voted no to gay marriage in California? I mean come on I could see that happening in Alabama but how do you explain that in California the liberal freak show state in the union.
Ahem the number of people who voted to ban gay marriage in California is greater than the entire population of Alabama. Further, in California 70% of blacks and 54% of Hispanics voted to ban gay marriage. So if the left or gay community has some issue with Alabama on gay marriage I think they need to speak to their own Democratic party base down there. KABOOM!!
What interest is that?States have an interest in maintaining the nuclear family.On sexual preferences? I call bull.That isn't in the Constitution. States have always defined who could get married. There's no reason three or more couldn't marry if we are going to let marriage be defined as people want. Gay marriage activists are hypocritical to reject traditional marriage while staking their claim to the aspects of traditional marriage they want.I don't need to dispute anything. Marriage is the joining of two people.
Change the Constitution to include sexual orientations of individuals to be protected like race, religion or gender and you'll at least have an honest argument.
States have always had the right to define marriage- subject to constitutional guarantees.
The Supreme Court has overturned State marriage laws at least 3 times- all based upon equal treatment claims.
Call whatever you want.
You are obsessed about sexual preferences- the Supreme Court was focusing on equal treatment before the law, and that marriage is an individual right that can only be denied when the State can demonstrate a specific State interest that is accomplished by denying that right.
The people ruled otherwise. The people should trump the supreme court.The supreme court has ruled otherwise. So yes it is.Marriage isn't a civil right.It's stupid to put civil rights up for a popular vote, the people who organized such unconstitutional initiatives had to know they were eventually doomed.Ignorance isn't exclusive to the deep south. It's just more prevalent.And when blacks and Hispanics voted no to gay marriage in California? I mean come on I could see that happening in Alabama but how do you explain that in California the liberal freak show state in the union.
Ahem the number of people who voted to ban gay marriage in California is greater than the entire population of Alabama. Further, in California 70% of blacks and 54% of Hispanics voted to ban gay marriage. So if the left or gay community has some issue with Alabama on gay marriage I think they need to speak to their own Democratic party base down there. KABOOM!!
perpetuating the tax paying species.What interest is that?States have an interest in maintaining the nuclear family.On sexual preferences? I call bull.That isn't in the Constitution. States have always defined who could get married. There's no reason three or more couldn't marry if we are going to let marriage be defined as people want. Gay marriage activists are hypocritical to reject traditional marriage while staking their claim to the aspects of traditional marriage they want.
Change the Constitution to include sexual orientations of individuals to be protected like race, religion or gender and you'll at least have an honest argument.
States have always had the right to define marriage- subject to constitutional guarantees.
The Supreme Court has overturned State marriage laws at least 3 times- all based upon equal treatment claims.
Call whatever you want.
You are obsessed about sexual preferences- the Supreme Court was focusing on equal treatment before the law, and that marriage is an individual right that can only be denied when the State can demonstrate a specific State interest that is accomplished by denying that right.
Said not a single person involved in writing the constitution. Go find a pole to smoke moron.The people ruled otherwise. The people should trump the supreme court.The supreme court has ruled otherwise. So yes it is.Marriage isn't a civil right.It's stupid to put civil rights up for a popular vote, the people who organized such unconstitutional initiatives had to know they were eventually doomed.Ignorance isn't exclusive to the deep south. It's just more prevalent.
Ahem the number of people who voted to ban gay marriage in California is greater than the entire population of Alabama. Further, in California 70% of blacks and 54% of Hispanics voted to ban gay marriage. So if the left or gay community has some issue with Alabama on gay marriage I think they need to speak to their own Democratic party base down there. KABOOM!!
No, they really shouldn't. Sometimes the people craft foolish and unconstitutional laws.The people ruled otherwise. The people should trump the supreme court.The supreme court has ruled otherwise. So yes it is.Marriage isn't a civil right.It's stupid to put civil rights up for a popular vote, the people who organized such unconstitutional initiatives had to know they were eventually doomed.Ignorance isn't exclusive to the deep south. It's just more prevalent.
Ahem the number of people who voted to ban gay marriage in California is greater than the entire population of Alabama. Further, in California 70% of blacks and 54% of Hispanics voted to ban gay marriage. So if the left or gay community has some issue with Alabama on gay marriage I think they need to speak to their own Democratic party base down there. KABOOM!!
perpetuating the tax paying species.What interest is that?States have an interest in maintaining the nuclear family.On sexual preferences? I call bull.States have always had the right to define marriage- subject to constitutional guarantees.
The Supreme Court has overturned State marriage laws at least 3 times- all based upon equal treatment claims.
Call whatever you want.
You are obsessed about sexual preferences- the Supreme Court was focusing on equal treatment before the law, and that marriage is an individual right that can only be denied when the State can demonstrate a specific State interest that is accomplished by denying that right.
Baker v. Nelson made marriage an issue for the states. If the SCOTUS overrules their own ruling in favor of homosexual marriage and claims there is a federal right to marriage, the game is over. The pushback from folks like the Duggars, the Duck Dynasty, F. Graham and tens of millions of other individuals and groups will be enormous. There never has been a right to marriage.
Almost no states have legalized gay marriage It has been imposed on them by an acitivist judiciary undermining the wll of the people. If people actually voted for that crap I could accept it. as legitimate.You keep saying such things as one state after another legalizes gay marriage.No, states grant privileges, not rights. Your argument sucks, and it conflates a "right to marriage" with the benefits that accrue from that right.Couples do not have rights. Individuals have rights.Same sex couples are being denied the right to enter into the contractual agreement that opposite sex couples are allowed to enter into,
and thus are being singled out to be denied any benefits that contract provides.
States give couples rights when they pass laws that offer potential benefit to couples. Once the state has taken that step, they are subject to comply with the Constitutional mandates on equal protection.
Total fail.
The people ruled otherwise. The people should trump the supreme court.The supreme court has ruled otherwise. So yes it is.Marriage isn't a civil right.It's stupid to put civil rights up for a popular vote, the people who organized such unconstitutional initiatives had to know they were eventually doomed.Ignorance isn't exclusive to the deep south. It's just more prevalent.
Ahem the number of people who voted to ban gay marriage in California is greater than the entire population of Alabama. Further, in California 70% of blacks and 54% of Hispanics voted to ban gay marriage. So if the left or gay community has some issue with Alabama on gay marriage I think they need to speak to their own Democratic party base down there. KABOOM!!
States have an interest in maintaining the nuclear family.On sexual preferences? I call bull.That isn't in the Constitution. States have always defined who could get married. There's no reason three or more couldn't marry if we are going to let marriage be defined as people want. Gay marriage activists are hypocritical to reject traditional marriage while staking their claim to the aspects of traditional marriage they want.I don't need to dispute anything. Marriage is the joining of two people.
Change the Constitution to include sexual orientations of individuals to be protected like race, religion or gender and you'll at least have an honest argument.
States have always had the right to define marriage- subject to constitutional guarantees.
The Supreme Court has overturned State marriage laws at least 3 times- all based upon equal treatment claims.
Call whatever you want.
You are obsessed about sexual preferences- the Supreme Court was focusing on equal treatment before the law, and that marriage is an individual right that can only be denied when the State can demonstrate a specific State interest that is accomplished by denying that right.
perpetuating the tax paying species.What interest is that?States have an interest in maintaining the nuclear family.On sexual preferences? I call bull.States have always had the right to define marriage- subject to constitutional guarantees.
The Supreme Court has overturned State marriage laws at least 3 times- all based upon equal treatment claims.
Call whatever you want.
You are obsessed about sexual preferences- the Supreme Court was focusing on equal treatment before the law, and that marriage is an individual right that can only be denied when the State can demonstrate a specific State interest that is accomplished by denying that right.
Marriage isn't a civil right.It's stupid to put civil rights up for a popular vote, the people who organized such unconstitutional initiatives had to know they were eventually doomed.Ignorance isn't exclusive to the deep south. It's just more prevalent.I don't think it's being discussed much because not a single person in the world is surprised that Alabama, the butthole of America, is on the wrong side of history yet again.
And when blacks and Hispanics voted no to gay marriage in California? I mean come on I could see that happening in Alabama but how do you explain that in California the liberal freak show state in the union.
Ahem the number of people who voted to ban gay marriage in California is greater than the entire population of Alabama. Further, in California 70% of blacks and 54% of Hispanics voted to ban gay marriage. So if the left or gay community has some issue with Alabama on gay marriage I think they need to speak to their own Democratic party base down there. KABOOM!!
Unlike the good judge, I follow the law. He makes his own.what a coincidence.He's an idiot, about to be slapped upside the head, again.
other alabama issues Govenor Robert BentleyI don't think it's being discussed much because not a single person in the world is surprised that Alabama, the butthole of America, is on the wrong side of history yet again.I'm surprised this isn't blowing up all over the web. It's such a hot topic, whether you agree or disagree. In Alabama, a same-sex marriage fight is upon us. Last month, a federal judge struck down the state's law against the unions. But Sunday night, "in a dramatic show of defiance toward the federal judiciary, Chief JusticeRoy S. Moore of the Alabama Supreme Court ordered the state’s probate judges not to issue marriage licenses to gay couples on Monday, the day same-sex marriages were expected to begin."
The Phantom Diaries Alabama Objects to Gay Marriage