Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where did Barr say he was Trumps wingman like that pile of shit Eric "Free BJs" Holder said about his status as Obama's wingman?…...and you said that with a straight face. The AG is Trump's personal lawyer, but that is ok in the mind of a Trump Humper.
He is a Trump Humper just like idiots like you, he should be classified as his personal attorney instead of the Attorney General.
Not really. Conservatives have long supported lessening government interference in American's lives.So, Congress has powers not enumerated in the Constitution, that Congress granted itself...and you don't see anything wrong with it.Nowhere at all.Exactly where in the Constitution does it say the President must turn over his financial records to Congress?? ....
Congress’s oversight authority derives from its implied powers in the Constitution, public laws, and House and Senate rules. It is an integral part of the American system of checks and balances.
Amazing how you Trump Humpers want to limit the powers of the Congress now that they are asking for documents from Trump.
But it's amazing how you Obama bootlickers now believe the Executive Branch should have some oversight.
Where did Barr say he was Trumps wingman like that pile of shit Eric "Free BJs" Holder said about his status as Obama's wingman?…...and you said that with a straight face. The AG is Trump's personal lawyer, but that is ok in the mind of a Trump Humper.
He is a Trump Humper just like idiots like you, he should be classified as his personal attorney instead of the Attorney General.
No, Doofus, Eric 'Free BJs' Holder is who I am referring to, but you don't want to answer that question.
Why is that? Why is it OK for Holder to be a cum bucket for Obama and say so, but Barr, who is following the law, is somehow Trumps personal attorney but Holder not so?
Roflmao, you leftwing idiotlogues are so hysterical.
ORANGE MAN BAD is not an argument.He laid out a clear, simple argument...very easy for other judges to follow. And they will.WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge in Washington ruled Monday against President Donald Trump in a financial records dispute with Congress.
U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta, who was appointed by President Barack Obama, said Trump cannot block a House subpoena of financial records. He said the Democratic-led House committee seeking the information has said it believes the documents would help lawmakers consider strengthening ethics and disclosure laws, among other things.
The committee's reasons were "valid legislative purposes," Mehta said, and it was not for him "to question whether the Committee's actions are truly motivated by political considerations."
Judge rules against Trump in records dispute with Congress
Does a higher court overturn this ruling?
How much longer can the Trump Administration stonewall the Congress.
Trump's accounting firm is not a part of the Gov't, so he can't use executive powers.
But it's the only one you've got, isn't it?
Not really. Conservatives have long supported lessening government interference in American's lives.So, Congress has powers not enumerated in the Constitution, that Congress granted itself...and you don't see anything wrong with it.Nowhere at all.
Congress’s oversight authority derives from its implied powers in the Constitution, public laws, and House and Senate rules. It is an integral part of the American system of checks and balances.
Amazing how you Trump Humpers want to limit the powers of the Congress now that they are asking for documents from Trump.
But it's amazing how you Obama bootlickers now believe the Executive Branch should have some oversight.
What a crock of shit, the size of Gov't has never gotten smaller when Republicans have been the majority. Republicans have been the main whiners of the Executive branch having oversight, now that Trump is in office and you all know he is crooked as hell you Trump Humpers want folks to turn a blind eye and deaf ear.
Their reasons is that Crooked Hillary LOST. And that's not a good enough reason.Nowhere at all.Exactly where in the Constitution does it say the President must turn over his financial records to Congress?? ....
Congress’s oversight authority derives from its implied powers in the Constitution, public laws, and House and Senate rules. It is an integral part of the American system of checks and balances.
Without a legitimate reason, they have no authority to demand private papers.
Uh they have a legitimate reason or should I say reasons.
Not really. Conservatives have long supported lessening government interference in American's lives.So, Congress has powers not enumerated in the Constitution, that Congress granted itself...and you don't see anything wrong with it.Congress’s oversight authority derives from its implied powers in the Constitution, public laws, and House and Senate rules. It is an integral part of the American system of checks and balances.
Amazing how you Trump Humpers want to limit the powers of the Congress now that they are asking for documents from Trump.
But it's amazing how you Obama bootlickers now believe the Executive Branch should have some oversight.
What a crock of shit, the size of Gov't has never gotten smaller when Republicans have been the majority. Republicans have been the main whiners of the Executive branch having oversight, now that Trump is in office and you all know he is crooked as hell you Trump Humpers want folks to turn a blind eye and deaf ear.
LolNot really. Conservatives have long supported lessening government interference in American's lives.So, Congress has powers not enumerated in the Constitution, that Congress granted itself...and you don't see anything wrong with it.
Amazing how you Trump Humpers want to limit the powers of the Congress now that they are asking for documents from Trump.
But it's amazing how you Obama bootlickers now believe the Executive Branch should have some oversight.
What a crock of shit, the size of Gov't has never gotten smaller when Republicans have been the majority. Republicans have been the main whiners of the Executive branch having oversight, now that Trump is in office and you all know he is crooked as hell you Trump Humpers want folks to turn a blind eye and deaf ear.
Get off your knees.
LolNot really. Conservatives have long supported lessening government interference in American's lives.Amazing how you Trump Humpers want to limit the powers of the Congress now that they are asking for documents from Trump.
But it's amazing how you Obama bootlickers now believe the Executive Branch should have some oversight.
What a crock of shit, the size of Gov't has never gotten smaller when Republicans have been the majority. Republicans have been the main whiners of the Executive branch having oversight, now that Trump is in office and you all know he is crooked as hell you Trump Humpers want folks to turn a blind eye and deaf ear.
Get off your knees.
Boy, You need to quit thinking nanny state is your savior... It makes you look fucking weak
LolLolNot really. Conservatives have long supported lessening government interference in American's lives.
But it's amazing how you Obama bootlickers now believe the Executive Branch should have some oversight.
What a crock of shit, the size of Gov't has never gotten smaller when Republicans have been the majority. Republicans have been the main whiners of the Executive branch having oversight, now that Trump is in office and you all know he is crooked as hell you Trump Humpers want folks to turn a blind eye and deaf ear.
Get off your knees.
Boy, You need to quit thinking nanny state is your savior... It makes you look fucking weak
Nanny state, hell that's all Trump Humpers live in.
Apples and oranges.How well did that defense work for Al Capone?
Congress and the IRS are two totally different branches of the government with separate responsibilities. ...
So, Congress has powers not enumerated in the Constitution, that Congress granted itself...and you don't see anything wrong with it.Nowhere at all.Exactly where in the Constitution does it say the President must turn over his financial records to Congress?? ....
Congress’s oversight authority derives from its implied powers in the Constitution, public laws, and House and Senate rules. It is an integral part of the American system of checks and balances.
Amazing how you Trump Humpers want to limit the powers of the Congress now that they are asking for documents from Trump.
Reality check: you are inventing fantasies to soothe yourselfReality Check: Hillary Clinton is a Crook who has no use for rules except to break them.Peak trump cultismThat judge was likely told to do it.
What? That's moronic. The judge spelled out his argument. But you wouldn't know, because you haven't read a single word about any of this. And, as usual, you are just vomiting the first stunted, uninformed thought that fizzles into your colon.It's your argument.
Pay attention, dumb-dumb: I said conservatives, not Republicans. The GOP is Dem Party Lite.Not really. Conservatives have long supported lessening government interference in American's lives.So, Congress has powers not enumerated in the Constitution, that Congress granted itself...and you don't see anything wrong with it.Nowhere at all.
Congress’s oversight authority derives from its implied powers in the Constitution, public laws, and House and Senate rules. It is an integral part of the American system of checks and balances.
Amazing how you Trump Humpers want to limit the powers of the Congress now that they are asking for documents from Trump.
But it's amazing how you Obama bootlickers now believe the Executive Branch should have some oversight.
What a crock of shit, the size of Gov't has never gotten smaller when Republicans have been the majority. Republicans have been the main whiners of the Executive branch having oversight, now that Trump is in office and you all know he is crooked as hell you Trump Humpers want folks to turn a blind eye and deaf ear.
What makes you think you merit any effort?ORANGE MAN BAD is not an argument.He laid out a clear, simple argument...very easy for other judges to follow. And they will.WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge in Washington ruled Monday against President Donald Trump in a financial records dispute with Congress.
U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta, who was appointed by President Barack Obama, said Trump cannot block a House subpoena of financial records. He said the Democratic-led House committee seeking the information has said it believes the documents would help lawmakers consider strengthening ethics and disclosure laws, among other things.
The committee's reasons were "valid legislative purposes," Mehta said, and it was not for him "to question whether the Committee's actions are truly motivated by political considerations."
Judge rules against Trump in records dispute with Congress
Does a higher court overturn this ruling?
How much longer can the Trump Administration stonewall the Congress.
Trump's accounting firm is not a part of the Gov't, so he can't use executive powers.
But it's the only one you've got, isn't it?
Dave Man dumbass is an easy argument.
If that makes you feel better about your protest-sign mentality, sure.What? That's moronic. The judge spelled out his argument. But you wouldn't know, because you haven't read a single word about any of this. And, as usual, you are just vomiting the first stunted, uninformed thought that fizzles into your colon.It's your argument.
Haha...you have no idea what the judge argued, do you? Just an ignorant little crybaby, soothing himself....If that makes you feel better about your protest-sign mentality, sure.What? That's moronic. The judge spelled out his argument. But you wouldn't know, because you haven't read a single word about any of this. And, as usual, you are just vomiting the first stunted, uninformed thought that fizzles into your colon.It's your argument.
Trump Humpers are some of the stupidest SOBs on the planet, Barr is not following the law hell he didn't follow it when he was Bush 41's AG. You ass clowns want a dictator, but I hate to tell you we have a President in this country.
