Julie Swetnick, the new accuser

I think youre missing my point. Why would they declare in public first if they are part of some scheme? Thats like murdering someone and not discussing your alibi with the person that helps commit the murder with you.

If they were independent of each other, than why not declare up front. That's just one of the holes big enough to drive a mack truck through
So you cant answer why they dont already have their timeline synced?

LOL! Because they don't know when Kavanaugh can prove where he was, so they have to be flexible. Otherwise, they run the risk of learning Kavanaugh can prove he was out of town when one of the allegation was claimed to have happened, so then all allegations would be discredited. With timelines that aren't synced, the possibility is that if one is discredited, the rest would stand.
That doesnt make any sense. Ford has to testify before Kav. The minute Kav can prove he wasnt where Ford says he is then the gig would be up.

The goal is to taint Kavanaugh so he can't be confirmed. that means here still have to be allegations at the end of the process that were not proven false.


they will always come up with another one and another one. all allegations that cant be proved or disproved. A slimy tactic, these people are sickening
 
She better have more than just an allegation, she signed a sworn affidavit, she lied and it carries criminal liability
Very true

Gives credence to her story
Yeah, she would never lie.....which is why she keeps refusing to testify.

Same old song

All women lie about rape. Let Republicans chant that at the November election
No....... Liberals lie. I see no reason to believe anything this woman says simply because none of her story checks out. She also appears to want to dictate terms when she should just want to answer questions.

She wants to decide who can question her (only Senators that believe her story). She doesn't want to be questioned by women or lawyers. She claimed she has a fear of flying, even though she has flown on numerous occasions. She can't name the time or the place this attack happened (so Kavavaugh can't establish an alibi). There are pictures of her passed out wearing only a G-string laying on a picnic table among roughly a dozen beer bottles. Her social networking accounts have all been scrubbed to remove any exculpatory evidence.

Hillary's fundraiser (Debra Katz) is representing her.

She may have been held in reserve for years to get judge Kavanaugh as early as 2012, in case Mitt Romney won the White House, because Mitt listed Kavanaugh on his list of possible nominees.

Nope. This all stinks to high heaven.
 
Since there is no down side to her lying, and no way to prove anything she says....it is time to take the vote...end this vile, democrat character assassination...and remember this in November......if they are willing to go this far against Kavanaugh, imagine what they will now do if they get power.... They are done with playing the politics game and it is all out in the open..... get in their way and nothing is off the table....

My question is why didn't she report this 40 years ago when it happened. She sounds more like Ford and Ramirez.

She was also under aged at that time just like Ford.

If this really happened then she should have reported it then. Not 40 years later.

This whole thing stinks to high heaven.

they should vote on Friday.

Maybe because she thought she would be harassed and nobody would believe her

Some people (conservatives) actually blame the victim
So DOPer godly folks blame the victims for giving out sex services, rather than the priest who raped them.
Hmm? As well it seems. As the priest are still on the job.
god I love the way a lord plans their lives.

DrLove is no GOPer, and he said there are plenty of girls that like to get drunk and pull trains.

I don't believe it myself, but that is what the Doc says.

:fu:
 
So, she saw that other girls were being drugged and raped and thought it was a good idea to keep attending these parties?

She too somehow thought Kavanaugh was fit to be a federal judge at lower levels but SCOTUS is a line that can’t be crossed?

This all smells like bullshit. At least they found a liar willing to lie in an affidavit.

This is the part I don't get.
If you've read her affidavit, she would have been a lot more believable if she had stopped with the general overall demeanor of Kavanaugh being aggressive toward the girls, etc., and left the line of boys waiting to gang rape a drugged girl out of it. That's the part I'm having trouble with, not the rest, which fits with what the others have reported.
That gang rape line thing happens alot. I've seen it personally.
I'm really sorry to hear that.
Its really sickening but without knowing the girls intentions its not something that you can do much about.

We always had a police detail at our fraternity parties. It was to stop allegations such as these as well as others. Always be proactive rather than reactive.
 
Since there is no down side to her lying, and no way to prove anything she says....it is time to take the vote...end this vile, democrat character assassination...and remember this in November......if they are willing to go this far against Kavanaugh, imagine what they will now do if they get power.... They are done with playing the politics game and it is all out in the open..... get in their way and nothing is off the table....

My question is why didn't she report this 40 years ago when it happened. She sounds more like Ford and Ramirez.

She was also under aged at that time just like Ford.

If this really happened then she should have reported it then. Not 40 years later.

This whole thing stinks to high heaven.

they should vote on Friday.

Maybe because she thought she would be harassed and nobody would believe her

Some people (conservatives) actually blame the victim
So DOPer godly folks blame the victims for giving out sex services, rather than the priest who raped them.
Hmm? As well it seems. As the priest are still on the job.
god I love the way a lord plans their lives.

DrLove is no GOPer, and he said there are plenty of girls that like to get drunk and pull trains.

I don't believe it myself, but that is what the Doc says.

:fu:

One more time with the quote then, you said:

"I remember a party my sophomore year in high school where a bunch of boys pulled a train on a drunk girl in the back bedroom."
 
Julie Swetnick: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com
---------------------------------------

Wow this is serious business, if true.
Laughable. If she knew what was happening at this parties, why did she attend 10 of them? I smell bullshit. I also smell creepy porn lawyer which is a worse smell than wet clown or dog.
Most likely because there were other guys there that werent raping women.
Hey moron, she claims she attended 10 of these parties where this activity occurred between 1981 and 1983 and that her incident happened in 1982. So she knew what was going on, was assaulted at one and decided it would be fun to attend more. That doesn't pass the smell test. Has the creepy porn lawyer done his due diligence and checked with the local police to learn if there were any spiked punch/teenage rape parties reported in the area for those 3 years...…..or is he just looking for another notch on his belt to help in becoming your next Democratic presidential candidate in 2020.
 
This is the part I don't get.
If you've read her affidavit, she would have been a lot more believable if she had stopped with the general overall demeanor of Kavanaugh being aggressive toward the girls, etc., and left the line of boys waiting to gang rape a drugged girl out of it. That's the part I'm having trouble with, not the rest, which fits with what the others have reported.
That gang rape line thing happens alot. I've seen it personally.
I'm really sorry to hear that.
Its really sickening but without knowing the girls intentions its not something that you can do much about.

We always had a police detail at our fraternity parties. It was to stop allegations such as these as well as others. Always be proactive rather than reactive.
Well my proactive was to immediately leave once I saw what was going on. Saw the same kind of stuff in the military too but the women actually consented to it until someone said or did something they didnt like.
 
She better have more than just an allegation, she signed a sworn affidavit, she lied and it carries criminal liability
Very true

Gives credence to her story
Yeah, she would never lie.....which is why she keeps refusing to testify.

Same old song

All women lie about rape. Let Republicans chant that at the November election
No....... Liberals lie. I see no reason to believe anything this woman says simply because none of her story checks out. She also appears to want to dictate terms when she should just want to answer questions. She wants to decide who can question her (only Senators that believe her story). She doesn't want to be questioned by women or lawyers. She claimed she has a fear of flying, even though she has flown on numerous occasions. She can't name the time or the place this attack happened (so Kavavaugh can't establish an alibi). There are pictures of her passed out wearing only a G-string laying on a picnic table among roughly a dozen beer bottles. Her social networking accounts have all been scrubbed to remove any exculpatory evidence.

Hillary's fundraiser (Debra Katz) is representing her.

She may have been held in reserve for years to get judge Kavanaugh as early as 2012, in case Mitt Romney won the White House, because Mitt listed Kavanaugh on his list of possible nominees.

Nope. This all stinks to high heaven.

You idiot - This is NOT a picture of Dr Ford. :rolleyes:

drunk-redneck-girl-passed-out-on-picnic-table.jpg
 
My question is why didn't she report this 40 years ago when it happened. She sounds more like Ford and Ramirez.

She was also under aged at that time just like Ford.

If this really happened then she should have reported it then. Not 40 years later.

This whole thing stinks to high heaven.

they should vote on Friday.

Maybe because she thought she would be harassed and nobody would believe her

Some people (conservatives) actually blame the victim
So DOPer godly folks blame the victims for giving out sex services, rather than the priest who raped them.
Hmm? As well it seems. As the priest are still on the job.
god I love the way a lord plans their lives.

DrLove is no GOPer, and he said there are plenty of girls that like to get drunk and pull trains.

I don't believe it myself, but that is what the Doc says.

:fu:

One more time with the quote then, you said:

"I remember a party my sophomore year in high school where a bunch of boys pulled a train on a drunk girl in the back bedroom."

And one more time with my response -
:fu:

You are now off to Ignoreville .. have fun!
 
She better have more than just an allegation, she signed a sworn affidavit, she lied and it carries criminal liability
Very true

Gives credence to her story
Yeah, she would never lie.....which is why she keeps refusing to testify.

Same old song

All women lie about rape. Let Republicans chant that at the November election
No....... Liberals lie. I see no reason to believe anything this woman says simply because none of her story checks out. She also appears to want to dictate terms when she should just want to answer questions. She wants to decide who can question her (only Senators that believe her story). She doesn't want to be questioned by women or lawyers. She claimed she has a fear of flying, even though she has flown on numerous occasions. She can't name the time or the place this attack happened (so Kavavaugh can't establish an alibi). There are pictures of her passed out wearing only a G-string laying on a picnic table among roughly a dozen beer bottles. Her social networking accounts have all been scrubbed to remove any exculpatory evidence.

Hillary's fundraiser (Debra Katz) is representing her.

She may have been held in reserve for years to get judge Kavanaugh as early as 2012, in case Mitt Romney won the White House, because Mitt listed Kavanaugh on his list of possible nominees.

Nope. This all stinks to high heaven.

You idiot - This is NOT a picture of Dr Ford. :rolleyes:

drunk-redneck-girl-passed-out-on-picnic-table.jpg
Conservatives have no bottom level. They will lie and create photos to smear people.
 
She better have more than just an allegation, she signed a sworn affidavit, she lied and it carries criminal liability
Very true

Gives credence to her story
Yeah, she would never lie.....which is why she keeps refusing to testify.

Same old song

All women lie about rape. Let Republicans chant that at the November election
No....... Liberals lie. I see no reason to believe anything this woman says simply because none of her story checks out. She also appears to want to dictate terms when she should just want to answer questions. She wants to decide who can question her (only Senators that believe her story). She doesn't want to be questioned by women or lawyers. She claimed she has a fear of flying, even though she has flown on numerous occasions. She can't name the time or the place this attack happened (so Kavavaugh can't establish an alibi). There are pictures of her passed out wearing only a G-string laying on a picnic table among roughly a dozen beer bottles. Her social networking accounts have all been scrubbed to remove any exculpatory evidence.

Hillary's fundraiser (Debra Katz) is representing her.

She may have been held in reserve for years to get judge Kavanaugh as early as 2012, in case Mitt Romney won the White House, because Mitt listed Kavanaugh on his list of possible nominees.

Nope. This all stinks to high heaven.

You idiot - This is NOT a picture of Dr Ford. :rolleyes:

drunk-redneck-girl-passed-out-on-picnic-table.jpg

Has she proven it's not?
 
Maybe because she thought she would be harassed and nobody would believe her

Some people (conservatives) actually blame the victim
So DOPer godly folks blame the victims for giving out sex services, rather than the priest who raped them.
Hmm? As well it seems. As the priest are still on the job.
god I love the way a lord plans their lives.

DrLove is no GOPer, and he said there are plenty of girls that like to get drunk and pull trains.

I don't believe it myself, but that is what the Doc says.

:fu:

One more time with the quote then, you said:

"I remember a party my sophomore year in high school where a bunch of boys pulled a train on a drunk girl in the back bedroom."

And one more time with my response -
:fu:

You are now off to Ignoreville .. have fun!

Sure, before you go, give us those phone numbers. Bet the lead right to the DNC
 
If you've read her affidavit, she would have been a lot more believable if she had stopped with the general overall demeanor of Kavanaugh being aggressive toward the girls, etc., and left the line of boys waiting to gang rape a drugged girl out of it. That's the part I'm having trouble with, not the rest, which fits with what the others have reported.
That gang rape line thing happens alot. I've seen it personally.
I'm really sorry to hear that.
Its really sickening but without knowing the girls intentions its not something that you can do much about.

We always had a police detail at our fraternity parties. It was to stop allegations such as these as well as others. Always be proactive rather than reactive.
Well my proactive was to immediately leave once I saw what was going on. Saw the same kind of stuff in the military too but the women actually consented to it until someone said or did something they didnt like.


You seem somewhat logical today. Have the meds kicked in? LOL

Anyway I kid

Here is what I don't get. Julie says she attended like 10 of these parties (her words) so:



#1) Why would she keep attending if she knew this sort of crap was going on?

#2) If this was happening all the time how come the Police never knew of this. Not one parent, student, anyone blabbing?

It just does not add up for me. Maybe I am being naieve. 10 TIMES?!?!? That is like playing Russian Roulette if this is true.

What am I missing here?
 
I remember a party my sophomore year in high school where a bunch of boys pulled a train on a drunk girl in the back bedroom.
We would have been 15 or 16.
Was pretty much disgusted with the bunch of 'em who bragged about it at school the following week.

So you are guilty of not reporting a rape?

Yeah, and we are supposed to believe you? It's just as easy to conclude that you participated in it. See how that works creep?

Had I believed it was a rape, I'd certainly have reported it. But this girl had a history of doing the same thing at one other party at least.

She liked to fuck. You didn't know girls like that in high school?

SURE SHE DID. Isn't that what all rapist say!

Here's you original statement:

"I remember a party my sophomore year in high school where a bunch of boys pulled a train on a drunk girl in the back bedroom."

See the bolded words. It MEANS she could NOT CONSENT.

AND YOU'RE COOL WITH THAT!

I'm assuming she had a few beers.
There was a keg - but I don't know for certain that she was drunk.
I do know she wasn't passed out -
Saw her leaving with another girl not long after and she wasn't "stumbling drunk" like Brett and his buddy.
One can be buzzed and still offer consent.
Now go bite somebody else's ankle

3975167029_cc949b8077_z.jpg


once again, your statement:

"I remember a party my sophomore year in high school where a bunch of boys pulled a train on a drunk girl in the back bedroom."

I never added that dipshit, it's your statement.

So, women who can't legally consent can be raped?

Do go on.
"So, women who can't legally consent can be raped?" Yes. Yes they can.
 
It appears in Maryland there is not a statute of limitations for rape. Would be pretty interesting if we had a sitting Supreme Court Justice get indicted for rape.

This new accuser has given her statement under oath... it would be a felony if she was proven to have lied.

She does not have direct proof. She just said Kav and Judge were at these parties. Never saw them be the "rapists".

She said she was raped by them.

She actually did not.

Andrew Kugle on Twitter

She said she was gang raped and they were there... and Avenatti didn't say yes or no in that interview, he said read the statement.
 
Julie Swetnick: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com
---------------------------------------

Wow this is serious business, if true.
Laughable. If she knew what was happening at this parties, why did she attend 10 of them? I smell bullshit. I also smell creepy porn lawyer which is a worse smell than wet clown or dog.
Most likely because there were other guys there that werent raping women.
Hey moron, she claims she attended 10 of these parties where this activity occurred between 1981 and 1983 and that her incident happened in 1982. So she knew what was going on, was assaulted at one and decided it would be fun to attend more. That doesn't pass the smell test. Has the creepy porn lawyer done his due diligence and checked with the local police to learn if there were any spiked punch/teenage rape parties reported in the area for those 3 years...…..or is he just looking for another notch on his belt to help in becoming your next Democratic presidential candidate in 2020.
You sound like an inexperienced idiot. I understand you dont have much experience with females but girls that age 12-17 frequently do things and go places they wouldnt do or go once they get older.
 
So you are guilty of not reporting a rape?

Yeah, and we are supposed to believe you? It's just as easy to conclude that you participated in it. See how that works creep?

Had I believed it was a rape, I'd certainly have reported it. But this girl had a history of doing the same thing at one other party at least.

She liked to fuck. You didn't know girls like that in high school?

SURE SHE DID. Isn't that what all rapist say!

Here's you original statement:

"I remember a party my sophomore year in high school where a bunch of boys pulled a train on a drunk girl in the back bedroom."

See the bolded words. It MEANS she could NOT CONSENT.

AND YOU'RE COOL WITH THAT!

I'm assuming she had a few beers.
There was a keg - but I don't know for certain that she was drunk.
I do know she wasn't passed out -
Saw her leaving with another girl not long after and she wasn't "stumbling drunk" like Brett and his buddy.
One can be buzzed and still offer consent.
Now go bite somebody else's ankle

3975167029_cc949b8077_z.jpg


once again, your statement:

"I remember a party my sophomore year in high school where a bunch of boys pulled a train on a drunk girl in the back bedroom."

I never added that dipshit, it's your statement.

So, women who can't legally consent can be raped?

Do go on.
"So, women who can't legally consent can be raped?" Yes. Yes they can.

Of course they can be, that's why I added the ? dipshit. DrLove seems to think it's not rape. He even keeps in contact with the rapists.

Thank's for bumping this, so now we can all see the respect that DrLove has for women, once again.
 
No doubt republicans will try to destroy her life too. The confirmation MUST be delayed.
'Too'?

Pointing out that Ford can't remember WHERE her story took place, what YEAR it took place, has no credible evidence, and 4 witnesses she identified say what she described never happened is 'trying to destroy HER life'?

Bwuhahahaha....only a snowflake!

As opposed to Chicom Spy Feinstein going extremely public with an unsubstantiated RUMOR that the 'victim' never wanted to come out, betraying the 'victim' by dragging her out into the open when she never wanted to come forward. (Way to throw Ford under the bus for Democratic Party gain, Diane!)

With this unsubstantiated rumor and witness who can provide nothing in the way of evidence the Democrats have attempted to destroy Kavanaugh's life's work, his word, his reputation, his family and his marriage...just to make sure he is not confirmed for political gain. In essence, the Democrats are once again 'Herman Cain'ing another good man while declaring the burden of proof is on the accused and that Kavanaugh is GUILTY until proven innocent.

WTF is wrong with you?

WHY doesn't hardly anyone believe these women that the lawyer of an ANTI-TRUMP PORN STAR and FORD AND HER DEEP STATE LAWYERS FOR BILL CLINTON, BARAK OBAMA, AND ANDREW McCABE?

1. The Democratic Party's history of USING WOMEN to pull this BS off in the past.
The Democrats drug women out of the woodpile to falsely accuse Cain, filed lawsuits against him, and the Liberal media painted the picture of him as a monster who had to be brought to justice. As soon as he dropped out of the race the women disappeared, the lawsuits were dropped, and the media acted like they had never heard his name.

2. The Deep State Lawyers for Slick Willy, Obama, and Co-Conspirator Andy McCabe shows up and immediately there is a 2nd accuser who says they came looking for her?

3. The sleazy lawyer for the Anti-Trump Porn Star shows up right behind the Deep State prose and suddenly there is a 3rd accuser less than 24 hours before the hearing tomorrow?!

In all of this the Democrats continue to demonstrate they do not stand up for women or women's rights - they USE WOMEN for political gain. Blacks and Latinos began walking away from the DNC because the Democrats proved they would rather use issues to manipulate them with instead of actually SOLVING those issues. I hope women get the same clue the Blacks and Latinos did while watching this circus. By continuing to USE women tis way and USING the accusation of sexual misconduct in this manner the Democrats do more harm to women than good.
 

Forum List

Back
Top