Just for those inflicted with TDS. A very real allfiction, and I love it.

[LoneLaugher]

Interesting interview with "hitler."

Been in the public eye for 40 years and the first time we heard anything of racism was about 5 minutes after that ride down the escalator.

Incorrect.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Why bring facts into the discussion with a leftist?

GG isn't a leftist.

Naaaah, he only votes for the party of high taxes, nonstop regulation and dedicated socialists?

If he claims he is not a leftists, and only votes for leftists, can you please explain that. Cause I admit. I am confused by your claim here.

i don't think he's leftist.

you and others now seem to think i'm saying he's pro-Trump and that doesn't fit either.

people need to stop thinking there are only 2 paths of thought and we'd all be a lot better off.

Two leftists called you a winner for your post. Ought to tell you something.

Actually it ought to tell YOU something, that being that contrary to your infantile cerebellum's obsession the world is *NOT* made up of two types of atoms, one called "Democrats" and the other "Republicans". Indeed most of the earth is not made up of politics at all. That's simply as deep as you choose to wade in the intellectual waters. But that's YOUR problem, no one else's.

That's why I gave him a Winner, because it's a salient point --- that's the scourge of discourse, and you're a carrier.

Actually it is now. The 17 clueless narcissists not on a side are irrelevant.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Naaaah, he only votes for the party of high taxes, nonstop regulation and dedicated socialists?

If he claims he is not a leftists, and only votes for leftists, can you please explain that. Cause I admit. I am confused by your claim here.

i don't think he's leftist.

you and others now seem to think i'm saying he's pro-Trump and that doesn't fit either.

people need to stop thinking there are only 2 paths of thought and we'd all be a lot better off.

I challenged him a year ago to provide a pro Republican post he’s made.

+23,000 LW posts and I’m still waiting to see just one.

why should he provide a pro-republican stance when he's thinking for himself, not the group? he provides how he sees an issue, YOU and many others choose to categorize it for YOUR benefit, not him nor the conversation.

he and i have gotten into it in the past and likely to again. but not because i'm not thinking beyond surface level petty shit to base decisions on.

VOTING FOR SOCIALISTS, MAKES THEM LEFT WINGERS, CAUSE ALL SOCIALISTS ARE LEFTISTS.

THAT IS NOT A SYLLOGISM.

no but it is pretty fucking stupid.

'night.

Where is it night? I just saw the Goober make the 2-3rd non-leftist post I've ever seen him make and I had it copied to post here, but then somebody made a funny, and that was minutes ago.
Score! Still on the clipboard!


Democrats Announce Hearing On Trump’s Tax Returns

 

[iceberg]

i don't think he's leftist.

you and others now seem to think i'm saying he's pro-Trump and that doesn't fit either.

people need to stop thinking there are only 2 paths of thought and we'd all be a lot better off.

I challenged him a year ago to provide a pro Republican post he’s made.

+23,000 LW posts and I’m still waiting to see just one.

why should he provide a pro-republican stance when he's thinking for himself, not the group? he provides how he sees an issue, YOU and many others choose to categorize it for YOUR benefit, not him nor the conversation.

he and i have gotten into it in the past and likely to again. but not because i'm not thinking beyond surface level petty shit to base decisions on.

VOTING FOR SOCIALISTS, MAKES THEM LEFT WINGERS, CAUSE ALL SOCIALISTS ARE LEFTISTS.

THAT IS NOT A SYLLOGISM.

no but it is pretty fucking stupid.

'night.

Where is it night? I just saw the Goober make the 2-3rd non-leftist post I've ever seen him make and I had it copied to post here, but then somebody made a funny, and that was minutes ago.

Democrats Announce Hearing On Trump’s Tax Returns

"night" is my way of saying later on, hos. i'm just going to spend much of my time responding to shouters who see things in black and white / teamspeak.

edward does this and even bitched at me for speaking out against *my* team cause he puts people into stereotypes and lobs bullet points of hate out at people.

sorry, that's ignorant to me on every level possible and i just don't want to spend my time talking to someone who's a posterchild for "their side".

 

[Marion Morrison]

I challenged him a year ago to provide a pro Republican post he’s made.

+23,000 LW posts and I’m still waiting to see just one.

why should he provide a pro-republican stance when he's thinking for himself, not the group? he provides how he sees an issue, YOU and many others choose to categorize it for YOUR benefit, not him nor the conversation.

he and i have gotten into it in the past and likely to again. but not because i'm not thinking beyond surface level petty shit to base decisions on.

VOTING FOR SOCIALISTS, MAKES THEM LEFT WINGERS, CAUSE ALL SOCIALISTS ARE LEFTISTS.

THAT IS NOT A SYLLOGISM.

no but it is pretty fucking stupid.

'night.

Where is it night? I just saw the Goober make the 2-3rd non-leftist post I've ever seen him make and I had it copied to post here, but then somebody made a funny, and that was minutes ago.

Democrats Announce Hearing On Trump’s Tax Returns

"night" is my way of saying later on, hos. i'm just going to spend much of my time responding to shouters who see things in black and white / teamspeak.

edward does this and even bitched at me for speaking out against *my* team cause he puts people into stereotypes and lobs bullet points of hate out at people.

sorry, that's ignorant to me on every level possible and i just don't want to spend my time talking to someone who's a posterchild for "their side".

Golfing Goober makes non-leftist posts slightly more often than JoeB131 is right.

 

[Theowl32]

Let's look at the new DS that have formed

1) .OBS Obama dereangement syndrome.
2). TDS Trump Derangement syndrome. Worsr than #1, not by much but more noticeable.
3). FEDS. This new one is the strangest. Federal employee Derangement syndrome. This one really takes the cake.

can you explain number 3?

I'm guessing that refers to those 800,000 workers who got docked for 35 days and in some cases converted to slavery. The derangement must refer to those questioning their temerity in requiring things like food. Wilbur Ross and that whole Elite Swamp set.

You know they got all of their pay, right? Loser.

So those 35 days didn't count?

Are you just retarded or is this an internet act?

They all got their pay loser. Now, please stop pretending you knew that or care.

To prove how much you losers prop up victims, you left out how they all got their back pay.

Loser.

Besides, when Trump was willing to give DACA (something, you leftist losers claim you wanted for the poor brown illegal kids you claim to care so much about) that skinny no good wide eyed bitch turned it down.

Why?

Cause no wall funding, even though democrats had said for years they wanted a barrier?

Now, all of a sudden they don't.

Yet a fucking loser like all of you pathetic fake morons blames Trump for those workers not getting their pay?

Fucking hypocritical ignorant loser.


And....


Iceberg, put me on your fucking ignore.

 

[Pogo]

Let's look at the new DS that have formed

1) .OBS Obama dereangement syndrome.
2). TDS Trump Derangement syndrome. Worsr than #1, not by much but more noticeable.
3). FEDS. This new one is the strangest. Federal employee Derangement syndrome. This one really takes the cake.

can you explain number 3?

I'm guessing that refers to those 800,000 workers who got docked for 35 days and in some cases converted to slavery. The derangement must refer to those questioning their temerity in requiring things like food. Wilbur Ross and that whole Elite Swamp set.

You know they got all of their pay, right? Loser.

So those 35 days didn't count?

Are you just retarded or is this an internet act?

They all got their pay loser. Now, please stop pretending you knew that or care.

To prove how much you losers prop up victims, you left out how they all got their back pay.

Loser.

Besides, when Trump was willing to give DACA (something, you leftist losers claim you wanted for the poor brown illegal kids you claim to care so much about) that skinny no good wide eyed bitch turned it down.

Why?

Cause no wall funding, even though democrats had said for years they wanted a barrier?

Now, all of a sudden they don't.

Yet a fucking loser like all of you pathetic fake morons blames Trump for those workers not getting their pay?

Fucking hypocritical ignorant loser.


And....


Iceberg, put me on your fucking ignore.

Actually I've never posted about DACA either. Nor did I bring up Rump. I simply took a guess at what "FEDS" might mean.

But ---- **I'm** the "loser" right.

SMFH What a fucking moron.

 

[Theowl32]

can you explain number 3?

I'm guessing that refers to those 800,000 workers who got docked for 35 days and in some cases converted to slavery. The derangement must refer to those questioning their temerity in requiring things like food. Wilbur Ross and that whole Elite Swamp set.

You know they got all of their pay, right? Loser.

So those 35 days didn't count?

Are you just retarded or is this an internet act?

They all got their pay loser. Now, please stop pretending you knew that or care.

To prove how much you losers prop up victims, you left out how they all got their back pay.

Loser.

Besides, when Trump was willing to give DACA (something, you leftist losers claim you wanted for the poor brown illegal kids you claim to care so much about) that skinny no good wide eyed bitch turned it down.

Why?

Cause no wall funding, even though democrats had said for years they wanted a barrier?

Now, all of a sudden they don't.

Yet a fucking loser like all of you pathetic fake morons blames Trump for those workers not getting their pay?

Fucking hypocritical ignorant loser.


And....


Iceberg, put me on your fucking ignore.

Actually I've never posted about DACA either. Nor did I bring up Rump. I simply took a guess at what "FEDS" might mean.

But ---- **I'm** the "loser" right.

SMFH What a fucking moron.

Yet you bring up the workers that did not get paid.

Holy shit

 

[Pogo]

I'm guessing that refers to those 800,000 workers who got docked for 35 days and in some cases converted to slavery. The derangement must refer to those questioning their temerity in requiring things like food. Wilbur Ross and that whole Elite Swamp set.

You know they got all of their pay, right? Loser.

So those 35 days didn't count?

Are you just retarded or is this an internet act?

They all got their pay loser. Now, please stop pretending you knew that or care.

To prove how much you losers prop up victims, you left out how they all got their back pay.

Loser.

Besides, when Trump was willing to give DACA (something, you leftist losers claim you wanted for the poor brown illegal kids you claim to care so much about) that skinny no good wide eyed bitch turned it down.

Why?

Cause no wall funding, even though democrats had said for years they wanted a barrier?

Now, all of a sudden they don't.

Yet a fucking loser like all of you pathetic fake morons blames Trump for those workers not getting their pay?

Fucking hypocritical ignorant loser.


And....


Iceberg, put me on your fucking ignore.

Actually I've never posted about DACA either. Nor did I bring up Rump. I simply took a guess at what "FEDS" might mean.

But ---- **I'm** the "loser" right.

SMFH What a fucking moron.

Yet you bring up the workers that did not get paid.

Holy shit

And where did you see any reference to Rump in that?

Go learn how to read, Dipshit.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Well there was that time when he refused to rent to black people...but other than that...


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Well that was his father so...

Actually the suit was brought after Fred brought him in to run the operation. So no.

Actually the feds brought suits to numerous landowners at the time all over the U.S.
This is a long known issue of the time when feds were trying to force landowners to rent to low income people with subsidies. Trump was among many-many landowners with equal suits. It is meaningless.
The ensuing losses and outrage by many led to the Section 8 housing law of 1974 that basically reversed the suits and continued to allow these higher income properties to refuse subsidy renters.
Still in force today.

 

[Pogo]

Well there was that time when he refused to rent to black people...but other than that...


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Well that was his father so...

Actually the suit was brought after Fred brought him in to run the operation. So no.

Actually the feds brought suits to numerous landowners at the time all over the U.S.
This is a long known issue of the time when feds were trying to force landowners to rent to low income people with subsidies. Trump was among many-many landowners with equal suits. It is meaningless.
The ensuing losses and outrage by many led to the Section 8 housing law of 1974 that basically reversed the suits and continued to allow these higher income properties to refuse subsidy renters.
Still in force today.

So what? Are you trying to say that because it was not unique, Rump gets off the hook?

What we did here was we corrected the record about what happened with that suit. What happened in other suits isn't part of the topic. And it's worth reiterating, the reason we had to correct that record was a trollish OP who insisted on setting up strawmen using revisionist history.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

So what? Are you trying to say that because it was not unique, Rump gets off the hook?......

Yes he gets off the hook. Just like all of the others did. You do realize many of those suits were dropped?
It was a bad policy by the government, and a misuse of the spirit of the equal housing act past in '68.
The gov't was trying to force landlords to accept gov't subsidized renters into all of their properties. That was/is absurd.
They changed the law in 1974 enacting a permanent change in the Section 8 housing law that prohibits the government from forcing landowners to take in Sec. 8 people.
You are a victim of misinformation plastered out there by the media.
Trumps father was a straight up racist like most older people were in the 70's. He straight up blocked non white people from living in the buildings regardless of their incomes. Trump Jr. did not. Ir at least not in the suit, before that I don't know. And even if he did, it is excusable due to the times and he has obviously changed.

 

[Pogo]

So what? Are you trying to say that because it was not unique, Rump gets off the hook?......

Yes he gets off the hook. Just like all of the others did. You do realize many of those suits were dropped?

This one wasn't. In fact the government came back after them when they failed to meet their own agreement to improve.

It was a bad policy by the government, and a misuse of the spirit of the equal housing act past in '68.
The gov't was trying to force landlords to accept gov't subsidized renters into all of their properties. That was/is absurd.
They changed the law in 1974 enacting a permanent change in the Section 8 housing law that prohibits the government from forcing landowners to take in Sec. 8 people.
You are a victim of misinformation plastered out there by the media.
Trumps father was a straight up racist like most older people were in the 70's. He straight up blocked non white people from living in the buildings regardless of their incomes. Trump Jr. did not. Ir at least not in the suit, before that I don't know. And even if he did, it is excusable due to the times and he has obviously changed.

Noted this earlier but while the (first) suit was going on, during a break, Rump (the current one, not the father) turned to Elyse Goldweber, a US Attorney who worked on the government's case, and said "come on Elyse --- you don't want to live with them either".

Sure times change and people evolve, even if Robert Byrd seems to be ineligible on this board. But don't sit here and claim shit didn't happen that provably did. That's the point here.

Oh and then there's the "black guys counting my money --- I hate it" quote, and that's from much later. Posted that way back too. It's back there with the Central Park Five.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

So what? Are you trying to say that because it was not unique, Rump gets off the hook?......

Yes he gets off the hook. Just like all of the others did. You do realize many of those suits were dropped?

This one wasn't. In fact the government came back after them when they failed to meet their own agreement to improve.

It was a bad policy by the government, and a misuse of the spirit of the equal housing act past in '68.
The gov't was trying to force landlords to accept gov't subsidized renters into all of their properties. That was/is absurd.
They changed the law in 1974 enacting a permanent change in the Section 8 housing law that prohibits the government from forcing landowners to take in Sec. 8 people.
You are a victim of misinformation plastered out there by the media.
Trumps father was a straight up racist like most older people were in the 70's. He straight up blocked non white people from living in the buildings regardless of their incomes. Trump Jr. did not. Ir at least not in the suit, before that I don't know. And even if he did, it is excusable due to the times and he has obviously changed.

Noted this earlier but while the (first) suit was going on, during a break, Rump (the current one, not the father) turned to Elyse Goldweber, a US Attorney who worked on the government's case, and said "come on Elyse --- you don't want to live with them either".

Sure times change and people evolve, even if Robert Byrd seems to be ineligible on this board. But don't sit here and claim shit didn't happen that provably did. That's the point here.

Oh and then there's the "black guys counting my money --- I hate it" quote, and that's from much later. Posted that way back too. It's back there with the Central Park Five.

So?
Doesn't change anything. Everything I said is true.
I really don't know ALL of the specifics of the suit, only that it was a part of a large governmental sweep of the time to force landowners to take in subsidized renters. If Trump or his staff extended that to some black families that were NOT subsidized, that is wrong. But very, very much par for the course in those years.
And like I said, he has obviously changed.
It is just more white noise for the race baiters. No pun intended.
IN the scheme of all that is terribly wrong with this country, what Trump did 46 years ago doesn't matter a f*cking bit. Not one ounce.

 

[Pogo]

So what? Are you trying to say that because it was not unique, Rump gets off the hook?......

Yes he gets off the hook. Just like all of the others did. You do realize many of those suits were dropped?

This one wasn't. In fact the government came back after them when they failed to meet their own agreement to improve.

It was a bad policy by the government, and a misuse of the spirit of the equal housing act past in '68.
The gov't was trying to force landlords to accept gov't subsidized renters into all of their properties. That was/is absurd.
They changed the law in 1974 enacting a permanent change in the Section 8 housing law that prohibits the government from forcing landowners to take in Sec. 8 people.
You are a victim of misinformation plastered out there by the media.
Trumps father was a straight up racist like most older people were in the 70's. He straight up blocked non white people from living in the buildings regardless of their incomes. Trump Jr. did not. Ir at least not in the suit, before that I don't know. And even if he did, it is excusable due to the times and he has obviously changed.

Noted this earlier but while the (first) suit was going on, during a break, Rump (the current one, not the father) turned to Elyse Goldweber, a US Attorney who worked on the government's case, and said "come on Elyse --- you don't want to live with them either".

Sure times change and people evolve, even if Robert Byrd seems to be ineligible on this board. But don't sit here and claim shit didn't happen that provably did. That's the point here.

Oh and then there's the "black guys counting my money --- I hate it" quote, and that's from much later. Posted that way back too. It's back there with the Central Park Five.

So?
Doesn't change anything. Everything I said is true.
I really don't know ALL of the specifics of the suit, only that it was a part of a large governmental sweep of the time to force landowners to take in subsidized renters. If Trump or his staff extended that to some black families that were NOT subsidized, that is wrong. But very, very much par for the course in those years.
And like I said, he has obviously changed.
It is just more white noise for the race baiters. No pun intended.
IN the scheme of all that is terribly wrong with this country, what Trump did 46 years ago doesn't matter a f*cking bit. Not one ounce.

Once AGAIN --- and I pointed this out to you specifically just a little while ago --- the idea of "racism" was brought up by the OP, as a strawman, so he could have something to argue with himself. Nobody else brought it up.

Misdirect again and I'll just point this out again. We can do this all day until it sinks in.

 

[iceberg]

Let's look at the new DS that have formed

1) .OBS Obama dereangement syndrome.
2). TDS Trump Derangement syndrome. Worsr than #1, not by much but more noticeable.
3). FEDS. This new one is the strangest. Federal employee Derangement syndrome. This one really takes the cake.

can you explain number 3?

I'm guessing that refers to those 800,000 workers who got docked for 35 days and in some cases converted to slavery. The derangement must refer to those questioning their temerity in requiring things like food. Wilbur Ross and that whole Elite Swamp set.

You know they got all of their pay, right? Loser.

So those 35 days didn't count?

Are you just retarded or is this an internet act?

They all got their pay loser. Now, please stop pretending you knew that or care.

To prove how much you losers prop up victims, you left out how they all got their back pay.

Loser.

Besides, when Trump was willing to give DACA (something, you leftist losers claim you wanted for the poor brown illegal kids you claim to care so much about) that skinny no good wide eyed bitch turned it down.

Why?

Cause no wall funding, even though democrats had said for years they wanted a barrier?

Now, all of a sudden they don't.

Yet a fucking loser like all of you pathetic fake morons blames Trump for those workers not getting their pay?

Fucking hypocritical ignorant loser.


And....


Iceberg, put me on your fucking ignore.

you're there. i only see your stupidity when i take it off to see who someone else is talking to.

 

[Siete]

TDS - TRUMP DEFLECTION SYNDROME ... common among rabid RW Trumpdrones.

mention Trump -

BUT HILLARY
BUT OBAMA
FAKE NEWS

usually leads the rebuttal deflecting away from Trump.

glad to help simpletons come to terms with TDS -

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

ok - time to dig.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...90163e-bfbe-11e5-bcda-62a36b394160_story.html

interesting read. the claim from trump is he didn't want to rent to ANY welfare class (regardless of race) because when they couldn't pay, they were difficult to evict. now, is this true? it was also noted that you can sit outside the building and see blacks go in and out all day long who did live there.

it was also a claim against the TRUMPS, not donald alone per se. trump didn't come into the picture til the later stages of all this from what i'm reading. also, unfortunately this seems to have been common at the time across the real estate board period, not just trump or the trump family.

so while you can honestly say "trump refused to rent to black people" it's far from the entire story.

Why bring facts into the discussion with a leftist?

GG isn't a leftist.

Naaaah, he only votes for the party of high taxes, nonstop regulation and dedicated socialists?

If he claims he is not a leftists, and only votes for leftists, can you please explain that. Cause I admit. I am confused by your claim here.

i don't think he's leftist.

you and others now seem to think i'm saying he's pro-Trump and that doesn't fit either.

people need to stop thinking there are only 2 paths of thought and we'd all be a lot better off.

Two leftists called you a winner for your post. Ought to tell you something.

It certainly does. That you lack critical thinking skills.

 

[Pogo]

can you explain number 3?

I'm guessing that refers to those 800,000 workers who got docked for 35 days and in some cases converted to slavery. The derangement must refer to those questioning their temerity in requiring things like food. Wilbur Ross and that whole Elite Swamp set.

You know they got all of their pay, right? Loser.

So those 35 days didn't count?

Are you just retarded or is this an internet act?

They all got their pay loser. Now, please stop pretending you knew that or care.

To prove how much you losers prop up victims, you left out how they all got their back pay.

Loser.

Besides, when Trump was willing to give DACA (something, you leftist losers claim you wanted for the poor brown illegal kids you claim to care so much about) that skinny no good wide eyed bitch turned it down.

Why?

Cause no wall funding, even though democrats had said for years they wanted a barrier?

Now, all of a sudden they don't.

Yet a fucking loser like all of you pathetic fake morons blames Trump for those workers not getting their pay?

Fucking hypocritical ignorant loser.


And....


Iceberg, put me on your fucking ignore.

you're there. i only see your stupidity when i take it off to see who someone else is talking to.

See, I don't put the Owl on ignore. He certainly qualifies as a poster with nothing to say, but it's so much fun watchingg h

TDS - TRUMP DEFLECTION SYNDROME ... common among rabid RW Trumpdrones.

mention Trump -

BUT HILLARY
BUT OBAMA
FAKE NEWS

usually leads the rebuttal deflecting away from Trump.

glad to help simpletons come to terms with TDS -

Also known as "Pogo's Law".

I get a nickel every time they do that.

The banks hate me now, coming in with wheelbarrows full of nickel rolls. Many banks are saying that.

 

[beagle9]

Interesting interview with "hitler."

Been in the public eye for 40 years and the first time we heard anything of racism was about 5 minutes after that ride down the escalator.

So those times Trump was charged with racial discrimination in those federal charges they filed back in the 1970's for refusing to rent apartments to blacks must have completely slipped his mind.

Was he refusing to rent to blacks persae or was he refusing to rent to welfare recipients or poor folks because of their track record or habbits of destroying their dwellings in which has gone on to this very day ?????

Do you deny that there has been a serious problem over time of welfare recipients and/or poor people destroying property that they occupied either in a low rent situation or as a government subsidized renter ????

If you act as if there hasn't been a serious problem over time of poor folks destroying the properties they were allowed to rent or worse not paying their rent, and the owner catching pure hell on evicting them, then you aren't being honest. If wanted to, the liberals could claim that all low rent housing owners are racist etc. All they gotta do is show up with camera's blazing as a poor family is being evicted, and start with the fake storyline that the owner was throwing them out for no reason at all or that he was just a racist etc. Never mind that these people might have destroyed their apt or caused trouble in the community etc. No, because the mere fact that they are a victimized beat down by the system family, who are living in a poor situation automatically makes them right, and the real estate owner the bad guy or gal everytime.

No accountability is the problem, and this goes for all involved.