Just Why Are People Against The Trump Agenda?

[JoeB131]

Yet OJ is rotting in jail, so your point being circle jerk?

But not for killing people. Trump will be rotting in jail, too. ONly a matter of time.

But it's still a travesty, stupid.

 

[JoeB131]

All those little blue areas should control all those huge red areas. Does that make sense to you? Because our President has power than just the people. He has power over land as well.

Yes, those BLUE AREAS are where people ACTUALLY LIVE.

Most of those red areas are just huge swaths of empty space and farmland.

 

[mudwhistle]

You see so often people here ripping on Trump and those who voted for him. Just what are they against? Here is the Trump Agenda as he campaigned on and what he has worked on since in office:

* Economy & Jobs
* Lower Taxes & Tax Reform
* Repeal & Replace Obamacare
* A Stronger Military
* To Defeat Radical Islam & ISIS
* Energy Independence
* Returning control of Education back to the Individual States
* Cutting the Size of Government
* Draining the Swamp

Therefore, it goes without saying that those who are dead set against Trump are not for a better economy, better jobs, lower taxes, tax reform, better, cheaper healthcare, building up our military strength in response to growing threats, defeating terrorism, improved education, or reducing the burden of massive government costs, oversight, regulation and corruption.

They might say they are, but they just don’t feel Trump’s the guy to get it done, but, Trump IS the president, so, if it’s going to get done these next for years, you would think they would want him to succeed! Then there is this futile wish that somehow he will be removed from office which will never happen, so you would think they would want him to succeed! But they don’t. They hate him.

But what if Hillary had won---- would they be hating and lambasting her? You know they would not, even though she ran on essentially Obama’s platform and wouldn’t have done any of the above.

So, were any of the Trump Hater’s jumping ugly when Obama was in office? I seriously doubt it. Let us look at Obama’s legacy that they supported and would have likely gone on with Hillary; what was Obama’s legacy that they are so unhappy Trump is in office to change?

* Lowest Labor Participation Rate Since the 1970’s
* 95 million out of the Labour Force
* Worst Recovery Since the 1940’s
* Lowest Home Ownership 51 Years
* 13 Million More Americans on Food Stamps
* 43 Million In Poverty
* 1 in 5 Families Had No One Working
* 1 in 6 Men ages 18-34 In Jail Or Out Of Work
* More National Debt Accumulated than All Previous Administrations Combined

(source: Census Bureau & Dept. of Treasury)

Yep. This is what they were fine with during the Obama years, would have been OK with Hillary continuing, and are now railing against Trump for trying to fix? And their reasons?

Trump has blond hair.
He is more rich than they.
His wife is more beautiful than theirs.
His kids are smarter and better looking. Rich too.
He texts.
He is blunt.
He means what he says.
He does what means.
He works 20 hours a day.
He holds people accountable.
He is real successful in getting things done he sets out to do.
He gets things done rather than just talk about doing them.

And their rationale? With a gale-force wind of opposition against him from those who stand to lose by his cleaning up Washington, they complain that he hasn’t already accomplished everything 4 months into his election.

Money talks.

They'd rather live in their multiple homes and live like fat cats instead of doing the right thing.

 

[JoeB131]

What I find amusing, Kiwi...is all the whining that's done by you on the left about how the rich are supposedly going to get richer under Trump...it's the rich who got wealthier under Obama and the Middle Class and the poor who got poorer!

Yeah, but only if you count in the bleeding that happened in 2009 because Bush's recession went on for so long. But since you are dishonest and racist, you probably won't admit that.

You ask most people, "Are you better off in 2016 than you were in 2009", they'd say yes.

What's sad is you buy the crap your Democratic leaders feed you about how they are there for you...the little guy...when the truth is...they're there for themselves and couldn't care less about you until it's time to vote again!

I think it's quite the oppossite. The little guy did better under Clinton and he did better under Obama. He did worse under both Bushes... Things ARE going to get worse under Biff and Pence when the GOP finally impeaches Biff.

You see, Recessions aren't a bug of Republican rule, it's a design feature.

 

[Windship]

Because it further escalates the lopsided transfer of wealth. How many of you understand this? How many of you understand economics?

 

[Windship]

Impeach rump NOW!!

 

[Wyatt earp]

Yet OJ is rotting in jail, so your point being circle jerk?

But not for killing people. Trump will be rotting in jail, too. ONly a matter of time.

But it's still a travesty, stupid.

What you think the jury was blind? Plus it's called karma


Trump is to big like Hillary he could kill someone and not serve time



.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Your analogy is ridiculous. One occurred via Constitutional mandate.

If you don't like it, change it through the process. The tools are available to you.

OJ's acquittal happened through constitutional means. He got a trial by a jury of his peers. His peers just happened to be 12 black folks who decided to ignore all the evidence because Mark Fuhrman said the N-word.

But he really did kill those people and it was a travesty.

We had an election.Hillary got the most votes. But the electors chose to ignore that (yes, the whole purpose of the electors is to deliberate all factors) and voted for an obvious crazy person because they were a bunch of political hacks and racists.

It is really bad and it was a travesty.

Happy to have cleared that up for you.

You are a severely confused individual. I'm sorry you feel bad about your loss , but the states choose the president, not the people.

The means to change that are available to you. Have at it.

 

[Oldstyle]

What I find amusing, Kiwi...is all the whining that's done by you on the left about how the rich are supposedly going to get richer under Trump...it's the rich who got wealthier under Obama and the Middle Class and the poor who got poorer!

Yeah, but only if you count in the bleeding that happened in 2009 because Bush's recession went on for so long. But since you are dishonest and racist, you probably won't admit that.

You ask most people, "Are you better off in 2016 than you were in 2009", they'd say yes.

What's sad is you buy the crap your Democratic leaders feed you about how they are there for you...the little guy...when the truth is...they're there for themselves and couldn't care less about you until it's time to vote again!

I think it's quite the oppossite. The little guy did better under Clinton and he did better under Obama. He did worse under both Bushes... Things ARE going to get worse under Biff and Pence when the GOP finally impeaches Biff.

You see, Recessions aren't a bug of Republican rule, it's a design feature.

Still trying to play the race card, Joey? Claiming people who didn't vote for Hillary are racists is about as stupid as it gets...but that's your "gig"...isn't it!

I know you snowflakes are convinced that Trump is going to be impeached but what you keep forgetting is that the people who are telling you that's going to happen are the same blinders wearing idiots that told you Hillary couldn't lose to Trump no matter what he did! Duh?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

All those little blue areas should control all those huge red areas. Does that make sense to you? Because our President has power than just the people. He has power over land as well.

Yes, those BLUE AREAS are where people ACTUALLY LIVE.

Most of those red areas are just huge swaths of empty space and farmland.

Yes, and that land is subject to regulation by a President. Get some look leftist in there, and he may have his EPA claim a third of that wetland and nobody can do anything to it.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Your analogy is ridiculous. One occurred via Constitutional mandate.

If you don't like it, change it through the process. The tools are available to you.

OJ's acquittal happened through constitutional means. He got a trial by a jury of his peers. His peers just happened to be 12 black folks who decided to ignore all the evidence because Mark Fuhrman said the N-word.

But he really did kill those people and it was a travesty.

We had an election.Hillary got the most votes. But the electors chose to ignore that (yes, the whole purpose of the electors is to deliberate all factors) and voted for an obvious crazy person because they were a bunch of political hacks and racists.

It is really bad and it was a travesty.

Happy to have cleared that up for you.

No, the electors who had a majority of votes for Hillary cast their vote for Hillary, and the electors who had a majority vote for Trump cast their vote for Trump.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[easyt65]

'Just Why Are People Against The Trump Agenda?'

It's not his agenda. Sour grapes, butt-hurt snowflakes just 'HATE'...period most of all they hate TRUMP for defeating Hillary.

PROOF: D-Chucky Schumer made the moronic decision to issue the declaration that the Democratic Party was committed to OBSTRUCTIONISM for the next 4 years or until they can get Trump out of office, that they would oppose EVERYTHING this administration attempted to do. This proves without a doubt it was all about 'TRUMP' not his 'agenda'.

 

[edward37]

Even the Pope knows he's an ah
President Trump met with Pope Francis for the first time at the Vatican on Wednesday morning, and a White House press pool detail indicates the Catholic leader may not have been thrilled about the audience.

Trump reportedly told Pope Francis it was a "very great honor" to be meeting with him in Vatican City, to which the Pope gave a void response.

"The Pope did not say anything. He did not smile," reads the White House Pool Report. "He looked at pool several times. We were quickly ushered out at 8:33 a.m."

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Even the Pope knows he's an ah
President Trump met with Pope Francis for the first time at the Vatican on Wednesday morning, and a White House press pool detail indicates the Catholic leader may not have been thrilled about the audience.

Trump reportedly told Pope Francis it was a "very great honor" to be meeting with him in Vatican City, to which the Pope gave a void response.

"The Pope did not say anything. He did not smile," reads the White House Pool Report. "He looked at pool several times. We were quickly ushered out at 8:33 a.m."

Social justice warriors always get a mite peakid when faced with American rationality.

 

[edward37]

Even the Pope knows he's an ah
President Trump met with Pope Francis for the first time at the Vatican on Wednesday morning, and a White House press pool detail indicates the Catholic leader may not have been thrilled about the audience.

Trump reportedly told Pope Francis it was a "very great honor" to be meeting with him in Vatican City, to which the Pope gave a void response.

"The Pope did not say anything. He did not smile," reads the White House Pool Report. "He looked at pool several times. We were quickly ushered out at 8:33 a.m."

Social justice warriors always get a mite peakid when faced with American rationality.

More leaks Billy
The U.K. government has criticized security allies in the United States for leaking sensitive information following the suicide bomb in Manchester on Monday.

The British Home Secretary Amber Rudd has said it was "irritating" that details about the Manchester bombing investigation were leaked and that they have been clear with Washington that it "should not happen again".

Details about the Manchester suicide bomb attack appeared on U.S. news sites before British police had publicly released them to the U.K. media.


Media outlets, including NBC, were able to publish death tolls, the attacker's name and the fact that it had been a suicide bombing.

Rudd told BBC Radio 4's Today program that she would be reviewing how intelligence is shared after the early release of the Manchester attacker's identity.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Even the Pope knows he's an ah
President Trump met with Pope Francis for the first time at the Vatican on Wednesday morning, and a White House press pool detail indicates the Catholic leader may not have been thrilled about the audience.

Trump reportedly told Pope Francis it was a "very great honor" to be meeting with him in Vatican City, to which the Pope gave a void response.

"The Pope did not say anything. He did not smile," reads the White House Pool Report. "He looked at pool several times. We were quickly ushered out at 8:33 a.m."

Social justice warriors always get a mite peakid when faced with American rationality.

More leaks Billy
The U.K. government has criticized security allies in the United States for leaking sensitive information following the suicide bomb in Manchester on Monday.

The British Home Secretary Amber Rudd has said it was "irritating" that details about the Manchester bombing investigation were leaked and that they have been clear with Washington that it "should not happen again".

Details about the Manchester suicide bomb attack appeared on U.S. news sites before British police had publicly released them to the U.K. media.


Media outlets, including NBC, were able to publish death tolls, the attacker's name and the fact that it had been a suicide bombing.

Rudd told BBC Radio 4's Today program that she would be reviewing how intelligence is shared after the early release of the Manchester attacker's identity.

Interesting.

What sensitive information? The death tolls, the attacker's name and the fact that it had been a suicide bombing? How is that "sensitive"? Were they trying to hide something?

 

[edward37]

Even the Pope knows he's an ah
President Trump met with Pope Francis for the first time at the Vatican on Wednesday morning, and a White House press pool detail indicates the Catholic leader may not have been thrilled about the audience.

Trump reportedly told Pope Francis it was a "very great honor" to be meeting with him in Vatican City, to which the Pope gave a void response.

"The Pope did not say anything. He did not smile," reads the White House Pool Report. "He looked at pool several times. We were quickly ushered out at 8:33 a.m."

Social justice warriors always get a mite peakid when faced with American rationality.

More leaks Billy
The U.K. government has criticized security allies in the United States for leaking sensitive information following the suicide bomb in Manchester on Monday.

The British Home Secretary Amber Rudd has said it was "irritating" that details about the Manchester bombing investigation were leaked and that they have been clear with Washington that it "should not happen again".

Details about the Manchester suicide bomb attack appeared on U.S. news sites before British police had publicly released them to the U.K. media.


Media outlets, including NBC, were able to publish death tolls, the attacker's name and the fact that it had been a suicide bombing.

Rudd told BBC Radio 4's Today program that she would be reviewing how intelligence is shared after the early release of the Manchester attacker's identity.

Interesting.

What sensitive information? The death tolls, the attacker's name and the fact that it had been a suicide bombing? How is that "sensitive"? Were they trying to hide something?

Not sure billy except for the FACT that it pissed off Englands leaders Soon no one will pass on any info to us

 

[danielpalos]

Well I am all for tax reform- but so far the 'lower taxes' has been essentially a windfall for the Trump family- and not much for mine.

And of course Trumpcare so far is a disaster- even the House that voted for it doesn't actually think its a good bill.

Ahhh, the tax reform hasn't even started yet! Might not get enacted until end of year. A little early to already be looking for it. Must get healthcare passed first. As to Trumpcare, again, still in the process of being formulated. You have no idea how it will end up, so why not wait to see it finished before deciding it is no good? Besides, you better hope it is good, because Obamacare is falling apart.

Rather than fix Obamacare, it's easier to throw tens of millions off healthcare and have hundreds of billions in tax cuts for billionaires. Makes sense to me.
Who will suffer the most? Trump's minions, of course. In a way, that makes it kind of delicious. Those ignorant pawns deserve what they get. Maybe next time, they will actually check things out before they so blindly follow a con man. And I thought they couldn't do worse than Bush. And even Trump hates Bush.

They are fixing Obamacare, R-Derp! Who cares what it's called! It was awful legislation designed by the people who wrote it to fail. That was the con and the con artists were Barack Obama, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi!

Oh yea. They sure are fixing it. Republcians have such a great record on "fixing" things.

If it wasn't such a pile of stinking crap in the first place, R-Derp...it wouldn't have to be fixed! The American people wanted legislation to make healthcare affordable...Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi gave them legislation that was designed to fail and designed to cost Middle Class Americans a lot of money. Their entire goal all along was to create something so flawed that it would have to be replaced. Of course they THOUGHT it would be them replacing it with Medicare for everyone instead of the GOP trying to come up with something the country can actually pay for!

All Congress has to do, is stand around "talk about Things" and maybe take voice votes to have laws enacted in our Republic. It is the executive branch, that must faithfully execute those laws.

 

[danielpalos]

Damn

Just saw Trumps budget
I can see why people are against his agenda

Only leftists are. Republicans are all for smaller government, less employees and less unnecessary spending.

Wars on Crime, Drugs, and Terror, is not, "smaller government". The right wing only "hates on the poor" regarding our war on poverty.

Ah yes...the "war on poverty"! All the way back to the LBJ Administration...all those government programs pushed by you liberals...all the billions of dollars spent on fighting poverty...and the number of people living in poverty essentially hasn't changed despite our spending some 22 trillion dollars on that war! LBJ stated that his welfare programs would end dependency on government and turn tax eaters into tax payers. They haven't! Those programs have only fostered inter generational dependence on government hand outs dooming families to languish in a welfare state purgatory.

Only right wing, red herring fantasy, can what you state, be more than just typical propaganda and rhetoric from the right wing, that claims, it is the left wing that allegedly, "hates on the poor".

Our poor are the "richest poor" in the entire world. That is how Good our form of socialism is.

The right wing "proves" it, by complaining about taxes and that our poor should be denied and disparaged steak and lobster privileges, if they don 't want to work or take drug tests for social services, due to the "for profit basis" of Capitalism's, natural rate of unemployment.

 

[miketx]

I voted for Trump. He lost me a few weeks ago. Investigate Trump and if need be, impeach him.

Did you learn that on CNN?