Kaine: No Apology Necessary for Clinton Team’s Mockery of Catholicism

[easyt65]

Despite Hillary's Team being exposed as having mocked Catholics and the catholic religion, VP Candidate Timmy Kaine opined that Hillary and her team have no reason to apologize....

-- “I don’t think you need to apologize for your opinions.”

"Yeah, all those INSULTING, demeaning things the Libs said about the catholic religion and Catholics...we still mean it but don't think we should have to apologize for believing all that."


Much like how the DNC has no reason to apologize for being exposed with their own leaked personal e-mails as being racists, sexists, homophobic anti-Semites....

Much like the predatory sexual assaulting, sexually harassing, raping pedophile, the WHITE BILL COSBY, and his ENABLER - Hillary Clinton, who called women 'sluts', whores' and claimed his victims 'dared to be raped' - have nothing for which to apologize to women....

Being a Liberal is 'never having to say you're sorry'.


Kaine: No Apology Necessary for Clinton Team's Mockery of Catholicism - Breitbart

 

[Rustic]

Even though Catholicism is a cult, you can never trust a career politician… LOL

 

[TNHarley]

“I don’t think you need to apologize for your opinions.”
So I assume he doesn't think Trump needs to apologize to rosie?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Kaine is a blubbering bag of stupid...much like all demoquacks

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Aren't these the same fucks that have a hissy if you say anything derogatory about Islam?

 

[easyt65]

Aren't these the same fucks that have a hissy if you say anything derogatory about Islam?

I wish I could have given you more 'Winners' for this!

 

[OldLady]

Re: Conservative Catholicism
From:[email protected]
To: [email protected], [email protected]
Date: 2011-04-11 21:10
Subject: Re: Conservative Catholicism

Excellent point. They can throw around "Thomistic" thought and "subsidiarity" and sound sophisticated because no one knows what the hell they're talking about.

Jennifer Palmieri <[email protected]> wrote:
I imagine they think it is the most socially acceptable politically conservative religion. Their rich friends wouldn't understand if they became evangelicals.

----- Original Message -----
From: John Halpin
To: John Podesta <[email protected]>; Jennifer Palmieri
Sent: Mon Apr 11 18:55:59 2011
Subject: Conservative Catholicism

Ken Auletta's latest piece on Murdoch in the New Yorker starts off with the aside that both Murdoch and Robert Thompson, managing editor of the WSJ, are raising their kids Catholic. Friggin' Murdoch baptized his kids in Jordan where John the Baptist baptized Jesus. Many of the most powerful elements of the conservative movement are all Catholic (many converts) from the SC and think tanks to the media and social groups. It's an amazing bastardization of the faith. They must be attracted to the systematic thought and severely backwards gender relations and must be totally unaware of Christian democracy.
WikiLeaks - The Podesta Emails

Really? Okay, "severely backwards gender relations" is harsh. Who was it said by? Did Podesta or Palmieri agree with him? Was Clinton involved in this rant in any way? Is this an official stance of the Democratic Party, the way conversion therapy is on the Republican agenda? I agree with Kaine. This one individual, Halpin, can have his nasty opinion, same as you can have yours about Muslims. Please remember Clinton never said a word about any of this and was not even in on the conversation. So stuff this conversation up your ***.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Time to play: You cant explain!

Starring the OP.

Todays question is: How did they mock Catholicism?


Annnnd go!

 

[easyt65]

Time to play: You cant explain!

Starring the OP.

Todays question is: How did they mock Catholicism?


Annnnd go!

Ask the author of the story I posted, whose title is 'Kaine: No Apology Necessary for Clinton Team’s Mockery of Catholicism'.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Time to play: You cant explain!

Starring the OP.

Todays question is: How did they mock Catholicism?


Annnnd go!

Ask the author of the story I posted, whose title is 'Kaine: No Apology Necessary for Clinton Team’s Mockery of Catholicism'.

Womp Womp! You lose in round 1.

 

[Compost]

Re: Conservative Catholicism
From:[email protected]
To: [email protected], [email protected]
Date: 2011-04-11 21:10
Subject: Re: Conservative Catholicism

Excellent point. They can throw around "Thomistic" thought and "subsidiarity" and sound sophisticated because no one knows what the hell they're talking about.

Jennifer Palmieri <[email protected]> wrote:
I imagine they think it is the most socially acceptable politically conservative religion. Their rich friends wouldn't understand if they became evangelicals.

----- Original Message -----
From: John Halpin
To: John Podesta <[email protected]>; Jennifer Palmieri
Sent: Mon Apr 11 18:55:59 2011
Subject: Conservative Catholicism

Ken Auletta's latest piece on Murdoch in the New Yorker starts off with the aside that both Murdoch and Robert Thompson, managing editor of the WSJ, are raising their kids Catholic. Friggin' Murdoch baptized his kids in Jordan where John the Baptist baptized Jesus. Many of the most powerful elements of the conservative movement are all Catholic (many converts) from the SC and think tanks to the media and social groups. It's an amazing bastardization of the faith. They must be attracted to the systematic thought and severely backwards gender relations and must be totally unaware of Christian democracy.
WikiLeaks - The Podesta Emails

Really? Okay, "severely backwards gender relations" is harsh. Who was it said by? Did Podesta or Palmieri agree with him? Was Clinton involved in this rant in any way? Is this an official stance of the Democratic Party, the way conversation therapy is on the Republican agenda? I agree with Kaine. This one individual, Halpin, can have his nasty opinion, same as you can have yours about Muslims. Please remember Clinton never said a word about any of this and was not even in on the conversation. So stuff this conversation up your ***.

Dear Old Lady, I am too much of a lady to suggest you stuff your opinion up your whatnot. Here's the thing. Podesta is Clinton's boy. The email about reeducating Catholics is what it is. I'll spell it out. It's an outrage. Catholics are doing that thing known as Freedom. You don't like their beliefs, tough bleep. That the staff of a woman running for potus is talking about this at all should frighten everyone. Even leftists. You know. Today it's Catholics. Tomorrow it may be Baptists. The next day it may be Jehoviah Witness. Eventually, they will get around to squelching something YOU believe in. Maybe even Muslims.

 

[rightwinger]

Liberal Catholics mocking Conservative Catholics


I am outraged

 

[easyt65]

"Many of the most powerful elements of the conservative movement are all Catholic (many converts) from the SC and think tanks to the media and social groups. They must be attracted to the systematic thought and severely backwards gender relations and must be totally unaware of Christian democracy. I imagine they think it is the most socially acceptable politically conservative religion. Their rich friends wouldn't understand if they became evangelicals."

Imagine the COW Liberals would have had Trump, Pence, or some Conservative had stated:

"Many of the most powerful elements of the Islamic Movement are all Muslim / Sharia (many converts) from the Middle east and think tanks to the media and social groups. They must be attracted to the systematic thought and severely backwards gender relations and must be totally unaware of Islamic 'democracy'. I imagine they think it is the most socially acceptable religion. Their rich friends wouldn't understand if they became Shia."

Hell, Loretta Lynch might come out to threaten stripping them of their 1st Amendment rights again.

 

[OldLady]

Time to play: You cant explain!

Starring the OP.

Todays question is: How did they mock Catholicism?


Annnnd go!

Ask the author of the story I posted, whose title is 'Kaine: No Apology Necessary for Clinton Team’s Mockery of Catholicism'.

The entire e-mail is copied in Post 7. It might be better if you read it and explained why YOU think it's a mockery of Catholicism. Rather than just spreading propaganda.

Re: Conservative Catholicism
From:[email protected]
To: [email protected], [email protected]
Date: 2011-04-11 21:10
Subject: Re: Conservative Catholicism

Excellent point. They can throw around "Thomistic" thought and "subsidiarity" and sound sophisticated because no one knows what the hell they're talking about.

Jennifer Palmieri <[email protected]> wrote:
I imagine they think it is the most socially acceptable politically conservative religion. Their rich friends wouldn't understand if they became evangelicals.

----- Original Message -----
From: John Halpin
To: John Podesta <[email protected]>; Jennifer Palmieri
Sent: Mon Apr 11 18:55:59 2011
Subject: Conservative Catholicism

Ken Auletta's latest piece on Murdoch in the New Yorker starts off with the aside that both Murdoch and Robert Thompson, managing editor of the WSJ, are raising their kids Catholic. Friggin' Murdoch baptized his kids in Jordan where John the Baptist baptized Jesus. Many of the most powerful elements of the conservative movement are all Catholic (many converts) from the SC and think tanks to the media and social groups. It's an amazing bastardization of the faith. They must be attracted to the systematic thought and severely backwards gender relations and must be totally unaware of Christian democracy.
WikiLeaks - The Podesta Emails

Really? Okay, "severely backwards gender relations" is harsh. Who was it said by? Did Podesta or Palmieri agree with him? Was Clinton involved in this rant in any way? Is this an official stance of the Democratic Party, the way conversation therapy is on the Republican agenda? I agree with Kaine. This one individual, Halpin, can have his nasty opinion, same as you can have yours about Muslims. Please remember Clinton never said a word about any of this and was not even in on the conversation. So stuff this conversation up your ***.

Dear Old Lady, I am too much of a lady to suggest you stuff your opinion up your whatnot. Here's the thing. Podesta is Clinton's boy. The email about reeducating Catholics is what it is. I'll spell it out. It's an outrage. Catholics are doing that thing known as Freedom. You don't like their beliefs, tough bleep. That the staff of a woman running for potus is talking about this at all should frighten everyone. Even leftists. You know. Today it's Catholics. Tomorrow it may be Baptists. The next day it may be Jehoviah Witness. Eventually, they will get around to squelching something YOU believe in. Maybe even Muslims.

Podesta never said a word for or against Conservative Catholicism, though, Compost, and neither did Palmieri. Halpin wrote to him and let off some steam. I don't like at all what Halpin said (and I'm not even Catholic) but everyone has bad days combating political foes.
That e-mail is not an official stance and I don't believe liberals actually want to take away anyone's freedom of religion. And no, I don't want to get in an argument about who can bake a cake.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Time to play: You cant explain!

Starring the OP.

Todays question is: How did they mock Catholicism?


Annnnd go!

Ask the author of the story I posted, whose title is 'Kaine: No Apology Necessary for Clinton Team’s Mockery of Catholicism'.

The entire e-mail is copied in Post 7. It might be better if you read it and explained why YOU think it's a mockery of Catholicism. Rather than just spreading propaganda.

Re: Conservative Catholicism
From:[email protected]
To: [email protected], [email protected]
Date: 2011-04-11 21:10
Subject: Re: Conservative Catholicism

Excellent point. They can throw around "Thomistic" thought and "subsidiarity" and sound sophisticated because no one knows what the hell they're talking about.

Jennifer Palmieri <[email protected]> wrote:
I imagine they think it is the most socially acceptable politically conservative religion. Their rich friends wouldn't understand if they became evangelicals.

----- Original Message -----
From: John Halpin
To: John Podesta <[email protected]>; Jennifer Palmieri
Sent: Mon Apr 11 18:55:59 2011
Subject: Conservative Catholicism

Ken Auletta's latest piece on Murdoch in the New Yorker starts off with the aside that both Murdoch and Robert Thompson, managing editor of the WSJ, are raising their kids Catholic. Friggin' Murdoch baptized his kids in Jordan where John the Baptist baptized Jesus. Many of the most powerful elements of the conservative movement are all Catholic (many converts) from the SC and think tanks to the media and social groups. It's an amazing bastardization of the faith. They must be attracted to the systematic thought and severely backwards gender relations and must be totally unaware of Christian democracy.
WikiLeaks - The Podesta Emails

Really? Okay, "severely backwards gender relations" is harsh. Who was it said by? Did Podesta or Palmieri agree with him? Was Clinton involved in this rant in any way? Is this an official stance of the Democratic Party, the way conversation therapy is on the Republican agenda? I agree with Kaine. This one individual, Halpin, can have his nasty opinion, same as you can have yours about Muslims. Please remember Clinton never said a word about any of this and was not even in on the conversation. So stuff this conversation up your ***.

Dear Old Lady, I am too much of a lady to suggest you stuff your opinion up your whatnot. Here's the thing. Podesta is Clinton's boy. The email about reeducating Catholics is what it is. I'll spell it out. It's an outrage. Catholics are doing that thing known as Freedom. You don't like their beliefs, tough bleep. That the staff of a woman running for potus is talking about this at all should frighten everyone. Even leftists. You know. Today it's Catholics. Tomorrow it may be Baptists. The next day it may be Jehoviah Witness. Eventually, they will get around to squelching something YOU believe in. Maybe even Muslims.

Podesta never said a word for or against Conservative Catholicism, though, Compost, and neither did Palmieri. Halpin wrote to him and let off some steam. I don't like at all what Halpin said (and I'm not even Catholic) but everyone has bad days combating political foes.
That e-mail is not an official stance and I don't believe liberals actually want to take away anyone's freedom of religion. And no, I don't want to get in an argument about who can bake a cake.

I don't blame you...it's taking away religious freedom you said liberals don't and are not doing. A quandary or dilemma

 

[Compost]

Time to play: You cant explain!

Starring the OP.

Todays question is: How did they mock Catholicism?


Annnnd go!

Ask the author of the story I posted, whose title is 'Kaine: No Apology Necessary for Clinton Team’s Mockery of Catholicism'.

The entire e-mail is copied in Post 7. It might be better if you read it and explained why YOU think it's a mockery of Catholicism. Rather than just spreading propaganda.

Re: Conservative Catholicism
From:[email protected]
To: [email protected], [email protected]
Date: 2011-04-11 21:10
Subject: Re: Conservative Catholicism

Excellent point. They can throw around "Thomistic" thought and "subsidiarity" and sound sophisticated because no one knows what the hell they're talking about.

Jennifer Palmieri <[email protected]> wrote:
I imagine they think it is the most socially acceptable politically conservative religion. Their rich friends wouldn't understand if they became evangelicals.

----- Original Message -----
From: John Halpin
To: John Podesta <[email protected]>; Jennifer Palmieri
Sent: Mon Apr 11 18:55:59 2011
Subject: Conservative Catholicism

Ken Auletta's latest piece on Murdoch in the New Yorker starts off with the aside that both Murdoch and Robert Thompson, managing editor of the WSJ, are raising their kids Catholic. Friggin' Murdoch baptized his kids in Jordan where John the Baptist baptized Jesus. Many of the most powerful elements of the conservative movement are all Catholic (many converts) from the SC and think tanks to the media and social groups. It's an amazing bastardization of the faith. They must be attracted to the systematic thought and severely backwards gender relations and must be totally unaware of Christian democracy.
WikiLeaks - The Podesta Emails

Really? Okay, "severely backwards gender relations" is harsh. Who was it said by? Did Podesta or Palmieri agree with him? Was Clinton involved in this rant in any way? Is this an official stance of the Democratic Party, the way conversation therapy is on the Republican agenda? I agree with Kaine. This one individual, Halpin, can have his nasty opinion, same as you can have yours about Muslims. Please remember Clinton never said a word about any of this and was not even in on the conversation. So stuff this conversation up your ***.

Dear Old Lady, I am too much of a lady to suggest you stuff your opinion up your whatnot. Here's the thing. Podesta is Clinton's boy. The email about reeducating Catholics is what it is. I'll spell it out. It's an outrage. Catholics are doing that thing known as Freedom. You don't like their beliefs, tough bleep. That the staff of a woman running for potus is talking about this at all should frighten everyone. Even leftists. You know. Today it's Catholics. Tomorrow it may be Baptists. The next day it may be Jehoviah Witness. Eventually, they will get around to squelching something YOU believe in. Maybe even Muslims.

Podesta never said a word for or against Conservative Catholicism, though, Compost, and neither did Palmieri. Halpin wrote to him and let off some steam. I don't like at all what Halpin said (and I'm not even Catholic) but everyone has bad days combating political foes.
That e-mail is not an official stance and I don't believe liberals actually want to take away anyone's freedom of religion. And no, I don't want to get in an argument about who can bake a cake.

It's so much easier to say the subject is overacting, then to react to the issue, isn't it?

 

[Norman]

Could she perhaps say a word about Islam?

No.. no way...

If Trump was the person making the statement, we would hear a barrage of "Racist, sexist, homophobe, misogynist, xenophobe...."

 

[easyt65]

OL, I posted the specific comments that were said about Catholicism. Kaine is right - what was said was opinion, but it was slightly insulting. If you do not see what is insulting I can not show it to you because YOU do not find them so. You will NOT see them insulting even If, as I did when I posted what was said, I showed them to you.

I also posted that is something extremely similar was said about the Muslim Faith versus the Catholic faith Libs would freak out, afraid we were insulting Islam/Muslims. Liberals SEEM to be more open to and worried about Americans insulting Islam than insulting the faith of Americans.

Liberals / the DNC seem to have an easier time mocking, making jokes about, and then defending their actions of racism, sexism, anti-Christian/Catholic religion, anti-Semitic homophobia when exposed, blaming Conservatives somehow - pointing fingers and saying, 'Yeah but THEY do this' - or blaming the person who hacked and released THEIR e-mails.

Again, these things may not be offensive to YOU, but they are obviously offensive to some. Like kaine said, these are beliefs and opinions, and should not have to apologize for opinions. At the same time that is so much BULLSHIT from the left because they demonize Conservatives all the time for having 'controversial opinions'. There's that double standard liberal BS again.

If you want to say Liberals don't have to apologize for their opinion then do so, but 1) Don't try to justify offensive things that are said, and 2) remember it was a LIB who said PEOPLE SHOULD NOT HAVE TO APOLOGIZE FOR OPINIPONS...even if others find them offensive.

 

[OldLady]

Time to play: You cant explain!

Starring the OP.

Todays question is: How did they mock Catholicism?


Annnnd go!

Ask the author of the story I posted, whose title is 'Kaine: No Apology Necessary for Clinton Team’s Mockery of Catholicism'.

The entire e-mail is copied in Post 7. It might be better if you read it and explained why YOU think it's a mockery of Catholicism. Rather than just spreading propaganda.

Re: Conservative Catholicism
From:[email protected]
To: [email protected], [email protected]
Date: 2011-04-11 21:10
Subject: Re: Conservative Catholicism

Excellent point. They can throw around "Thomistic" thought and "subsidiarity" and sound sophisticated because no one knows what the hell they're talking about.

Jennifer Palmieri <[email protected]> wrote:
I imagine they think it is the most socially acceptable politically conservative religion. Their rich friends wouldn't understand if they became evangelicals.

----- Original Message -----
From: John Halpin
To: John Podesta <[email protected]>; Jennifer Palmieri
Sent: Mon Apr 11 18:55:59 2011
Subject: Conservative Catholicism

Ken Auletta's latest piece on Murdoch in the New Yorker starts off with the aside that both Murdoch and Robert Thompson, managing editor of the WSJ, are raising their kids Catholic. Friggin' Murdoch baptized his kids in Jordan where John the Baptist baptized Jesus. Many of the most powerful elements of the conservative movement are all Catholic (many converts) from the SC and think tanks to the media and social groups. It's an amazing bastardization of the faith. They must be attracted to the systematic thought and severely backwards gender relations and must be totally unaware of Christian democracy.
WikiLeaks - The Podesta Emails

Really? Okay, "severely backwards gender relations" is harsh. Who was it said by? Did Podesta or Palmieri agree with him? Was Clinton involved in this rant in any way? Is this an official stance of the Democratic Party, the way conversation therapy is on the Republican agenda? I agree with Kaine. This one individual, Halpin, can have his nasty opinion, same as you can have yours about Muslims. Please remember Clinton never said a word about any of this and was not even in on the conversation. So stuff this conversation up your ***.

Dear Old Lady, I am too much of a lady to suggest you stuff your opinion up your whatnot. Here's the thing. Podesta is Clinton's boy. The email about reeducating Catholics is what it is. I'll spell it out. It's an outrage. Catholics are doing that thing known as Freedom. You don't like their beliefs, tough bleep. That the staff of a woman running for potus is talking about this at all should frighten everyone. Even leftists. You know. Today it's Catholics. Tomorrow it may be Baptists. The next day it may be Jehoviah Witness. Eventually, they will get around to squelching something YOU believe in. Maybe even Muslims.

Podesta never said a word for or against Conservative Catholicism, though, Compost, and neither did Palmieri. Halpin wrote to him and let off some steam. I don't like at all what Halpin said (and I'm not even Catholic) but everyone has bad days combating political foes.
That e-mail is not an official stance and I don't believe liberals actually want to take away anyone's freedom of religion. And no, I don't want to get in an argument about who can bake a cake.

It's so much easier to say the subject is overacting, then to react to the issue, isn't it?

What's to react to? I thought it was a mean thing to say, I said that.

 

[bodecea]

“I don’t think you need to apologize for your opinions.”
So I assume he doesn't think Trump needs to apologize to rosie?

He never would....he might apple-a-gize