ClosedCaption
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2010
- 53,233
- 6,719
It's not a quandary to me in the least. If it was, I'd say so. I think it's wrong to say you won't do business with a a homosexual because your religion says homosexuality is a sin. Fine, if it's a sin, don't be one, don't invite them to your picnic. Just don't discriminate. Aren't all the evangelicals saying they still support Trump because we all have sin? That we shouldn't judge? Handy how that only applies sometimes.I don't agree that it is taking away your religious freedom to insist it not interfere with the rights of others who do not believe as you do. And that's ALL I will say.The entire e-mail is copied in Post 7. It might be better if you read it and explained why YOU think it's a mockery of Catholicism. Rather than just spreading propaganda.
Podesta never said a word for or against Conservative Catholicism, though, Compost, and neither did Palmieri. Halpin wrote to him and let off some steam. I don't like at all what Halpin said (and I'm not even Catholic) but everyone has bad days combating political foes.
That e-mail is not an official stance and I don't believe liberals actually want to take away anyone's freedom of religion. And no, I don't want to get in an argument about who can bake a cake.
I don't blame you...it's taking away religious freedom you said liberals don't and are not doing. A quandary or dilemma
It is going against their religious freedom and of course that's all you'll say....that quandary after you yourself stated liberals are not trying to do it
So your argument is it's OK to persecute Christians and their beliefs under the guise of "discrimination"....got ya
Time to play: You cant explain!
Starring SassyGunSlinger.
Todays question is: How did they persecute Christians and their beliefs?
Annnnd go!