bodecea
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2009
- 185,066
- 66,582
You haven't named names. Surely you aren't lying, hun?/——-/ democrats tried with a kangaroo court and failed miserably.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You haven't named names. Surely you aren't lying, hun?/——-/ democrats tried with a kangaroo court and failed miserably.
They didn't even have to hack counting machines.
All they had to do was send out millions of ballots to the wrong zip code and wait for million of them to come back undelivered....and then fill them out for Democrats and count them on election day.
Actually, THIS sounds like another conspiracy theory by you Nazis.No, you'll make up a new silly conspiracy to explain away why Hannity said he never believed your LAST silly conspiracy.
/——/ The Jan 6 committee. Is this another example of you playing stupid to get attention?You haven't named names. Surely you aren't lying, hun?
Your opinion of the hearings you did not watch and know nothing about is worthless./——/ The Jan 6 committee. Is this another example of you playing stupid to get attention?
Have you been nipping on the eggnog?You haven't named names. Surely you aren't lying, hun?
.I am hereby calling for Kari Lake to kicked in the taco repeatedly by a rabid donkey.
The odds are about the same.
.Your opinion of the hearings you did not watch and know nothing about is worthless.
yes I have proof of it. Nothing I've related here is imagined.....unlike "Russian Collusion" was imagined and "Jan 6th was an insurrection" was imagined.Do you have proof to back that up? Or is this another fantasy that you've imagined?
yes I have proof of it. Nothing I've related here is imagined.....unlike "Russian Collusion" was imagined and "Jan 6th was an insurrection" was imagined.
Drunk version of sipping.
Nipping?
.
Yes, definitely. It was in no way a joke, and you are actually not a squealing twat who is too stupid to know a joke when he sees it.Threatening a public figure with bodily harm.
.Yes, definitely. It was on no way a joke, and you are actually not a squealing twat who is too stupid to know a joke when he sees it.
I don't see the point of wasting my time, because unless it's part of the agenda and official talking-points of the state-run media....to minions and Deep State contractors like you it doesn't exist.Is it the special kind of evidence that can't be shown in court....or verified in anyway by anyone who hasn't already seen it?
Because your promises of 'evidence' have been rather underwhelming.
I don't see the point of wasting my time, because unless it's part of the agenda and official talking-points of the state-run media....to minions like you it doesn't exist.
I just told you one of the ways they harvested votes with mail-in voting. It's pretty straight forward. This is why so many people discovered on election day that they had already voted when they showed up at their polling places in important battleground states. There votes had already been registered thru the mail.
The trick to stopping it is to get rid of mail-in voting entirely....except in extreme cases like overseas deployments.
How's Moscow, Comrade?
It's also why they refuse to clean their voter rolls....every dead person, or registered voter not living at the address anymore, because they moved, is just another possible vote to be harvested. It's why some districts had over 100% of all registered voters voting in elections in PA and other states.Is it the special kind of evidence that can't be shown in court....or verified in anyway by anyone who hasn't already seen it?
Because your promises of 'evidence' have been rather underwhelming.