Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
1. There was no fraud, no one lost money. Bernie Madoff was a fraud, FTX and Sam Bankman Fried was a fraud, Trump was not.The governor didn't "target" anyone. The AG of NY Leticia James did the prosecuting. The judge apparently agreed with her...to the tune of about 455 million. Apparently, fraud doesn't go unpunished in the state of NY.
Many have already left NY.Except no other business seems to be under scrutiny and no other executives seem to be in court for fraud at the moment.
Just Trump. What does that tell you?
LOL. WHAT SHOULD THAT TELL YOU!!!Except no other business seems to be under scrutiny and no other executives seem to be in court for fraud at the moment.
Just Trump. What does that tell you?
What about Sam Bankman-Fried? You know, that yuge Democrat donor?Except no other business seems to be under scrutiny and no other executives seem to be in court for fraud at the moment.
Just Trump. What does that tell you?
Duh. It tells us it’s a politically motivated prosecution - and decision.Except no other business seems to be under scrutiny and no other executives seem to be in court for fraud at the moment.
Just Trump. What does that tell you?
And then the bank would conduct its own appraisal to determine how much they should lend. That the bank in question didn’t do that tells us that they knew Trump was worth billions and were eager to lend him the money. In doing so, they collected $100M in interest.If I was in commercial real estate in NY I might give pause. Surely they have other businesses? A popular Deli owner probably got his/her loans on the up and up. Maybe not. "I'll put up my 30,000 sq ft home as collateral."
Actually, there's a small harm due to Justice Arthur F. Engoron's recent decision. There's your foul.And then the bank would conduct its own appraisal to determine how much they should lend. That the bank in question didn’t do that tells us that they knew Trump was worth billions and were eager to lend him the money. In doing so, they collected $100M in interest.
No harm, no foul.
With this ruling every podunk municipality in the borders of New York State will be looking for ways to squeeze money out of past real estate transactions. I'm not saying that the practice is correct but I'm saying is that the core system is up against a giant they cannot defeat.Except no other business seems to be under scrutiny and no other executives seem to be in court for fraud at the moment.
Just Trump. What does that tell you?
So a biased, anti-Trump judge who announced his hostility for him before the trial started said there was “harm”? Meaningless. It will be overturned, and Trump could countersue.Actually, there's a small harm due to Justice Arthur F. Engoron's recent decision. There's your foul.
We shall wait and see, I suppose.So a biased, anti-Trump judge who announced his hostility for him before the trial started said there was “harm”? Meaningless. It will be overturned, and Trump could countersue.
But by then, he’ll be too busy being president.
Have you ever been to NYC James?Sorry bout that,
1. NYC is a sinking ship, and everyone will see the rats abandoning it!!!
2. Only people stupid enough to stay there are the illegals, they get everything free, just turn it over to them.
Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
They just interviewed a mother-daughter pair (maybe 40s and 20s) and asked them about their living conditions in NY. They said that not only had they been living rent-free in the hotel for 7 months, but they were getting all their meals AND daily maid service. They even said how their linens were frequently changed.Sorry bout that,
1. NYC is a sinking ship, and everyone will see the rats abandoning it!!!
2. Only people stupid enough to stay there are the illegals, they get everything free, just turn it over to them.
Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
Yup. At the minimum, it will be reduced to a modest fine.We shall wait and see, I suppose.
Sorry bout that,Have you ever been to NYC James?
Now if that happened, then NY WOULD be a hostile place to do business. Except there is no evidence to back this claim up. This about one man's fraud and corruption. He is the only one I see with a civil judgement against him. I don't see other businesses or their executives in court facing the same types of claims. Which makes NY....a good place to do business. Might be more expensive. But that depends on what kind of sweetheart tax breaks you could get out of the municipality where you want to locate. And those types of breaks are exactly what these other states are offering...but they won't last.With this ruling every podunk municipality in the borders of New York State will be looking for ways to squeeze money out of past real estate transactions. I'm not saying that the practice is correct but I'm saying is that the core system is up against a giant they cannot defeat.
That's not the question you were asked.Sorry bout that,
1. Yes, I have a cousin there.
2. Jack, lives just down the street from Central Park.
3. Why he lives there is a weird story.
Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
