paulitician
Platinum Member
- Oct 7, 2011
- 38,401
- 4,162
- 1,130
In most of the cases, the parents were the one's responsible for the child being exposed to the guns that were used in the massacres. If not the parents, some other adult was involved.
We need to change our approach to firearms completely. No more just handing a child a gun. I don't care if it's about hunting or not. Teach them hunting when they're adults.
Oh no, no, no. Don't change my question for me. I know where the guns came from. What I asked is what parent openly gave a child a gun for a mass shooting. There's a big difference between a parent "giving" a child a gun and him stealing a gun.
Many adults in America provide their children with firearms. That's no secret. None of the kids who carried out massacres, could have done it without adults providing them the means. The firearms were accessible.
Let's try this again: a kid stealing their parents guns and the parents providing the weapons are two entirely different things. It seems to me the kids that learn about guns, use guns, and are respectful of guns are not the same kids that are shooting up the schools.
Most if not all of the kids who carried out massacres, were exposed to firearms by adults. Some didn't have to steal the guns used in the shootings. They were allowed access to them. In many cases, the adults gave them the firearms.
Okay, then I'm calling you out: which mass murder took place by a child where the parent gave them the firearm?
Look, get your child into a different hobby. One that doesn't involve him or her possibly blowing their head off. Lots of other activities out there for kids. Time to explore those. Keep the guns for the adults.