Kerry Warns of Israeli ‘Apartheid’

You just don't get it Toast...Wars of attrition destroy one's enemies by exhaustion as they just get up and leave like the Crusaders, Ottomans, French, Brits, Italians, etc...

Israel like all these previous invaders will suffer the same fate if NOT accepted. An acceptable peace or a slow death by implosion.

This is the lesson of History.

Israel is not an invader. The Europeans Jews were invited and their immigration facilitated by the British. That's NOT invading.

Second, you're comparing Israel to empires/states that existed a long time ago.
We are now living in the 21st century. Countries don't just fall anymore.

Keep it up with your delirious projections Peebel, but remember this:
In 50 years from now, leftards like you will be saying the same shit about how Israel is doomed .

"The Europeans Jews were invited and their immigration facilitated by the British. That's NOT invading."

Now that's funny. The British, who live in Northern Europe, invite other Europeans to settle in the Middle East. Do you even think about what you post. It is called an invasion, you dunce.

Wow, I almost cannot believe what I just read!

Thanks for once again proving to us that you have very little knowledge about this conflict.

It was called the British Mandate for Palestine. The territory was administered by the BRITISH, not the Palestinians, you incredibly ignorant fool.

Yes, they DID invite European Jews to Mandatory Palestine. Yes, they DID facilitate their immigration. That's not an invasion.
An invasion is when a people come to a land UNINVITED.

And wtf does it matter where Britain is on the map.

MASSIVE fail on your part monty. And I mean really massive
 
There are nine officially recognised Christian communities, and Jewish, Muslim and Druze communities. Marriages in each community are under the jurisdiction of their own religious authorities.
Marriage in Israel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Funny, last week you acknowledged that you did not like this law...This week you knowingly distort and deflect...Next post you will whine about it.

Court upholds law banning Palestinian spouses from living in Israel | World news | theguardian.com

The supreme court has narrowly voted to uphold a law which bans thousands of Palestinians who are married to Israelis from living in Israel. The ruling was denounced as racist by human rights organisations.

Following a five-year legal battle, the court ruled the Palestinians could pose a security threat. "Human rights are not a prescription for national suicide," wrote Asher Grunis, one of the judges in the 6-5 majority ruling.

The law, which was introduced in 2003 as emergency legislation during the second intifada (Palestinian uprising), has prevented thousands from the West Bank and Gaza from living with their spouses who are generally Israeli Arabs.

Many families are forced to move out of Israel, live apart, or live together illegally in Israel.

Exemptions can be granted for Palestinian men over the age of 35, or women over 25. However, according to Adalah, a legal rights group representing Israeli-Arabs, only 33 out of 3,000 applications for exemptions were granted last year.

The 232-page judgment was in response to a number of petitions which argued the law infringed the basic right to family life of Israel's 20% Arab population. The court ruled: "The right to a family life does not necessarily have to be realised within the borders of Israel."

One of the minority judges, Edmund Levy, wrote: "This law is greatly harmful. Its damage resonates. Its legislation is a formative event in the history of Israeli democracy."

Among those awaiting the decision was Taysar and Lana Hatib, who married six years ago. He is from the northern Israeli city of Acre; she was originally from Nablus in the West Bank.

Lana has a temporary residency permit which must be renewed annually, and which prohibits her from driving a car.

"The decision is proof that one shouldn't have any faith in the Israeli judicial system," Taysar told the Israeli news organisation Haaretz. "It is clear that the supreme court is influenced by the wave of fascism and racism sweeping Israel and the judges weren't expected to act in any other way."

The ruling, he said, put an end to hopes for a normal life.

Adalah, one of the organisations which challenged the law, said: "The supreme court approved a law the likes of which do not exist in any democratic state in the world, depriving citizens from maintaining a family life in Israel only on the basis of the ethnicity or national belonging of their spouse.

"The ruling proves how much the situation regarding the civil rights of the Arab minority in Israel is declining into a highly dangerous and unprecedented situation."

The Association of Civil Rights in Israel, another petitioner, said it was "a dark day for the protection of human rights and for the Israeli high court of justice".

The law was racist, it said, and would "harm the very texture of the lives of families whose only sin is the Palestinian blood that runs in their veins".

From your post, whiner:

Following a five-year legal battle, the court ruled the Palestinians could pose a security threat. "Human rights are not a prescription for national suicide," wrote Asher Grunis, one of the judges in the 6-5 majority ruling.

The law, which was introduced in 2003 as emergency legislation during the second intifada (Palestinian uprising), has prevented thousands from the West Bank and Gaza from living with their spouses who are generally Israeli Arabs.





This law you are talking about has nothing to do with discrimination against Arabs you blind leftard. It was to prevent Palestinians from coming to Israel to blow themselves up.

Oh Peebel :rolleyes:

It restrict men younger than 35 and women under 25 from getting permits and applying for citizenship.
Israelis are not allowed to live with their spouses in the WB or gaza. Hamas won't allow unification of spouses.
Our mongers don't complain about Hamas discriminating against Israelis.
 
No, most of the world, with the exception of Americans, agrees that Israel is an Apartheid state and now the U.S. leadership is admitting that it will be one. They are a little late in realizing it though.
Depends which planet you are living on, MOHOMOD.

"Depends which planet you are living on, MOHOMOD."

The same planet that Tzipi Livni, Israel’s Justice Minister, lives on you buffoon. Ain't it a bitch to always be wrong and upstaged?

"A senior Israeli government official warned this week of a potential “apartheid state” should the Israelis and Palestinians fail in achieving a two-state solution to their decades-old conflict.
Tzipi Livni, Israel’s Justice Minister and lead negotiator with the Palestinians, has said......"

Top Israeli Official Warns Of An 'Apartheid State' Should Two-State Solution Fail | ThinkProgress




Read it again little boy and you will see that every reference so far has been to an arab muslims apartheid state, just like the already existing arab muslim apartheid states in existence in the rest of Palestine and the M.E.
 
Get your facts right little boy, it is what the ISLAMONAZI PROPAGANDISTS knows. The rest of the world see's no apartheid inside Israel, and repudiates the BLOOD LIBELS that you and your fellow muslims spread on the internet.

No, most of the world, with the exception of Americans, agrees that Israel is an Apartheid state and now the U.S. leadership is admitting that it will be one. They are a little late in realizing it though.
So most of the world has been to Israel down at the grass roots level for how long a time? Days, months years? Give us a list of do's and don'ts that are posted in public venues like it was in South Africa. If people are gonna live by certain rules they have to be posted in public places so people can tell if they can ride a bus, drink water, eat in a restaurant, etc. Post them rules, Captain Knowledge.





The illiterate child is just spewing the ISLAMONAZI PROPAGANDA that its imam is telling it to.
 
No, most of the world, with the exception of Americans, agrees that Israel is an Apartheid state and now the U.S. leadership is admitting that it will be one. They are a little late in realizing it though.


The " Intrrnational Community" can make all the noise they want but at the same time realize Abbas is demanding " pre conditions" that can't be met . Tell us what Abbas has offered? Thank God, He has offered None !! :D


It is funny how the Boiler Room gang tries so hard with this "apartheid" shtick, but they care nothing about the tens of thousands of innocent people kiled just in the last rhee years in Syria and all the other murders committed in the Muslim world against the non-believers and even Muslims of different sects.. If they can't blame the Jews, they just are not interested. Meanwhile, most of the world is not even thinking about Israel. They have more important things to thinks about -- like being able to support their families. The Boiler Room gang must think that those citizens in places like El Salvador or Mexico get up in the morning and think about Israel. Only the anti-Semitic Muslims like the Boiler Room gang and their fellow travelers can't waste one spare moment from their demonizong Israel.




They don't care about the ISLAMONAZI apartheid regimes in gaza, west bank, Syria, Iran, Iraq, Saudi, Jordan and Egypt. It is all smoke and mirrors to hide the reality that islam is the real bad guy out there.
 
No, most of the world, with the exception of Americans, agrees that Israel is an Apartheid state and now the U.S. leadership is admitting that it will be one. They are a little late in realizing it though.
So most of the world has been to Israel down at the grass roots level for how long a time? Days, months years? Give us a list of do's and don'ts that are posted in public venues like it was in South Africa. If people are gonna live by certain rules they have to be posted in public places so people can tell if they can ride a bus, drink water, eat in a restaurant, etc. Post them rules, Captain Knowledge.

They don't need signs, they put up walls to keep the non-Jews out.



A bit like the Saudis then who have erected a wall 10 miles inside Yemen so the farmers cant get to their fields. The walls in Israel have worked and keep the PSYCHOPATHIC ISLAMONAZI MURDERING SCUM away from Israeli children. That is not apartheid, that is common sense to keep enemies at bay.
 
Goes to show how the Israeli lobby controls the U.S. The guy only said what everyone in the rest of world knows. But, what goes around comes around.

only anti-semites think Israel or jews control the US.

normal people know that oil has far more influence.

oops.... :cuckoo:


oops...:Quack

N.Y. Times scraps AIPAC from Syria story - POLITICO.com

By HADAS GOLD | 9/3/13 11:17 AM EDT


A reference to the pro-Israel lobbying group AIPAC was mysteriously cut from a New York Times article published online Monday and in print Tuesday. The first version, published online Monday, quotes an anonymous administration official calling AIPAC the "800-pound gorilla in the room." The original article, which is still available on The Boston Globe's site, had two paragraphs worth of quotes from officials about the powerful lobbying group's position in the Syria debate:


Administration officials said the influential American Israel Public Affairs Committee was already at work pressing for military action against the government of Assad, fearing that if Syria escapes American retribution for its use of chemical weapons, Iran might be emboldened in the future to attack Israel. In the House, the majority leader, Eric Cantor of Virginia, the only Jewish Republican in Congress, has long worked to challenge Democrats’ traditional base among Jews.

One administration official, who, like others, declined to be identified discussing White House strategy, called AIPAC “the 800-pound gorilla in the room,” and said its allies in Congress had to be saying, “If the White House is not capable of enforcing this red line” against the catastrophic use of chemical weapons, “we’re in trouble.”




Did you read this in your link,


“If the White House is not capable of enforcing this red line” against the catastrophic use of chemical weapons, “we’re in trouble" So AIPAC was campaigning to have the USA do something about the illegal weapons in use against Syrian civilians. Really evil people these Jews looking to save the lives of innocent muslims. Now what would you do if it was a plan by AIPAC to give the green light to Syrias use of illegal weapons.
 
"Depends which planet you are living on, MOHOMOD."

The same planet that Tzipi Livni, Israel’s Justice Minister, lives on you buffoon. Ain't it a bitch to always be wrong and upstaged?

"A senior Israeli government official warned this week of a potential “apartheid state” should the Israelis and Palestinians fail in achieving a two-state solution to their decades-old conflict.
Tzipi Livni, Israel’s Justice Minister and lead negotiator with the Palestinians, has said......"

Top Israeli Official Warns Of An 'Apartheid State' Should Two-State Solution Fail | ThinkProgress

Where is there apartheid in Israel proper?

Marriage Laws against the Palestinian/Israeli citizens.




The same laws are in existence in most civilised nations, and for the same reason. Which country would allow a known enemy into the country to murder from the inside.
 
Marriage Laws against the Palestinian/Israeli citizens.
WOW! We used to have Jim Crow laws here in the states. Every building, train, bus, restaurant, etc. had signs. Whites only. Colored waiting room. white drinking fountain, Swimming pool:No colored except Tues and Thurs, colored taxi, white taxi, Restaurants (coloreds order at side window), movies and theaters- colored in balcony only and on and on. In SA the blacks had to be out of he cities at a set time and take trains and buses home. Does anyone see any of this in the US now or Israel or any civilized country? Let's have a list of that stuff.

I bet you loved it, 'ya'll being from West Virgini Sen Byrd country! that is KKK Byrd.



Unable to find any evidence of the alleged racism anywhere but in Islamic nations, so you decide to whinge and whine like a whingey whiney thing
 
They don't need signs, they put up walls to keep the non-Jews out.
So tell us convert, is the fact that Hamas wants a Jew free Palestine to be named the Islamic Khalifate of Palestine which, according to Shariah law does not allow the same rights to minorities, not considered apartheid?

You is fuuuuny.

You are a buffoon.



Whats wrong suddenly had an epiphany moment and realised that Israel is far removed from apartheid as Palestine is involved in it
 
It is funny how the Boiler Room gang tries so hard with this "apartheid" shtick, but they care nothing about the tens of thousands of innocent people kiled just in the last rhee years in Syria and all the other murders committed in the Muslim world against the non-believers and even Muslims of different sects.. If they can't blame the Jews, they just are not interested. Meanwhile, most of the world is not even thinking about Israel. They have more important things to thinks about -- like being able to support their families. The Boiler Room gang must think that those citizens in places like El Salvador or Mexico get up in the morning and think about Israel. Only the anti-Semitic Muslims like the Boiler Room gang and their fellow travelers can't waste one spare moment from their demonizong Israel.

they get into this name calling and false labeling because it help defame and demean, or so they assume, their favorite targets.
zionist, zionazi, apartheid, new world order, secrets, POZ, genocide, controlling the money/economy/world leaders, demons, dogs, pigs, etc.....
It is an automatic trash post with nothing useful to say. The moment these terms become used by them the debate, discussion, has been lost. Their posts become more desperate, more numerous, more of a rant rather than an exchange of ideas or facts.
They also begin to insult or belittle posters, as if they will help them win anything.
At that point they make themselves look bad.
DFTT
spend your time on more worthy endeavors

You are so full of shit. On most other forums the racism that you people, especially you, exhibit towards Muslims and Arabs would be banned.




Do you mean the ISLAMONAZI controlled forums that ban the truth from being told..........
 
Funny, last week you acknowledged that you did not like this law...This week you knowingly distort and deflect...Next post you will whine about it.

Court upholds law banning Palestinian spouses from living in Israel | World news | theguardian.com

The supreme court has narrowly voted to uphold a law which bans thousands of Palestinians who are married to Israelis from living in Israel. The ruling was denounced as racist by human rights organisations.

Following a five-year legal battle, the court ruled the Palestinians could pose a security threat. "Human rights are not a prescription for national suicide," wrote Asher Grunis, one of the judges in the 6-5 majority ruling.

The law, which was introduced in 2003 as emergency legislation during the second intifada (Palestinian uprising), has prevented thousands from the West Bank and Gaza from living with their spouses who are generally Israeli Arabs.

Many families are forced to move out of Israel, live apart, or live together illegally in Israel.

Exemptions can be granted for Palestinian men over the age of 35, or women over 25. However, according to Adalah, a legal rights group representing Israeli-Arabs, only 33 out of 3,000 applications for exemptions were granted last year.

The 232-page judgment was in response to a number of petitions which argued the law infringed the basic right to family life of Israel's 20% Arab population. The court ruled: "The right to a family life does not necessarily have to be realised within the borders of Israel."

One of the minority judges, Edmund Levy, wrote: "This law is greatly harmful. Its damage resonates. Its legislation is a formative event in the history of Israeli democracy."

Among those awaiting the decision was Taysar and Lana Hatib, who married six years ago. He is from the northern Israeli city of Acre; she was originally from Nablus in the West Bank.

Lana has a temporary residency permit which must be renewed annually, and which prohibits her from driving a car.

"The decision is proof that one shouldn't have any faith in the Israeli judicial system," Taysar told the Israeli news organisation Haaretz. "It is clear that the supreme court is influenced by the wave of fascism and racism sweeping Israel and the judges weren't expected to act in any other way."

The ruling, he said, put an end to hopes for a normal life.

Adalah, one of the organisations which challenged the law, said: "The supreme court approved a law the likes of which do not exist in any democratic state in the world, depriving citizens from maintaining a family life in Israel only on the basis of the ethnicity or national belonging of their spouse.

"The ruling proves how much the situation regarding the civil rights of the Arab minority in Israel is declining into a highly dangerous and unprecedented situation."

The Association of Civil Rights in Israel, another petitioner, said it was "a dark day for the protection of human rights and for the Israeli high court of justice".

The law was racist, it said, and would "harm the very texture of the lives of families whose only sin is the Palestinian blood that runs in their veins".

From your post, whiner:

Following a five-year legal battle, the court ruled the Palestinians could pose a security threat. "Human rights are not a prescription for national suicide," wrote Asher Grunis, one of the judges in the 6-5 majority ruling.

The law, which was introduced in 2003 as emergency legislation during the second intifada (Palestinian uprising), has prevented thousands from the West Bank and Gaza from living with their spouses who are generally Israeli Arabs.





This law you are talking about has nothing to do with discrimination against Arabs you blind leftard. It was to prevent Palestinians from coming to Israel to blow themselves up.

Oh Peebel :rolleyes:

You've got to stop making lame excuses for lame laws...Arab/Israeli Palestinians are as peaceful within Israel as others.

Stop shoring up useless hate because it comes back with a vengeance. It is to try and preserve a Jewish State against the demographic tide. A Law against births of Palestinians in Israel.



Whats wrong don't like seeing your link taken apart and your POV destroyed. The fact remains most civilised nations have the same laws in place to stop any possibility of a terrorist getting into the country and murdering innocent children. It is not racism or apartheid and since when have hamas been as peaceful inside Israel as any others.
 
As I stated a few days ago, your worst nightmare is coming true...
Young Modern Orthodox Jews trained in the use of the latest machine guns are building towns in Israel like hotcakes.
But don't let the facts soften your emotional erection.
I saw today that Israel has started 14,000 new units in WB and E Jerusalem.

They are digging their hole deeper.




All the better to bury the dead Palestinians when they exceed the limits of their land to sustain life.
 
From your post, whiner:

Following a five-year legal battle, the court ruled the Palestinians could pose a security threat. "Human rights are not a prescription for national suicide," wrote Asher Grunis, one of the judges in the 6-5 majority ruling.

The law, which was introduced in 2003 as emergency legislation during the second intifada (Palestinian uprising), has prevented thousands from the West Bank and Gaza from living with their spouses who are generally Israeli Arabs.





This law you are talking about has nothing to do with discrimination against Arabs you blind leftard. It was to prevent Palestinians from coming to Israel to blow themselves up.

Oh Peebel :rolleyes:

You've got to stop making lame excuses for lame laws...Arab/Israeli Palestinians are as peaceful within Israel as others.

Stop shoring up useless hate because it comes back with a vengeance. It is to try and preserve a Jewish State against the demographic tide. A Law against births of Palestinians in Israel.



Whats wrong don't like seeing your link taken apart and your POV destroyed. The fact remains most civilised nations have the same laws in place to stop any possibility of a terrorist getting into the country and murdering innocent children. It is not racism or apartheid and since when have hamas been as peaceful inside Israel as any others.

The ZioNazi can't read.
 
You've got to stop making lame excuses for lame laws...Arab/Israeli Palestinians are as peaceful within Israel as others.

Stop shoring up useless hate because it comes back with a vengeance. It is to try and preserve a Jewish State against the demographic tide. A Law against births of Palestinians in Israel.



Whats wrong don't like seeing your link taken apart and your POV destroyed. The fact remains most civilised nations have the same laws in place to stop any possibility of a terrorist getting into the country and murdering innocent children. It is not racism or apartheid and since when have hamas been as peaceful inside Israel as any others.

The ZioNazi can't read.




Another ISLAMONAZI using oxymorons how can you defend the Jews right to a homeland while trying to wipe them out ?

Try a law limiting all races, religions, creeds and nationalities from having more than 2 children. That is not racist or apartheid in any way, and will result in the mass migration of arab Israelis to other countries.
 
As I stated a few days ago, your worst nightmare is coming true...
Young Modern Orthodox Jews trained in the use of the latest machine guns are building towns in Israel like hotcakes.
But don't let the facts soften your emotional erection.
I saw today that Israel has started 14,000 new units in WB and E Jerusalem.

They are digging their hole deeper.
If so then why does that freak the Arabs out?
 
You just don't get it Toast...Wars of attrition destroy one's enemies by exhaustion as they just get up and leave like the Crusaders, Ottomans, French, Brits, Italians, etc...

Israel like all these previous invaders will suffer the same fate if NOT accepted. An acceptable peace or a slow death by implosion.

This is the lesson of History.

Israel is not an invader. The Europeans Jews were invited and their immigration facilitated by the British. That's NOT invading.

Second, you're comparing Israel to empires/states that existed a long time ago.
We are now living in the 21st century. Countries don't just fall anymore.

Keep it up with your delirious projections Peebel, but remember this:
In 50 years from now, leftards like you will be saying the same shit about how Israel is doomed .

"The Europeans Jews were invited and their immigration facilitated by the British. That's NOT invading."

Now that's funny. The British, who live in Northern Europe, invite other Europeans to settle in the Middle East. Do you even think about what you post. It is called an invasion, you dunce.
The land was never owned by Arabs. The same British then invited Arabs to invade the area in hoards. That that doesn't seemed to bother you, MOHOMOD.
 
""A number of very senior Israeli officials have also warned that Israel risks becoming an apartheid-like state absent a two-state solution:
2007 — then-Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert: “If the day comes when the two-state solution collapses, and we face a South African-style struggle for equal voting rights (also for the Palestinians in the territories), then, as soon as that happens, the State of Israel is finished.”
2010 — then-Israeli Defense Minister and Former Prime Minister Ehud Barak: “The simple truth is, if there is one state” including Israel, the West Bank and Gaza, “it will have to be either binational or undemocratic. … if this bloc of millions of Palestinians cannot vote, that will be an apartheid state.”
2013 — Israeli Justice Minister and Lead Peace Negotiator Tzipi Livni: “But the time has come for the same youth to ask, to what kind of state do they want to leave the gas reserves? To a Jewish democratic Israel? Or to a binational Arab state? Or to an apartheid state? It is impossible to deal with economic issues and to ignore the important diplomatic issues related to two states for two peoples.”
Last year, Yuval Diskin — the former head of Israel’s internal security service, the Shin Bet — issued a similar warning. He said if the two-state solution fails, the result would essentially be “one state for two nations.”
“When we get there,” he said, “we will face an immediate existential threat of the erasure of the identity of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state, and in a few years, the reality of the country’s demographics will lead to a Palestinian- Arab majority and a Jewish minority, with all that entails.”
Regarding the “apartheid” warning, Vox’s Zack Beauchamp expains the conundrum absent two states:
Arabs will eventually outnumber Jews in Israel-Palestine, if they don’t already. For Israel, which sees itself as both Jewish and democratic, this poses an existential crisis. If Arabs outnumber Jews and are allowed to vote, then it’s the end of a Jewish state. But if Arabs outnumber Jews and aren’t allowed to vote, then Israel is no longer a democracy.""

Like Kerry, Senior Israeli Officials Have Warned Of Israel Becoming 'An Apartheid State' | ThinkProgress
 
ThiMk Progwess? LOL. Nutjob Site.

People predict a lot of things, doesn't mean it will come to fruition. What is true today is that Israel is a vibrant, strong Democracy that treats its 1.8 million Arab citizens as equals. So all the HOOPLA about apartheid is meaningless drivel and demonization. Israel will inshallah annex the West Bank soon and figure out a way to treat those Arabs as equals too.

But, you can only treat someone as an equal if they want to. If they run around like savages trying to kill innocent People, then Israelis will do what they have to, defend their people. :clap2:

Can we hear a praise be Allah on that one?
 
Last edited:
ThiMk Progwess? LOL. Nutjob Site.

People predict a lot of things, doesn't mean it will come to fruition. What is true today is that Israel is a vibrant, strong Democracy that treats its 1.8 million Arab citizens as equals. So all the HOOPLA about apartheid is meaningless drivel and demonization. Israel will inshallah annex the West Bank soon and figure out a way to treat those Arabs as equals too.

But, you can only treat someone as an equal if they want to. If they run around like savages trying to kill innocent People, then Israelis will do what they have to, to defend their people. :clap2:

Can we hear a praise be Allah on that one?

Apartheid is what palestinians practice with their demonization of jews and insitance on a jew free land and ignoring, destroying all evidence of jews having so much as set foot in any of the land that made up the british mandate.

Teach the muslims palestinians to treat their own with equality. Speak out loudly for all muslims to treat other muslims equally and tolerate with peace, patience, without prejudice and with understanding all other people no matter faith, race, sexual preference or ability. That includes other people of the book. That includes jews. That includes christians.

Why should Israel treat palestinians as equals, when they are not Israeli, when palestinians don't treat others with respect or as equals, entitled to the same rights to live and make a happy life by working hard? Palestinians want equal rights with they want to deny Israel the right to exist. So, Israel should then deny the palestinians a right too exist so palestinians can have equal rights? Israel should terrorize and actively seek the annihilation of all palestinians?

Treat others as you would have them treat you. Palestinians don't treat Israel with recognition as a jewish state, recognize their history and identity to the land including the mount, don't allow they freedom to pray at the wall without harassment at the wall or on the mount, freedom to travel through the WB/gaza or around the rest of the middle east freely or peacefully, to carry out business with muslims in the PA middle east or muslims throughout the rest of the world, etc.

You want the right to peace and security for the palestinian people but you don't give it to the Israelis.

Why should Israel give a smile or handshake without reciprocity, instead of a knife blade between the ribs?
 

Forum List

Back
Top