Kevin McCarthy is not shy about being a scum-bucket

[Sun Devil 92]

So despite Hillary's best efforts (and her outright lies), the truth came out...

What the heck are you blabbering about? What "truth" about Hillary?

All we got was a direct admission from McCarthy that the entire Benghazi hearing is for political purposes to demonize Clinton......And it works on morons, as you've clearly shown.

The "truth" about Hillary is whatever the RW traitors' owners tell them it is.

Seriously, RW traitors are now lying even more than before the last two general elections.

You use the term traitors a great deal.

Have you seen any of them tried ?

If not, then what is your purpose ?

To look stupid ?

 

[Sun Devil 92]

The hearings had nothing to do with finding the truth of what happened. It is purely partisan politics. If they had been looking for the truth they would be asking why we had a secret compound in Benghazi not asking why we didn't have more security. It's a red herring.

...At the very least, McCarthy showed some "candor" in opening the REASON for the hearings.....i.e., to demonize Hillary,

Nowhere did he use the term demonize.

You make Rightwinger look smart (and that takes some doing).

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"Kevin McCarthy is not shy about being a scum-bucket"

To be fair, any rightists who promoted the Benghazi 'hearings' as an effort to 'find the truth' is likewise a scum-bucket, not just McCarthy.

 

[nat4900]

Kevin McCarthy is not shy about being a scum-bucket"

To be fair, any rightists who promoted the Benghazi 'hearings' as an effort to 'find the truth' is likewise a scum-bucket, not just McCarthy.

True....but McCarthy is the current one who wants to secure that coveted "speaker" position.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

"Kevin McCarthy is not shy about being a scum-bucket"

To be fair, any rightists who promoted the Benghazi 'hearings' as an effort to 'find the truth' is likewise a scum-bucket, not just McCarthy.

Clearly the fouled air you breath because you've got your head up your ass is causing you brain damage.

 

[Zander]

the State Dept. lied about the "youtube" video in an effort to deflect blame from the Obama administration

What the hell are you talking about with the above? How is "blaming a YouTube video" shielding the Obama administration?

Right after the attack, EVERYONE was scrambling for some explanation and the YouTube video was one of many possibility and, accordingly, it was voiced that way.

So, after this 500 days of "investigations"....WHAT IS the committee's real reason for the attack?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

It comes as no surprise, of course, that most on the right lack the honesty and integrity to just admit the truth: that 'Benghazi' was solely about 'getting Clinton,' pure partisanism having nothing to do with objective facts or evidence.

 

[amrchaos]

In other words, Republicans really do not give a damn about american tax dollars . All they really want is power and are willing to do anything to gain power.

Kind of knew that already. They are all about BBA when a Democrat is in the WH, but let George Bush sit there and ask for a Billion dollar gummy bear machine and they just got to have it!!

 

[Claudette]

So, the Hildebeast gets caught lying, repeatedly, and McCarthy's a scumbag?

That's odd...

Yup. Apparently as far as the op is concerned the only liars who are worth outing are those that aren't Dems.

Oh and the only liars who should be prosecuted and thrown in jail for lying aren't Dems either.

Gotta love hypocrisy.

 

[Claudette]

It comes as no surprise, of course, that most on the right lack the honesty and integrity to just admit the truth: that 'Benghazi' was solely about 'getting Clinton,' pure partisanism having nothing to do with objective facts or evidence.

Nope. It was about the death of four good men that never should have been killed.

They had months of warnings and Hildebeasts State Department did nothing.

If you don't see a problem with that then you are one fucking biased idiot.

 

[nat4900]

Nope. It was about the death of four good men that never should have been killed.

They had months of warnings and Hildebeasts State Department did nothing.

If you don't see a problem with that then you are one fucking biased idiot.

Like most deficiencies by right wingers like you......simple arithmetic should be included.....So, I ask:

Why did congressional investigations on 3,000plus US civilians (on 9-11) took LESS time than this on-going investigation over 4 government employees' deaths as sad as that may be????????

Answer THAT question.

 

[Claudette]

The question is what are YOUR feeling on four good men dying because the State Department did nothing.

 

[rightwinger]

MCCARTHY: I knew you'd want to ask it. What you're going to see is a conservative speaker, that takes a conservative Congress, that puts a strategy to fight and win. And let me give you one example. Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she's untrustable. But no one would have known any of that had happened, had we not fought and made that happen.


What is really scary about McCarthy is that he uses the partisan Benghazi witch hunt as an example of what he needs to do more of if he becomes Speaker

 

[The Rabbi]

"Kevin McCarthy is not shy about being a scum-bucket"

To be fair, any rightists who promoted the Benghazi 'hearings' as an effort to 'find the truth' is likewise a scum-bucket, not just McCarthy.

Because we know the administration has been completely forthcoming about what happened, right?
The lefties who defend the administration's obvious lies are the scumbuckets around here.

 

[The Rabbi]

Nope. It was about the death of four good men that never should have been killed.

They had months of warnings and Hildebeasts State Department did nothing.

If you don't see a problem with that then you are one fucking biased idiot.

Like most deficiencies by right wingers like you......simple arithmetic should be included.....So, I ask:

Why did congressional investigations on 3,000plus US civilians (on 9-11) took LESS time than this on-going investigation over 4 government employees' deaths as sad as that may be????????

Answer THAT question.

Because this administration has done nothing but stonewall, slow walk, and impede the investigation in every way possible.
See, that was easy.

 

[The Rabbi]

MCCARTHY: I knew you'd want to ask it. What you're going to see is a conservative speaker, that takes a conservative Congress, that puts a strategy to fight and win. And let me give you one example. Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she's untrustable. But no one would have known any of that had happened, had we not fought and made that happen.


What is really scary about McCarthy is that he uses the partisan Benghazi witch hunt as an example of what he needs to do more of if he becomes Speaker

Yes, as Speaker he needs to do more to uncover the crimes of this administration and its members. Why would you oppose that?

 

[nat4900]

The question is what are YOUR feeling on four good men dying because the State Department did nothing.

So, this is what passes for right wing "intelligentsia"??

First, nitwit you never (or never can) answer MY question....

Second, as sad as those 4 deaths may be...how exactly are those deaths the fault of State doing nothing?....

Go on...answer in YOUR OWN words, not something you may have heard FOX..

 

[The Rabbi]

The question is what are YOUR feeling on four good men dying because the State Department did nothing.

So, this is what passes for right wing "intelligentsia"??

First, nitwit you never (or never can) answer MY question....

Second, as sad as those 4 deaths may be...how exactly are those deaths the fault of State doing nothing?....

Go on...answer in YOUR OWN words, not something you may have heard FOX..

Because State could have responded positively to Stevens' requests for more security.
Damn you're stupid.

 

[nat4900]

Because this administration has done nothing but stonewall, slow walk, and impede the investigation in every way possible.
See, that was easy.

In other words, the SAUDIS were much more cooperative than "this administration" ......which you obviously hate so much that you blabber on like the idiot that you surely are.

 

[Claudette]

MCCARTHY: I knew you'd want to ask it. What you're going to see is a conservative speaker, that takes a conservative Congress, that puts a strategy to fight and win. And let me give you one example. Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she's untrustable. But no one would have known any of that had happened, had we not fought and made that happen.


What is really scary about McCarthy is that he uses the partisan Benghazi witch hunt as an example of what he needs to do more of if he becomes Speaker

What's scary is that people like you see absolutely nothing wrong with a State Department that did nothing and caused the deaths of four good men.

What's scary is people like you who watched an administration lie their asses off because Barry was in the middle of running for POTUS. He also had no problem jetting of to his Vegas fundraiser. Hell they knew it was a terrorist attack the minute it happened via the CIA.

That's some scary shit folks. People who could care less and defend the undefendable.