I don't know what he was thinking? I just found another article on it, and this says he put nothing down on the form even though he had a meeting with the Russian ambassador less than a month before filing his security papers, but the next day, his Lawyer called the govt telling them Jared needed to file an amendment because he did meet with the Russians, and would do so when he is interviewed by the FBI on the Russian interference investigation...Did Kushner not think of these bank businessmen as "officials of a foreign government" ?? Leadership in Russia is so entangled with big business that it's hard to tell. That's the only thing I can guess. He did say (I'm referring to the Times article linked in the OP) that he was planning to give them more details of the extensive meetings he had with foreign officials as part of his "job."the burning question is WHY LIE? And ALL lying about the same thing?Thanks. In that case, it could be suspicious.you'd be wrong on this...This is going way too far, imo. I think the reason these guys didn't disclose their meetings with these foreign officials is because they forgot because they are involved in international activities and meet with lots of foreign people on a regular basis. The Sessions thing was absurd. It's like asking the Schwann man if he's ever met with an overweight housewife. If he forgets to list one, he should be fired?
because it was a matter of days....60 or so, from their last meetings and the questionnaire asked for ANY International meetings...not just Russians....but the Russian meetings were the ones INTENTIONALLY left off, in the midst of Russia and Trump campaign being an issue....
it wasn't absentmindedness oldlady... truly, it wasn't....
there was nothing illegal done, as far as I can tell....each person could have explained such...????
It's possible they thought they were answering the questions honestly, like Sessions did. The NYT article linked in the OP says Kushner wrote saying he was going to supply more information on the many foreign contacts he had.
You know that we come at this issue from different angles. I still think it is primarily Democratic "payback" for all the ad nauseum investigations (read harrassment) of Benghazi. Democrats are cheerfully willing to admit it, too. They didn't mind doing tit for tat when it came to shooting themselves in the foot over the SCOTUS nomination and they are willing to do it here.
I've been rolling my eyes at all this Russian stuff for awhile; it's a lot of political noise imo. I'm certainly interested in what the FBI finds, but I don't think IF there was some back room collusion that we will ever have actual evidence of it. It was done informally, if done at all, while the boys were out spittin' 'baccy in the garage, and the only people that will ever know are the people involved. That's what I think is going on here.
And his lawyer, is Jamie Gorelick, the Democratic asst attorney general under Bill Clinton, who was blamed by right wingers for building a WALL between intelligence agencies which caused 9/11 to happen....yadahdahdahdahdah
Kushner omits contacts with Russian officials in application for security clearance
In seeking a top-secret government security clearance, Jared Kushner, President Donald Trump's son-in-law and senior adviser, failed to report dozens of contacts with foreign officials, according to a Thursday New York Times report.
The contacts included meetings with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak and the head of a Russian state-owned bank, Vnesheconombank, both of which took place in December.
The security clearance questionnaire leaked to The Times requires that those applying for access to top-secret national security information report all communications with foreign government officials over the previous 7 years.
Kushner's lawyer, Jamie Gorelick, called the omissions an error and said that Kushner told the FBI the day after he submitted the form on January 18 that he would provide the agency with additional information.
According to Gorelick, Kushner told the FBI: "During the presidential campaign and transition period, I served as a point-of-contact for foreign officials trying to reach the president-elect. I had numerous contacts with foreign officials in this capacity. … I would be happy to provide additional information about these contacts."
Kushner has been granted an interim security clearance — Gorelick says Kushner will provide the FBI with complete information regarding his contacts when the agency interviews him.
While the security questionnaire states that "withholding, misrepresenting, or falsifying information" could lead to the loss of clearance, denial of a job, or prosecution, applicants are often permitted to amend the forms and avoid adverse consequences if the omissions are determined to be unintentional.
The fact that Kushner failed to report meetings with Russian officials is notable given the ongoing congressional and FBI investigations into relations between Trump associates and Russian officials.
The Senate Intelligence Committee announced in late March that it is planning to question Kushner about the meetings with Kislyak and the bank head as part of its broader investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and the possibility that Trump's associates colluded with Russia.
Vnesheconombank is under US sanctions imposed by the Obama administration following Russia's 2014 annexation of Crimea and attacks in Ukraine.
This is not the first time Trump's top advisers have failed to report their communications with Russian officials. Earlier this year, Trump's national security adviser, Michael Flynn, resigned when it became clear he had discussed sanctions with Kislyak and misrepresented those conversations to Vice President Mike Pence.
In March, Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself from overseeing Russia-related investigations after reports surfaced that said Sessions met with Kislyak during the campaign — meetings he did not disclose to Congress.