Hutch Starskey
Diamond Member
- Mar 24, 2015
- 35,391
- 9,170
Restricting a right is not eliminating it. I've seen over and over how difficult it is to obtain full auto weapons in this thread. Is that not a sensible restriction?We already have reasonable restriction.I'm sure you're not a threat to the public. However, in order to restrict firearms from being in the hands of someone who is a threat (and I'm not just talking mass murder, but DV killings, gang killings, etc.) the rights of all need reasonable restriction.Well, it should be my call. Your stance like so many millions of others is entirely selfish.
Not selfish at all since my guns pose absolutely no threat to the public Because I pose absolutely no threat to the public.
There is no reason for my ownership of firearms to be restricted because some piece of shit uses a gun to kill someone.
Convicted felons can't buy guns, the adjudicated mentally ill can't buy guns.
People with no criminal record need not be restricted.
So people like the shooter?
You can't restrict a person's right before he has committed a crime.