Las Vegas shooting: Reports of shooter at Mandalay Bay Casino

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've never seen a rifle semi or not chase anyone down the street and kill anybody… Have you?
People with rifles kill innocent American people.
Did you know that more people are killed by fists and feet than by all types of rifles combines, even the scary black ones?

More people are killed with knives than by all rifles combined

More people are killed with hammers and other blunt objects than by all rifles combined

Didn't know that did ya?
Try killing almost 60 people and injuring over 400 from a 32 floor window using your fists and feet. Or a knife. No American civilian needs automatic or semiautomatic rifles. They couldn't effectively wage a war on our government with them, and they do nothing but allow killing machines to float through our society, to be grabbed up any time someone gets murder in his heart.

Not your call on what I need or want

-Geaux
Well, it should be my call. Your stance like so many millions of others is entirely selfish.

Not selfish at all since my guns pose absolutely no threat to the public Because I pose absolutely no threat to the public.

There is no reason for my ownership of firearms to be restricted because some piece of shit uses a gun to kill someone.
 
Did you know that more people are killed by fists and feet than by all types of rifles combines, even the scary black ones?

More people are killed with knives than by all rifles combined

More people are killed with hammers and other blunt objects than by all rifles combined

Didn't know that did ya?
Try killing almost 60 people and injuring over 400 from a 32 floor window using your fists and feet. Or a knife. No American civilian needs automatic or semiautomatic rifles. They couldn't effectively wage a war on our government with them, and they do nothing but allow killing machines to float through our society, to be grabbed up any time someone gets murder in his heart.

So only people who get killed in mass shootings count even though mass shootings result in 1% of all murders annually?
Skull, without automatic and semiautomatic weapons in the hands of any and every Tom Dick and Harry in this country, there would not be mass shootings. Yes there could be bombings or whatever incident Westwall keeps referring to with his gallon of gasoline. They would be far fewer and far between, which is the point. Damage control. Nothing will stop all killing but it would stop a LOT in this country. And yes, the people who get killed in mass shootings, doing nothing but going about their business, do count. You bet your ass they do.

Automatic weapons are very scarce in the general public.
Semiautomatic weapons have been around since the 1860's

It's not the guns that are the problem.
LOL. Semi's that can easily be converted to automatic fire and the INSTRUCTIONS to do so on the internet for all to learn are definitely the problem. Without a gun, no one would be shot.

It's not as easy as you think. If it was there would be a shit ton more of them on the streets.

and a person doesn't need a gun to commit murder
 
If guns are needed for self protection, then from whom was Stephen Paddock protecting himself.? Was he in danger from innocent concert goers?

Guns are fun. They are used as a hobby. Others use them to put food on the table, and some like me, have used them in self defense

-Geaux


You didn't answer my question? Who was threatening Stephen Paddock? If guns are for self defense, who was he defending himself from?





Your brain isn't working. Paddock was a progressive scumbag. He felt he was above the law and wanted to punish all of those evil trump voters. The gun Rights we enjoy aren't for scumbags like him. They are for the reasonable people.
You have no right to be calling that monster a progressive. You know absolutely nothing about his politics or his motivation. That is just too much bullshit, from a mod no less. I'd expect it from some of the mindless bots here but you are not supposed to fling loose shit.

He doesn't have very good judgement.
Just doesn't seem right to start calling someone a progressive or a Democrat or a liberal just because they're a monster. Not without a single crumb of evidence to support it. Unless I've missed something REAL--not the photoshopped U-Tube vids of him in a crowd wearing a pink vagina hat which aren't even him.
 
Try killing almost 60 people and injuring over 400 from a 32 floor window using your fists and feet. Or a knife. No American civilian needs automatic or semiautomatic rifles. They couldn't effectively wage a war on our government with them, and they do nothing but allow killing machines to float through our society, to be grabbed up any time someone gets murder in his heart.

So only people who get killed in mass shootings count even though mass shootings result in 1% of all murders annually?
Skull, without automatic and semiautomatic weapons in the hands of any and every Tom Dick and Harry in this country, there would not be mass shootings. Yes there could be bombings or whatever incident Westwall keeps referring to with his gallon of gasoline. They would be far fewer and far between, which is the point. Damage control. Nothing will stop all killing but it would stop a LOT in this country. And yes, the people who get killed in mass shootings, doing nothing but going about their business, do count. You bet your ass they do.

Automatic weapons are very scarce in the general public.
Semiautomatic weapons have been around since the 1860's

It's not the guns that are the problem.
LOL. Semi's that can easily be converted to automatic fire and the INSTRUCTIONS to do so on the internet for all to learn are definitely the problem. Without a gun, no one would be shot.

It's not as easy as you think. If it was there would be a shit ton more of them on the streets.

and a person doesn't need a gun to commit murder
Well, that's a relief.
No, that's true, but I already responded to that.
 
Regulated as well as cars, dope. I swear you're all functionally illiterate. Either that or you're not native speakers.
Last time I checked I didn't have to have my fingerprints on file with the state cops in order to get my drivers license as I had to for my carry permit.

I bet you don't need a title or registration for that weapon either.

I have to show my CCW permit every time I buy any weapon in my state even when I buy ammo. The Permit is scanned and there is a record of every purchase

That's great. That should be the case for everyone. It's really the only way to trace the movement of guns.

It really is no one's business how many guns or what guns I own. All that needs to be proven is that I am legally eligible to buy a gun at the time of sale.

What's stopping you from selling any or all of them to a guy who then sells them on to criminals? How could LE even know the transaction occurred?
You don't see this as a problem?
 
Nope, very outdated....guns should be banned completly. Results? less mass shootings, and shootings all together. Proof? most countries have that in place.


And libs are constantly telling us, "we don't want to take you guns, why don't you believe us"?


HEY LEFTIES, THIS IS WHY!
Go out there visit other countries , ask around if they have gun deaths and mass shootings. You'll be surprised that there is a civilized peaceful world out there.

Shut the fuck up.
Norway killings: The laughing gunman who shot 85 young victims, one by one

Happened once years ago. How about since and before?

The terrorists in Europe use bombs, mostly.

"...From January to July this year, 143 people died in the region, according to the BBC, citing research from the University of Maryland’s global terrorism database.

"The last time the number was higher was in 2004, when the Madrid train bombings claimed 191 victims."
Terror deaths in Western Europe in 2016 highest in over a decade: report

We don't need terrorists for much bigger numbers than all of Western Europe?
 
I've never seen a rifle semi or not chase anyone down the street and kill anybody… Have you?
People with rifles kill innocent American people.
Did you know that more people are killed by fists and feet than by all types of rifles combines, even the scary black ones?

More people are killed with knives than by all rifles combined

More people are killed with hammers and other blunt objects than by all rifles combined

Didn't know that did ya?
Try killing almost 60 people and injuring over 400 from a 32 floor window using your fists and feet. Or a knife. No American civilian needs automatic or semiautomatic rifles. They couldn't effectively wage a war on our government with them, and they do nothing but allow killing machines to float through our society, to be grabbed up any time someone gets murder in his heart.

So only people who get killed in mass shootings count even though mass shootings result in 1% of all murders annually?
Skull, without automatic and semiautomatic weapons in the hands of any and every Tom Dick and Harry in this country, there would not be mass shootings. Yes there could be bombings or whatever incident Westwall keeps referring to with his gallon of gasoline. They would be far fewer and far between, which is the point. Damage control. Nothing will stop all killing but it would stop a LOT in this country. And yes, the people who get killed in mass shootings, doing nothing but going about their business, do count. You bet your ass they do.
I've never seen a rifle semi or not chase anyone down the street and kill anybody… Have you?
People with rifles kill innocent American people.
Did you know that more people are killed by fists and feet than by all types of rifles combines, even the scary black ones?

More people are killed with knives than by all rifles combined

More people are killed with hammers and other blunt objects than by all rifles combined

Didn't know that did ya?
Try killing almost 60 people and injuring over 400 from a 32 floor window using your fists and feet. Or a knife. No American civilian needs automatic or semiautomatic rifles. They couldn't effectively wage a war on our government with them, and they do nothing but allow killing machines to float through our society, to be grabbed up any time someone gets murder in his heart.

Not your call on what I need or want

-Geaux
Well, it should be my call. Your stance like so many millions of others is entirely selfish.

Not really.

Its my right

-Geaux
 
People with rifles kill innocent American people.
Did you know that more people are killed by fists and feet than by all types of rifles combines, even the scary black ones?

More people are killed with knives than by all rifles combined

More people are killed with hammers and other blunt objects than by all rifles combined

Didn't know that did ya?
Try killing almost 60 people and injuring over 400 from a 32 floor window using your fists and feet. Or a knife. No American civilian needs automatic or semiautomatic rifles. They couldn't effectively wage a war on our government with them, and they do nothing but allow killing machines to float through our society, to be grabbed up any time someone gets murder in his heart.

Not your call on what I need or want

-Geaux
Well, it should be my call. Your stance like so many millions of others is entirely selfish.

Not selfish at all since my guns pose absolutely no threat to the public Because I pose absolutely no threat to the public.

There is no reason for my ownership of firearms to be restricted because some piece of shit uses a gun to kill someone.
I'm sure you're not a threat to the public. However, in order to restrict firearms from being in the hands of someone who is a threat (and I'm not just talking mass murder, but DV killings, gang killings, etc.) the rights of all need reasonable restriction.
 
Regulated as well as cars, dope. I swear you're all functionally illiterate. Either that or you're not native speakers.
Last time I checked I didn't have to have my fingerprints on file with the state cops in order to get my drivers license as I had to for my carry permit.

I bet you don't need a title or registration for that weapon either.





Nope, but you don't need to have your fingerprints on file with the authorities either. You do for a CCW.

As it should be. Are you suggesting background checks for car registration?

The thing is you don't have a right to drive a car on public property where you do have the right to own firearms

there is a difference

The point is there is room for more regulation without a loss of the right.
 
Last time I checked I didn't have to have my fingerprints on file with the state cops in order to get my drivers license as I had to for my carry permit.

I bet you don't need a title or registration for that weapon either.

I have to show my CCW permit every time I buy any weapon in my state even when I buy ammo. The Permit is scanned and there is a record of every purchase

That's great. That should be the case for everyone. It's really the only way to trace the movement of guns.

It really is no one's business how many guns or what guns I own. All that needs to be proven is that I am legally eligible to buy a gun at the time of sale.

What's stopping you from selling any or all of them to a guy who then sells them on to criminals? How could LE even know the transaction occurred?
You don't see this as a problem?
It is illegal to sell a gun to anyone not eligible to buy a gun.
That's what stops me but that doesn't stop a piece of shit criminal from doing it does it?

Laws only stop law abiding people from doing something.

What stops piece of shit criminals? LONG HARSH PRISON TIME WITH NO PAROLE.
 
Did you know that more people are killed by fists and feet than by all types of rifles combines, even the scary black ones?

More people are killed with knives than by all rifles combined

More people are killed with hammers and other blunt objects than by all rifles combined

Didn't know that did ya?
Try killing almost 60 people and injuring over 400 from a 32 floor window using your fists and feet. Or a knife. No American civilian needs automatic or semiautomatic rifles. They couldn't effectively wage a war on our government with them, and they do nothing but allow killing machines to float through our society, to be grabbed up any time someone gets murder in his heart.

Not your call on what I need or want

-Geaux
Well, it should be my call. Your stance like so many millions of others is entirely selfish.

Not selfish at all since my guns pose absolutely no threat to the public Because I pose absolutely no threat to the public.

There is no reason for my ownership of firearms to be restricted because some piece of shit uses a gun to kill someone.
I'm sure you're not a threat to the public. However, in order to restrict firearms from being in the hands of someone who is a threat (and I'm not just talking mass murder, but DV killings, gang killings, etc.) the rights of all need reasonable restriction.

Thats just it

There's nothing reasonable

-Geaux
 
Last time I checked I didn't have to have my fingerprints on file with the state cops in order to get my drivers license as I had to for my carry permit.

I bet you don't need a title or registration for that weapon either.





Nope, but you don't need to have your fingerprints on file with the authorities either. You do for a CCW.

As it should be. Are you suggesting background checks for car registration?

The thing is you don't have a right to drive a car on public property where you do have the right to own firearms

there is a difference

The point is there is room for more regulation without a loss of the right.

I think we have enough regulation we just have to start enforcing it with a iron fist
 
Last time I checked I didn't have to have my fingerprints on file with the state cops in order to get my drivers license as I had to for my carry permit.

I bet you don't need a title or registration for that weapon either.





Nope, but you don't need to have your fingerprints on file with the authorities either. You do for a CCW.

As it should be. Are you suggesting background checks for car registration?

The thing is you don't have a right to drive a car on public property where you do have the right to own firearms

there is a difference

The point is there is room for more regulation without a loss of the right.

No there's not

-Geaux
 
Did you know that more people are killed by fists and feet than by all types of rifles combines, even the scary black ones?

More people are killed with knives than by all rifles combined

More people are killed with hammers and other blunt objects than by all rifles combined

Didn't know that did ya?
Try killing almost 60 people and injuring over 400 from a 32 floor window using your fists and feet. Or a knife. No American civilian needs automatic or semiautomatic rifles. They couldn't effectively wage a war on our government with them, and they do nothing but allow killing machines to float through our society, to be grabbed up any time someone gets murder in his heart.

Not your call on what I need or want

-Geaux
Well, it should be my call. Your stance like so many millions of others is entirely selfish.

Not selfish at all since my guns pose absolutely no threat to the public Because I pose absolutely no threat to the public.

There is no reason for my ownership of firearms to be restricted because some piece of shit uses a gun to kill someone.
I'm sure you're not a threat to the public. However, in order to restrict firearms from being in the hands of someone who is a threat (and I'm not just talking mass murder, but DV killings, gang killings, etc.) the rights of all need reasonable restriction.
We already have reasonable restriction.

Convicted felons can't buy guns, the adjudicated mentally ill can't buy guns.

People with no criminal record need not be restricted.
 
I bet you don't need a title or registration for that weapon either.

I have to show my CCW permit every time I buy any weapon in my state even when I buy ammo. The Permit is scanned and there is a record of every purchase

That's great. That should be the case for everyone. It's really the only way to trace the movement of guns.

It really is no one's business how many guns or what guns I own. All that needs to be proven is that I am legally eligible to buy a gun at the time of sale.

What's stopping you from selling any or all of them to a guy who then sells them on to criminals? How could LE even know the transaction occurred?
You don't see this as a problem?
It is illegal to sell a gun to anyone not eligible to buy a gun.
That's what stops me but that doesn't stop a piece of shit criminal from doing it does it?

Laws only stop law abiding people from doing something.

What stops piece of shit criminals? LONG HARSH PRISON TIME WITH NO PAROLE.
:blahblah:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top