Contumacious
Radical Freedom
- Aug 16, 2009
- 19,744
- 2,473
The mentality of Attorneys is well laid out in most LSAT Introductions...
The purpose of the Legal System is to outsmart the opponent.
True,
But the judiciary is supposed to be IMPARTIAL.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The mentality of Attorneys is well laid out in most LSAT Introductions...
The purpose of the Legal System is to outsmart the opponent.
.
Someone explain to me why a man who wants us to elect him President on the basis of his "vast business experience" - and whose major business acumen appears to be in the area of marketing, branding, and hyping himself - doesn't know what they teach first year advertising and marketing students: you cannot lie in advertising. You can "puffery" all you like, but it has to be at least technically true.
Good grief! Trump's a very successful businessman. Not all of his enterprises have been successful, but most have. And here you are basically calling him a fool. Unreal.
In every enterprise one is going to find unhappy customers. That's right across the board.
It's to be expected.
This is such an obvious political hit job using the judiciary for Clinton.
sure it is sweety. & the 'mexican' judge is in on it. it's a conspiracy I tell ya! a CONSPIRACY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Judge happens to belong to a group that is actively boycotting all things Trump. Did you know that?
This is such an obvious political hit job using the judiciary for Clinton.
Even for a Trumpette, that's insane. The first lawsuit against Trump U was filed in 2010, the second and third in 2013, long before Trump even announced his candidacy, let alone before he became Hillary Clinton's primary opponent. If those people were so prescient they knew they'd need a lawsuit to derail his candidacy all the way back in 2010, don't you think they'd have been prescient enough to know he was scamming them in the first place?
It has dragged out this long but Judge Curiel is biased big time and the two law firms for the plaintiffs gave close to a million dollars to the Clintons. Oh and those law firms are pissed off because they wanted the lawsuit to proceed right before the convention.
Would have been great timing right?
It's not a conspiracy theory. This shit is playing out in real time.
He's been running for president since 2000. I don't think the suit has anything to do with it though. But what ever happened to innocent until proven guilty? The libs run with that for Hillary but have Trump guilty for much less.This is such an obvious political hit job using the judiciary for Clinton.
Even for a Trumpette, that's insane. The first lawsuit against Trump U was filed in 2010, the second and third in 2013, long before Trump even announced his candidacy, let alone before he became Hillary Clinton's primary opponent. If those people were so prescient they knew they'd need a lawsuit to derail his candidacy all the way back in 2010, don't you think they'd have been prescient enough to know he was scamming them in the first place?
Universities made bilking students out of their money, backed by mother government, a cottage industry. This is selective outrage. THAT is what's political about it.Bilking people out of tens of thousands of dollars and calling it "puffery" is orders of magnitude different from putting out a clearly ordinary vodka and charging a premium price, just because it has the Trump name on it. Branding has a long and storied history in American business, but with Trump U Lyin' Don moved into Scientology-type scam territory.
Engineering schools are design to defraud their students??Universities made bilking students out of their money, backed by mother government, a cottage industry. This is selective outrage. THAT is what's political about it.Bilking people out of tens of thousands of dollars and calling it "puffery" is orders of magnitude different from putting out a clearly ordinary vodka and charging a premium price, just because it has the Trump name on it. Branding has a long and storied history in American business, but with Trump U Lyin' Don moved into Scientology-type scam territory.
He's been running for president since 2000. I don't think the suit has anything to do with it though. But what ever happened to innocent until proven guilty? The libs run with that for Hillary but have Trump guilty for much less.This is such an obvious political hit job using the judiciary for Clinton.
Even for a Trumpette, that's insane. The first lawsuit against Trump U was filed in 2010, the second and third in 2013, long before Trump even announced his candidacy, let alone before he became Hillary Clinton's primary opponent. If those people were so prescient they knew they'd need a lawsuit to derail his candidacy all the way back in 2010, don't you think they'd have been prescient enough to know he was scamming them in the first place?
Universities provide actual instruction, despite your efforts to bring them down to the Trump PU level.Universities made bilking students out of their money, backed by mother government, a cottage industry. This is selective outrage. THAT is what's political about it.Bilking people out of tens of thousands of dollars and calling it "puffery" is orders of magnitude different from putting out a clearly ordinary vodka and charging a premium price, just because it has the Trump name on it. Branding has a long and storied history in American business, but with Trump U Lyin' Don moved into Scientology-type scam territory.
No presumption of innocence in a civil suit? That's off the charts stupid. Anyone can sue anyone for anything. The rest of your steamy pile isn't worth my time.He's been running for president since 2000. I don't think the suit has anything to do with it though. But what ever happened to innocent until proven guilty? The libs run with that for Hillary but have Trump guilty for much less.This is such an obvious political hit job using the judiciary for Clinton.
Even for a Trumpette, that's insane. The first lawsuit against Trump U was filed in 2010, the second and third in 2013, long before Trump even announced his candidacy, let alone before he became Hillary Clinton's primary opponent. If those people were so prescient they knew they'd need a lawsuit to derail his candidacy all the way back in 2010, don't you think they'd have been prescient enough to know he was scamming them in the first place?
Hillary's not bribing AG's in two states not to file law suits. And innocent until proven guilty only applies to criminal prosecution. These are all civil suits so there is no presumption of innocence. Trump has been sued so often he has litigation lawyers on retainer. He lies about not settling, about what's failed and what hasn't. He lied about Judge Curiel, and yet you believe him.
You're prepared to find Hillary guilty of all sorts of things - cover-ups, security breaches, bribery, obstruction, all of which have been investigated extensively by Republicans, Special Prosecutors, and Congressional Committees, and all of which have concluded that there's nothing to see here, and yet still you believe that she's guilty and corrupt. No charges have ever been filed - in over 30 years of witch hunts, no evidence has ever been uncovered, in spite of more than a dozen investigations, all instigated by Republicans, and no one has ever turned "state's evidence" on the Clintons, except Monica.
And still you believe the lies against Hillary, and deny the truth about Trump. Denial is not just a river in Egypt.
I have a degree and know what they provide. Actual instruction? LOL. Trump's students didn't get any? You dipsticks are desperate.Universities provide actual instruction, despite your efforts to bring them down to the Trump PU level.Universities made bilking students out of their money, backed by mother government, a cottage industry. This is selective outrage. THAT is what's political about it.Bilking people out of tens of thousands of dollars and calling it "puffery" is orders of magnitude different from putting out a clearly ordinary vodka and charging a premium price, just because it has the Trump name on it. Branding has a long and storied history in American business, but with Trump U Lyin' Don moved into Scientology-type scam territory.
Put the crack pipe down, cowboy.Engineering schools are design to defraud their students??Universities made bilking students out of their money, backed by mother government, a cottage industry. This is selective outrage. THAT is what's political about it.Bilking people out of tens of thousands of dollars and calling it "puffery" is orders of magnitude different from putting out a clearly ordinary vodka and charging a premium price, just because it has the Trump name on it. Branding has a long and storied history in American business, but with Trump U Lyin' Don moved into Scientology-type scam territory.
Where do we get engineers? From China??
So you're saying your degree is worthless? From your posts I'm inclined to agree.I have a degree and know what they provide. Actual instruction? LOL. Trump's students didn't get any? You dipsticks are desperate.
This is such an obvious political hit job using the judiciary for Clinton.
Even for a Trumpette, that's insane. The first lawsuit against Trump U was filed in 2010, the second and third in 2013, long before Trump even announced his candidacy, let alone before he became Hillary Clinton's primary opponent. If those people were so prescient they knew they'd need a lawsuit to derail his candidacy all the way back in 2010, don't you think they'd have been prescient enough to know he was scamming them in the first place?
It has dragged out this long but Judge Curiel is biased big time and the two law firms for the plaintiffs gave close to a million dollars to the Clintons. Oh and those law firms are pissed off because they wanted the lawsuit to proceed right before the convention.
Would have been great timing right?
It's not a conspiracy theory. This shit is playing out in real time.
Put the crack pipe down, cowboy.Engineering schools are design to defraud their students??Universities made bilking students out of their money, backed by mother government, a cottage industry. This is selective outrage. THAT is what's political about it.Bilking people out of tens of thousands of dollars and calling it "puffery" is orders of magnitude different from putting out a clearly ordinary vodka and charging a premium price, just because it has the Trump name on it. Branding has a long and storied history in American business, but with Trump U Lyin' Don moved into Scientology-type scam territory.
Where do we get engineers? From China??
I didn't say that was all they provided, you thought so because you are a moron. Lots of bullshit there, I never bought into the anti-capitalism garbage but, I know this is new for you, they have courses that cover various topics.So you're saying your degree is worthless? From your posts I'm inclined to agree.I have a degree and know what they provide. Actual instruction? LOL. Trump's students didn't get any? You dipsticks are desperate.
Overcharge, hell yes. Tuition has skyrocketed. A student can go to a "legitimate" university and come away with a very expensive worthless degree. So I take the whole Trump U thing with a grain of salt.Put the crack pipe down, cowboy.Engineering schools are design to defraud their students??Universities made bilking students out of their money, backed by mother government, a cottage industry. This is selective outrage. THAT is what's political about it.Bilking people out of tens of thousands of dollars and calling it "puffery" is orders of magnitude different from putting out a clearly ordinary vodka and charging a premium price, just because it has the Trump name on it. Branding has a long and storied history in American business, but with Trump U Lyin' Don moved into Scientology-type scam territory.
Where do we get engineers? From China??
You are the one suggesting Universities bilk(could be take as defraud OR to overcharge) their students.
The only consistent definition of bilk in terms of the thread is to defraud. Else, you are subtly misrepresenting what legitimate Universities do.