Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thank you for continuing to confirm you cannot demonstrate the necessity for, or the efficacy of, the restrictions you seek to lay on the right to keep an bear arms.Look assfuck, we can regulate firearms.Thank you for confirming you cannot demonstrate the necessity for, or the efficacy of, the restrictions you seek to lay on the right to keep an bear arms.We have regulations for gun ownership. Quit being such an ass.But nowhere near as ignorant as your claim, above.It's really ignorant to support a party that supports giving school shooters powerful weapons so they can kill more,
And not a single one of them can demonstrate the necessity for, or the efficacy of, these restrictions to the right to keep an bear arms.The Democrat Party supports better back ground checks, closing the associated loopholes, banning assault type rifles, large capacity magazines
I knew you had it in you.
It is not a violation of the Second Amendment.
Yes - he was placed with the brighter 4 yr olds.I have your addressSo, you are a school shooter? Should we send the police?No one gave me anythingIt's really ignorant to support a party that supports giving school shooters powerful weapons so they can kill more,It's really ignorant to support a party that are anti gunBecause only Republicans own guns.
The Democrat Party supports better back ground checks, closing the associated loopholes, banning assault type rifles, large capacity magazines. I support far far far more restrictive guideline for concealed carry.
1414 romper room Ms bebe room
ass fuck shall not be infringed says you can'tLook assfuck, we can regulate firearms.Thank you for confirming you cannot demonstrate the necessity for, or the efficacy of, the restrictions you seek to lay on the right to keep an bear arms.We have regulations for gun ownership. Quit being such an ass.But nowhere near as ignorant as your claim, above.It's really ignorant to support a party that supports giving school shooters powerful weapons so they can kill more,
And not a single one of them can demonstrate the necessity for, or the efficacy of, these restrictions to the right to keep an bear arms.The Democrat Party supports better back ground checks, closing the associated loopholes, banning assault type rifles, large capacity magazines
I knew you had it in you.
It is not a violation of the Second Amendment.
My 8 year old grandson can own and carry a loaded gun?No leftist should be allowed to possess a gun. Period!"First came the panic buying of hand sanitizer. Then, people panic bought toilet paper. Now, food shelves are emptying and firearm and ammunition sales are through the roof. The COVID19 outbreak might be bad for the stock market, but it’s certainly been a boon for very specific sectors of the economy. The gun industry, used to such boom/bust cycles, knows how to respond – but other sectors might not be so acclimated.
Here at Omaha Outdoors, we’ve been inundated with inquiries from out-of-state folks – many from California – asking if we can ship them a gun directly. The answer is, of course, no. Despite what politicians and many in popular media claim, you can’t buy a gun online and have it shipped to your house. Well, you could, if you were a federally licensed firearm dealer (or federally licensed curio and relic collector) and your home was your place of business. Other than that, no, you can’t buy a gun online and have it shipped, especially across state lines, to your home."
A Lot of People Are Finding Out You Can’t Just Buy a Gun Online - Omaha Outdoors
---------------------
I never tire of proving these anti-gun idiots wrong.
Make that, no Democrat voter.
Every American CITIZEN who is not a felon has the right to own and carry a gun.
Look assfuck, we can regulate firearms.Thank you for confirming you cannot demonstrate the necessity for, or the efficacy of, the restrictions you seek to lay on the right to keep an bear arms.We have regulations for gun ownership. Quit being such an ass.But nowhere near as ignorant as your claim, above.It's really ignorant to support a party that supports giving school shooters powerful weapons so they can kill more,
And not a single one of them can demonstrate the necessity for, or the efficacy of, these restrictions to the right to keep an bear arms.The Democrat Party supports better back ground checks, closing the associated loopholes, banning assault type rifles, large capacity magazines
I knew you had it in you.
It is not a violation of the Second Amendment.
The courts have upheld UBCs to be perfectly Constitutional – no rights violated or subject to an undue burden.Thank you for confirming you cannot demonstrate the necessity for, or the efficacy of, the restrictions you seek to lay on the right to keep an bear arms.We have regulations for gun ownership. Quit being such an ass.But nowhere near as ignorant as your claim, above.It's really ignorant to support a party that supports giving school shooters powerful weapons so they can kill more,
And not a single one of them can demonstrate the necessity for, or the efficacy of, these restrictions to the right to keep an bear arms.The Democrat Party supports better back ground checks, closing the associated loopholes, banning assault type rifles, large capacity magazines
I knew you had it in you.
The courts have upheld UBCs to be perfectly Constitutional – no rights violated or subject to an undue burden.Thank you for confirming you cannot demonstrate the necessity for, or the efficacy of, the restrictions you seek to lay on the right to keep an bear arms.We have regulations for gun ownership. Quit being such an ass.But nowhere near as ignorant as your claim, above.It's really ignorant to support a party that supports giving school shooters powerful weapons so they can kill more,
And not a single one of them can demonstrate the necessity for, or the efficacy of, these restrictions to the right to keep an bear arms.The Democrat Party supports better back ground checks, closing the associated loopholes, banning assault type rifles, large capacity magazines
I knew you had it in you.
The problem is that the vast majority of gunowners are nothing like these survivalist nitwits who create ammo shortages because they think someone is going to try to take their stockpile of toilet paper.'Unprecedented': Gun and ammunition sales spike amid coronavirus spread
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/unpre...sales-spike-amid-coronavirus-spread-1.5502092
So instead of thinking about how to help their neighbors, Republicans are thinking about how to kill them. FEAR FEAR FEAR - the Conservative way. Republican yahoos! That's why I never vote Conservative
Conservatives are so SNIVELING AND WEAK.
We noticed this here. I wouldn't want to blanket-label them as "conservatives", certainly gun fetishists and sociopaths, but yes it is interesting to find out who among us thinks "how can I do my part" versus who thinks "now I can go shoot people".
In reality though, optimistically I like to think they're just wanking online because they have no life. I guess it somehow makes them feel 'relevant'. I like to think it's more sociopathy than actual gunnuttery.
'Unprecedented': Gun and ammunition sales spike amid coronavirus spread
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/unpre...sales-spike-amid-coronavirus-spread-1.5502092
So instead of thinking about how to help their neighbors, Republicans are thinking about how to kill them. FEAR FEAR FEAR - the Conservative way. Republican yahoos! That's why I never vote Conservative.
Conservatives are so SNIVELING AND WEAK.
Leftist's courts ruling outside the Constitution doesn't make their ruling Constitutional.The courts have upheld UBCs to be perfectly Constitutional – no rights violated or subject to an undue burden.Thank you for confirming you cannot demonstrate the necessity for, or the efficacy of, the restrictions you seek to lay on the right to keep an bear arms.We have regulations for gun ownership. Quit being such an ass.But nowhere near as ignorant as your claim, above.It's really ignorant to support a party that supports giving school shooters powerful weapons so they can kill more,
And not a single one of them can demonstrate the necessity for, or the efficacy of, these restrictions to the right to keep an bear arms.The Democrat Party supports better back ground checks, closing the associated loopholes, banning assault type rifles, large capacity magazines
I knew you had it in you.
Maybe we should just ask you since you think you are a Constitution expert.Leftist's courts ruling outside the Constitution doesn't make their ruling Constitutional.The courts have upheld UBCs to be perfectly Constitutional – no rights violated or subject to an undue burden.Thank you for confirming you cannot demonstrate the necessity for, or the efficacy of, the restrictions you seek to lay on the right to keep an bear arms.We have regulations for gun ownership. Quit being such an ass.But nowhere near as ignorant as your claim, above.It's really ignorant to support a party that supports giving school shooters powerful weapons so they can kill more,
And not a single one of them can demonstrate the necessity for, or the efficacy of, these restrictions to the right to keep an bear arms.The Democrat Party supports better back ground checks, closing the associated loopholes, banning assault type rifles, large capacity magazines
I knew you had it in you.
So tell me any the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed mean?
Hell what if the government said you had to attend religious services that they pick? And the courts ruled it Constitutional does it make it Constitutional?
dodge boy doesn't like to address the factsMaybe we should just ask you since you think you are a Constitution expert.Leftist's courts ruling outside the Constitution doesn't make their ruling Constitutional.The courts have upheld UBCs to be perfectly Constitutional – no rights violated or subject to an undue burden.Thank you for confirming you cannot demonstrate the necessity for, or the efficacy of, the restrictions you seek to lay on the right to keep an bear arms.We have regulations for gun ownership. Quit being such an ass.But nowhere near as ignorant as your claim, above.
And not a single one of them can demonstrate the necessity for, or the efficacy of, these restrictions to the right to keep an bear arms.
I knew you had it in you.
So tell me any the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed mean?
Hell what if the government said you had to attend religious services that they pick? And the courts ruled it Constitutional does it make it Constitutional?
Here is a single shot .22 rifle. Now you are armed. Shut the fuck up.
The courts have upheld UBCs to be perfectly ConstitutionalThank you for confirming you cannot demonstrate the necessity for, or the efficacy of, the restrictions you seek to lay on the right to keep an bear arms.We have regulations for gun ownership. Quit being such an ass.But nowhere near as ignorant as your claim, above.It's really ignorant to support a party that supports giving school shooters powerful weapons so they can kill more,
And not a single one of them can demonstrate the necessity for, or the efficacy of, these restrictions to the right to keep an bear arms.The Democrat Party supports better back ground checks, closing the associated loopholes, banning assault type rifles, large capacity magazines
I knew you had it in you.
If Clayton were prohibited from lying, or making things up, he'd never post.Stop making shit up, Saul Goodman.
Does your mother know yo use her iPhone to post language like that on the internet?Here is a single shot .22 rifle. Now you are armed. Shut the fuck up.
The courts have upheld UBCs to be perfectly Constitutional – no rights violated or subject to an undue burden.Thank you for confirming you cannot demonstrate the necessity for, or the efficacy of, the restrictions you seek to lay on the right to keep an bear arms.We have regulations for gun ownership. Quit being such an ass.But nowhere near as ignorant as your claim, above.It's really ignorant to support a party that supports giving school shooters powerful weapons so they can kill more,
And not a single one of them can demonstrate the necessity for, or the efficacy of, these restrictions to the right to keep an bear arms.The Democrat Party supports better back ground checks, closing the associated loopholes, banning assault type rifles, large capacity magazines
I knew you had it in you.
Not exactly. There is no universal background check, hence no court challenge.
Stop making shit up, Saul Goodman.
If Clayton were prohibited from lying, or making things up, he'd never post.Stop making shit up, Saul Goodman.
How did Colorado have all those mass shootings if "universal background checks" work?The courts have upheld UBCs to be perfectly Constitutional – no rights violated or subject to an undue burden.Thank you for confirming you cannot demonstrate the necessity for, or the efficacy of, the restrictions you seek to lay on the right to keep an bear arms.We have regulations for gun ownership. Quit being such an ass.But nowhere near as ignorant as your claim, above.
And not a single one of them can demonstrate the necessity for, or the efficacy of, these restrictions to the right to keep an bear arms.
I knew you had it in you.
Not exactly. There is no universal background check, hence no court challenge.
Stop making shit up, Saul Goodman.
We have UBC here in Colorado and the NRA contested it in court in 2013 and lost. Hence, court challenge and it stands. MOST Americans agree with a UBC for the entire US. But I agree that it should be left up to the states. It's a states right. Unless a State misuses their either lack of UBC or their UBC. And then it becomes a Federal problem.
How did Colorado have all those mass shootings if "universal background checks" work?The courts have upheld UBCs to be perfectly Constitutional – no rights violated or subject to an undue burden.Thank you for confirming you cannot demonstrate the necessity for, or the efficacy of, the restrictions you seek to lay on the right to keep an bear arms.We have regulations for gun ownership. Quit being such an ass.
I knew you had it in you.
Not exactly. There is no universal background check, hence no court challenge.
Stop making shit up, Saul Goodman.
We have UBC here in Colorado and the NRA contested it in court in 2013 and lost. Hence, court challenge and it stands. MOST Americans agree with a UBC for the entire US. But I agree that it should be left up to the states. It's a states right. Unless a State misuses their either lack of UBC or their UBC. And then it becomes a Federal problem.
A case in point: According to the Gun Violence Archive, there have been 24 mass shootings in Colorado, nine of them in Denver, during the past six years, and the majority are likely to be unfamiliar to the average person. All of them are listed below, complete with links to additional archive information and previous Westword coverage.
Inside Colorado's 24 Mass Shootings During the Last Six Years
And an overwhelming number of gunowners support UBCs.The courts have upheld UBCs to be perfectly Constitutional – no rights violated or subject to an undue burden.Thank you for confirming you cannot demonstrate the necessity for, or the efficacy of, the restrictions you seek to lay on the right to keep an bear arms.We have regulations for gun ownership. Quit being such an ass.But nowhere near as ignorant as your claim, above.
And not a single one of them can demonstrate the necessity for, or the efficacy of, these restrictions to the right to keep an bear arms.
I knew you had it in you.
Not exactly. There is no universal background check, hence no court challenge.
Stop making shit up, Saul Goodman.
We have UBC here in Colorado and the NRA contested it in court in 2013 and lost. Hence, court challenge and it stands. MOST Americans agree with a UBC for the entire US. But I agree that it should be left up to the states. It's a states right. Unless a State misuses their either lack of UBC or their UBC. And then it becomes a Federal problem.
