Leftists owe the rest of us an explanation for the Florida shooting

[kaz]

Libertarians don't have the house or the Senate. As for your prognostication ability on elections. Remember this gem?

[media]

Meanwhile give the guard a fucking rifle, before trying billions of dollars worth of legislation and maybe put more than one there. Can't we try simple fixes before starting a bunch of histerical moves and spending tme and money where it does not need to be! Why all of a sudden does every problem need to be adressed with such out landish over kill response. What happened to tweaking what we have instead of starting all over?

The FBI dropped the ball on passing along information to local authorities

The local authorities dropped the ball on doing anything about a kid who had the cops called on him 39 times

The social worker dropped the ball on declaring the kid psycho and detaining him for evaluation

The deputy assigned to the school dropped the ball on entering when the shooting started

Three more deputies arrived and dropped the same ball

You/the left dropped the ball on believing you can keep 300 million guns from one psycho

You/the left dropped the ball on believing we can have no southern border and keep guns out of the hands of psychos

You/the left dropped the ball not asking yourselves why we can't keep drugs from teenagers but we can keep guns from criminals

And you blame us? Seriously? You should invest in a mirror

OMG so now unless we build a fucking wall on the southern border it's our fault? LOL

No, it's not starting now. It was before and still is. When you disarm honest citizens and you allow the continued importation of weapons through our non-southern border to arm criminals. Then yes, you are responsible for the consequence of your choice. See how manhood works?

And you admit that you're the lapdog of illegal alien lobby? Another interesting one.

Just pointing out your standard. To support a special interest group is to be their "lapdog." That's what you said.

I have a different tact. I support lobbies that advocate my views. I guess we're not all the same

No one disarmed your stupid ass. We just want to take certain guns off the assembly line so in the future you can't buy them. That way you and the nut doesn't get their hands on certain weapons. But you can keep your guns. In fact if you already have a automatic weapon, keep it. We just don't make them anymore. Again, no one is trying to disarm you despite your paranoia.

Let me ask you a simple question. If you can't purchase this is that considered disarming you?

Right, like drug laws. Drugs are illegal, so you can't buy drugs! Poof! Have you asked your drug dealer about that? How if we make things like guns illegal, then we can't buy them?

 

[kaz]

Libertarians don't have the house or the Senate. As for your prognostication ability on elections. Remember this gem?

[media]

Meanwhile give the guard a fucking rifle, before trying billions of dollars worth of legislation and maybe put more than one there. Can't we try simple fixes before starting a bunch of histerical moves and spending tme and money where it does not need to be! Why all of a sudden does every problem need to be adressed with such out landish over kill response. What happened to tweaking what we have instead of starting all over?

The FBI dropped the ball on passing along information to local authorities

The local authorities dropped the ball on doing anything about a kid who had the cops called on him 39 times

The social worker dropped the ball on declaring the kid psycho and detaining him for evaluation

The deputy assigned to the school dropped the ball on entering when the shooting started

Three more deputies arrived and dropped the same ball

You/the left dropped the ball on believing you can keep 300 million guns from one psycho

You/the left dropped the ball on believing we can have no southern border and keep guns out of the hands of psychos

You/the left dropped the ball not asking yourselves why we can't keep drugs from teenagers but we can keep guns from criminals

And you blame us? Seriously? You should invest in a mirror

OMG so now unless we build a fucking wall on the southern border it's our fault? LOL

No, it's not starting now. It was before and still is. When you disarm honest citizens and you allow the continued importation of weapons through our non-southern border to arm criminals. Then yes, you are responsible for the consequence of your choice. See how manhood works?

And you admit that you're the lapdog of illegal alien lobby? Another interesting one.

Just pointing out your standard. To support a special interest group is to be their "lapdog." That's what you said.

I have a different tact. I support lobbies that advocate my views. I guess we're not all the same

Are guns being smuggled into the USA? I am aware of guns being smuggled into Mexico from our gun manufacturers but not the other way around. I think the NRA does two things. A. They use this an excuse. B. They use this border to unload illegal/black market weapons to get their profits up.

So guns are still legal here and guns aren't smuggled into the United States, so that proves that if we make them illegal here, they won't be smuggled into the United States.

Have you ever had an IQ test to see if you have one?

 

[kaz]

Have you mentioned to your drug dealer your theory that if you make something illegal then people can't buy it?

Making it illegal makes it difficult to buy. Which means the gun owner would have to go through illegal and sketchy channels to get the gun. Channels that put them at risk of; the police, the FBI, the ATF, and other criminals. If Cruz had to go "underground" or the "black market" to get his killing machine, he would have put himself at risk of being caught, robbed, or killed. Those risks are what makes it likely that most of these people won't go and seek these weapons. That's the whole point.

I get all of that yet when I was in high school it was easier to find pot than alcohol. There was profit in weed not as much as in alcohol. Pleolpe were not risking thier stores and liquore liscences to sell alcohol to minors but many were sellin the weed because the prroffit was enough. Take away prohibition and Al Capone would have just been a chubby guy from chicago. People will take these risks, they do it every day! I think giving the guard a rifle and back up onlocation may have the same or better effect than gun legislation and does not enfringe on the rights of others. Should this not be tried first! Then move on to more agressive tactics after some less agree

Meanwhile give the guard a fucking rifle, before trying billions of dollars worth of legislation and maybe put more than one there. Can't we try simple fixes before starting a bunch of histerical moves and spending tme and money where it does not need to be! Why all of a sudden does every problem need to be adressed with such out landish over kill response. What happened to tweaking what we have instead of starting all over?

it means “cop-killer” ammunition that should be banned under the 1986 law will remain available. The government has allowed itself to be bullied by the gun lobby, which with its defense of these armor-piercing bullets has in effect aligned itself with violent criminals and against public safety.

Ban these 'cop killer' bullets

So that's your standard? The government allows itself to be bullied by unions, NOW, NAACP, Amnesty International, Audubon and the ACLU? You admit that?

Any body with enough money can pretty much buy l;egislation right now. It is sad but true! Our goverment is being plyed with it from both sides of the fence all day every day! You can take that to the bank!

I agree, which is why I'm a libertarian.

You only objected to one side. I left the Republican party because I don't apply your one sided standard

I object to both sides of the isle. I am not for gun control. I am also not for kissing the one percenters ass! I realize that both corps and unions are necessary or they would not exist. I am not for the patriot act or the asset forfeture. Both sides do things I do not get! The left has taken the power from parents and the right has given the middle class away to the wealthy! Not happy with either!

It's funny how only the pro-Democrat ones come out on the site

 

[evenflow1969]

Have you mentioned to your drug dealer your theory that if you make something illegal then people can't buy it?

Making it illegal makes it difficult to buy. Which means the gun owner would have to go through illegal and sketchy channels to get the gun. Channels that put them at risk of; the police, the FBI, the ATF, and other criminals. If Cruz had to go "underground" or the "black market" to get his killing machine, he would have put himself at risk of being caught, robbed, or killed. Those risks are what makes it likely that most of these people won't go and seek these weapons. That's the whole point.

I get all of that yet when I was in high school it was easier to find pot than alcohol. There was profit in weed not as much as in alcohol. Pleolpe were not risking thier stores and liquore liscences to sell alcohol to minors but many were sellin the weed because the prroffit was enough. Take away prohibition and Al Capone would have just been a chubby guy from chicago. People will take these risks, they do it every day! I think giving the guard a rifle and back up onlocation may have the same or better effect than gun legislation and does not enfringe on the rights of others. Should this not be tried first! Then move on to more agressive tactics after some less agree

it means “cop-killer” ammunition that should be banned under the 1986 law will remain available. The government has allowed itself to be bullied by the gun lobby, which with its defense of these armor-piercing bullets has in effect aligned itself with violent criminals and against public safety.

Ban these 'cop killer' bullets

So that's your standard? The government allows itself to be bullied by unions, NOW, NAACP, Amnesty International, Audubon and the ACLU? You admit that?

Any body with enough money can pretty much buy l;egislation right now. It is sad but true! Our goverment is being plyed with it from both sides of the fence all day every day! You can take that to the bank!

I agree, which is why I'm a libertarian.

You only objected to one side. I left the Republican party because I don't apply your one sided standard

I object to both sides of the isle. I am not for gun control. I am also not for kissing the one percenters ass! I realize that both corps and unions are necessary or they would not exist. I am not for the patriot act or the asset forfeture. Both sides do things I do not get! The left has taken the power from parents and the right has given the middle class away to the wealthy! Not happy with either!

It's funny how only the pro-Democrat ones come out on the site

Realy like I have not been fighting for gun rights all along, I have started threads on it. I have also started threads on asset forfeture.

 

[kaz]

Have you mentioned to your drug dealer your theory that if you make something illegal then people can't buy it?

Making it illegal makes it difficult to buy. Which means the gun owner would have to go through illegal and sketchy channels to get the gun. Channels that put them at risk of; the police, the FBI, the ATF, and other criminals. If Cruz had to go "underground" or the "black market" to get his killing machine, he would have put himself at risk of being caught, robbed, or killed. Those risks are what makes it likely that most of these people won't go and seek these weapons. That's the whole point.

I get all of that yet when I was in high school it was easier to find pot than alcohol. There was profit in weed not as much as in alcohol. Pleolpe were not risking thier stores and liquore liscences to sell alcohol to minors but many were sellin the weed because the prroffit was enough. Take away prohibition and Al Capone would have just been a chubby guy from chicago. People will take these risks, they do it every day! I think giving the guard a rifle and back up onlocation may have the same or better effect than gun legislation and does not enfringe on the rights of others. Should this not be tried first! Then move on to more agressive tactics after some less agree

So that's your standard? The government allows itself to be bullied by unions, NOW, NAACP, Amnesty International, Audubon and the ACLU? You admit that?

Any body with enough money can pretty much buy l;egislation right now. It is sad but true! Our goverment is being plyed with it from both sides of the fence all day every day! You can take that to the bank!

I agree, which is why I'm a libertarian.

You only objected to one side. I left the Republican party because I don't apply your one sided standard

I object to both sides of the isle. I am not for gun control. I am also not for kissing the one percenters ass! I realize that both corps and unions are necessary or they would not exist. I am not for the patriot act or the asset forfeture. Both sides do things I do not get! The left has taken the power from parents and the right has given the middle class away to the wealthy! Not happy with either!

It's funny how only the pro-Democrat ones come out on the site

Realy like I have not been fighting for gun rights all along, I have started threads on it. I have also started threads on asset forfeture.

Asset forfeiture is a big issue to me. It's flagrantly unconstitutional.

If you're for gun rights, then why do you say things like we're talking about arming children and forcing everyone to be armed? Those are anti-gun wacko positions

 

[evenflow1969]

Have you mentioned to your drug dealer your theory that if you make something illegal then people can't buy it?

Making it illegal makes it difficult to buy. Which means the gun owner would have to go through illegal and sketchy channels to get the gun. Channels that put them at risk of; the police, the FBI, the ATF, and other criminals. If Cruz had to go "underground" or the "black market" to get his killing machine, he would have put himself at risk of being caught, robbed, or killed. Those risks are what makes it likely that most of these people won't go and seek these weapons. That's the whole point.

I get all of that yet when I was in high school it was easier to find pot than alcohol. There was profit in weed not as much as in alcohol. Pleolpe were not risking thier stores and liquore liscences to sell alcohol to minors but many were sellin the weed because the prroffit was enough. Take away prohibition and Al Capone would have just been a chubby guy from chicago. People will take these risks, they do it every day! I think giving the guard a rifle and back up onlocation may have the same or better effect than gun legislation and does not enfringe on the rights of others. Should this not be tried first! Then move on to more agressive tactics after some less agree

Any body with enough money can pretty much buy l;egislation right now. It is sad but true! Our goverment is being plyed with it from both sides of the fence all day every day! You can take that to the bank!

I agree, which is why I'm a libertarian.

You only objected to one side. I left the Republican party because I don't apply your one sided standard

I object to both sides of the isle. I am not for gun control. I am also not for kissing the one percenters ass! I realize that both corps and unions are necessary or they would not exist. I am not for the patriot act or the asset forfeture. Both sides do things I do not get! The left has taken the power from parents and the right has given the middle class away to the wealthy! Not happy with either!

It's funny how only the pro-Democrat ones come out on the site

Realy like I have not been fighting for gun rights all along, I have started threads on it. I have also started threads on asset forfeture.

Asset forfeiture is a big issue to me. It's flagrantly unconstitutional.

If you're for gun rights, then why do you say things like we're talking about arming children and forcing everyone to be armed? Those are anti-gun wacko positions

I am for gun rights I am not for pushing teaschers and children that are not comfortable with them into it. It should be thier decision. As far as the teacher goes I do n ot think most are suited for it. I am pretty sure that if most of my teachers had a pulled a gun on me they would not have had the what ever it takes to use it. They would have ended up with thier gun in place the sun don't shine. I would prefer they come to their own conclusions and buy a fire arm under their own volition. Not every one is suited to carry a fire arm that is a fact. I am worried about fiore arms in bars and schools becausew they are filled with idiots. It is that simlple. Other wise take your gun where you feel like it! Many on your side have forwarded the idea that students and teachers should be carrying I do not agree with this. Teen agers are overly emotional, teachers are thier to teach, they have a hard enough job with out adding to it. Let the students learn and the teachers teach, lets have some one with experience and know how operate the fire arms at schools.

 

[kaz]

I am for gun rights I am not for pushing teaschers and children that are not comfortable with them into it

No one is, no one said that, go fuck yourself, stupid useless bitch

 

[evenflow1969]

I am for gun rights I am not for pushing teaschers and children that are not comfortable with them into it

No one is, no one said that, go fuck yourself, stupid useless bitch

I love some fat peice of shit that would cower in the corner if he were here. I fuck bitches like you!

 

[P@triot]

We are all residents of the world...

Yeaaaaaahhh maaaaaaaaaan. Good Lord this hippie needs to get in the Delorian and head back to the 1960’s.

 

[P@triot]

If you were not so thick, you would realize that all nukes are not weapons.

If you weren’t such a desperate, disingenuous hack, you’d admit that your idiotic scream name means exactly what it says.

 

[sealybobo]

Have you mentioned to your drug dealer your theory that if you make something illegal then people can't buy it?

Making it illegal makes it difficult to buy. Which means the gun owner would have to go through illegal and sketchy channels to get the gun. Channels that put them at risk of; the police, the FBI, the ATF, and other criminals. If Cruz had to go "underground" or the "black market" to get his killing machine, he would have put himself at risk of being caught, robbed, or killed. Those risks are what makes it likely that most of these people won't go and seek these weapons. That's the whole point.

I get all of that yet when I was in high school it was easier to find pot than alcohol. There was profit in weed not as much as in alcohol. Pleolpe were not risking thier stores and liquore liscences to sell alcohol to minors but many were sellin the weed because the prroffit was enough. Take away prohibition and Al Capone would have just been a chubby guy from chicago. People will take these risks, they do it every day! I think giving the guard a rifle and back up onlocation may have the same or better effect than gun legislation and does not enfringe on the rights of others. Should this not be tried first! Then move on to more agressive tactics after some less agree

Meanwhile give the guard a fucking rifle, before trying billions of dollars worth of legislation and maybe put more than one there. Can't we try simple fixes before starting a bunch of histerical moves and spending tme and money where it does not need to be! Why all of a sudden does every problem need to be adressed with such out landish over kill response. What happened to tweaking what we have instead of starting all over?

it means “cop-killer” ammunition that should be banned under the 1986 law will remain available. The government has allowed itself to be bullied by the gun lobby, which with its defense of these armor-piercing bullets has in effect aligned itself with violent criminals and against public safety.

Ban these 'cop killer' bullets

So that's your standard? The government allows itself to be bullied by unions, NOW, NAACP, Amnesty International, Audubon and the ACLU? You admit that?

Any body with enough money can pretty much buy l;egislation right now. It is sad but true! Our goverment is being plyed with it from both sides of the fence all day every day! You can take that to the bank!

I agree, which is why I'm a libertarian.

You only objected to one side. I left the Republican party because I don't apply your one sided standard

I object to both sides of the isle. I am not for gun control. I am also not for kissing the one percenters ass! I realize that both corps and unions are necessary or they would not exist. I am not for the patriot act or the asset forfeture. Both sides do things I do not get! The left has taken the power from parents and the right has given the middle class away to the wealthy! Not happy with either!

We need a holistic solution. Dicks and Walmart stop selling these guns, it’s a step. Don’t make it so easy. I know the nra would like gun vending machines in every Walmart. No questions asked.

Gun nuts have already compromised. They just need to compromise a little more

 

[sealybobo]

Meanwhile give the guard a fucking rifle, before trying billions of dollars worth of legislation and maybe put more than one there. Can't we try simple fixes before starting a bunch of histerical moves and spending tme and money where it does not need to be! Why all of a sudden does every problem need to be adressed with such out landish over kill response. What happened to tweaking what we have instead of starting all over?

The FBI dropped the ball on passing along information to local authorities

The local authorities dropped the ball on doing anything about a kid who had the cops called on him 39 times

The social worker dropped the ball on declaring the kid psycho and detaining him for evaluation

The deputy assigned to the school dropped the ball on entering when the shooting started

Three more deputies arrived and dropped the same ball

You/the left dropped the ball on believing you can keep 300 million guns from one psycho

You/the left dropped the ball on believing we can have no southern border and keep guns out of the hands of psychos

You/the left dropped the ball not asking yourselves why we can't keep drugs from teenagers but we can keep guns from criminals

And you blame us? Seriously? You should invest in a mirror

OMG so now unless we build a fucking wall on the southern border it's our fault? LOL

No, it's not starting now. It was before and still is. When you disarm honest citizens and you allow the continued importation of weapons through our non-southern border to arm criminals. Then yes, you are responsible for the consequence of your choice. See how manhood works?

And you admit that you're the lapdog of illegal alien lobby? Another interesting one.

Just pointing out your standard. To support a special interest group is to be their "lapdog." That's what you said.

I have a different tact. I support lobbies that advocate my views. I guess we're not all the same

No one disarmed your stupid ass. We just want to take certain guns off the assembly line so in the future you can't buy them. That way you and the nut doesn't get their hands on certain weapons. But you can keep your guns. In fact if you already have a automatic weapon, keep it. We just don't make them anymore. Again, no one is trying to disarm you despite your paranoia.

Let me ask you a simple question. If you can't purchase this is that considered disarming you?

Right, like drug laws. Drugs are illegal, so you can't buy drugs! Poof! Have you asked your drug dealer about that? How if we make things like guns illegal, then we can't buy them?

I can’t find any cocaine thank god its illegal

 

[sealybobo]

Meanwhile give the guard a fucking rifle, before trying billions of dollars worth of legislation and maybe put more than one there. Can't we try simple fixes before starting a bunch of histerical moves and spending tme and money where it does not need to be! Why all of a sudden does every problem need to be adressed with such out landish over kill response. What happened to tweaking what we have instead of starting all over?

The FBI dropped the ball on passing along information to local authorities

The local authorities dropped the ball on doing anything about a kid who had the cops called on him 39 times

The social worker dropped the ball on declaring the kid psycho and detaining him for evaluation

The deputy assigned to the school dropped the ball on entering when the shooting started

Three more deputies arrived and dropped the same ball

You/the left dropped the ball on believing you can keep 300 million guns from one psycho

You/the left dropped the ball on believing we can have no southern border and keep guns out of the hands of psychos

You/the left dropped the ball not asking yourselves why we can't keep drugs from teenagers but we can keep guns from criminals

And you blame us? Seriously? You should invest in a mirror

OMG so now unless we build a fucking wall on the southern border it's our fault? LOL

No, it's not starting now. It was before and still is. When you disarm honest citizens and you allow the continued importation of weapons through our non-southern border to arm criminals. Then yes, you are responsible for the consequence of your choice. See how manhood works?

And you admit that you're the lapdog of illegal alien lobby? Another interesting one.

Just pointing out your standard. To support a special interest group is to be their "lapdog." That's what you said.

I have a different tact. I support lobbies that advocate my views. I guess we're not all the same

Are guns being smuggled into the USA? I am aware of guns being smuggled into Mexico from our gun manufacturers but not the other way around. I think the NRA does two things. A. They use this an excuse. B. They use this border to unload illegal/black market weapons to get their profits up.

So guns are still legal here and guns aren't smuggled into the United States, so that proves that if we make them illegal here, they won't be smuggled into the United States.

Have you ever had an IQ test to see if you have one?

The kid in Florida purchased his guns legally.

I thought trump was gonna end the lawlessness? Go get the illegal guns. Tell him where you find them

 

[kaz]

Have you mentioned to your drug dealer your theory that if you make something illegal then people can't buy it?

Making it illegal makes it difficult to buy. Which means the gun owner would have to go through illegal and sketchy channels to get the gun. Channels that put them at risk of; the police, the FBI, the ATF, and other criminals. If Cruz had to go "underground" or the "black market" to get his killing machine, he would have put himself at risk of being caught, robbed, or killed. Those risks are what makes it likely that most of these people won't go and seek these weapons. That's the whole point.

I get all of that yet when I was in high school it was easier to find pot than alcohol. There was profit in weed not as much as in alcohol. Pleolpe were not risking thier stores and liquore liscences to sell alcohol to minors but many were sellin the weed because the prroffit was enough. Take away prohibition and Al Capone would have just been a chubby guy from chicago. People will take these risks, they do it every day! I think giving the guard a rifle and back up onlocation may have the same or better effect than gun legislation and does not enfringe on the rights of others. Should this not be tried first! Then move on to more agressive tactics after some less agree

it means “cop-killer” ammunition that should be banned under the 1986 law will remain available. The government has allowed itself to be bullied by the gun lobby, which with its defense of these armor-piercing bullets has in effect aligned itself with violent criminals and against public safety.

Ban these 'cop killer' bullets

So that's your standard? The government allows itself to be bullied by unions, NOW, NAACP, Amnesty International, Audubon and the ACLU? You admit that?

Any body with enough money can pretty much buy l;egislation right now. It is sad but true! Our goverment is being plyed with it from both sides of the fence all day every day! You can take that to the bank!

I agree, which is why I'm a libertarian.

You only objected to one side. I left the Republican party because I don't apply your one sided standard

I object to both sides of the isle. I am not for gun control. I am also not for kissing the one percenters ass! I realize that both corps and unions are necessary or they would not exist. I am not for the patriot act or the asset forfeture. Both sides do things I do not get! The left has taken the power from parents and the right has given the middle class away to the wealthy! Not happy with either!

We need a holistic solution. Dicks and Walmart stop selling these guns, it’s a step. Don’t make it so easy. I know the nra would like gun vending machines in every Walmart. No questions asked.

Gun nuts have already compromised. They just need to compromise a little more

Because Wall Mart and Dicks stopped selling drugs and now drug dealers can't sell them!!!!!!!

Idiot

 

[sealybobo]

Have you mentioned to your drug dealer your theory that if you make something illegal then people can't buy it?

Making it illegal makes it difficult to buy. Which means the gun owner would have to go through illegal and sketchy channels to get the gun. Channels that put them at risk of; the police, the FBI, the ATF, and other criminals. If Cruz had to go "underground" or the "black market" to get his killing machine, he would have put himself at risk of being caught, robbed, or killed. Those risks are what makes it likely that most of these people won't go and seek these weapons. That's the whole point.

I get all of that yet when I was in high school it was easier to find pot than alcohol. There was profit in weed not as much as in alcohol. Pleolpe were not risking thier stores and liquore liscences to sell alcohol to minors but many were sellin the weed because the prroffit was enough. Take away prohibition and Al Capone would have just been a chubby guy from chicago. People will take these risks, they do it every day! I think giving the guard a rifle and back up onlocation may have the same or better effect than gun legislation and does not enfringe on the rights of others. Should this not be tried first! Then move on to more agressive tactics after some less agree

So that's your standard? The government allows itself to be bullied by unions, NOW, NAACP, Amnesty International, Audubon and the ACLU? You admit that?

Any body with enough money can pretty much buy l;egislation right now. It is sad but true! Our goverment is being plyed with it from both sides of the fence all day every day! You can take that to the bank!

I agree, which is why I'm a libertarian.

You only objected to one side. I left the Republican party because I don't apply your one sided standard

I object to both sides of the isle. I am not for gun control. I am also not for kissing the one percenters ass! I realize that both corps and unions are necessary or they would not exist. I am not for the patriot act or the asset forfeture. Both sides do things I do not get! The left has taken the power from parents and the right has given the middle class away to the wealthy! Not happy with either!

We need a holistic solution. Dicks and Walmart stop selling these guns, it’s a step. Don’t make it so easy. I know the nra would like gun vending machines in every Walmart. No questions asked.

Gun nuts have already compromised. They just need to compromise a little more

Because Wall Mart and Dicks stopped selling drugs and now drug dealers can't sell them!!!!!!!

Idiot

No ones trying to convince you.

Listen schmuck. Let’s be honest guns are already regulated. You can’t take yours everywhere. You can’t buy automatics. Background checks. You have to take a class or it’s illegal to carry. So you’ve already given some ground. You must admit this is true.

Well, hate to tell you but you’re about to be regulated a little more. You’ll accept the new rules

 

[Godboy]

The FBI dropped the ball on passing along information to local authorities

The local authorities dropped the ball on doing anything about a kid who had the cops called on him 39 times

The social worker dropped the ball on declaring the kid psycho and detaining him for evaluation

The deputy assigned to the school dropped the ball on entering when the shooting started

Three more deputies arrived and dropped the same ball

You/the left dropped the ball on believing you can keep 300 million guns from one psycho

You/the left dropped the ball on believing we can have no southern border and keep guns out of the hands of psychos

You/the left dropped the ball not asking yourselves why we can't keep drugs from teenagers but we can keep guns from criminals

And you blame us? Seriously? You should invest in a mirror

OMG so now unless we build a fucking wall on the southern border it's our fault? LOL

No, it's not starting now. It was before and still is. When you disarm honest citizens and you allow the continued importation of weapons through our non-southern border to arm criminals. Then yes, you are responsible for the consequence of your choice. See how manhood works?

And you admit that you're the lapdog of illegal alien lobby? Another interesting one.

Just pointing out your standard. To support a special interest group is to be their "lapdog." That's what you said.

I have a different tact. I support lobbies that advocate my views. I guess we're not all the same

Are guns being smuggled into the USA? I am aware of guns being smuggled into Mexico from our gun manufacturers but not the other way around. I think the NRA does two things. A. They use this an excuse. B. They use this border to unload illegal/black market weapons to get their profits up.

So guns are still legal here and guns aren't smuggled into the United States, so that proves that if we make them illegal here, they won't be smuggled into the United States.

Have you ever had an IQ test to see if you have one?

The kid in Florida purchased his guns legally.

I thought trump was gonna end the lawlessness? Go get the illegal guns. Tell him where you find them

You thought Trump was going to end crime? God damn you're stupid!

 

[sealybobo]

OMG so now unless we build a fucking wall on the southern border it's our fault? LOL

No, it's not starting now. It was before and still is. When you disarm honest citizens and you allow the continued importation of weapons through our non-southern border to arm criminals. Then yes, you are responsible for the consequence of your choice. See how manhood works?

And you admit that you're the lapdog of illegal alien lobby? Another interesting one.

Just pointing out your standard. To support a special interest group is to be their "lapdog." That's what you said.

I have a different tact. I support lobbies that advocate my views. I guess we're not all the same

Are guns being smuggled into the USA? I am aware of guns being smuggled into Mexico from our gun manufacturers but not the other way around. I think the NRA does two things. A. They use this an excuse. B. They use this border to unload illegal/black market weapons to get their profits up.

So guns are still legal here and guns aren't smuggled into the United States, so that proves that if we make them illegal here, they won't be smuggled into the United States.

Have you ever had an IQ test to see if you have one?

The kid in Florida purchased his guns legally.

I thought trump was gonna end the lawlessness? Go get the illegal guns. Tell him where you find them

You thought Trump was going to end crime? God damn you're stupid!

No I knew he’d break that promise just like all the rest

 

[NoNukes]

We had shooters 30 years ago and we kept adding guns per the orders of the NRA. Now we have more shooters.


If we ban drugs only criminals will have drugs....so let’s give everyone drugs.

There weren't the mass shootings 30 years ago at a high rate, particularly at gun free zone schools. That's a lie.

It's racism, isn't it, dumb ass?

What we have here is a single cause fallacy. You're just guilty over the blood of 17 students on your hands.

Let's pretend that gun laws keep guns out of the hands of shooters and remove the ability of anyone to defend themselves now as if it does. Then when it doesn't work, we blame the NRA and demand more laws.

If one digs into your plan, it's as stupid as the first reading of our plan

Why do you not need similar defence in other countries?

There are a lot of other countries. Actually, in many countries you need the same or more defense. You have to be more specific than a sweeping, shallow question

Speaking of sweeping and shallow.

You make a shallow statement about "other countries" when there are 150+ other countries besides the United States which are very different.

And what's shallow to you is pointing out it's shallow to lump every country other than the United States together?

You aren't even American, are you, stupid bitch? And you're saying your country is like Saudi Arabia, North Korea, Laos and Ecuador? Seriously?

What a dumb ass

What an idiotic reply, I must have really touched a nerve. Tough for you to realize how wrong you are.

 

[NoNukes]

If you were not so thick, you would realize that all nukes are not weapons.

If you weren’t such a desperate, disingenuous hack, you’d admit that your idiotic scream name means exactly what it says.

And it still flies over your head.

 

[kaz]

Have you mentioned to your drug dealer your theory that if you make something illegal then people can't buy it?

Making it illegal makes it difficult to buy. Which means the gun owner would have to go through illegal and sketchy channels to get the gun. Channels that put them at risk of; the police, the FBI, the ATF, and other criminals. If Cruz had to go "underground" or the "black market" to get his killing machine, he would have put himself at risk of being caught, robbed, or killed. Those risks are what makes it likely that most of these people won't go and seek these weapons. That's the whole point.

I get all of that yet when I was in high school it was easier to find pot than alcohol. There was profit in weed not as much as in alcohol. Pleolpe were not risking thier stores and liquore liscences to sell alcohol to minors but many were sellin the weed because the prroffit was enough. Take away prohibition and Al Capone would have just been a chubby guy from chicago. People will take these risks, they do it every day! I think giving the guard a rifle and back up onlocation may have the same or better effect than gun legislation and does not enfringe on the rights of others. Should this not be tried first! Then move on to more agressive tactics after some less agree

Any body with enough money can pretty much buy l;egislation right now. It is sad but true! Our goverment is being plyed with it from both sides of the fence all day every day! You can take that to the bank!

I agree, which is why I'm a libertarian.

You only objected to one side. I left the Republican party because I don't apply your one sided standard

I object to both sides of the isle. I am not for gun control. I am also not for kissing the one percenters ass! I realize that both corps and unions are necessary or they would not exist. I am not for the patriot act or the asset forfeture. Both sides do things I do not get! The left has taken the power from parents and the right has given the middle class away to the wealthy! Not happy with either!

We need a holistic solution. Dicks and Walmart stop selling these guns, it’s a step. Don’t make it so easy. I know the nra would like gun vending machines in every Walmart. No questions asked.

Gun nuts have already compromised. They just need to compromise a little more

Because Wall Mart and Dicks stopped selling drugs and now drug dealers can't sell them!!!!!!!

Idiot

No ones trying to convince you.

Listen schmuck. Let’s be honest guns are already regulated. You can’t take yours everywhere. You can’t buy automatics. Background checks. You have to take a class or it’s illegal to carry. So you’ve already given some ground. You must admit this is true.

Well, hate to tell you but you’re about to be regulated a little more. You’ll accept the new rules

And more people will die because your stupid laws only work on honest citizens, not criminals.

What's a bunch of dead kids when you're protecting your authoritarian government, eh?