NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
It was the phrase "ruled unconstitutional in New York." I've explained it to you at least three different ways. It not that he's wrong, he was deceptive.and now i'll refer you to the 4th amendment which the right seems not to like.
lester wasn't wrong. thanks for playing
And until the Supreme Court rules stop and frisk by itself as unconstitutional, Holt (and his word games) is still wrong.
Thanks for playing.
You might want to actually read the ruling and then you should try to explain what Holt said, SPECIFICALLY, that was inaccurate.
Landmark Decision: Judge Rules NYPD Stop and Frisk Practices Unconstitutional, Racially Discriminatory
And you are incredibly dense.
He was not at all deceptive. Read the ruling.