nodoginnafight
No Party Affiliation
- Dec 15, 2008
- 11,755
- 1,070
Yes, "saint" Mike, I do....but that's not discrimination. In fact, wanting churches to bend to peer pressure and be more open and accepting of gays and lesbians is the opposite of discrimination.
BUllshit, it is DISCRIMINATING against their right not to accept you.
Really?
So you think that the thousands of Catholic women who have been advocating for years to be accepted as Priests in the Church are 'discriminating against men's right not to accept them'?
The African Americans who asked that they be considered full and equal members of the Church of Latter Day Saints with white people were discriminating against White people right not to accept them?
Or is this just specific to homosexuals and the church?
Not what I said at all.
What I DID say was that screaming that a group doesn't have a right to discriminate and trying to force them to change is discriminating against that group. Doesn't matter what group that is.
Okay then- again then
Do you think that the thousands of Catholic women who have been advocating for years to be accepted as Priests in the Church are 'discriminating against men's right not to accept them'?
Do you think that the African Americans who asked that they be considered full and equal members of the Church of Latter Day Saints with white people were discriminating against White people right not to accept them?
In both cases, you had a specific group saying that the church shouldn't discriminate and try to 'force' the church to change through public opinion.
That is 100% correct. Look up the definition of discrimination.
If you have two churches , one accepts female ministers and one doesn't , and you treat one differently than the other, you have discriminated.
The difference between you and I is, I believe that it is a crock of shit for the government at any level to tell us we can not discriminate.
You lost that battle 50 years ago