🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Lets hear it for the girls!!

Why is it "wonderful to have more women elected into office"? Is there some way in which ovaries are a special benefit in this job of which I'm unaware? Or is it just that you think the possession of ovaries is the sum total of our identities, and we can't be judged and evaluated on our merits the same as men?

Personally, I think it's wonderful to have GOOD people elected to office, and terrible to have BAD ones elected, and their reproductive systems are irrelevant to that.

Most people think that it is good for our elected officials to reflect society as a whole.

If you do not see a benefit in that I cannot help you.

If I ever want to be "helped" in becoming a regressive, superficial Neanderthal, I'll be sure to remember your expertise in the field.

While I remain intelligent and enlightened, I will continue to view it as insulting, condescending, and sexist for you to view women as "other" and judge them by their genitals rather than by their brains and character.

You have a strange fascination with other women's genitals, is this you coming out of the closet?

It is not about their genitals, it is about the governing body reflecting the population they are elected to represent

And one only believes that YOUR viewpoint is "reflecting the population" if one is a bigot who believes all women - or all blacks, or all Asians, or whatever - are exactly the same because of their superficial similarities.

Evolved people understand that Ted Cruz - for example - truly reflects and represents me far more than the likes of Elizabeth Warren - again for example - despite the fact that by your shallow leftist standards, Elizabeth Warren is "just like me".

The incoming House Democrats reflect and represent the exact same population the last crop did, and the crop before them: left-wing bigoted imbeciles.

Oh, and btw, I'M not the one with a fascination with genitals, since I'M not the one voting for and celebrating people because of them.


yet you cannot stop talking about genitals when the topic has nothing to do with them.

odd...
 
When their periods sync up Dem's won't get anything passed.
Actually, Crooked Donny won't get anything passed.

And somehow you equate this to be good...
If it stops Trump from continuing to run trillion dollar deficits? Yeah, that would be very good.

OMG Dem's are going to cut spending? In what alternate reality?

Then they must be OVERJOYED with the Government Shutdown. Look at all that money we're not spending.
 
Why is it "wonderful to have more women elected into office"? Is there some way in which ovaries are a special benefit in this job of which I'm unaware? Or is it just that you think the possession of ovaries is the sum total of our identities, and we can't be judged and evaluated on our merits the same as men?

Personally, I think it's wonderful to have GOOD people elected to office, and terrible to have BAD ones elected, and their reproductive systems are irrelevant to that.

Most people think that it is good for our elected officials to reflect society as a whole.

If you do not see a benefit in that I cannot help you.

If I ever want to be "helped" in becoming a regressive, superficial Neanderthal, I'll be sure to remember your expertise in the field.

While I remain intelligent and enlightened, I will continue to view it as insulting, condescending, and sexist for you to view women as "other" and judge them by their genitals rather than by their brains and character.

You have a strange fascination with other women's genitals, is this you coming out of the closet?

It is not about their genitals, it is about the governing body reflecting the population they are elected to represent

And one only believes that YOUR viewpoint is "reflecting the population" if one is a bigot who believes all women - or all blacks, or all Asians, or whatever - are exactly the same because of their superficial similarities.

Evolved people understand that Ted Cruz - for example - truly reflects and represents me far more than the likes of Elizabeth Warren - again for example - despite the fact that by your shallow leftist standards, Elizabeth Warren is "just like me".

The incoming House Democrats reflect and represent the exact same population the last crop did, and the crop before them: left-wing bigoted imbeciles.

Oh, and btw, I'M not the one with a fascination with genitals, since I'M not the one voting for and celebrating people because of them.
You miss the point in spectacular fashion. Its not about political orientation. Its about opportunity. Where are the female Republicans ? One party seems to be making progress. One not so much.

YOU miss the point in spectacular fashion. Making a big deal of "Look, a woman got elected!" is the same as saying, "Look, a talking dog!"

Where are the female Republicans, you ask? Winning and losing on their own merits. Pity leftist women are handicapped by chauvinists like you telling them that they have to be given special consideration for the "disability" of being female.

Thank you for attempting to mansplain to me. Nothing misogynistic about you, no way.
 
Why is it "wonderful to have more women elected into office"? Is there some way in which ovaries are a special benefit in this job of which I'm unaware? Or is it just that you think the possession of ovaries is the sum total of our identities, and we can't be judged and evaluated on our merits the same as men?

Personally, I think it's wonderful to have GOOD people elected to office, and terrible to have BAD ones elected, and their reproductive systems are irrelevant to that.

Most people think that it is good for our elected officials to reflect society as a whole.

If you do not see a benefit in that I cannot help you.

If I ever want to be "helped" in becoming a regressive, superficial Neanderthal, I'll be sure to remember your expertise in the field.

While I remain intelligent and enlightened, I will continue to view it as insulting, condescending, and sexist for you to view women as "other" and judge them by their genitals rather than by their brains and character.

You have a strange fascination with other women's genitals, is this you coming out of the closet?

It is not about their genitals, it is about the governing body reflecting the population they are elected to represent

And one only believes that YOUR viewpoint is "reflecting the population" if one is a bigot who believes all women - or all blacks, or all Asians, or whatever - are exactly the same because of their superficial similarities.

Evolved people understand that Ted Cruz - for example - truly reflects and represents me far more than the likes of Elizabeth Warren - again for example - despite the fact that by your shallow leftist standards, Elizabeth Warren is "just like me".

The incoming House Democrats reflect and represent the exact same population the last crop did, and the crop before them: left-wing bigoted imbeciles.

Oh, and btw, I'M not the one with a fascination with genitals, since I'M not the one voting for and celebrating people because of them.


yet you cannot stop talking about genitals when the topic has nothing to do with them.

odd...

The topic has nothing to do with genitals when the topic is all about "We gotta get women elected just because they're women!"? Yeah, I don't think so.

I'm very sorry if referring to the primary visible difference between men and women somehow activated your pubescent hormones and latent Puritanism, but it was not actually sexual in nature, so calm down. And maybe grow up.
 
Most people think that it is good for our elected officials to reflect society as a whole.

If you do not see a benefit in that I cannot help you.

If I ever want to be "helped" in becoming a regressive, superficial Neanderthal, I'll be sure to remember your expertise in the field.

While I remain intelligent and enlightened, I will continue to view it as insulting, condescending, and sexist for you to view women as "other" and judge them by their genitals rather than by their brains and character.

You have a strange fascination with other women's genitals, is this you coming out of the closet?

It is not about their genitals, it is about the governing body reflecting the population they are elected to represent

And one only believes that YOUR viewpoint is "reflecting the population" if one is a bigot who believes all women - or all blacks, or all Asians, or whatever - are exactly the same because of their superficial similarities.

Evolved people understand that Ted Cruz - for example - truly reflects and represents me far more than the likes of Elizabeth Warren - again for example - despite the fact that by your shallow leftist standards, Elizabeth Warren is "just like me".

The incoming House Democrats reflect and represent the exact same population the last crop did, and the crop before them: left-wing bigoted imbeciles.

Oh, and btw, I'M not the one with a fascination with genitals, since I'M not the one voting for and celebrating people because of them.


yet you cannot stop talking about genitals when the topic has nothing to do with them.

odd...

The topic has nothing to do with genitals when the topic is all about "We gotta get women elected just because they're women!"? Yeah, I don't think so.

I'm very sorry if referring to the primary visible difference between men and women somehow activated your pubescent hormones and latent Puritanism, but it was not actually sexual in nature, so calm down. And maybe grow up.

Seems that boobs are a more visible difference unless you live in a nudist camp.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 
When their periods sync up Dem's won't get anything passed.
Actually, Crooked Donny won't get anything passed.

And somehow you equate this to be good...
If it stops Trump from continuing to run trillion dollar deficits? Yeah, that would be very good.

OMG Dem's are going to cut spending? In what alternate reality?

Then they must be OVERJOYED with the Government Shutdown. Look at all that money we're not spending.
And more time for them to make sandwiches ... and buy beer.
 
Actually, Crooked Donny won't get anything passed.

And somehow you equate this to be good...
If it stops Trump from continuing to run trillion dollar deficits? Yeah, that would be very good.

OMG Dem's are going to cut spending? In what alternate reality?

Then they must be OVERJOYED with the Government Shutdown. Look at all that money we're not spending.
And more time for them to make sandwiches ... and buy beer.

I don't think the former Obama supporters are really the sandwich and beer crowd. But, perhaps you are correct. Good for them.
 
You said he tripled it..you lied.
You said he didn't double it....you lied......

Nope, you are either lying or you really suck at math...or maybe both.

The day he took office it was at $10,626,877,048,913, the last day of his term it was at $19,944,429,217,106. That is an increase of 87.86%.

Since you seem to really suck at math, it would have to increase by 100% to double, that did not happen.

By the way...

Under Obama we added $3,188,758,442 per day to the national debt.

Since Trump's first day in office through Dec 31st we have added $4,123,692,367 per day to the national debt.

Trump and GOP controlled congress is adding to the debt $934,933,925 a day faster than even Obama managed.
Its as good as doubled you moron....jeeze...aren't you proud of your magic Kenyan?....
 
You said he tripled it..you lied.
You said he didn't double it....you lied......

Nope, you are either lying or you really suck at math...or maybe both.

The day he took office it was at $10,626,877,048,913, the last day of his term it was at $19,944,429,217,106. That is an increase of 87.86%.

Since you seem to really suck at math, it would have to increase by 100% to double, that did not happen.

By the way...

Under Obama we added $3,188,758,442 per day to the national debt.

Since Trump's first day in office through Dec 31st we have added $4,123,692,367 per day to the national debt.

Trump and GOP controlled congress is adding to the debt $934,933,925 a day faster than even Obama managed.
Its as good as doubled you moron....jeeze...aren't you proud of your magic Kenyan?....

Moving the goal post now, how typical.

Be a man and admit you were wrong and move on.

No, I think Obama is the 2nd worst POTUS in the history of the nation, behind only the guy he replaced. He fucked up our healthcare system far more than most people without a connection to the medical field can understand. While all the focus was on the stupid mandate, that was actually one of the lesser of the evils of the ACA.

His foreign policy was a wreck trying to support every "arab spring" movement and then getting us stuck in Syria. He should have brought all the troops home from Afghanistan instead of sending more.

And yes, he added way too much to the debt, but he is not being made to look like an amateur in that area thanks to Trump. Think about it, Trump added more in CY18 than Obama did in any single year...and we are in a booming economy.

Why is it that Trump's spending is not a problem for people like you? Why is Obama's spending so bad but Trump is your fucking god for adding 1.48 trillion dollars to the debt?
 
Moving the goal post now, how typical.

Be a man and admit you were wrong and move on.
You are missing my point purposely...like a child you skip over my point to argue numbers...Obama raised our debt more than any other president we have ever had is my point and to cry foul at Trump's increase while ignoring Obama's is disingenuous...as disingenuous as your argument with me has been...grow up...try that....
 
You said he tripled it..you lied.
You said he didn't double it....you lied......

Nope, you are either lying or you really suck at math...or maybe both.

The day he took office it was at $10,626,877,048,913, the last day of his term it was at $19,944,429,217,106. That is an increase of 87.86%.

Since you seem to really suck at math, it would have to increase by 100% to double, that did not happen.

By the way...

Under Obama we added $3,188,758,442 per day to the national debt.

Since Trump's first day in office through Dec 31st we have added $4,123,692,367 per day to the national debt.

Trump and GOP controlled congress is adding to the debt $934,933,925 a day faster than even Obama managed.
Its as good as doubled you moron....jeeze...aren't you proud of your magic Kenyan?....

Moving the goal post now, how typical.

Be a man and admit you were wrong and move on.

No, I think Obama is the 2nd worst POTUS in the history of the nation, behind only the guy he replaced. He fucked up our healthcare system far more than most people without a connection to the medical field can understand. While all the focus was on the stupid mandate, that was actually one of the lesser of the evils of the ACA.

His foreign policy was a wreck trying to support every "arab spring" movement and then getting us stuck in Syria. He should have brought all the troops home from Afghanistan instead of sending more.

And yes, he added way too much to the debt, but he is not being made to look like an amateur in that area thanks to Trump. Think about it, Trump added more in CY18 than Obama did in any single year...and we are in a booming economy.

Why is it that Trump's spending is not a problem for people like you? Why is Obama's spending so bad but Trump is your fucking god for adding 1.48 trillion dollars to the debt?
You debate like a 12 year old girl....
 
New US Congress makes history with record number of women

New US legislators were sworn in on Thursday, with a number of "firsts" taking their seats in the 116th Congress.

Democrats assumed majority control of the House of Representative, while Republicans kept their hold on the Senate.

Nancy Pelosi, who was elected speaker of the House, said in a USA Today interview that the new Congress will represent a "different world".

Among those sworn in is a record number of women, including the first Muslim women, as well as the youngest woman ever elected to Congress.

Here's a look at the 'firsts' taking their seats in Congress:

Big day for women in the US.

No, big day for THOSE women. Contrary to your misogynist views, all women are not drone slaves to a hive mind.

No, just the women of Cult45.
 
Moving the goal post now, how typical.

Be a man and admit you were wrong and move on.
You are missing my point purposely...like a child you skip over my point to argue numbers...Obama raised our debt more than any other president we have ever had is my point and to cry foul at Trump's increase while ignoring Obama's is disingenuous...as disingenuous as your argument with me has been...grow up...try that....

Total dollars yes Obama raised it more than any other POTUS. Percentage wise he is 3rd behind Reagan and Bush II.

I have never ignored Obama's contribution to the debt, this is just a lie. I give him full blame for the debt added under his watch, not even giving him a break for starting off with a recession. I have never praised Obama for anything and this is one of the reasons why.

But you on the other hand still cannot admit that Trump is just as bad, that he is in fact spending money faster than Obama did. It is a fact, a fact I have proven time and time again.

But despite this, you have never once complained about Trump's debt...NOT ONCE.

As of Dec 31st Trump has added to the debt on average of 934,933,925 dollars per day more than Obama did. At his current rate if Trump does 8 years he will add almost 15 trillion dollars to the debt!
 
you just fucking lied your moron. :21::21::21::21::21::21:

Obama did not triple the debt, he did not even double the debt.
Liar
Since Obama took office, the national debt has increased by $7.4 trillion. On January 20, 2009, it stood at $10.6 trillion; on Monday, it was at $18 trillion...
Based on quarterly data released by the US Treasury, the debt at the end of 2008 — just before Obama took office — stood at roughly $10,699,805,000,000.

As of the third quarter of 2016, the most recent data available, the debt as Obama is set to leave office stood at $19,573,445,000,000.

Looks like he definitely doubled it...so you say now?....

So you were definitely wrong when you made your stupid partisan assessment. Why do you cockroaches lie constantly? Are you so insecure with your Orange Virus that this is all you can do?
 
Total dollars yes Obama raised it more than any other POTUS. Percentage wise he is 3rd behind Reagan and Bush II.

Percentage wise is bogus...who cares?....but thanks for recognizing my initial point finally....
 
So you were definitely wrong when you made your stupid partisan assessment. Why do you cockroaches lie constantly? Are you so insecure with your Orange Virus that this is all you can do?
No I wasn't wrong....I inflated the amount for dramatic license....:113:
 
Why is it "wonderful to have more women elected into office"? Is there some way in which ovaries are a special benefit in this job of which I'm unaware? Or is it just that you think the possession of ovaries is the sum total of our identities, and we can't be judged and evaluated on our merits the same as men?

Holy projection, Batman!
 
Total dollars yes Obama raised it more than any other POTUS. Percentage wise he is 3rd behind Reagan and Bush II.

Percentage wise is bogus...who cares?....but thanks for recognizing my initial point finally....

Trump is going to blow Obama's debt out of the water. Total dollars wise nobody has ever added more in a single year than Trump added in CY18.

And still not a peep, not a word, you continue to blow him even as he sets new debt records.
 

Forum List

Back
Top