Letter to Pelosi

[gipper]

Letter to Pelosi...
.
When I first read Donald Trump’s six-page letter to Speaker Pelosi, I marveled at the ease with which he shared what goes on in his mind openly, and without reservation. His letter is the quintessential example of how professional victims actually think. They turn the prosecutor into the persecutor.
.
Trump’s letter is just such an expression of entitled, delusional grievance. He accuses Pelosi of injuring his family, but it is his nepotism that exposes his older children to public scrutiny and his teenager (to whom he refers as “Melania’s son") to life in a fishbowl. More damning, in making her a public figure, he subjected the First Lady to humiliation. He knew full well he paid a stripper $130,000 not to talk about their affair and was surely aware that this and other unsavory behaviors would surface when he sought the presidency.
.
Trump is a con artist who succeeds by tricking his marks into not seeing the con. But the biggest mark — bigger than the GOP and his base — is himself. He believes the lies he tells, the delinquent traits he disavows. It’s what psychoanalysts call delusional projection. We see it the simple sentence he wrote to the speaker: “You view democracy as your enemy.” Trump confirms my findings published in "Trump on the Couch." But now his defenses are writ large, because instead of changing in moments of crisis, people become more the way they are. Trump has reverted to the most familiar means to cope with fears of being caught, punished and humiliated.
.
Finally, the letter is a treasure trove for psychiatric residents who want to study the psychotic mind. Trump’s paradoxical sleight of hand makes him think he can hide in plain sight. But he can’t anymore. This is why he accuses Pelosi of hating democracy: It is he who hates a system that promotes the idea that no one is above the law. And watch how the moron trumkins rush to support this moron
.
https://www.salon.com/2019/12/20/mental-health-professionals-read-trumps-letter-a-study-in-the-psychotic-mind-at-work/

It was a perfect letter.....showing how delusional our President is

Please point out the delusional parts.

You're sending me on a fools errand??? Trump is a madman Now he's not worried about NK surprise ?

That’s right he’s a madman, but the Ds in the House and Senate approve his horrendous war budget, expansion of the Patriot Act, and trade deals. lol

 

[basquebromance]

Nancy Pelosi... 1) you suck. 2) stop ruining this beautiful state. It used to be good. 3) your security sucks more than you. 4) fake impeachment

 

[edward37]

Letter to Pelosi...
.
When I first read Donald Trump’s six-page letter to Speaker Pelosi, I marveled at the ease with which he shared what goes on in his mind openly, and without reservation. His letter is the quintessential example of how professional victims actually think. They turn the prosecutor into the persecutor.
.
Trump’s letter is just such an expression of entitled, delusional grievance. He accuses Pelosi of injuring his family, but it is his nepotism that exposes his older children to public scrutiny and his teenager (to whom he refers as “Melania’s son") to life in a fishbowl. More damning, in making her a public figure, he subjected the First Lady to humiliation. He knew full well he paid a stripper $130,000 not to talk about their affair and was surely aware that this and other unsavory behaviors would surface when he sought the presidency.
.
Trump is a con artist who succeeds by tricking his marks into not seeing the con. But the biggest mark — bigger than the GOP and his base — is himself. He believes the lies he tells, the delinquent traits he disavows. It’s what psychoanalysts call delusional projection. We see it the simple sentence he wrote to the speaker: “You view democracy as your enemy.” Trump confirms my findings published in "Trump on the Couch." But now his defenses are writ large, because instead of changing in moments of crisis, people become more the way they are. Trump has reverted to the most familiar means to cope with fears of being caught, punished and humiliated.
.
Finally, the letter is a treasure trove for psychiatric residents who want to study the psychotic mind. Trump’s paradoxical sleight of hand makes him think he can hide in plain sight. But he can’t anymore. This is why he accuses Pelosi of hating democracy: It is he who hates a system that promotes the idea that no one is above the law. And watch how the moron trumkins rush to support this moron
.
https://www.salon.com/2019/12/20/mental-health-professionals-read-trumps-letter-a-study-in-the-psychotic-mind-at-work/

It was a perfect letter.....showing how delusional our President is

Please point out the delusional parts.

You're sending me on a fools errand??? Trump is a madman Now he's not worried about NK surprise ?

That’s right he’s a madman, but the Ds in the House and Senate approve his horrendous war budget, expansion of the Patriot Act, and trade deals. lol

I know you understand no party is without faults but having this madman in the highest office in the world is imho a disaster

 

[BluesLegend]

Finally, the letter is a treasure trove for psychiatric residents who want to study the psychotic mind.

In which facility do you reside?

"L" wing.

 

[gipper]

Letter to Pelosi...
.
When I first read Donald Trump’s six-page letter to Speaker Pelosi, I marveled at the ease with which he shared what goes on in his mind openly, and without reservation. His letter is the quintessential example of how professional victims actually think. They turn the prosecutor into the persecutor.
.
Trump’s letter is just such an expression of entitled, delusional grievance. He accuses Pelosi of injuring his family, but it is his nepotism that exposes his older children to public scrutiny and his teenager (to whom he refers as “Melania’s son") to life in a fishbowl. More damning, in making her a public figure, he subjected the First Lady to humiliation. He knew full well he paid a stripper $130,000 not to talk about their affair and was surely aware that this and other unsavory behaviors would surface when he sought the presidency.
.
Trump is a con artist who succeeds by tricking his marks into not seeing the con. But the biggest mark — bigger than the GOP and his base — is himself. He believes the lies he tells, the delinquent traits he disavows. It’s what psychoanalysts call delusional projection. We see it the simple sentence he wrote to the speaker: “You view democracy as your enemy.” Trump confirms my findings published in "Trump on the Couch." But now his defenses are writ large, because instead of changing in moments of crisis, people become more the way they are. Trump has reverted to the most familiar means to cope with fears of being caught, punished and humiliated.
.
Finally, the letter is a treasure trove for psychiatric residents who want to study the psychotic mind. Trump’s paradoxical sleight of hand makes him think he can hide in plain sight. But he can’t anymore. This is why he accuses Pelosi of hating democracy: It is he who hates a system that promotes the idea that no one is above the law. And watch how the moron trumkins rush to support this moron
.
https://www.salon.com/2019/12/20/mental-health-professionals-read-trumps-letter-a-study-in-the-psychotic-mind-at-work/

It was a perfect letter.....showing how delusional our President is

Please point out the delusional parts.

You're sending me on a fools errand??? Trump is a madman Now he's not worried about NK surprise ?

That’s right he’s a madman, but the Ds in the House and Senate approve his horrendous war budget, expansion of the Patriot Act, and trade deals. lol

I know you understand no party is without faults but having this madman in the highest office in the world is imho a disaster

Why would the Ds give a madman more power?

 

[BULLDOG]

More and more evidence is emerging that Donald Trump is suffering from severe mental illness which is being aggravated by his position as POTUS.

Either Donald Trump is exceedingly cunning or he is suffering mental deterioration. Or maybe both cunning and mentally unsound. Psychopaths are known to be cunning.

"Psychopaths are incapable of feeling guilt, remorse, or empathy for their actions or the objects of their actions. They are generally cunning and manipulative. They know the difference between right and wrong but don't believe the rules apply to them."

Mental health professionals have been analyzing Donald Trump since 2015 and the general tendency in progressive articles is that Donald Trump's mental condition is deteriorating.

One of the latest signals of his lack of rationality has been a GOP lawmaker stroking and arousing Trump's ego by comparing him to Jesus and others claiming that he has saved Christianity. Unfortunately, Donald Trump's mental condition appears to be contagious among his followers who will believe any lie Donald Trump utters or publishes. GOP lawmakers are infected by Trump's psychoses.

Are there any people around Donald Trump who can prevent his descent into the abyss of madness?

Shrinks on Trump's letter: A study in "the psychotic mind" at work

Mental health professionals read Trump's letter: A study in "the psychotic mind" at work
Bandy Lee, Justin Frank, Lance Dodes, David Reiss and others unpack a "venomous and vitriolic" historic document

CHAUNCEY DEVEGA
DECEMBER 20, 2019 12:00PM (UTC)

... Trump’s impeachment is one of the few moments in his life when he has ever been held accountable for his behavior. ... when Democrats and the public defied Trump’s authoritarian goal of becoming a de facto king or emperor, he has lashed out in the form of (another) temper tantrum.

On Tuesday, Trump continued with this ugly and deeply troubling behavior in the form of a six-page letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, fueled by exaggerated rage that Democrats had dared to impeach him. Reportedly co-authored by Stephen Miller, Trump's white supremacist White House adviser, Trump’s letter continued numerous obvious lies about impeachment, the Ukraine scandal and other matters.
In keeping with his strategy of stochastic terrorism, Trump’s letter is an incitement to violence by his followers against the Democrats for the “crime” of impeachment.

... This letter is a very obvious demonstration of Donald Trump’s severe mental compromise. His assertions should alarm not only those who believe that a president of the United States and a commander-in-chief of the world’s most powerful military should be mentally sound, but also those who are concerned about the potential implications of such a compromised individual bringing out pathological elements in his supporters and in society in general. I have been following and interpreting Donald Trump’s tweets as a public service, since merely reading them “gaslights” you and reforms your thoughts in unhealthy ways. Without arming yourself with the right interpretation, you end up playing into the hands of pathology and helping it — even if you do not fully believe it. This is because of a common phenomenon that happens when you are continually exposed to a severely compromised person without appropriate intervention. You start taking on the person’s symptoms in a phenomenon called “shared psychosis.”
It happens often in households where a sick individual goes untreated, and I have seen some of the most intelligent and otherwise healthy persons succumb to the most bizarre delusions. It can also happen at national scale, as renowned mental health experts such as Erich Fromm have noted. Shared psychosis at large scale is also called “mass hysteria.”
The president is quite conscious of his ability to generate mass hysteria, which is the purpose of the letter.

... In terms of what we have come to expect from President Trump, the only remarkable thing about this letter is that it is so long — and that it contains a few big words, like “solemnity.” But in nearly every other way, the letter is like the vitriolic, grievance-filled tweets he sends out every day, full of falsehoods, hyperbole and hate. As an extended expression of who Trump really is, the letter shows you how his mind works and what his raw experience is like.

... To quote what Trump told People Magazine when asked to recite his philosophy of life, “Man is the most vicious of all animals and life is a series of battles ending in victory or defeat.” This is truly how Trump has always experienced the world. The letter merely reinforces his world view.

... Content-wise it [the letter] is the typical Trump distortions, outright lies, and exclusive focus on his feelings. For Trump, his feelings define reality. ... Because, objectively, Trump complains he is being treated "unfairly" anytime he does not get his way, his feelings are hurt, and/or others are not accepting what he says at face value and without question — even if it is contrary to proven fact or internally inconsistent.

Whoever actually wrote the letter, it accurately reflects Trump's immaturity that has been obvious in public as long as he has been a public figure: insisting that his needs be met in a child-like manner; having very poor problem-solving ability; having an inability to take responsibility for anything and projecting his own negative attributes onto others; an inability to look at consequences of his statements or actions. Basically, acting as a frustrated or emotionally hurt toddler would react, looking for a parent to protect him and "make the bad people go away."

... Mr. Trump's letter shows his incapacity to recognize other people as separate from him or having worth.
As he always does, he accuses others of precisely what he has done, in precisely the same language. When confronted with violating the Constitution he says his accusers are violating the Constitution. When others point out that he undermines democracy, he says they undermine democracy. Through these very simpleminded projections he deletes others' selfhood and replaces who they are with what is unacceptable in himself.

... When you read excerpts of the Trump letter to Pelosi it doesn't do justice to how unhinged, paranoid and manic it is in its entirety.

... Dr. Justin Frank [said] ... When I first read Donald Trump’s six-page letter to Speaker Pelosi, I marveled at the ease with which he shared what goes on in his mind openly, and without reservation. His letter is the quintessential example of how professional victims actually think. They turn the prosecutor into the persecutor.

... Finally, the letter is a treasure trove for psychiatric residents who want to study the psychotic mind. Trump’s paradoxical sleight of hand makes him think he can hide in plain sight. But he can’t anymore. This is why he accuses Pelosi of hating democracy: It is he who hates a system that promotes the idea that no one is above the law. ...

You realize that no SANE "professional" would try to diagnose a serious mental condition without ever seeing a patient. Right?

Oh but honestly, most "mental health professionals" are themselves total nutbags

In training, mental health professionals are often given case studies and are assigned the task of evaluating different aspects of the case. That is the kind of evaluation they use to develop their skills. It's ridiculous to say a trained mental health professional can't give informed opinions on cases they haven't interviewed for themselves. The vast majority of their education is based on such case studies. While it is true that a physician in charge of determining the day to day treatment of a particular patient should always have his own interview with the patient, the wide network of consultants that physicians take advantage of doesn't, and probably couldn't have a chance to personally evaluate each patient.

Goldwater rule to both of you

Look it up

Coward. Trump has precluded ethic from the conversation. That rule says nothing about the accuracy of such professional opinions.

 

[edward37]

It was a perfect letter.....showing how delusional our President is

Please point out the delusional parts.

You're sending me on a fools errand??? Trump is a madman Now he's not worried about NK surprise ?

That’s right he’s a madman, but the Ds in the House and Senate approve his horrendous war budget, expansion of the Patriot Act, and trade deals. lol

I know you understand no party is without faults but having this madman in the highest office in the world is imho a disaster

Why would the Ds give a madman more power?

Seems to me they're trying to put a stop to him Repubs in the senate are the ones giving him power by not speaking up Are they the real cowards ?

 

[gipper]

Please point out the delusional parts.

You're sending me on a fools errand??? Trump is a madman Now he's not worried about NK surprise ?

That’s right he’s a madman, but the Ds in the House and Senate approve his horrendous war budget, expansion of the Patriot Act, and trade deals. lol

I know you understand no party is without faults but having this madman in the highest office in the world is imho a disaster

Why would the Ds give a madman more power?

Seems to me they're trying to put a stop to him Repubs in the senate are the ones giving him power by not speaking up Are they the real cowards ?

You need to look at the votes in the House. Many Ds voted with Donnie.

 

[edward37]

You're sending me on a fools errand??? Trump is a madman Now he's not worried about NK surprise ?

That’s right he’s a madman, but the Ds in the House and Senate approve his horrendous war budget, expansion of the Patriot Act, and trade deals. lol

I know you understand no party is without faults but having this madman in the highest office in the world is imho a disaster

Why would the Ds give a madman more power?

Seems to me they're trying to put a stop to him Repubs in the senate are the ones giving him power by not speaking up Are they the real cowards ?

You need to look at the votes in the House. Many Ds voted with Donnie.

You mean those in trump areas afraid of losing their job? How many ? 2,,,,3?

 

[gipper]

That’s right he’s a madman, but the Ds in the House and Senate approve his horrendous war budget, expansion of the Patriot Act, and trade deals. lol

I know you understand no party is without faults but having this madman in the highest office in the world is imho a disaster

Why would the Ds give a madman more power?

Seems to me they're trying to put a stop to him Repubs in the senate are the ones giving him power by not speaking up Are they the real cowards ?

You need to look at the votes in the House. Many Ds voted with Donnie.

You mean those in trump areas afraid of losing their job? How many ? 2,,,,3?

Really?

How about 188 voted for the madman.
'Atrocious': 188 Democrats Join GOP to Hand Trump $738 Billion Military Budget That Includes 'Space Force'

 

[Correll]

He's closer to Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Look up the symptoms and there he is.

This is where the Trumpsters (try to) deflect to Obama. Back in Normal World, the two men are breathtakingly different.

I don't see much different. I recall the drinking game where you took a drink every time Obama mentioned himself in a speech.

And I'm not a Trump supporter.

Anyone who thinks that they should be the most powerful man in the world, almost by definition, has to have a massive ego.


Or woman.

I'm not sure I would equate a massive ego with a psychosis but I'm no expert. One could have a huge ego but still not want to harm others. Those we are speaking about here (or at least that I am) seem to have no qualm in harming others.

To put this back on full topic, like Trump making fun of a handicapped man or the remarks he made about McCain. Those to me show an inability to care about anyone but themselves. If one has a desire to win, well OK. That isn't all bad. Not caring at all about who you hurt to win is where I draw a line.

Well, it is worth mentioning that Trump's McCain comments were in RESPONSE to an attack on Trump supporters, so not a good example of "not caring about anyone but themselves".

No, that is not a proper way to respond. Reagan was good at responding to things like this without having an abnormal desire to harm.

Reagan was good, but does someone who is a dick to you, deserve to be handled with kid gloves, or does he deserve some, omg, harsh language in return?

 

[Correll]

He's closer to Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Look up the symptoms and there he is.

This is where the Trumpsters (try to) deflect to Obama. Back in Normal World, the two men are breathtakingly different.

I don't see much different. I recall the drinking game where you took a drink every time Obama mentioned himself in a speech.

And I'm not a Trump supporter.

Anyone who thinks that they should be the most powerful man in the world, almost by definition, has to have a massive ego.


Or woman.

I'm not sure I would equate a massive ego with a psychosis but I'm no expert. One could have a huge ego but still not want to harm others. Those we are speaking about here (or at least that I am) seem to have no qualm in harming others.

To put this back on full topic, like Trump making fun of a handicapped man or the remarks he made about McCain. Those to me show an inability to care about anyone but themselves. If one has a desire to win, well OK. That isn't all bad. Not caring at all about who you hurt to win is where I draw a line.

Well, it is worth mentioning that Trump's McCain comments were in RESPONSE to an attack on Trump supporters, so not a good example of "not caring about anyone but themselves".

I would really like to know what you might consider to have been an attack on Trump's supporters, especially one that would make Trump's response seem rational in comparison.

What do you mean, what I consider an attack? When McCain insulted them. Are you denying that he did that?

 

[pknopp]

I don't see much different. I recall the drinking game where you took a drink every time Obama mentioned himself in a speech.

And I'm not a Trump supporter.

Anyone who thinks that they should be the most powerful man in the world, almost by definition, has to have a massive ego.


Or woman.

I'm not sure I would equate a massive ego with a psychosis but I'm no expert. One could have a huge ego but still not want to harm others. Those we are speaking about here (or at least that I am) seem to have no qualm in harming others.

To put this back on full topic, like Trump making fun of a handicapped man or the remarks he made about McCain. Those to me show an inability to care about anyone but themselves. If one has a desire to win, well OK. That isn't all bad. Not caring at all about who you hurt to win is where I draw a line.

Well, it is worth mentioning that Trump's McCain comments were in RESPONSE to an attack on Trump supporters, so not a good example of "not caring about anyone but themselves".

No, that is not a proper way to respond. Reagan was good at responding to things like this without having an abnormal desire to harm.

Reagan was good, but does someone who is a dick to you, deserve to be handled with kid gloves, or does he deserve some, omg, harsh language in return?

What I generally do is ignore them.

 

[BULLDOG]

I don't see much different. I recall the drinking game where you took a drink every time Obama mentioned himself in a speech.

And I'm not a Trump supporter.

Anyone who thinks that they should be the most powerful man in the world, almost by definition, has to have a massive ego.


Or woman.

I'm not sure I would equate a massive ego with a psychosis but I'm no expert. One could have a huge ego but still not want to harm others. Those we are speaking about here (or at least that I am) seem to have no qualm in harming others.

To put this back on full topic, like Trump making fun of a handicapped man or the remarks he made about McCain. Those to me show an inability to care about anyone but themselves. If one has a desire to win, well OK. That isn't all bad. Not caring at all about who you hurt to win is where I draw a line.

Well, it is worth mentioning that Trump's McCain comments were in RESPONSE to an attack on Trump supporters, so not a good example of "not caring about anyone but themselves".

I would really like to know what you might consider to have been an attack on Trump's supporters, especially one that would make Trump's response seem rational in comparison.

What do you mean, what I consider an attack? When McCain insulted them. Are you denying that he did that?

Specifics? I'm not aware of McCain insulting anyone, but even if he did, that doesn't make Trump's behavior acceptable. Perhaps you can fill in the details of McCain's insult that precipitated Trump's rant, and explain how that perceived insult was as bad or worse than the crap spouted by right wingers every day.

 

[pknopp]

Anyone who thinks that they should be the most powerful man in the world, almost by definition, has to have a massive ego.


Or woman.

I'm not sure I would equate a massive ego with a psychosis but I'm no expert. One could have a huge ego but still not want to harm others. Those we are speaking about here (or at least that I am) seem to have no qualm in harming others.

To put this back on full topic, like Trump making fun of a handicapped man or the remarks he made about McCain. Those to me show an inability to care about anyone but themselves. If one has a desire to win, well OK. That isn't all bad. Not caring at all about who you hurt to win is where I draw a line.

Well, it is worth mentioning that Trump's McCain comments were in RESPONSE to an attack on Trump supporters, so not a good example of "not caring about anyone but themselves".

I would really like to know what you might consider to have been an attack on Trump's supporters, especially one that would make Trump's response seem rational in comparison.

What do you mean, what I consider an attack? When McCain insulted them. Are you denying that he did that?

Specifics? I'm not aware of McCain insulting anyone, but even if he did, that doesn't make Trump's behavior acceptable. Perhaps you can fill in the details of McCain's insult that precipitated Trump's rant, and explain how that perceived insult was as bad or worse than the crap spouted by right wingers every day.

McCain did make a crack about Trump's supporters . I dont recall exactly what he said but someone that avoided going to Vietnam has no business saying what Trump said in return.

McCain could be a jerk also.... One reason why he lost.

 

[Muhammed]

Anyone who thinks that they should be the most powerful man in the world, almost by definition, has to have a massive ego.


Or woman.

I'm not sure I would equate a massive ego with a psychosis but I'm no expert. One could have a huge ego but still not want to harm others. Those we are speaking about here (or at least that I am) seem to have no qualm in harming others.

To put this back on full topic, like Trump making fun of a handicapped man or the remarks he made about McCain. Those to me show an inability to care about anyone but themselves. If one has a desire to win, well OK. That isn't all bad. Not caring at all about who you hurt to win is where I draw a line.

Who has Trump harmed?

Two parts to this.

You don't think that Trump making fun of someone with a handicap hurts them?

Your faux outrage is ridiculously funny, jackass.

Replies like this helps me understand how psychopaths get elected.

You resemble that remark, jackass.

 

[Muhammed]

I'm not sure I would equate a massive ego with a psychosis but I'm no expert. One could have a huge ego but still not want to harm others. Those we are speaking about here (or at least that I am) seem to have no qualm in harming others.

To put this back on full topic, like Trump making fun of a handicapped man or the remarks he made about McCain. Those to me show an inability to care about anyone but themselves. If one has a desire to win, well OK. That isn't all bad. Not caring at all about who you hurt to win is where I draw a line.

Well, it is worth mentioning that Trump's McCain comments were in RESPONSE to an attack on Trump supporters, so not a good example of "not caring about anyone but themselves".

I would really like to know what you might consider to have been an attack on Trump's supporters, especially one that would make Trump's response seem rational in comparison.

What do you mean, what I consider an attack? When McCain insulted them. Are you denying that he did that?

Specifics? I'm not aware of McCain insulting anyone, but even if he did, that doesn't make Trump's behavior acceptable. Perhaps you can fill in the details of McCain's insult that precipitated Trump's rant, and explain how that perceived insult was as bad or worse than the crap spouted by right wingers every day.

McCain did make a crack about Trump's supporters . I dont recall exactly what he said but someone that avoided going to Vietnam has no business saying what Trump said in return.

McCain could be a jerk also.... One reason why he lost.

McCain was an admitted war criminal. A murderer and serial killer (aka "war hero" lol) The worst of the worst.


THINK!

 

[Dragonlady]

Only a mental nutcase would be shitposting anti-Trump hatred at 3 in the morning on a Tuesday.

Get some kind of a life dude.

You're defending your clown at 3:30 am. But that's 10:30 in Russia so I guess that's OK.

 

[Correll]

Anyone who thinks that they should be the most powerful man in the world, almost by definition, has to have a massive ego.


Or woman.

I'm not sure I would equate a massive ego with a psychosis but I'm no expert. One could have a huge ego but still not want to harm others. Those we are speaking about here (or at least that I am) seem to have no qualm in harming others.

To put this back on full topic, like Trump making fun of a handicapped man or the remarks he made about McCain. Those to me show an inability to care about anyone but themselves. If one has a desire to win, well OK. That isn't all bad. Not caring at all about who you hurt to win is where I draw a line.

Well, it is worth mentioning that Trump's McCain comments were in RESPONSE to an attack on Trump supporters, so not a good example of "not caring about anyone but themselves".

No, that is not a proper way to respond. Reagan was good at responding to things like this without having an abnormal desire to harm.

Reagan was good, but does someone who is a dick to you, deserve to be handled with kid gloves, or does he deserve some, omg, harsh language in return?

What I generally do is ignore them.

Yeah, that is what we have been doing for a long time, and it lets your enemies define you in the Conventional Wisdom.


It is a way to lose with your dignity intact. But it is a strategy to lose.

 

[Correll]

Anyone who thinks that they should be the most powerful man in the world, almost by definition, has to have a massive ego.


Or woman.

I'm not sure I would equate a massive ego with a psychosis but I'm no expert. One could have a huge ego but still not want to harm others. Those we are speaking about here (or at least that I am) seem to have no qualm in harming others.

To put this back on full topic, like Trump making fun of a handicapped man or the remarks he made about McCain. Those to me show an inability to care about anyone but themselves. If one has a desire to win, well OK. That isn't all bad. Not caring at all about who you hurt to win is where I draw a line.

Well, it is worth mentioning that Trump's McCain comments were in RESPONSE to an attack on Trump supporters, so not a good example of "not caring about anyone but themselves".

I would really like to know what you might consider to have been an attack on Trump's supporters, especially one that would make Trump's response seem rational in comparison.

What do you mean, what I consider an attack? When McCain insulted them. Are you denying that he did that?

Specifics? I'm not aware of McCain insulting anyone, but even if he did, that doesn't make Trump's behavior acceptable. Perhaps you can fill in the details of McCain's insult that precipitated Trump's rant, and explain how that perceived insult was as bad or worse than the crap spouted by right wingers every day.

1. Your ignorance on this is noted. Let me educate you. The whole incident was McCain insulting Trump supporters, and Trump insulting him back, and the media presenting it to the American people as an unprovoked attack. You are either a sucker or a supporter of the lie.


2. As EVERYONE has said something in the heat of the moment, that they do not really mean, it DOES make Trump's behavior acceptable. You could claim that you have never done that, and in doing so, will verify for all the readers, that nothing you say, should be taken seriously.


3. Trump's comments were a few sentences. That is not normally considered a rant, by honest observers. Your status as a partisan hack, is confirmed.

4. It is interesting that you added the requirement that McCain's insult be worse than something, in order to be considered a valid provocation, when your stated position is that you were unaware that there was a provocation. Let's just focus on the point that, my point was simply that YOUR sides' lie that what TRump said was an unprovoked attack on "Vets" was utter bullshit uttered by vile liars. So, your requirement is irrelevant.