Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The St. Jude Dream House giveaway was yesterday. It seems a fairly well to do person won it. As of last night, people were responding to the announcement that he should donate the proceeds of the house all to St. Jude. Jesus H. Christ. Liberals even want to tell people what to do with their winnings in a charity raffle. The posts have been removed, but the talk on Paducah Topix has started up. It isn't up to the donating back part yet, but will be soon, they did the same shit last year.
I, too, bought a ticket both this year and last. That was a $100 not tax deductible to St. Jude's both years. They raised $500,000 last year and $700,000 this year. I had to retire early due to my health, and if I ever win it, I won't feel obligated to donate once cent of my winnings to anyone.
Liberals are just disgusting. What's theirs is theirs and what's ours is theirs! I would bet at least the cyber dollar hat none of the critics even purchased a ticket.
..
What is disgusting is the person who posted the OP.
and ten bucks it wasn't liberals. 20 she made the whole thing up.
Those that have less give more of what they have. Households with incomes of of $50,000 to $99,000 give 6% of there income. Those with incomes over $200,000 give to 4.7%.Successful people have a social responsibility to make the world a better place and not just take from it because they have the God given ability to do so, something many of us don't have. There is nothing wrong with suggesting the wealthy give back to those that are the source of their wealth. Despite the headlines dedicated to donations made by the super-rich, data shows that the most charitable people in the U.S. aren't those making six or even seven-figure salaries, its lower-income people.
Buying a non tax free charitable raffle ticket IS giving back. I'm not sure where you came up with your other data. Out of the air as usual, no doubt.
Interactive: How America Gives - How America Gives - The Chronicle of Philanthropy- Connecting the nonprofit world with news, jobs, and ideas
The St. Jude Dream House giveaway was yesterday. It seems a fairly well to do person won it. As of last night, people were responding to the announcement that he should donate the proceeds of the house all to St. Jude. Jesus H. Christ. Liberals even want to tell people what to do with their winnings in a charity raffle. The posts have been removed, but the talk on Paducah Topix has started up. It isn't up to the donating back part yet, but will be soon, they did the same shit last year.
I, too, bought a ticket both this year and last. That was a $100 not tax deductible to St. Jude's both years. They raised $500,000 last year and $700,000 this year. I had to retire early due to my health, and if I ever win it, I won't feel obligated to donate once cent of my winnings to anyone.
Liberals are just disgusting. What's theirs is theirs and what's ours is theirs! I would bet at least the cyber dollar hat none of the critics even purchased a ticket.
..
What is disgusting is the person who posted the OP.
and ten bucks it wasn't liberals. 20 she made the whole thing up.
I really don't see too many conservatives as passionate about their envy and covetousness as liberals seem to be.Ummm...she's saved money all her career(s) so she can take care of herself during her retirement.Again, making my point for me.
Me and my family, "liberals" all, probably donate more to charity each year than you make.
You have this ridiculous idea of what the term "liberal" means, and keep expanding to take in everything you don't like. Rather than taking responsibility for yourself (or even demanding that others do), you instead attempt to lay blame for all of your problems on a political ideology, rather than the individuals responsible.
Remind me -- how is she not taking responsibility for herself?
Conceded.
Are you also defending her ridiculous broad-brushing of "liberals"?
Oh wait... you're as bad as she is with that shit. Of course you do.
You could maybe provide links proving me wrong.Soooo...attacking Soros for spending millions on politics = bad.The sheer number of threads devoted to attacking George Soros seems to belay your claims...
But attacking the Koch Brothers for spending millions on politics = good.
That about cover it?
It's funny watching you try to put words in my mouth.
Oh, you mean like pretending the attacks on the Koch brothers don't exist.I'm not seeing multitude links to all the disgusting soros attacks.
Must be an oversight.
You've been a poster for as long as I have. You've seen them.
Pretending they don't exist isn't going to work.
Wait for it...Whatever makes you feel better about yourself.
I could try to use simpler words, if that'll help.
How would giving this home, with its attendant tax burdens, to a poor person be helping the poor person?Successful people have a social responsibility to make the world a better place and not just take from it because they have the God given ability to do so, something many of us don't have. There is nothing wrong with suggesting the wealthy give back to those that are the source of their wealth. Despite the headlines dedicated to donations made by the super-rich, data shows that the most charitable people in the U.S. aren't those making six or even seven-figure salaries, its lower-income people."Personal Responsibility" is a two-way street. You can't claim to be all about "personal responsibility", then attempt to make the actions of an individual the "responsibility" of an entire political ideology.
How would giving this home, with its attendant tax burdens, to a poor person be helping the poor person?Successful people have a social responsibility to make the world a better place and not just take from it because they have the God given ability to do so, something many of us don't have. There is nothing wrong with suggesting the wealthy give back to those that are the source of their wealth. Despite the headlines dedicated to donations made by the super-rich, data shows that the most charitable people in the U.S. aren't those making six or even seven-figure salaries, it’s lower-income people."Personal Responsibility" is a two-way street. You can't claim to be all about "personal responsibility", then attempt to make the actions of an individual the "responsibility" of an entire political ideology.
Liberals are just disgusting.
Most of them are, at least.Liberals are just disgusting.
People who engage in gross generalizations are disgusting.
You could maybe provide links proving me wrong.Soooo...attacking Soros for spending millions on politics = bad.
But attacking the Koch Brothers for spending millions on politics = good.
That about cover it?
It's funny watching you try to put words in my mouth.
I really don't see too many conservatives as passionate about their envy and covetousness as liberals seem to be.Ummm...she's saved money all her career(s) so she can take care of herself during her retirement.
Remind me -- how is she not taking responsibility for herself?
Conceded.
Are you also defending her ridiculous broad-brushing of "liberals"?
Oh wait... you're as bad as she is with that shit. Of course you do.
Could you maybe point out a statistically-significant number for me, please?
Oh, you mean like pretending the attacks on the Koch brothers don't exist.I'm not seeing multitude links to all the disgusting soros attacks.
Must be an oversight.
You've been a poster for as long as I have. You've seen them.
Pretending they don't exist isn't going to work.
The St. Jude Dream House giveaway was yesterday. It seems a fairly well to do person won it. As of last night, people were responding to the announcement that he should donate the proceeds of the house all to St. Jude. Jesus H. Christ. Liberals even want to tell people what to do with their winnings in a charity raffle. The posts have been removed, but the talk on Paducah Topix has started up. It isn't up to the donating back part yet, but will be soon, they did the same shit last year.
I, too, bought a ticket both this year and last. That was a $100 not tax deductible to St. Jude's both years. They raised $500,000 last year and $700,000 this year. I had to retire early due to my health, and if I ever win it, I won't feel obligated to donate once cent of my winnings to anyone.
Liberals are just disgusting. What's theirs is theirs and what's ours is theirs! I would bet at least the cyber dollar hat none of the critics even purchased a ticket.
..
What is disgusting is the person who posted the OP.
and ten bucks it wasn't liberals. 20 she made the whole thing up.
Of course being a welfare queen yourself you would know nothing about the St. Jude Dream Home raffles that take place all over the country.
St. Jude Dream Home winner named - Topix
Now, give me the 20 bucks. Never mind. I would just have to give it to you first. I'll just keep it.
Oh, you mean like pretending the attacks on the Koch brothers don't exist.You've been a poster for as long as I have. You've seen them.
Pretending they don't exist isn't going to work.
Are you confusing conversations in your head with reality? Where have I "pretended" that the Kochs aren't attacked?
Of course the Kochs are attacked. Constantly, all the time. I get 10 emails a day from Liberal organizations attacking the Kochs.
But that doesn't change the fact that Conservatives attack Soros for how he spends his money - which is all I said.
Oh, you mean like pretending the attacks on the Koch brothers don't exist.
Are you confusing conversations in your head with reality? Where have I "pretended" that the Kochs aren't attacked?
Of course the Kochs are attacked. Constantly, all the time. I get 10 emails a day from Liberal organizations attacking the Kochs.
But that doesn't change the fact that Conservatives attack Soros for how he spends his money - which is all I said.
Oooh..how dishonest of you. That's not what you said. You said there were a plethora of soros attack threads at USMB.
Changing history only works if you're a teacher.
