Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm not seeing multitude links to all the disgusting soros attacks.
Must be an oversight.
I'm not seeing multitude links to all the disgusting soros attacks.
Must be an oversight.
You've been a poster for as long as I have. You've seen them.
Pretending they don't exist isn't going to work.
"Personal Responsibility" is a two-way street. You can't claim to be all about "personal responsibility", then attempt to make the actions of an individual the "responsibility" of an entire political ideology.
I'm not seeing multitude links to all the disgusting soros attacks.
Must be an oversight.
You've been a poster for as long as I have. You've seen them.
Pretending they don't exist isn't going to work.
No, I haven't seen them.
I acknowledge your surrender, and your dishonesty. Nice try.![]()
"Personal Responsibility" is a two-way street. You can't claim to be all about "personal responsibility", then attempt to make the actions of an individual the "responsibility" of an entire political ideology.
![]()
Successful people have a social responsibility to make the world a better place and not just take from it because they have the God given ability to do so, something many of us don't have. There is nothing wrong with suggesting the wealthy give back to those that are the source of their wealth. Despite the headlines dedicated to donations made by the super-rich, data shows that the most charitable people in the U.S. aren't those making six or even seven-figure salaries, it’s lower-income people."Personal Responsibility" is a two-way street. You can't claim to be all about "personal responsibility", then attempt to make the actions of an individual the "responsibility" of an entire political ideology.
I only know you as an anonymous poster on a message board. Anything that I've "presumed", I've done so because of what you've said.Again, making my point for me.
Me and my family, "liberals" all, probably donate more to charity each year than you make.
You have this ridiculous idea of what the term "liberal" means, and keep expanding to take in everything you don't like. Rather than taking responsibility for yourself (or even demanding that others do), you instead attempt to lay blame for all of your problems on a political ideology, rather than the individuals responsible.
LMAO! Thanks for the laugh, but I really doubt that. I find it interesting that you have to include others in that donation thing for it to be worthwhile mentioning.
As to what my problems are or who I blame for them: the mere fact that you presume to have any idea is about as arrogant as it gets.
I have seen people with REAL problems in my practice as a nurse. Once many years ago before I became a nurse, someone told me that God could even make you thankful for your problems. And you know what. He was right. Every day I thank God for my problems. Every single day. And if you had seen the things I have seen you would drop your arrogant little charade and be doing the same.
What "charade"?
YOU are making ridiculous claims about what "liberals" feel and do.
YOU started a thread bragging that you donated $100 to charity, then accused "liberals" of not doing so.
Successful people have a social responsibility to make the world a better place and not just take from it because they have the God given ability to do so, something many of us don't have. There is nothing wrong with suggesting the wealthy give back to those that are the source of their wealth. Despite the headlines dedicated to donations made by the super-rich, data shows that the most charitable people in the U.S. aren't those making six or even seven-figure salaries, its lower-income people."Personal Responsibility" is a two-way street. You can't claim to be all about "personal responsibility", then attempt to make the actions of an individual the "responsibility" of an entire political ideology.
So....have we figured out who put a gun to those people's heads and FORCED them to give back their prize?
So....have we figured out who put a gun to those people's heads and FORCED them to give back their prize?
I take it you are referring to the taxes due on a $400,000 house. That would be the IRS. That would be 35% and come to $140,000.
The St. Jude Dream House giveaway was yesterday. It seems a fairly well to do person won it. As of last night, people were responding to the announcement that he should donate the proceeds of the house all to St. Jude. Jesus H. Christ. Liberals even want to tell people what to do with their winnings in a charity raffle. The posts have been removed, but the talk on Paducah Topix has started up. It isn't up to the donating back part yet, but will be soon, they did the same shit last year.
I, too, bought a ticket both this year and last. That was a $100 not tax deductible to St. Jude's both years. They raised $500,000 last year and $700,000 this year. I had to retire early due to my health, and if I ever win it, I won't feel obligated to donate once cent of my winnings to anyone.
Liberals are just disgusting. What's theirs is theirs and what's ours is theirs! I would bet at least the cyber dollar hat none of the critics even purchased a ticket.
..
Those that have less give more of what they have. Households with incomes of of $50,000 to $99,000 give 6% of there income. Those with incomes over $200,000 give to 4.7%.Successful people have a social responsibility to make the world a better place and not just take from it because they have the God given ability to do so, something many of us don't have. There is nothing wrong with suggesting the wealthy give back to those that are the source of their wealth. Despite the headlines dedicated to donations made by the super-rich, data shows that the most charitable people in the U.S. aren't those making six or even seven-figure salaries, its lower-income people."Personal Responsibility" is a two-way street. You can't claim to be all about "personal responsibility", then attempt to make the actions of an individual the "responsibility" of an entire political ideology.
Buying a non tax free charitable raffle ticket IS giving back. I'm not sure where you came up with your other data. Out of the air as usual, no doubt.