Liberals Aren’t Liking This Newly-Discovered Photo Of The 1924 Democratic Convention…

Don’t change the fact, three democrats invented the KKK. Democrats moved the most in the KKK especially those in the south despite what your top secret KKK archives you put together.

Nnnnnnope. Six (not three) ex-Confederate soldiers invented the KKK and they had no known political affilations -- and Democrats didn't exist in that time and place anyway. They were all twentysomethings and modeled it after "Kuklos Adelphon" a popular college fraternity of the time; they corrupted Kuklos (Greek for 'circle') into two words Ku Klux for the mystery factor and added Klan with A K for alliteration (all the ideas of a founder-soldier named Kennedy).

That Klan was soon taken over by nearby pre-existing vigilante elements and became one of literally dozens of similar local and regional groups throughout the defeated Confederacy, usually started by and/or populated by ex-soldiers bent on in effect continuing the War. That Klan was defunct by the early 1870s. Then in 1915 after the Dixon/Grifith film "Birth of a Nation" romanticized that decades-old Klan as part of the Lost Cause movement, an ex-minister and salesman named William J. "Colonel Joe" Simmons recreated a new Klan (officially called the "Knights of the Ku Klux Klan") so that he could milk money off the film by selling memberships to gullibles wanting to emulate the movie. Simmons too had no political affiliation.

That (Simmons) Klan is the one pictured in the OP. It spread literally from coast to coast.

That Klan was officially terminated in 1944 by a combination of an IRS lien and getting its state charter terminated by the Governor. Some historians cite a third Klan when one Dr. Samuel Green tried to re-start it after World War II. Happily Green keeled over and croaked from a heart attack and that was the end of that. I don't count Green as a "third Klan" since it never officially got off the ground, but if you want to count him --- Green too had no political affiliation.

Ya see shirley, the Klan wasn't there for politics. It was there for racism and bigotry and busting unions and whipping drunks and making people go to church. When it dabbled in politics at all it supported or opposed both Democrats and Republicans as well as no-party candidates.

NONE of this is a "secret". It's all readily available on the internets. You could go to those internets and try to prove any of this wrong. But you'll fail.

Here, I'll even give you the search terms:
Original founders: James Crowe, Calvin Jones, John B. Kennedy, John Lester, Frank O. McCord, Richard R. Reed. December 24 1865. 205 West Madison Street, Pulaski Tennessee.

Second Klan: William Joseph Simmons, Thanksgiving Day 1915, Stone Mountain Georgia.

aaaaaaaaaaaaand GO.
Notice what is says about party affiliation (here's a hint: "Democrat"):

iu

I didn't know there was an image here until I killed my AdBlock just now.

The Democrat (Douglas) is in blue. He won one state and half of New Jersey, which split its EV between Douglas and Lincoln. Douglas came in dead last in a field of four major candidates. You'll notice none of his EVs are in the South, the same number there (zero) as Lincoln --- who wasn't even on ballots in the South (the Republican Party didn't run a POTUS candidate in the South until 1868). The purple area is a candidate the Southerners ran after they kicked the Democratic Party convention out from Charleston. The D party had to move its convention north. The southerners never actually named the party or formally organized it -- they just put a candidate on the ballots.

The ochre color is the Constitutional Unionists, an outgrowth of the defunct Whig Party which disintegrated because it couldn't come to a consensus on slavery. Bell was a slaveowner himself who nevertheless opposed expansion of slavery and opposed secession. In fact of these four candidates three (Lincoln, Douglas and Bell) actively opposed the idea of secession. After Douglas lost he worked with Lincoln to prevent the secession going on speaking tours in the South and when that didn't work, advised the new President on how to combat the South.

So contrary to Fingerboy's Fantasies, the Democratic Party pulled a big fat zero in 1860 in the South. As I said it wasn't going to be in its dominant "Solid South" position until at least the 1870s.

Oh and here's another flaw in this map --- "West Virginia". It didn't exist in 1860. That area was part of Virginia until after the War started when it was split off, ostensibly not wishing to be part of secession. There might have been an "East Tennessee" created in the same way, as there was similar sentiment in this region. So where this map imagines a West Virginia sending its votes to Lincoln, it was actually the northwest section of Virginia, which voted for Bell. And New Jersey should be both red and blue. Sloppy work.

That West Virginia split to the Union and East Tennessee did not, is a reflection of how many Union troops were in West Virginia and how many Confederate troops were in East Tennessee, when each took their votes on it. And that in turn is demonstrative of how split the South was about secession and war. Significant chunks of the Southern population wanted no part of either. Just as there were significant chunks of what is now West Virginia who wanted to stay Virginia and Confederate. As usual the population is cowed by force --- voter intimidation was in NO WAY a new idea when the Klan and the Knights of the White Camellia and all those groups engaged in it.

Matter of fact here's a blatant example of voter intimidation from several years before the Civil War in a massive riot perpetuated by the political party that would most resemble the later Klan --- the Know Nothings.
You claimed the Democrat Party didn't exist in 1860.

You were dead wrong.

End of story.
LOL

He never said that, ya lyin’ piss bucket.

Post #1391

"Democrats didn't exist in that time and place anyway."

Wrong again, dumbass.
 
You claimed the Democrat Party didn't exist in 1860.

You were dead wrong.

End of story.

Here is what he actually said:
Nnnnnnope. Six (not three) ex-Confederate soldiers invented the KKK and they had no known political affilations -- and Democrats didn't exist in that time and place anyway

Who invented the KKK?

6 white ex-confederate soldiers- that there is no record of ever being members of the Democratic Party

Why did he say that the Democrats didn't exist in that time and place anyway?

Because the Democratic Party didn't exist in the Confederacy and wasn't yet an official force in the ex-Confederate states when the KKK was started.

What part of "Democrats didn't exist in that time and place anyway" didn't you understand, dumbass?
What part of, “in that time and place,” don’t you understand?

Pogo did, moron.
Nope, Pogo didn’t. You’re simply lying now and everyone here sees that for themselves.

Quote Pogo saying anything about Democrats not existing before 1860... you can’t because he didn’t even say snything about 1860.

Quote Pogo saying anything about Democrats not existing beyond the borders of Tennessee... you can’t do that either because he didn’t.

Basically, you misunderstood what he said and accused him of saying what you imagine he did. And because you’re not a man of character, you can’t bring yourself to simply acknowledge your mistake but would rather keep digging your hole deeper and deeper.

Allow me to quote post #1391

"Democrats didn't exist in that time and place anyway."

You and Pogo are batting 1.000 when it comes to being wrong.
 
Nnnnnnope. Six (not three) ex-Confederate soldiers invented the KKK and they had no known political affilations -- and Democrats didn't exist in that time and place anyway. They were all twentysomethings and modeled it after "Kuklos Adelphon" a popular college fraternity of the time; they corrupted Kuklos (Greek for 'circle') into two words Ku Klux for the mystery factor and added Klan with A K for alliteration (all the ideas of a founder-soldier named Kennedy).

That Klan was soon taken over by nearby pre-existing vigilante elements and became one of literally dozens of similar local and regional groups throughout the defeated Confederacy, usually started by and/or populated by ex-soldiers bent on in effect continuing the War. That Klan was defunct by the early 1870s. Then in 1915 after the Dixon/Grifith film "Birth of a Nation" romanticized that decades-old Klan as part of the Lost Cause movement, an ex-minister and salesman named William J. "Colonel Joe" Simmons recreated a new Klan (officially called the "Knights of the Ku Klux Klan") so that he could milk money off the film by selling memberships to gullibles wanting to emulate the movie. Simmons too had no political affiliation.

That (Simmons) Klan is the one pictured in the OP. It spread literally from coast to coast.

That Klan was officially terminated in 1944 by a combination of an IRS lien and getting its state charter terminated by the Governor. Some historians cite a third Klan when one Dr. Samuel Green tried to re-start it after World War II. Happily Green keeled over and croaked from a heart attack and that was the end of that. I don't count Green as a "third Klan" since it never officially got off the ground, but if you want to count him --- Green too had no political affiliation.

Ya see shirley, the Klan wasn't there for politics. It was there for racism and bigotry and busting unions and whipping drunks and making people go to church. When it dabbled in politics at all it supported or opposed both Democrats and Republicans as well as no-party candidates.

NONE of this is a "secret". It's all readily available on the internets. You could go to those internets and try to prove any of this wrong. But you'll fail.

Here, I'll even give you the search terms:
Original founders: James Crowe, Calvin Jones, John B. Kennedy, John Lester, Frank O. McCord, Richard R. Reed. December 24 1865. 205 West Madison Street, Pulaski Tennessee.

Second Klan: William Joseph Simmons, Thanksgiving Day 1915, Stone Mountain Georgia.

aaaaaaaaaaaaand GO.
Notice what is says about party affiliation (here's a hint: "Democrat"):

iu

I didn't know there was an image here until I killed my AdBlock just now.

The Democrat (Douglas) is in blue. He won one state and half of New Jersey, which split its EV between Douglas and Lincoln. Douglas came in dead last in a field of four major candidates. You'll notice none of his EVs are in the South, the same number there (zero) as Lincoln --- who wasn't even on ballots in the South (the Republican Party didn't run a POTUS candidate in the South until 1868). The purple area is a candidate the Southerners ran after they kicked the Democratic Party convention out from Charleston. The D party had to move its convention north. The southerners never actually named the party or formally organized it -- they just put a candidate on the ballots.

The ochre color is the Constitutional Unionists, an outgrowth of the defunct Whig Party which disintegrated because it couldn't come to a consensus on slavery. Bell was a slaveowner himself who nevertheless opposed expansion of slavery and opposed secession. In fact of these four candidates three (Lincoln, Douglas and Bell) actively opposed the idea of secession. After Douglas lost he worked with Lincoln to prevent the secession going on speaking tours in the South and when that didn't work, advised the new President on how to combat the South.

So contrary to Fingerboy's Fantasies, the Democratic Party pulled a big fat zero in 1860 in the South. As I said it wasn't going to be in its dominant "Solid South" position until at least the 1870s.

Oh and here's another flaw in this map --- "West Virginia". It didn't exist in 1860. That area was part of Virginia until after the War started when it was split off, ostensibly not wishing to be part of secession. There might have been an "East Tennessee" created in the same way, as there was similar sentiment in this region. So where this map imagines a West Virginia sending its votes to Lincoln, it was actually the northwest section of Virginia, which voted for Bell. And New Jersey should be both red and blue. Sloppy work.

That West Virginia split to the Union and East Tennessee did not, is a reflection of how many Union troops were in West Virginia and how many Confederate troops were in East Tennessee, when each took their votes on it. And that in turn is demonstrative of how split the South was about secession and war. Significant chunks of the Southern population wanted no part of either. Just as there were significant chunks of what is now West Virginia who wanted to stay Virginia and Confederate. As usual the population is cowed by force --- voter intimidation was in NO WAY a new idea when the Klan and the Knights of the White Camellia and all those groups engaged in it.

Matter of fact here's a blatant example of voter intimidation from several years before the Civil War in a massive riot perpetuated by the political party that would most resemble the later Klan --- the Know Nothings.
You claimed the Democrat Party didn't exist in 1860.

You were dead wrong.

End of story.

Once AGAIN -- WRONG. And once again, we already did this. Once again, as I corrected your jellyfaced ignorant ass before, I said it did not exist *IN* *THAT* *TIME* *AND* *PLACE*. And once again, "that time and place" was Tennessee and 1865. I did not bring up "1860". YOU did.

Jesus Christ in a Canoe, you even QUOTED ME two posts later and contradicted yourself ---

What part of "Democrats didn't exist in that time and place anyway" didn't you understand, dumbass?


Your use of facts and actual accurate language confuses Brippy.

I'll let you know if I ever encounter any from you dumbasses.
 
Here is what he actually said:
Nnnnnnope. Six (not three) ex-Confederate soldiers invented the KKK and they had no known political affilations -- and Democrats didn't exist in that time and place anyway

Who invented the KKK?

6 white ex-confederate soldiers- that there is no record of ever being members of the Democratic Party

Why did he say that the Democrats didn't exist in that time and place anyway?

Because the Democratic Party didn't exist in the Confederacy and wasn't yet an official force in the ex-Confederate states when the KKK was started.

What part of "Democrats didn't exist in that time and place anyway" didn't you understand, dumbass?
What part of, “in that time and place,” don’t you understand?

Pogo did, moron.
Nope, Pogo didn’t. You’re simply lying now and everyone here sees that for themselves.

Quote Pogo saying anything about Democrats not existing before 1860... you can’t because he didn’t even say snything about 1860.

Quote Pogo saying anything about Democrats not existing beyond the borders of Tennessee... you can’t do that either because he didn’t.

Basically, you misunderstood what he said and accused him of saying what you imagine he did. And because you’re not a man of character, you can’t bring yourself to simply acknowledge your mistake but would rather keep digging your hole deeper and deeper.

Allow me to quote post #1391

"Democrats didn't exist in that time and place anyway."

You and Pogo are batting 1.000 when it comes to being wrong.

Then find us one.

And don't take us to some trolley tracks a thousand miles away this time.
 
What part of "Democrats didn't exist in that time and place anyway" didn't you understand, dumbass?
What part of, “in that time and place,” don’t you understand?

Pogo did, moron.
Nope, Pogo didn’t. You’re simply lying now and everyone here sees that for themselves.

Quote Pogo saying anything about Democrats not existing before 1860... you can’t because he didn’t even say snything about 1860.

Quote Pogo saying anything about Democrats not existing beyond the borders of Tennessee... you can’t do that either because he didn’t.

Basically, you misunderstood what he said and accused him of saying what you imagine he did. And because you’re not a man of character, you can’t bring yourself to simply acknowledge your mistake but would rather keep digging your hole deeper and deeper.

Allow me to quote post #1391

"Democrats didn't exist in that time and place anyway."

You and Pogo are batting 1.000 when it comes to being wrong.

Then find us one.

And don't take us to some trolley tracks a thousand miles away this time.

You aren't improving your creibility by brining up the same two-year old post over and over again. If that's all you got, it's pretty fucking sad.

You're the one who made the claim. Now support it.
 
What part of, “in that time and place,” don’t you understand?

Pogo did, moron.
Nope, Pogo didn’t. You’re simply lying now and everyone here sees that for themselves.

Quote Pogo saying anything about Democrats not existing before 1860... you can’t because he didn’t even say snything about 1860.

Quote Pogo saying anything about Democrats not existing beyond the borders of Tennessee... you can’t do that either because he didn’t.

Basically, you misunderstood what he said and accused him of saying what you imagine he did. And because you’re not a man of character, you can’t bring yourself to simply acknowledge your mistake but would rather keep digging your hole deeper and deeper.

Allow me to quote post #1391

"Democrats didn't exist in that time and place anyway."

You and Pogo are batting 1.000 when it comes to being wrong.

Then find us one.

And don't take us to some trolley tracks a thousand miles away this time.

You aren't improving your creibility by brining up the same two-year old post over and over again. If that's all you got, it's pretty fucking sad.

You're the one who made the claim. Now support it.

Already did. The first time you started whining about it. Your job is to prove the positive.

The Confederacy didn't believe in political parties. Some historians say that contributed to their downfall. I don't necessarily agree but it's out there.

Ironic you want to bring up "credibility" after trying to claim a Klan march in December in Wisconsin was a Democratic convention, and then somehow found a map that included a state that did not then exist.

Oh yes do tell us more about this "credibility".
 
Pogo did, moron.
Nope, Pogo didn’t. You’re simply lying now and everyone here sees that for themselves.

Quote Pogo saying anything about Democrats not existing before 1860... you can’t because he didn’t even say snything about 1860.

Quote Pogo saying anything about Democrats not existing beyond the borders of Tennessee... you can’t do that either because he didn’t.

Basically, you misunderstood what he said and accused him of saying what you imagine he did. And because you’re not a man of character, you can’t bring yourself to simply acknowledge your mistake but would rather keep digging your hole deeper and deeper.

Allow me to quote post #1391

"Democrats didn't exist in that time and place anyway."

You and Pogo are batting 1.000 when it comes to being wrong.

Then find us one.

And don't take us to some trolley tracks a thousand miles away this time.

You aren't improving your creibility by brining up the same two-year old post over and over again. If that's all you got, it's pretty fucking sad.

You're the one who made the claim. Now support it.

Already did. The first time you started whining about it. Your job is to prove the positive.

The Confederacy didn't believe in political parties. Some historians say that contributed to their downfall. I don't necessarily agree but it's out there.

The "positive" is your claim that there was no Democrat party in Tennesee when the KKK was created. You don't get to claim your proposition is the "negative" simply because it has the word "no" in it. A 5-year-old could understand that. You keep talking about the Confederacy, but that didn't exist at the time the KKK was created.

Who do you think you're fooling?
 
Nope, Pogo didn’t. You’re simply lying now and everyone here sees that for themselves.

Quote Pogo saying anything about Democrats not existing before 1860... you can’t because he didn’t even say snything about 1860.

Quote Pogo saying anything about Democrats not existing beyond the borders of Tennessee... you can’t do that either because he didn’t.

Basically, you misunderstood what he said and accused him of saying what you imagine he did. And because you’re not a man of character, you can’t bring yourself to simply acknowledge your mistake but would rather keep digging your hole deeper and deeper.

Allow me to quote post #1391

"Democrats didn't exist in that time and place anyway."

You and Pogo are batting 1.000 when it comes to being wrong.

Then find us one.

And don't take us to some trolley tracks a thousand miles away this time.

You aren't improving your creibility by brining up the same two-year old post over and over again. If that's all you got, it's pretty fucking sad.

You're the one who made the claim. Now support it.

Already did. The first time you started whining about it. Your job is to prove the positive.

The Confederacy didn't believe in political parties. Some historians say that contributed to their downfall. I don't necessarily agree but it's out there.

The "positive" is your claim that there was no Democrat party in Tennesee when the KKK was created. You don't get to claim your proposition is the "negative" simply because it has the word "no" in it. A 5-year-old could understand that. You keep talking about the Confederacy, but that didn't exist at the time the KKK was created.

Who do you think you're fooling?

And neither did the United States in that time and place. Tennessee wouldn't be readmitted until 1866. Therefore the last time it existed under a government where Democrats even operated was June of 1861, when it seceded from that government. And that's four years prior to 1865, which is what I said in the first place.

See, I have this shit mapped out before I post. I don't just throw up random fake Wisconsin and West Virginia pics and hope nobody notices. That's the difference between you and I. Also I don't have jelly all over my face.

And no, the "positive" is your claim that something existed. All you need is one to prove that.
 
Allow me to quote post #1391

"Democrats didn't exist in that time and place anyway."

You and Pogo are batting 1.000 when it comes to being wrong.

Then find us one.

And don't take us to some trolley tracks a thousand miles away this time.

You aren't improving your creibility by brining up the same two-year old post over and over again. If that's all you got, it's pretty fucking sad.

You're the one who made the claim. Now support it.

Already did. The first time you started whining about it. Your job is to prove the positive.

The Confederacy didn't believe in political parties. Some historians say that contributed to their downfall. I don't necessarily agree but it's out there.

The "positive" is your claim that there was no Democrat party in Tennesee when the KKK was created. You don't get to claim your proposition is the "negative" simply because it has the word "no" in it. A 5-year-old could understand that. You keep talking about the Confederacy, but that didn't exist at the time the KKK was created.

Who do you think you're fooling?

And neither did the United States in that time and place. Tennessee wouldn't be readmitted until 1866. Therefore the last time it existed under a government where Democrats even operated was June of 1861, when it seceded from that government. And that's four years prior to 1865, which is what I said in the first place.

See, I have this shit mapped out before I post. I don't just throw up random fake Wisconsin and West Virginia pics and hope nobody notices. That's the difference between you and I. Also I don't have jelly all over my face.

And no, the "positive" is your claim that something existed. All you need is one to prove that.

I don't even care about this point, but you're parsing words like your life depended on it.
From now on here's the only response you're going to get: I just don't care.
 
Then find us one.

And don't take us to some trolley tracks a thousand miles away this time.

You aren't improving your creibility by brining up the same two-year old post over and over again. If that's all you got, it's pretty fucking sad.

You're the one who made the claim. Now support it.

Already did. The first time you started whining about it. Your job is to prove the positive.

The Confederacy didn't believe in political parties. Some historians say that contributed to their downfall. I don't necessarily agree but it's out there.

The "positive" is your claim that there was no Democrat party in Tennesee when the KKK was created. You don't get to claim your proposition is the "negative" simply because it has the word "no" in it. A 5-year-old could understand that. You keep talking about the Confederacy, but that didn't exist at the time the KKK was created.

Who do you think you're fooling?

And neither did the United States in that time and place. Tennessee wouldn't be readmitted until 1866. Therefore the last time it existed under a government where Democrats even operated was June of 1861, when it seceded from that government. And that's four years prior to 1865, which is what I said in the first place.

See, I have this shit mapped out before I post. I don't just throw up random fake Wisconsin and West Virginia pics and hope nobody notices. That's the difference between you and I. Also I don't have jelly all over my face.

And no, the "positive" is your claim that something existed. All you need is one to prove that.

I don't even care about this point, but you're parsing words like your life depended on it.
From now on here's the only response you're going to get: I just don't care.

So you can't do it.

No shit.
 
You aren't improving your creibility by brining up the same two-year old post over and over again. If that's all you got, it's pretty fucking sad.

You're the one who made the claim. Now support it.

Already did. The first time you started whining about it. Your job is to prove the positive.

The Confederacy didn't believe in political parties. Some historians say that contributed to their downfall. I don't necessarily agree but it's out there.

The "positive" is your claim that there was no Democrat party in Tennesee when the KKK was created. You don't get to claim your proposition is the "negative" simply because it has the word "no" in it. A 5-year-old could understand that. You keep talking about the Confederacy, but that didn't exist at the time the KKK was created.

Who do you think you're fooling?

And neither did the United States in that time and place. Tennessee wouldn't be readmitted until 1866. Therefore the last time it existed under a government where Democrats even operated was June of 1861, when it seceded from that government. And that's four years prior to 1865, which is what I said in the first place.

See, I have this shit mapped out before I post. I don't just throw up random fake Wisconsin and West Virginia pics and hope nobody notices. That's the difference between you and I. Also I don't have jelly all over my face.

And no, the "positive" is your claim that something existed. All you need is one to prove that.

I don't even care about this point, but you're parsing words like your life depended on it.
From now on here's the only response you're going to get: I just don't care.

So you can't do it.

No shit.

I don't care, moron
 
Already did. The first time you started whining about it. Your job is to prove the positive.

The Confederacy didn't believe in political parties. Some historians say that contributed to their downfall. I don't necessarily agree but it's out there.

The "positive" is your claim that there was no Democrat party in Tennesee when the KKK was created. You don't get to claim your proposition is the "negative" simply because it has the word "no" in it. A 5-year-old could understand that. You keep talking about the Confederacy, but that didn't exist at the time the KKK was created.

Who do you think you're fooling?

And neither did the United States in that time and place. Tennessee wouldn't be readmitted until 1866. Therefore the last time it existed under a government where Democrats even operated was June of 1861, when it seceded from that government. And that's four years prior to 1865, which is what I said in the first place.

See, I have this shit mapped out before I post. I don't just throw up random fake Wisconsin and West Virginia pics and hope nobody notices. That's the difference between you and I. Also I don't have jelly all over my face.

And no, the "positive" is your claim that something existed. All you need is one to prove that.

I don't even care about this point, but you're parsing words like your life depended on it.
From now on here's the only response you're going to get: I just don't care.

So you can't do it.

No shit.

I don't care, moron

Obviously not. Nor did you care when you posted a December day in Wisconsin and tried to sell it as the "Democratic convention" at the beginning here. Because it's all about "credibility".

Friggin' jackass.
 
The "positive" is your claim that there was no Democrat party in Tennesee when the KKK was created. You don't get to claim your proposition is the "negative" simply because it has the word "no" in it. A 5-year-old could understand that. You keep talking about the Confederacy, but that didn't exist at the time the KKK was created.

Who do you think you're fooling?

And neither did the United States in that time and place. Tennessee wouldn't be readmitted until 1866. Therefore the last time it existed under a government where Democrats even operated was June of 1861, when it seceded from that government. And that's four years prior to 1865, which is what I said in the first place.

See, I have this shit mapped out before I post. I don't just throw up random fake Wisconsin and West Virginia pics and hope nobody notices. That's the difference between you and I. Also I don't have jelly all over my face.

And no, the "positive" is your claim that something existed. All you need is one to prove that.

I don't even care about this point, but you're parsing words like your life depended on it.
From now on here's the only response you're going to get: I just don't care.

So you can't do it.

No shit.

I don't care, moron

Obviously not. Nor did you care when you posted a December day in Wisconsin and tried to sell it as the "Democratic convention" at the beginning here. Because it's all about "credibility".

Friggin' jackass.
I don't care, moron
 
Just pointing out- that Brippy is the sterling character who called every American veteran of World War 2 a dupe. And clearly he is still pissed off that America defeated Germany and Japan.

The people who engineered us into a war with Germany and Japan are Stalinists. The people who actually did the fighting were just dupes and victims.
 
Then find us one.

And don't take us to some trolley tracks a thousand miles away this time.

You aren't improving your creibility by brining up the same two-year old post over and over again. If that's all you got, it's pretty fucking sad.

You're the one who made the claim. Now support it.

Already did. The first time you started whining about it. Your job is to prove the positive.

The Confederacy didn't believe in political parties. Some historians say that contributed to their downfall. I don't necessarily agree but it's out there.

The "positive" is your claim that there was no Democrat party in Tennesee when the KKK was created. You don't get to claim your proposition is the "negative" simply because it has the word "no" in it. A 5-year-old could understand that. You keep talking about the Confederacy, but that didn't exist at the time the KKK was created.

Who do you think you're fooling?

And neither did the United States in that time and place. Tennessee wouldn't be readmitted until 1866. Therefore the last time it existed under a government where Democrats even operated was June of 1861, when it seceded from that government. And that's four years prior to 1865, which is what I said in the first place.

See, I have this shit mapped out before I post. I don't just throw up random fake Wisconsin and West Virginia pics and hope nobody notices. That's the difference between you and I. Also I don't have jelly all over my face.

And no, the "positive" is your claim that something existed. All you need is one to prove that.

I don't even care about this point, but you're parsing words like your life depended on it.
From now on here's the only response you're going to get: I just don't care.

You don't care so much you keep posting bullshit over and over.

lol
 
Ever wonder why the Dims try so hard to paint Republicans as racists? Here's your answer, and it's hilarious!

Liberals Aren’t Liking This Newly-Discovered Photo Of The 1924 Democrat Convention…

klanbake-600x387.jpg


ct-kkk-chicago-flashback-0125-20150123-600x477.jpg

And here is of course Brip lying again.

Still trying to dance away from his lie.

But as we all know- all he/she/it does is lie- and make nonsensical insults and of course express his disdain for our veterans of World War 2

That's really the only post I ever submitted that you can attack?
 
You aren't improving your creibility by brining up the same two-year old post over and over again. If that's all you got, it's pretty fucking sad.

You're the one who made the claim. Now support it.

Already did. The first time you started whining about it. Your job is to prove the positive.

The Confederacy didn't believe in political parties. Some historians say that contributed to their downfall. I don't necessarily agree but it's out there.

The "positive" is your claim that there was no Democrat party in Tennesee when the KKK was created. You don't get to claim your proposition is the "negative" simply because it has the word "no" in it. A 5-year-old could understand that. You keep talking about the Confederacy, but that didn't exist at the time the KKK was created.

Who do you think you're fooling?

And neither did the United States in that time and place. Tennessee wouldn't be readmitted until 1866. Therefore the last time it existed under a government where Democrats even operated was June of 1861, when it seceded from that government. And that's four years prior to 1865, which is what I said in the first place.

See, I have this shit mapped out before I post. I don't just throw up random fake Wisconsin and West Virginia pics and hope nobody notices. That's the difference between you and I. Also I don't have jelly all over my face.

And no, the "positive" is your claim that something existed. All you need is one to prove that.

I don't even care about this point, but you're parsing words like your life depended on it.
From now on here's the only response you're going to get: I just don't care.

You don't care so much you keep posting bullshit over and over.

lol
I don't care, moron.
 
Ever wonder why the Dims try so hard to paint Republicans as racists? Here's your answer, and it's hilarious!

Liberals Aren’t Liking This Newly-Discovered Photo Of The 1924 Democrat Convention…

klanbake-600x387.jpg


ct-kkk-chicago-flashback-0125-20150123-600x477.jpg

And here is of course Brip lying again.

Still trying to dance away from his lie.

But as we all know- all he/she/it does is lie- and make nonsensical insults and of course express his disdain for our veterans of World War 2

That's really the only post I ever submitted that you can attack?

No- i can attack virtually all of your posts.

I choose to point out this specific blatant lie that you were caught in in this thread.
 
Ever wonder why the Dims try so hard to paint Republicans as racists? Here's your answer, and it's hilarious!

Liberals Aren’t Liking This Newly-Discovered Photo Of The 1924 Democrat Convention…

klanbake-600x387.jpg


ct-kkk-chicago-flashback-0125-20150123-600x477.jpg

And here is of course Brip lying again.

Still trying to dance away from his lie.

But as we all know- all he/she/it does is lie- and make nonsensical insults and of course express his disdain for our veterans of World War 2

That's really the only post I ever submitted that you can attack?

No- i can attack virtually all of your posts.

I choose to point out this specific blatant lie that you were caught in in this thread.

You really are a pathetic douchebag.
 

Forum List

Back
Top