Liberals Outraged, Too!!!

Guess what? Obamas favorite color is Orange and breaking News Harry Reid was quoted as saying his favorite color was purple.

Cant liberals agree on anything?
 
The essential point of the OP was that the shameful speech by Reverend Lucas, and endorsed by Communist/Liberal/Democrat DeBlasio was designed to divide rather than bring the races together.

And, central to the theme, as seen in the title, was that sensible Liberals agree that it was a shameful display.

I also pointed out that those were the brighter Liberals who found it so.


Sure enough, the comments, and lack of comment, by Liberals in this thread proved my very point:
we have some of the stupidest Liberals in the nation right here on this very board.
 
The essential point of the OP was that the shameful speech by Reverend Lucas, and endorsed by Communist/Liberal/Democrat DeBlasio was designed to divide rather than bring the races together.

And, central to the theme, as seen in the title, was that sensible Liberals agree that it was a shameful display.

I also pointed out that those were the brighter Liberals who found it so.


Sure enough, the comments, and lack of comment, by Liberals in this thread proved my very point:
we have some of the stupidest Liberals in the nation right here on this very board.

To be fair there was an equally hate-filled speech at Bush's inauguration too.
 
New York City, as is almost every American mega-city, a perfect venue for Marxist growth. Plenty of room for corruption, deception, uncontrolled growth of regulations, welfare and taxation....the perfect formula for orchestrated progression to a failed socialist state.

Ahahahahahahahahahaaaa......New York City is Mecca for the plutocracy that has killed off the middle class. "Marxist growth"....Stupidest thing I've read today.
 
The essential point of the OP was that the shameful speech by Reverend Lucas, and endorsed by Communist/Liberal/Democrat DeBlasio was designed to divide rather than bring the races together.

And, central to the theme, as seen in the title, was that sensible Liberals agree that it was a shameful display.

I also pointed out that those were the brighter Liberals who found it so.


Sure enough, the comments, and lack of comment, by Liberals in this thread proved my very point:
we have some of the stupidest Liberals in the nation right here on this very board.

To be fair there was an equally hate-filled speech at Bush's inauguration too.


For example?
 
so there are a variety of Librals :cool: in NYC w/ differing views. :eusa_eh: This is a breaking story because...
 
Last edited:
New York City, as is almost every American mega-city, a perfect venue for Marxist growth. Plenty of room for corruption, deception, uncontrolled growth of regulations, welfare and taxation....the perfect formula for orchestrated progression to a failed socialist state.

Ahahahahahahahahahaaaa......New York City is Mecca for the plutocracy that has killed off the middle class. "Marxist growth"....Stupidest thing I've read today.

Seriously though. Thats where the "orgy of rw greed" took place in late 2007.
 
Guess what? Obamas favorite color is Orange and breaking News Harry Reid was quoted as saying his favorite color was purple.

Cant liberals agree on anything?

That liberals disagree on a non-political issue proves they don't have the same position on every political issue. Got it.
 
1. NYC had made the most egregious of errors in electing Communist/Progressive/Democrat Bill DeBlasio as mayor of this great city. So, there really is no element of surprise when DeBlasio tapped Brooklyn pastor Reverend Fred Lucas Jr., who serves as the chaplain to the Department of Sanitation, to provide the invocation at the inauguration ceremony.





2. The Reverend's speech was peppered with numerous inappropriate racial references, such as “End the civil wars and usher in a new Reconstruction era..." and words used were shackles, plantation, crooked, and emancipation proclamation."

The reverend referred to New York City as "the plantation called New York City."

3. But, heck, what would one expect, after all Communist/Progressive/Democrat DeBlasio is an avowed exponent of the Marxist 'religious' perspective called "Liberation Theology."

a. "... "Bill de Blasio says he doesn't believe in churches -- and he doesn't believe in God either," reports the NY Daily News.
De Blasio told reporters in the Bronx, "I’m not affiliated with any particular church. I do consider myself a spiritual person." He continued, "As I’ve said many times, I was very influenced by liberation theology, by Christian liberation theology in the work I did after college and after graduate school."
Mayor Elect Bill De Blasio Quashes Atheism Rumors, Says He's Spiritual But Unaffiliated

He means when he was in Nicaragua, working with the Sandinistas.







4. Coincidentally, Communist/Progressive/Democrat DeBlasio is known as New York's Obama....and Obama had the same kind of racialist banter at his inauguration.

a "Lord, in the memory of all the saints who from their labors rest, and in the joy of a new beginning, we ask you to help us work for that day when black will not be asked to get in back, when brown can stick around ... when yellow will be mellow ... when the red man can get ahead, man; and when white will embrace what is right. That all those who do justice and love mercy say Amen."
Reverend Joseph Lowry, at Obama Inauguration

Me...I'm as mellow as I can be.







5. But there is a ray of sunlight, as many Liberals found that divisionist polemics hard to stomach:

a." Personally, I am very versed in the income inequalities that exist today. I am also versed in the issues that exhist in New York City. There was no need for Reverend Lucas to use this opportunity to make erroneous references to slavery, with regards to the present conditions of New York City. I'm not going to tolerate this behavior from Sarah Palin or Phil Roberston, so i'm certainly not going to tolerate it from Reverend Lucas. "
The Urban Politico: New York City Mayor Bill deBlasio Inauguration (Full Video) & The Plantation called New York City (???)

b. I am a proud liberal, but the speakers opening DeBlasio's inaugural are embarrassing. "The Plantation of NYC"......F**K OFF!
At Bill de Blasio?s mayoral inauguration, invocation speaker says NYC is a ?plantation? | Twitchy

c. Cleric Fred Lucas Jr., calling NYC a plantation in his "prayer" is a disgrace! Isn't this supposed to be a day of uniting? linda stasi @Lindastasi Ibid.

d. A liberal New Yorker friend's candid comment about some of the tone so far: "This stuff is freaking me out." Josh Greenman @Joshgreenman Ibid.






7. Of course, there were examples of boilerplate Liberalism, too...not just from the podium:
"777Mark777 Sicarium
Deal wit it, hombre. You don't like it? Then move back home to Europe where you came from. You European people are illegal aliens here anyway." Preacher: New York City is a 'plantation' [VIDEO] | The Daily Caller

And this is exactly the kind of sentiment the DeBlasio-Lucas Axis was meant to bring out.

At least he left the 'mellow' folks alone!






6. Just more of this: De Blasio was roundly criticized back in November when Harry Belafonte, the civil rights leader and actor who was also a de Blasio surrogate, compared the libertarian billionaires Charles and David Koch to the Ku Klux Klan.
Preacher: New York City is a 'plantation' [VIDEO] | The Daily Caller



Throughout history there have been folks who sought to divide people in order to accrue power.....
....they're called tyrants.





I suspect that the brighter Liberals are shaking their heads, muttering 'What have we done...."

The rest of the nation knows what you've done.
I tried to think of an appropriate response to your post:
BULLSHIT! BULLSHIT! EVEN MORE BULLSHIT!
(I think I nailed it!!!!!)
 
The essential point of the OP was that the shameful speech by Reverend Lucas, and endorsed by Communist/Liberal/Democrat DeBlasio was designed to divide rather than bring the races together.

And, central to the theme, as seen in the title, was that sensible Liberals agree that it was a shameful display.

I also pointed out that those were the brighter Liberals who found it so.


Sure enough, the comments, and lack of comment, by Liberals in this thread proved my very point:
we have some of the stupidest Liberals in the nation right here on this very board.

Wow PC has found that if you mention race it doesnt unite people. Her proof is that she doesnt feel united. It doesnt matter if PC already felt that way since birth this is NEW STUFF.

Where oh where is this person who can discuss differences that bring us together? :doubt:

This person has never existed but PC is sure it can be done one day. Its' only been thousands upon thousands of years.

I feel the same way when I hear women talk about Pap Smears I'm all like "great! Someone else dedicated to divide us into groups instead of offering Pap Smears for everyone."
 
so there are a variety of Librals :cool: in NYC w/ differing views. :eusa_eh: This is a breaking story because...



Translation: "Well...some of us know it's shameful....."

Great!

This is the variety of post provided by Liberals trying to run and hide from the debilitation the Obama regime has wreaked on the nation, but aren't ready to admit the to complicity.


It's a step closer to accepting the blame you deserve.
 
The essential point of the OP was that the shameful speech by Reverend Lucas, and endorsed by Communist/Liberal/Democrat DeBlasio was designed to divide rather than bring the races together.

And, central to the theme, as seen in the title, was that sensible Liberals agree that it was a shameful display.

I also pointed out that those were the brighter Liberals who found it so.


Sure enough, the comments, and lack of comment, by Liberals in this thread proved my very point:
we have some of the stupidest Liberals in the nation right here on this very board.

To be fair there was an equally hate-filled speech at Bush's inauguration too.




I can't recall any such.


Fill us in, Rab......
 
The essential point of the OP was that the shameful speech by Reverend Lucas, and endorsed by Communist/Liberal/Democrat DeBlasio was designed to divide rather than bring the races together.

And, central to the theme, as seen in the title, was that sensible Liberals agree that it was a shameful display.

I also pointed out that those were the brighter Liberals who found it so.


Sure enough, the comments, and lack of comment, by Liberals in this thread proved my very point:
we have some of the stupidest Liberals in the nation right here on this very board.

Libs are a hive creature, unless they're instructed to protest you won't hear a peep.
 
The essential point of the OP was that the shameful speech by Reverend Lucas, and endorsed by Communist/Liberal/Democrat DeBlasio was designed to divide rather than bring the races together.

And, central to the theme, as seen in the title, was that sensible Liberals agree that it was a shameful display.

I also pointed out that those were the brighter Liberals who found it so.


Sure enough, the comments, and lack of comment, by Liberals in this thread proved my very point:
we have some of the stupidest Liberals in the nation right here on this very board.

Libs are a hive creature, unless they're instructed to protest you won't hear a peep.

Thats right! Thats why some liberals didnt like the speech because they all think alike


Retard
 
The essential point of the OP was that the shameful speech by Reverend Lucas, and endorsed by Communist/Liberal/Democrat DeBlasio was designed to divide rather than bring the races together.

And, central to the theme, as seen in the title, was that sensible Liberals agree that it was a shameful display.

I also pointed out that those were the brighter Liberals who found it so.


Sure enough, the comments, and lack of comment, by Liberals in this thread proved my very point:
we have some of the stupidest Liberals in the nation right here on this very board.

To be fair there was an equally hate-filled speech at Bush's inauguration too.


For example?
OK I made that up. But you can excuse any liberal excess by saying Bush did the same thing.
 
The essential point of the OP was that the shameful speech by Reverend Lucas, and endorsed by Communist/Liberal/Democrat DeBlasio was designed to divide rather than bring the races together.

And, central to the theme, as seen in the title, was that sensible Liberals agree that it was a shameful display.

I also pointed out that those were the brighter Liberals who found it so.


Sure enough, the comments, and lack of comment, by Liberals in this thread proved my very point:
we have some of the stupidest Liberals in the nation right here on this very board.

Libs are a hive creature, unless they're instructed to protest you won't hear a peep.




Let me give that an 'Amen:'

1. Gustave Le Bon, in his groundbreaking 1896 book, “The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind,” was the first to identify the phenomenon of mass psychology. Both Hitler and Mussolini used his book to understand how to incite a mob.

a. Coulter, in "Demonic," reminds of the similarity of Liberals.


b. Gustave Le Bon was the second to bring up mass psychology, the first "Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds" was published in 1841 and was written by the Scottish journalist (back when they actually did real journalism) Charles Mackay, which exposed mass psychosis for the first time..... accounts of classic scams, grand-scale madness, and deceptions.
in "Extraordinary Popular Delusions and The Madness of Crowds" by Charles MacKay



But...seems a number of 'em are breaking away....and not just those mentioned in the OP...

...I've even seen suggestions of Obama's incompetence noted in the mainstream media.



How long before our ersatz Liberals go on about how they always knew it.....
 
The essential point of the OP was that the shameful speech by Reverend Lucas, and endorsed by Communist/Liberal/Democrat DeBlasio was designed to divide rather than bring the races together.

And, central to the theme, as seen in the title, was that sensible Liberals agree that it was a shameful display.

I also pointed out that those were the brighter Liberals who found it so.


Sure enough, the comments, and lack of comment, by Liberals in this thread proved my very point:
we have some of the stupidest Liberals in the nation right here on this very board.

Libs are a hive creature, unless they're instructed to protest you won't hear a peep.

Thats right! Thats why some liberals didnt like the speech because they all think alike


Retard



Right....

In 2008 and 2012, they behaved more like iron filings in a magnetic field than human beings capable of thought and analysis.

They....you....voted for a failure in both domestic and foreign policy, and supported unemployment in the United States and radicals in the Middle East.

Great.

Just great.
 
Libs are a hive creature, unless they're instructed to protest you won't hear a peep.

Thats right! Thats why some liberals didnt like the speech because they all think alike


Retard



Right....

In 2008 and 2012, they behaved more like iron filings in a magnetic field than human beings capable of thought and analysis.

They....you....voted for a failure in both domestic and foreign policy, and supported unemployment in the United States and radicals in the Middle East.

Great.

Just great.

Those were also Bush's fault. And the GOP. Somehow they just were.
 
1. Gustave Le Bon, in his groundbreaking 1896 book, “The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind,” was the first to identify the phenomenon of mass psychology. Both Hitler and Mussolini used his book to understand how to incite a mob.

Was the ancient Roman versions not available to read?
 

Forum List

Back
Top