"Liberation of Iraq" or "INVASION of Iraq" caused 3,000 soldiers deaths!

[healthmyths]

So it is a fact.

People who use the term "Iraq Invasion" are perfectly content with dictators who allow drill bits used on people. With tongues cut out. With 28 million people living in constant fear of the dictator. People that use the Term "Iraq Invasion" are perfectly happy to support a dictator who if still in power today would have allowed 2,073,000 children to starve!
People who use the term "Iraq Invasion" are the type of people that were happy when US troops were killed by the terrorists because after all these people were encouraged when John Kerry called our troops "terrorists". When obama declared our military methodically and systematically using air-raids on villages killing civilians" ALL the Time! Our troops were INVADERS as you people that use that term so disgustingly call the heros that freed 28 million people all the while people like those that called it an "INVASION" were against these 28 million people having the same freedoms!

People who called it an "INVASION" did not want the people of Iraq to enjoy a 900% increase in their living!
People who called it an "INVASION" totally preferred Saddam to stay in power. These people have NO problem with the keeping Saddam doing things like the following to his OWN people...
Maybe those of you that don't enjoy as the people that wanted to keep Saddam in power will enjoy these videos!

Videos that show: Victims of Saddam's regime - SADDAM ATROCITIES
limb amputations - a man's arm is strapped to a board and lopped off,
footage from inside Abu Ghraib prison hospital of amputations of one of nine merchants who had their hands cut off for merely dealing in foreign currency.
tongue amputations - surrounded by several Fedayeen, the men are blindfolded with hands strapped behind their backs, tongues pulled out and cut in front of people watching
beheadings - very graphic footage - blindfolded men mae to kneel with heads put on pillows face down, their executioners with faces covered in black hoods, with long swords, chop off a man's head..
1987-88, during the Anfal campaign against the Kurds in the north of Iraq, as many as 100,000 people were killed. On March 16, 1988, Saddam forces dropped mustard gas, nerve agents,

ALL these during Saddam's rule. And people that use the term "Iraq Invasion" obviously approved of Saddam doing these things.

Victims of Saddam's regime - SADDAM ATROCITIES | Stock Footage, Research, Rights and Clearances | Global ImageWorks

Those of you that are civilized and not animals like Saddam, his sons, and the people that wanted Saddam to stay in power..would want the 28 million people of Iraq Liberated. That 2,073,000 children would not as they would have been starved under Saddam.. these children are alive!
This children are enjoying the benefits of US troops and 49 other countries of the "Coalition of the Willing" that helped "LIBERATE IRAQ" from Saddam!

If you and your neocon pigs were so interested in liberating people why did'nt we go into Rawanda, or the Sudan?

Pretty obvious. Not in the national security interest of the USA.

Rwanda (certainly shows you care when you can't even take time as I did to use the correct spelling!) or the Sudan didn't have an interest in destroying the USA
as terrorists that Saddam supported exhibited.

I mean Democrats complained we didn't take Saddam out the first time because he was a national security risk!

"Iraq's search for WMDs ...will continue as long as Saddam's in power"..Gore 2002

Here is a quote from a speech Gore gave in 1992.
"He,[Saddam Hussein], had already launched poison gas attacks repeatedly, and Bush looked the other way.
He had already conducted extensive terrorism activities, and Bush looked the other way.
He was already deeply involved in the efforts to obtain nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction.
Bush knew it, but he looked the other way."

Congressional Chronicle - C-SPAN Video Library

Rwanda and Sudan have never been a threat to US national security as Saddam Hussein was as Al Gore and these democrats illustrate:

"..deny Iraq the capacity to develop WMD".Bill Clinton,1998
"..most brutal dictators of Century", Biden,1998
"Iraq compliance with Resolution 687 becomes shell game"..Daschle 1998
"He will use those WMDs again,as he has ten times since 1983" ..Berger Clinton Ntl. Secur. Advr 1998
"posed by Iraq's refusal to end its WMD programs" Levin 1998
"Saddam has been engaged in development of WMDs which is a threat.."Pelosi 1998
"Hussein has chosen to spend his money on building WMDS.."Albright 1999
"Saddam to refine delivery systems, that will threaten the US..."Graham 2001
"Saddam has ignored the mandate of the UN and is building WMDs and the means to deliver.." Levin 2002
"Iraq's search for WMDs ...will continue as long as Saddam's in power"..Gore 2002
"Saddam retains stockpiles of WMDS.."Byrd 2002
"..give President authority to use force..to disarm Saddam because an arsenal of WMDs..threat our security"..Kerry 2002
"..Unmistakable evidence Saddam developing nuclear weapons next 5 years.."Rockefeller 2002
"Violated over 11 years every UN resolution demanding disarming WMDs.."Waxman 2002
"He's given aid,comfort & sanctuary to al Qaeda members..and keep developing WMDs"..Hillary 2002
"Compelling evidence Saddam has WMDs production storage capacity.." Graham 2002
"Without a question, we need to disarm Saddam. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime .... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction .... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...."Kerry , Jan. 23. 2003.