Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would agree that if there is a risk of death to the mother, and she is amicable to termination of the pregnancy, then so be it. There shouldn't be a need to get govt involved either.
That said, the circumstance is probably so rare that it's not a real issue. The bottom line is that the abortion is beyond barbaric itself. It's an act of a savage criminal.
.
the baby inside her isnt her body,,
You are literally dumber than xit.The jury heard all the evidence and disagreed with the judge
Sorry if that bothers you but thats how it is
No...you people really are mindless.Most of that is just you projecting
No, She had every right not to become pregnant, why do you continue to skip over facts. She, and the male participant, should have been more responsible, but you should not be able to negate his rights.…..
No, he can never have the same rights prior to birth. Again, she faces all the risks including mortality. That’s not emotional. So now you have 3 people claiming rights to her body!
BAd argument as many Christian's adopt those children, why can't we just make it so people have to be responsible for their actions?Until they're out of the womb
We let them decide they had sex and got pregnant killing the child makes no senseBirth = death. Only women of a certain age can give birth. Logic would simply let them decide. They are the only population concerned, the only one's who decide whether or not to cause someone to be born and then die.
No, She had every right not to become pregnant, why do you continue to skip over facts. She, and the male participant, should have been more responsible, but you should not be able to negate his rights.
She had every right not to become pregnant, why do you continue to skip over facts
Why can't we just shoot The Stupid?BAd argument as many Christian's adopt those children, why can't we just make it so people have to be responsible for their actions?
Self evidently, yes.I'm cornfused by this thread--- I've not followed it, but isn't each pregnancy situation unique? I mean, how can anyone have a blanket policy for anything when each problem pregnancy should be looked at individually on how to best deliver or terminate the pregnancy as is the case while best protecting the mother?
I mean, what is the logic of killing one of them just to save the life of the other? The mother can always have another child whereas the child has not even been born, so, wouldn't that mean that in areas of doubt or when it is an exclusive or, the mother's life must take precedent?
Your death would be guaranteed, fucktard…Why can't we just shoot The Stupid?
Did you cast two votes for the guy whom Gary Cohn described as having "the IQ of an inbred tanning bed"?Your death would be guaranteed, fucktard…
I don’t know who that is, but the answer is no.Did you cast two votes for the guy whom Gary Cohn described as having "the IQ of an inbred tanning bed"?
If you don't know who it is, how can the answer be "No".......unless, of course, you are one of those imbeciles who piss&moan but won't vote....I don’t know who that is, but the answer is no.
Did you vote for Obama, Hillary, or objectively the worst President we’ve ever had (the current one)? Because damn, living in glass houses, with the glass melting AND cracked, don’t throw stones…
Is this Adult conversation?
This needs to be said
That is so damned fucking stupid, I'm obliged to assume you were pithed at birth.
Tell me I'm wrong.
Because then you wouldn't be here to post!Why can't we just shoot The Stupid?
Yes, tanning beds are more intelligent than Biden we get itDid you cast two votes for the guy whom Gary Cohn described as having "the IQ of an inbred tanning bed"?
So why is Biden performing so much better than the Inbred Tanning Bed?Yes, tanning beds are more intelligent than Biden we get it
