Catsnmeters
Gold Member
- Sep 19, 2022
- 15,218
- 5,907
Then they shouldn't have threatened school board members. Duh.Yes xiden’s DOJ labeled them domestic terrorist
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then they shouldn't have threatened school board members. Duh.Yes xiden’s DOJ labeled them domestic terrorist
Huh? We are on the threadOk. Make the thread.
Haha typical…fascist often believe questioning their party is a threat…hitler locked up people that questioned his party too labeled them terroristThen they shouldn't have threatened school board members. Duh.
They were threats. Nice dodge though.Haha typical…fascist often believe questioning their party is a threat…hitler locked up people that questioned his party too labeled them terrorist
And when nothing happens because their was no known censorship all the Trump supporters will claim deep state. Maybe even follow it up with 7 or 8 investigations for old times sake.
We have been here before multiple times.
The suit was filed in 2022. Trump and all his people were long gone. This is not rocket science.Quick question. Why are none of the defendant's from the prior administration? The laptop requests were done by Trump's administration, not Biden's.
Also we have seen an example of Trump's people requesting Twitter remove posts that hurt Trump's feelings.
Why isn't he listed?
Really? WHen was the Federal gvt. sued for censorship via social media? This is a first that I'm aware of.
Why does it matter when the alleged crimes occurred? If Biden loses the election will they have to refile the lawsuit and name the new administration as the defendents?The suit was filed in 2022. Trump and all his people were long gone. This is not rocket science.
Haha yes, questioning why they let boys into girls bathrooms after a girl was raped was a threat…it undermines their agenda, therefore they were labeled terroristThey were threats. Nice dodge though.
What difference does that make? Are you saying that when someone is sued over something for the first time, they must be guilty?
First of all his is not a criminal matter, they are asking for injunctions, 'stop doing what you are doing.' Second, if the new administration is doing similar censoring, I assume there will be a similar lawsuit.Why does it matter when the alleged crimes occurred? If Biden loses the election will they have to refile the lawsuit and name the new administration as the defendents?
Because it's completely and utterly irrelevant to this lawsuit.Why are you avoiding responding to the fact that Trump requested Twitter to remove posts that offended him?
You are talking to a cultist…evidence doesn’t matter??? I'm telling you, contrary to your opinion, the Judge explictly found a patterns of censorship by the Biden administration.
First of all his is not a criminal matter, they are asking for injuctions, stop doing what you are doing. Second, if the new administration is doing similar censoring, I assume there will be a similar lawsuit.
Because it's completely and utterly irrelevant to this lawsuit.
She's certainly opinionated. But not like the troll I wasted my time trying to humor today. Last time I give that one the time of day.You are talking to a cultist…evidence doesn’t matter
They didn't question, they threatened.Haha yes, questioning why they let boys into girls bathrooms after a girl was raped was a threat…it undermines their agenda, therefore they were labeled terrorist
You keep calling questioning, threats…just like many Germans did in 1930They didn't question, they threatened.
You keep avoiding the distinction.
??? I'm telling you, contrary to your opinion, the Judge explicitly found a patterns of censorship by the Biden administration. Read the opinion I gave to you
How is Trump requesting Twitter to remove a post irrelevant to a judge saying the Biden administration asked Twitter to remove a post?First of all his is not a criminal matter, they are asking for injunctions, 'stop doing what you are doing.' Second, if the new administration is doing similar censoring, I assume there will be a similar lawsuit.
Because it's completely and utterly irrelevant to this lawsuit.
Good point. The threats are reminiscent of brown shirts back in the 30s. Someday history may equate brown shirts with red hats.You keep calling questioning, threats…just like many Germans did in 1930
Because you're a groomer?I wonder why Gym Jordan is attacking the primary federal agency that goes after pedophiles and other sexual assaulters...........makes one go hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.![]()
They denied talking about sex to 8 year olds, which we know now. They do and are doing it.So you called them liars without any evidence whatsoever?
Can't wait till it's turned on you, I'll tell you. There is no censoring going on.Censorship is an action or forceful removal of information.
Making a request is not censorship.
Trump and the FBI can make requests until they are blue in the face, that is not censorship.
Maybe this will help you.
![]()
Definition of CENSOR
a person who supervises conduct and morals: such as; an official who examines materials (such as publications or films) for objectionable matter; an official (as in time of war) who reads communications (such as letters) and deletes material considered sensitive or harmful… See the full definitionwww.merriam-webster.com
Haha peaceful protest…isn’t that what you all called it when you sent assassins to Justices homes?Good point. The threats are reminiscent of brown shirts back in the 30s. Someday history may equate brown shirts with red hats.
![]()
‘I Don’t Want to Die for It’: School Board Members Face Rising Threats (Published 2021)
Across the country, parents have threatened board members and vandalized their homes. One board member scans his driveway before walking to his car.www.nytimes.com
No here not what he said. That’s what you heard because you’re a deeply partisan hack who doesn’t care about the truth.
Garland was perfectly clear and said nothing of the sort.
The demafacist believe parents thinking their children are not the states is the threatlol
This thread doesn't seem to be working out very well for you.
Garland is a 2-bit elitist punk whose best idea of national security is going after soccer mom's who care about their kids.
Democrats are low life scum.