tinydancer
Diamond Member
Stand up too the anti gun tyrants and if they get in your face knock them into another god damn zip code.
They try reb, they try. It's a matter of numbers in the urban.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Stand up too the anti gun tyrants and if they get in your face knock them into another god damn zip code.
Boy if that doesn't sum up everything liberal policy is about.... Their entire philosophy is wait until people are dead (like 9/11), exploit the situation (like Newtown), and then use it to close the barn door after all of the horses have escaped
When you are talking New York, and by the way it's an absolutely gorgeous state, honest it's so beautiful it's urban vs rural.
The conservatives try.
Have you ever seen the electoral map? Let me pull it up. It tells the tale.
![]()
In 2012, I blame you guys nominating Mitt the Twitt, voting for one was voting for the other.
![]()
Boy if that doesn't sum up everything liberal policy is about.... Their entire philosophy is wait until people are dead (like 9/11), exploit the situation (like Newtown), and then use it to close the barn door after all of the horses have escaped
When you are talking New York, and by the way it's an absolutely gorgeous state, honest it's so beautiful it's urban vs rural.
The conservatives try.
Have you ever seen the electoral map? Let me pull it up. It tells the tale.
When I say "New York" I mean the world's largest city - not the state (my bad - I should be more specific).
That being said, I personally would flee that state. Any state which elects Hillary fuck'n Clinton is NOT a state I want to live in. The only thing I can think of worse than that is Nancy Pelosi...
New York is becoming a fascist shit hole. New York city over half parasitic population it is no wonder they're electing such shit.Our days are numbered,new york sucks big time.
Very well done. New York is overstepping its bounds by telling people what to do with their firearms. I advocate reasonable reform, not this nonsense. Keep giving them whats for.![]()
Very well done. New York is overstepping its bounds by telling people what to do with their firearms. I advocate reasonable reform, not this nonsense. Keep giving them whats for.![]()
Yep,
This is unconstitutional.
Some great arguments were made there. None of the politicians who voted for it were present, not surprising. They don't feel they are accountable for their actions, once they're in. The second amendment is shaping up to be THE most important issue of the 21st century, and ALL of us who value freedom need to be involved in this fight. Our freedom and the American way of life depends on it. Thanks, Edward, for your participation.
![]()
When you are talking New York, and by the way it's an absolutely gorgeous state, honest it's so beautiful it's urban vs rural.
The conservatives try.
Have you ever seen the electoral map? Let me pull it up. It tells the tale.
When I say "New York" I mean the world's largest city - not the state (my bad - I should be more specific).
That being said, I personally would flee that state. Any state which elects Hillary fuck'n Clinton is NOT a state I want to live in. The only thing I can think of worse than that is Nancy Pelosi...
No problemo you're preaching to the choir here. I literally gave up my home and my life in Ontario because I couldn't take it anymore. My kids still love me.I couldn't take the government anymore.
A little hiccup came up on my journey to Louisiana called Katrina. Hence I am now in the middle of nowhere Canada.
![]()
Stand up too the anti gun tyrants and if they get in your face knock them into another god damn zip code.
They try reb, they try. It's a matter of numbers in the urban.
Stand up too the anti gun tyrants and if they get in your face knock them into another god damn zip code.
They try reb, they try. It's a matter of numbers in the urban.
I am tired of fighting the same old shit every time something happens we got to add more gun control or ban something. Let's end this even if it takes bloodshed. Winner takes all.
They try reb, they try. It's a matter of numbers in the urban.
I am tired of fighting the same old shit every time something happens we got to add more gun control or ban something. Let's end this even if it takes bloodshed. Winner takes all.
That's exactly what the shadow leadership of the Progressive movement wants (The International Bankers), because they have both the sufficient popular support and military ability to win that contest at this current moment in time, remember that they own all the News stations and media outlets, both conservative and liberal.
We need to show first what we are for, and disseminate that in the minds of the self-reliant population (not the entire population), then we can overturn them, be it through elections, jury nullification, or outright force.
We cannot win at this moment in time.
Come to the Aegis of Liberty and if you wish to contribute and article (I'll provide you with the table of contents), message Edward Solomon on facebook.
https://www.facebook.com/notes/the-...ommon-sense-2013-introduction/590942260935667
OP- a small loudmouth minority, you mean. There will be background checks, strawman ban, and big magazine ban before it's over. It's called actual common sense.
OP- a small loudmouth minority, you mean. There will be background checks, strawman ban, and big magazine ban before it's over. It's called actual common sense.
OP- a small loudmouth minority, you mean. There will be background checks, strawman ban, and big magazine ban before it's over. It's called actual common sense.
But first you must have Miller vs U.S. ruling overturned.
OP- a small loudmouth minority, you mean. There will be background checks, strawman ban, and big magazine ban before it's over. It's called actual common sense.
SOME writers have so confounded society with government, as to leave little or no distinction between them; whereas they are not only different, but have different origins. Society is produced by our wants, and government by our wickedness; the former promotes our happiness positively by uniting our affections, the latter negatively by restraining our vices. The one encourages intercourse, the other creates distinctions. The first is a patron, the last a punisher.
Society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil, in its worst state an intolerable one; for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries by a government, which we might expect in a country without government, our calamities is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer! Government, like dress, is the badge of lost innocence; the palaces of kings are built on the ruins of the bowers of paradise. For were the impulses of conscience clear, uniform, and irresistibly obeyed, man would need no other lawgiver; but that not being the case, he finds it necessary to surrender up a part of his property to furnish means for the protection of the rest; and this he is induced to do by the same prudence which in every other case advises him out of two evils to choose the least. Wherefore, security being the true design and end of government, it unanswerably follows that whatever form thereof appears most likely to ensure it to us, with the least expense and greatest benefit, is preferable to all others.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it...