Maher to Guest Defending Islam in Wake of Boston Bombings: 'That's Liberal Bulls--t'

[Freewill]

let's read Wallace as he continues:

"...the very opposite of Christ for it feeds and encourages everything degenerate and base in our people as it assumes the responsibilities that we ourselves should assume. Its psuedo-liberal spokesmen and some Harvard advocates have never examined the logic of its substitution of what it calls "human rights" for individual rights, for its propaganda play on words has appeal for the unthinking. Its logic is totally material and irresponsible as it runs the full gamut of human desires . . . including the theory that everyone has voting rights without the spiritual responsibility of preserving freedom. Our founding fathers recognized those rights . . . but only within the framework of those spiritual responsibilities. But the strong, simple faith and sane reasoning of our founding fathers has long since been forgotten as the so-called "progressives" tell us that our Constitution was written for "horse and buggy" days . . . so were the Ten Commandments."

Yeah, that sounds like a modern democrat, lol

I do believe that the democrat Wallace lost his election. Didn't have enough Christians backing him.

The speech is from his gubernatorial inauguration, so he obviously won that election.

When he ran for the presidency in 1968, it was third party.

In 1964 he ran as a Democrat, he was going to run against JFK but obviously that didn't happen.

In 1968 he did run as a third party and lost.

In 1972 while running as a democrat he was shot.

In 1978 he ran but his health was to be of concern, and yes he was still a democrat.

So the segregationist belongs solidly with the democrat party.

 

[Katzndogz]

Please tell us when the last time Christians rioted because someone said something mean about their religion.

?Da Vinci Code? Sparks Indian Riots | Movie News | Hollywood.com

Did you read your own article?

CSF general secretary Joseph Dias says, "Activists will go on a fast unto death if the government fails to take action against anti-Christian movies.

It might be a riot in Hollywood, but not many other places.

 

[midcan5]

I think it is a mistake to consider that these two recent violent youths were motivated by religion. Maybe we will eventually know, but alienated youth in America has been a problem for a long time now and the fact they find it necessary to kill a real puzzle. Aside from the murderers noted below consider too the Koreans who have done similar acts of evil. What is it that drives all these people regardless of religion or even background. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/31/m...e-shooter-at-oikos-university-was-korean.html

"But there was enough in America already to alienate young men like Adam Lanza, Dylan Klebold and all the other mass murderers in recent history. There are enough weapons to kill anyone you want, and a madman can always find an excuse for murder if he looks for one.

Combine the fact that the Tsarnaev brothers were apparently isolated young men in America with the fact that they had access to the full power of jihadist ideology. Perhaps what we saw in Boston was Beslan meets Columbine; Sandy Hook meets Dubrovka. Let us hope that those two toxic varieties of modern violence never meet again." Link below.


"A promising boxer, he [Tamarlan Tsarnaev] fought in the Golden Gloves National Tournament in 2009, and he was noticed by a young photographer, Johannes Hirn, who took him as a subject for an essay assignment in a photojournalism class at Boston University. “There are no values anymore,” Tamerlan said in the essay, which was later published in Boston University’s magazine The Comment. “People can’t control themselves."" http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/20/us/details-of-tsarnaev-brothers-boston-suspects-emerge.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/20/opinion/beslan-meets-columbine.html

 

[NYcarbineer]

Maher uses the example of the play about Mormons and asks if a show like that about Muslims could be done.

In my lifetime, a play with a black man kissing a white woman in the Deep South would have ended in fire, destruction, and death by Christian religious fanatics.

Did that mean there were no peaceful Christians anywhere? What special kind of idiot would you have to be to make that argument?

Maher and his fellow travelling Islamophobes are those special kind of idiots.

Straight up liar. Religion had almost nothing to do with racial hatred. The KKK had to fabricate themselves as Christians to get some followers, most though were just inbred hicks or elitist scum.

Some of the 9/11 hijackers were known to have hung out in bars and strip clubs etc. in very non-Islamic fashion,

does that mean we can exclude the 9/11 attacks from being classified as Islamic extremism??????

 

[Truthmatters]

Maybe Maher is coming around to reality from his dark years steeped in liberal BS, maybe.

Maher to Guest Defending Islam in Wake of Boston Bombings: 'That's Liberal Bulls--t'

Read more: Maher to Guest Defending Islam in Wake of Boston Bombings: 'That's Liberal Bulls--t' | NewsBusters

Bill Maher on HBO's Real Time Friday made a statement that will make the Right cheer as the left predictably cringes.

After his guest Brian Levin - the director of the Center for the Study of Hate & Extremism at California State University, San Bernardino - said of the Boston bombings and how it relates to radical Islam, "We have hypocrites across faiths, Jewish, Christian who say they're out for God and end up doing not so nice things," Maher marvelously responded, "That’s liberal bulls--t right there" (video follows with transcript and commentary):


Read more: Maher to Guest Defending Islam in Wake of Boston Bombings: 'That's Liberal Bulls--t' | NewsBusters

bill Mahr was a libertarian for decades.

He has a real deep streak of dick in him.


He always has.

You see the left doesnt shit it pants and scream DINO or some stupid crap everytime we dont agree with each other


oh yeah and his job is to make people laugh

 

[NYcarbineer]

"We have hypocrites across faiths, Jewish, Christian who say they're out for God and end up doing not so nice things," Maher marvelously responded, "That’s liberal bulls--t right there"

What part of that is bullshit?

1. that we have hypocrites across faiths?

No, that's true. That's not bullshit.

2. that we have some in all faiths who say they're out for God and end up doing not so nice things?

No, that's true. That's not bullshit.

...well, what's left? Where's the so-called bullshit in that statement once you've shown its two main points to be absolutely true?

 

[Meathead]

As I also pointed out on the other thread, Maher was being stupid, yelling that the true statement "all religions have hypocrites" was "liberal bullshit". His subsequent diversion to a speech of how muslims are more violent (they are) doesn't change the fact that "all religions have hypocrites" would be a true statement, not "liberal bullshit".

But that's how conservatives think these days. Simple truth is now defined as "liberal bullshit".

Bullshit is not truth, whether liberal or conservative. Bullshit is bullshit and the idea that Islam is a peaceful religion is exactly that.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Now that the rightwing nuthouse has decided that Bill Maher is an expert on what constitutes 'bullshit',

let's explore his expertise in that area:

“The Constitution, contrary to the beliefs of so many Tea Baggers, was not brought to us directly by Jesus,” Maher told his panel. “And actually, the founding fathers understood that we need to amend it. They wanted us to do it. Yes, so much of it does need a Page 1 rewrite,

including that bullshit about the Senate and the Second Amendment. Both of them should go.”

lol

 

[NYcarbineer]

As I also pointed out on the other thread, Maher was being stupid, yelling that the true statement "all religions have hypocrites" was "liberal bullshit". His subsequent diversion to a speech of how muslims are more violent (they are) doesn't change the fact that "all religions have hypocrites" would be a true statement, not "liberal bullshit".

But that's how conservatives think these days. Simple truth is now defined as "liberal bullshit".

Bullshit is not truth, whether liberal or conservative. Bullshit is bullshit and the idea that Islam is a peaceful religion is exactly that.

The idea that America is a peaceful nation is also bullshit then.

 

[Votto]

Maher, and all Islamophobes, use the actions of a few to implicitly argue there are no peaceful Muslims anywhere.

It's bigotry in its purist form.

Maher hates all religions. All of them. With a passion. That he hates Islam a little more than the others is a distinction without a difference.

To say that all Muslims are terrorists is irresponsible, however, to glibly ignore the rates of violence from Islamists around the world is equally as irresponsible.

Something is amiss in the Islamic world.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Maher, and all Islamophobes, use the actions of a few to implicitly argue there are no peaceful Muslims anywhere.

It's bigotry in its purist form.

Maher hates all religions. All of them. With a passion. That he hates Islam a little more than the others is a distinction without a difference.

To say that all Muslims are terrorists is irresponsible, however, to glibly ignore the rates of violence from Islamists around the world is equally as irresponsible.

Something is amiss in the Islamic world.

Christianity, an older religion, went through a much bigger violent phase. An optimist might hope that Islam will evolve similarly,

if that optimist was not invested in seeing some other particular religion eventually win out and monopolize the world's faithful.

 

[Meathead]

Maher, and all Islamophobes, use the actions of a few to implicitly argue there are no peaceful Muslims anywhere.

It's bigotry in its purist form.

Maher hates all religions. All of them. With a passion. That he hates Islam a little more than the others is a distinction without a difference.

To say that all Muslims are terrorists is irresponsible, however, to glibly ignore the rates of violence from Islamists around the world is equally as irresponsible.

Something is amiss in the Islamic world.

Christianity, an older religion, went through a much bigger violent phase. An optimist might hope that Islam will evolve similarly,

if that optimist was not invested in seeing some other particular religion eventually win out and monopolize the world's faithful.

You need to learn more about the spread of Islam before you go off and say stupid things. Islam was spread by the sword in the days of yore, and there are those seeking to spread it with Kalashnikovs, pressure cookers and box cutters today.

 

[NYcarbineer]

To say that all Muslims are terrorists is irresponsible, however, to glibly ignore the rates of violence from Islamists around the world is equally as irresponsible.

Something is amiss in the Islamic world.

Christianity, an older religion, went through a much bigger violent phase. An optimist might hope that Islam will evolve similarly,

if that optimist was not invested in seeing some other particular religion eventually win out and monopolize the world's faithful.

You need to learn more about the spread of Islam before you go off and say stupid things. Islam was spread by the sword in the days of yore, and there are those seeking to spread it with Kalashnikovs, pressure cookers and box cutters today.

And Christianity wasn't!!!???!!!??? Another outburst of brilliance from the rightwing nuthouse.

 

[Meathead]

Christianity, an older religion, went through a much bigger violent phase. An optimist might hope that Islam will evolve similarly,

if that optimist was not invested in seeing some other particular religion eventually win out and monopolize the world's faithful.

You need to learn more about the spread of Islam before you go off and say stupid things. Islam was spread by the sword in the days of yore, and there are those seeking to spread it with Kalashnikovs, pressure cookers and box cutters today.

And Christianity wasn't!!!???!!!??? Another outburst of brilliance from the rightwing nuthouse.

No, not initially. Christianity was spread by the 12 apostles. Christians did not conquer Rome nor subjugate the non-Christians population when they did prevail.

There is no doubt much violence was used in the Crusades, Spanish Inquisition and the conquest of the New World, but "bigger and more violent" simply shows a tenuous or very dogmatic grasp of world history.

 

[Sunshine]

Maher, and all Islamophobes, use the actions of a few to implicitly argue there are no peaceful Muslims anywhere.

It's bigotry in its purist form.

Maher hates all religions. All of them. With a passion. That he hates Islam a little more than the others is a distinction without a difference.

That isn't whate he said. He said it is the only RELIGION that will kill you if you leave it or if you draw a cartoon of Mohammed. He made no mention of any individuals anywhere.

 

[Sunshine]

You need to learn more about the spread of Islam before you go off and say stupid things. Islam was spread by the sword in the days of yore, and there are those seeking to spread it with Kalashnikovs, pressure cookers and box cutters today.

And Christianity wasn't!!!???!!!??? Another outburst of brilliance from the rightwing nuthouse.

No, not initially. Christianity was spread by the 12 apostles. Christians did not conquer Rome nor subjugate the non-Christians population when they did prevail.

There is no doubt much violence was used in the Crusades, Spanish Inquisition and the conquest of the New World, but "bigger and more violent" simply shows a tenuous or very dogmatic grasp of world history.

Violence in the middle ages is not pertinent to modern times. Your logic is 'your grandmother killed my grandmother, therefore I am justified in killing you.'

 

[buckeye45_73]

Maher, and all Islamophobes, use the actions of a few to implicitly argue there are no peaceful Muslims anywhere.

It's bigotry in its purist form.

Maher hates all religions. All of them. With a passion. That he hates Islam a little more than the others is a distinction without a difference.

I agree Mahr is a devout atheist that doesnt like religion....but I do think it's funny how he said equating christianity and other religions to islam is liberal bullshit...because it it....In every large group you're going to have some nuts, but the nut circle in Islam is much much much larger and deadlier than others.....they've been doing this for 60-70 years. They're taught some very extreme beliefs....mostly on killing jews.....and liberals ignore all of this.....God forbid a republican makes a joke that jews are cheap, he's a racist....but they ignore the crazy ass jew HATING muslims, like the PLO and such.

 

[buckeye45_73]

As I also pointed out on the other thread, Maher was being stupid, yelling that the true statement "all religions have hypocrites" was "liberal bullshit". His subsequent diversion to a speech of how muslims are more violent (they are) doesn't change the fact that "all religions have hypocrites" would be a true statement, not "liberal bullshit".

But that's how conservatives think these days. Simple truth is now defined as "liberal bullshit".

Bullshit is not truth, whether liberal or conservative. Bullshit is bullshit and the idea that Islam is a peaceful religion is exactly that.

The idea that America is a peaceful nation is also bullshit then.

Who argued that? For the amount of power we have, we do much more good than bad.....sorry man, we fight commies and crazy muslims....you dont like it and want to call that interventionist....then go ahead...buty to compare the US to crazy muslims, shows you have no idea what you're talking about......again apples to apples

 

[Meathead]

Bullshit is not truth, whether liberal or conservative. Bullshit is bullshit and the idea that Islam is a peaceful religion is exactly that.

The idea that America is a peaceful nation is also bullshit then.

Who argued that? For the amount of power we have, we do much more good than bad.....sorry man, we fight commies and crazy muslims....you dont like it and want to call that interventionist....then go ahead...buty to compare the US to crazy muslims, shows you have no idea what you're talking about......again apples to apples

Succinct! Thank you!

 

[Sallow]

You need to learn more about the spread of Islam before you go off and say stupid things. Islam was spread by the sword in the days of yore, and there are those seeking to spread it with Kalashnikovs, pressure cookers and box cutters today.

And Christianity wasn't!!!???!!!??? Another outburst of brilliance from the rightwing nuthouse.

No, not initially. Christianity was spread by the 12 apostles. Christians did not conquer Rome nor subjugate the non-Christians population when they did prevail.

There is no doubt much violence was used in the Crusades, Spanish Inquisition and the conquest of the New World, but "bigger and more violent" simply shows a tenuous or very dogmatic grasp of world history.

You really, really need to pick up a history book.

Emperor Constantine adopted Christianity and forced conversions, although not violently. Why the fuck do you think it's called "Roman" Catholic.

Later on..you had a real fun chap, named King Charlamagne. He did force conversion. You lost your head if you refused. Christians have been doing this sort of stuff for ages.