Maine’s passage of ‘right to food’ amendment stirs celebration, worry

[danielpalos]

Left-wingers enjoy playing on emotions to get more free money for themselves, while pretending to "help" others.

Right-wingers prefer to love their guns instead of their republic and prove they are just plain hypocrites about being Legal to the Law.

 

[danielpalos]

Just had to drag this back down to Limbaugh level, eh?

You missed my debate in the clean debate zone. Right-wingers couldn't handle it.

 

[Grumblenuts]

You missed my debate in the clean debate zone. Right-wingers couldn't handle it.

There's no "clean" or "debate" while simply pissing on others.

 

[danielpalos]

There's no "clean" or "debate" while simply pissing on others.

They were just a bunch of whiners who can only dish it out. Where were their valid arguments for rebuttal or refutation? Show me any from right-wingers whining.

 

[danielpalos]

There's no "clean" or "debate" while simply pissing on others.

Let me ask you this. Are you colluding with right-wingers "behind my back"? It seems like it to me.

Girlymen and gossip girls do that.

 

[Grumblenuts]

So amp up the personal attacks, why don't ya? That'll help!

If you were really interested in debate you'd ignore the political turd tossing and stick to arguing your points... which I still mostly don't buy either.. regardless of being a proud lefty.

 

[danielpalos]

So amp up the personal attacks, why don't ya? That'll help!

If you were really interested in debate you'd ignore the political turd tossing and stick to arguing your points... which I still mostly don't buy either.. regardless of being a proud lefty.

You first, new righty. Did the right-wing "get to you" too? Struth seems to have become Sfalse now that he is more right-wing.

 

[WinterBorn]

You first, new righty. Did the right-wing "get to you" too? Struth seems to have become Sfalse now that he is more right-wing.

The overwhelming majority of your posts on this topics have been attacks on other posters. You are thin on actual facts.

There is no inequality for UC.

 

[danielpalos]

The overwhelming majority of your posts on this topics have been attacks on other posters. You are thin on actual facts.

There is no inequality for UC.

That is just You making that up. Simply having nothing but fallacy is just plain trolling.

Yes, there is inequality regarding unemployment compensation.

 

[WinterBorn]

That is just You making that up. Simply having nothing but fallacy is just plain trolling.

Yes, there is inequality regarding unemployment compensation.

No, there is not. Your argument is like someone dropping out of high school and still expecting a diploma.

The at-will employment laws do nothing but describe the relationship between employer and employee. They do not require that all other laws follow them, just as not all employment situations follow them.

But thanks for proving my point with the first 2 sentences in your post.

 

[danielpalos]

No, there is not. Your argument is like someone dropping out of high school and still expecting a diploma.

The at-will employment laws do nothing but describe the relationship between employer and employee. They do not require that all other laws follow them, just as not all employment situations follow them.

But thanks for proving my point with the first 2 sentences in your post.

You simply appeal to ignorance. The labor code defines at-will emplyment.

 

[WinterBorn]

You simply appeal to ignorance. The labor code defines at-will emplyment.

Yes it does. What it does not do is make any sort of statement requiring all benefits be available for all people. It also does not remove your personal responsibility for your own choices.

 

[danielpalos]

Yes it does. What it does not do is make any sort of statement requiring all benefits be available for all people. It also does not remove your personal responsibility for your own choices.

So what? You keep appealing to ignorance of the law, like usual.

All laws of a general nature shall have uniform operation.

This is federal doctrine regarding employment at will: At-will employment is generally described as follows: "any hiring is presumed to be 'at will'; that is, the employer is free to discharge individuals 'for good cause, or bad cause, or no cause at all,' and the employee is equally free to quit, strike, or otherwise cease work."

 

[WinterBorn]

So what? You keep appealing to ignorance of the law, like usual.

All laws of a general nature shall have uniform operation.

This is federal doctrine regarding employment at will: At-will employment is generally described as follows: "any hiring is presumed to be 'at will'; that is, the employer is free to discharge individuals 'for good cause, or bad cause, or no cause at all,' and the employee is equally free to quit, strike, or otherwise cease work."

And the UC laws do not change any of that. You quit your job and you were not prosecuted at all. You had no requirement to repay wages.

 

[danielpalos]

And the UC laws do not change any of that. You quit your job and you were not prosecuted at all. You had no requirement to repay wages.

UIC ignores at-will employment law. That is the problem. Can tax breaks be nullified for an employer if he fires anyone without Good Cause?

 

[Grumblenuts]

Ah, that's nothin. What really sucks is how tax breaks aren't nullified for employers who stub their own toes without good cause. Even those that appeal to ignorance!

 

[danielpalos]

Will the homeless as a class be worse off?

Will women as a class be worse off?

 

[WinterBorn]

Will the homeless as a class be worse off?

Will women as a class be worse off?

Whether the homeless or women will be worse off is not the issue.

It is whether unemployment compensation will be morphed into another welfare program, drawing from the tax payers to pay those who can survive without it.

 

[danielpalos]

Whether the homeless or women will be worse off is not the issue.

It is whether unemployment compensation will be morphed into another welfare program, drawing from the tax payers to pay those who can survive without it.

Yes, that is the issue regarding the Law and promoting the general welfare.

 

[WinterBorn]

Yes, that is the issue regarding the Law and promoting the general welfare.

And is it not the duty of every citizen to promote the general welfare?