Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
My dad was coming home from a gig ( he had his own band) and was hit head on by a 19 year old drunk kid..
The choice of driving the young boy left 40 kids without fathers, I was only 7 years old.
In California it is 3 times caught driving drunk your out..
..
GOOD.
DUI drivers kill as many or more people per year than guns. Liberals of course oppose any police action and love drugs so they'll say it's brutality or something to enforce DUI laws.
It's a shame he didn't decide to resist.
Wrong. I've just studied the subject and found out what a scam it is. And the only time I've been on a jury was a DUI case. (can you say jury nullification).DUI laws are nothing but a scheme to take people's money.Wrong.You can't prove stuff like that. If you're driving drunk and crash into someone they law says you're at fault and that's how it has to be.
My daughter was hit by a drunk driver. Fortunately, she saw him coming and took evasive action to limit the impact. It doesn't matter that he was drunk or sober. I wanted to beat him with the tire iron he was using to change his flat tire after the accident when the cops caught him.
Sounds like you may have a resentment after a DUI Muhammed ?
I also think it is wrong to arrest people for thought crimes.
DUI laws are predicated on the assumption that at an unspecified time in the future, at an unspecified location, you will cause unspecified harm or damage to an unspecified person(s) or property.
That is a serious assault on liberty.
My dad was coming home from a gig ( he had his own band) and was hit head on by a 19 year old drunk kid..
The choice of driving the young boy left 40 kids without fathers, I was only 7 years old.
In California it is 3 times caught driving drunk your out..
..
Not true.
I know several three time offenders. One who works for me had to put a breathalizer machine in his car to start it, but there are lots of 3 time losers who spend no more than 90 days in jail here in the Peoples Republic.
California Drunk Driving Fines & Penalties | DrivingLaws.org
How do you know whether someone is "drunk" or not? Is there some sort of scientific test?Wrong. I've just studied the subject and found out what a scam it is. And the only time I've been on a jury was a DUI case. (can you say jury nullification).DUI laws are nothing but a scheme to take people's money.Wrong.
My daughter was hit by a drunk driver. Fortunately, she saw him coming and took evasive action to limit the impact. It doesn't matter that he was drunk or sober. I wanted to beat him with the tire iron he was using to change his flat tire after the accident when the cops caught him.
Sounds like you may have a resentment after a DUI Muhammed ?
I also think it is wrong to arrest people for thought crimes.
DUI laws are predicated on the assumption that at an unspecified time in the future, at an unspecified location, you will cause unspecified harm or damage to an unspecified person(s) or property.
That is a serious assault on liberty.
Having a drivers license is a privilege and being behind a car when drunk makes the car a weapon.
I myself have driven drunk in my 20's and thank God I didn't kill anyone. You feel invincible when your younger.
Arresting someone drunk is not a thought crime..the person is abusing the privilege just like texting or any distraction.
Just like arresting a dumb drunk person in public, they are abusing the freedom to drink and could hurt themselves or another.
GOOD.
DUI drivers kill as many or more people per year than guns. Liberals of course oppose any police action and love drugs so they'll say it's brutality or something to enforce DUI laws.
[
Thanks ,I guess the 3 times your out if for crime..but driving drunk is a crime..I don't know
How do you know whether someone is "drunk" or not? Is there some sort of scientific test?Wrong. I've just studied the subject and found out what a scam it is. And the only time I've been on a jury was a DUI case. (can you say jury nullification).DUI laws are nothing but a scheme to take people's money.My daughter was hit by a drunk driver. Fortunately, she saw him coming and took evasive action to limit the impact. It doesn't matter that he was drunk or sober. I wanted to beat him with the tire iron he was using to change his flat tire after the accident when the cops caught him.
Sounds like you may have a resentment after a DUI Muhammed ?
I also think it is wrong to arrest people for thought crimes.
DUI laws are predicated on the assumption that at an unspecified time in the future, at an unspecified location, you will cause unspecified harm or damage to an unspecified person(s) or property.
That is a serious assault on liberty.
Having a drivers license is a privilege and being behind a car when drunk makes the car a weapon.
I myself have driven drunk in my 20's and thank God I didn't kill anyone. You feel invincible when your younger.
Arresting someone drunk is not a thought crime..the person is abusing the privilege just like texting or any distraction.
Just like arresting a dumb drunk person in public, they are abusing the freedom to drink and could hurt themselves or another.
But they do not test whether someone is "drunk".How do you know whether someone is "drunk" or not? Is there some sort of scientific test?Wrong. I've just studied the subject and found out what a scam it is. And the only time I've been on a jury was a DUI case. (can you say jury nullification).DUI laws are nothing but a scheme to take people's money.
Sounds like you may have a resentment after a DUI Muhammed ?
I also think it is wrong to arrest people for thought crimes.
DUI laws are predicated on the assumption that at an unspecified time in the future, at an unspecified location, you will cause unspecified harm or damage to an unspecified person(s) or property.
That is a serious assault on liberty.
Having a drivers license is a privilege and being behind a car when drunk makes the car a weapon.
I myself have driven drunk in my 20's and thank God I didn't kill anyone. You feel invincible when your younger.
Arresting someone drunk is not a thought crime..the person is abusing the privilege just like texting or any distraction.
Just like arresting a dumb drunk person in public, they are abusing the freedom to drink and could hurt themselves or another.
Breathalyzer measures the blood alcohol in your breath.. A urine test / blood test can show drugs in your system.
DUI laws are nothing but a scheme to take people's money.Wrong.Do you have any proof that the accident would not have happened if the kid wasn't drinking?
You can't prove stuff like that. If you're driving drunk and crash into someone they law says you're at fault and that's how it has to be.
My daughter was hit by a drunk driver. Fortunately, she saw him coming and took evasive action to limit the impact. It doesn't matter that he was drunk or sober. I wanted to beat him with the tire iron he was using to change his flat tire after the accident when the cops caught him.
Got any proof?... or are you just shedding crocodile tears?DUI laws are nothing but a scheme to take people's money.Wrong.Do you have any proof that the accident would not have happened if the kid wasn't drinking?
You can't prove stuff like that. If you're driving drunk and crash into someone they law says you're at fault and that's how it has to be.
My daughter was hit by a drunk driver. Fortunately, she saw him coming and took evasive action to limit the impact. It doesn't matter that he was drunk or sober. I wanted to beat him with the tire iron he was using to change his flat tire after the accident when the cops caught him.
I could have lost my daughter because some brain-dead alcoholic was visiting strip joints all night long.
Goodbye. There is no recovery from such a stupid statement.
Agree. A fourth DUI should be mandatory execution by firing squad.This should be the policy after the THIRD DUI. This is a super-violent drug crime and we are far too easy on these psychopaths.
Texas man sentenced to life in prison after 10th drunk driving offense | Fox News
jan 23 2016 WEATHERFORD, Texas – A judge concerned about public safety sentenced a 62-year-old North Texas man to life in prison for his 10th drunken driving conviction since the 1980s.
Ivy Ray Eberhardt, of Weatherford, Texas, was sentenced Wednesday. Eberhardt would be eligible for parole after serving 15 years.
The case involved an April 2014 driving while intoxicated stop in Parker County in which Eberhardt's blood alcohol level was almost four times the 0.08 legal limit for driving in Texas.
While free on bond in that DWI case, Eberhardt cut off an electronic ankle monitor and fled to Colorado, where he was again arrested for drunken driving, prosecutors said.
But they do not test whether someone is "drunk".How do you know whether someone is "drunk" or not? Is there some sort of scientific test?Wrong. I've just studied the subject and found out what a scam it is. And the only time I've been on a jury was a DUI case. (can you say jury nullification).Sounds like you may have a resentment after a DUI Muhammed ?
I also think it is wrong to arrest people for thought crimes.
DUI laws are predicated on the assumption that at an unspecified time in the future, at an unspecified location, you will cause unspecified harm or damage to an unspecified person(s) or property.
That is a serious assault on liberty.
Having a drivers license is a privilege and being behind a car when drunk makes the car a weapon.
I myself have driven drunk in my 20's and thank God I didn't kill anyone. You feel invincible when your younger.
Arresting someone drunk is not a thought crime..the person is abusing the privilege just like texting or any distraction.
Just like arresting a dumb drunk person in public, they are abusing the freedom to drink and could hurt themselves or another.
Breathalyzer measures the blood alcohol in your breath.. A urine test / blood test can show drugs in your system.
Sorry bitch, you fail.
That statement is a lie.But they do not test whether someone is "drunk".How do you know whether someone is "drunk" or not? Is there some sort of scientific test?Wrong. I've just studied the subject and found out what a scam it is. And the only time I've been on a jury was a DUI case. (can you say jury nullification).
I also think it is wrong to arrest people for thought crimes.
DUI laws are predicated on the assumption that at an unspecified time in the future, at an unspecified location, you will cause unspecified harm or damage to an unspecified person(s) or property.
That is a serious assault on liberty.
Having a drivers license is a privilege and being behind a car when drunk makes the car a weapon.
I myself have driven drunk in my 20's and thank God I didn't kill anyone. You feel invincible when your younger.
Arresting someone drunk is not a thought crime..the person is abusing the privilege just like texting or any distraction.
Just like arresting a dumb drunk person in public, they are abusing the freedom to drink and could hurt themselves or another.
Breathalyzer measures the blood alcohol in your breath.. A urine test / blood test can show drugs in your system.
Sorry bitch, you fail.
The machine measures a persons blood alcohol ...
That statement is a lie.
People who can not spell "you're" are stupid.That statement is a lie.
Why? back up your statement... right now your looking stupid.
People who can not spell "you're" are stupid.That statement is a lie.
Why? back up your statement... right now your looking stupid.
You're an illiterate fool.
hamm is a troll 
Declaring victory and walking off isnt going to work here, and I am sympathetic to the idea of rolling back some of the Puritanical restrictions on BAC of these days.People who can not spell "you're" are stupid.That statement is a lie.
Why? back up your statement... right now your looking stupid.
You're an illiterate fool.
Apparently muhammed is a drunkard.
