Man Sends Wife Spreadsheet Of All Her Excuses Not To Have Sex

[Sgt_Gath]

Thing? THING???

Yes?

This loser is free to file for divorce if he wants.

Which is pretty much what's happening.

Hurray for being single, I suppose. Here's hoping she enjoys it.

 

[Gracie]

I am really surprised at some of the men responding. Really surprised. But I shouldn't be.

 

[Noomi]

What are you calling a 'thing'?

 

[Noomi]

I am really surprised at some of the men responding. Really surprised. But I shouldn't be.

I am not in the least surprised. But you do know, don't you, that if the situation was reversed, and the man was denying sex for the same reasons, the men here would be loudly defending this bloke.

 

[Sgt_Gath]

I am really surprised at some of the men responding. Really surprised. But I shouldn't be.

The vagina is, technically, a "thing," is it not?

I wasn't trying to be offensive. I was playing off of Noomi's constant references to the vagina (as opposed to the person attached to it) in her posts.

What are you calling a 'thing'?

A "thing," perhaps?

 

[September]

Its not to have sex either.

A large part of it is having sex together.

Sex occurs before a marriage, sex does not make a marriage, nor should it be required of couples.

As much as I love sex... I still totally agree with this. Marriage is about so much more than just sex.

 

[Sgt_Gath]

I am really surprised at some of the men responding. Really surprised. But I shouldn't be.

I am not in the least surprised. But you do know, don't you, that if the situation was reversed, and the man was denying sex for the same reasons, the men here would be loudly defending this bloke.

Uhhh... No. I'd be suggesting that she ditch the loser, and find a guy who can actually get it up.

 

[dilloduck]

I am really surprised at some of the men responding. Really surprised. But I shouldn't be.

I am not in the least surprised. But you do know, don't you, that if the situation was reversed, and the man was denying sex for the same reasons, the men here would be loudly defending this bloke.

So if you were married and you needed something from your husband you would be content if he told you :"I'm too tired---go do it yourself "

 

[Noomi]

I am really surprised at some of the men responding. Really surprised. But I shouldn't be.

I am not in the least surprised. But you do know, don't you, that if the situation was reversed, and the man was denying sex for the same reasons, the men here would be loudly defending this bloke.

Uhhh... No. I'd be suggesting that she ditch the loser, and find a guy who can actually get it up.

And if the guy could get it up?

 

[dilloduck]

A large part of it is having sex together.

Sex occurs before a marriage, sex does not make a marriage, nor should it be required of couples.

As much as I love sex... I still totally agree with this. Marriage should be about so much more than that.

That's nice but no one is claiming that sex is everything------that strawman keeps popping up over and over.

 

[Noomi]

I am really surprised at some of the men responding. Really surprised. But I shouldn't be.

I am not in the least surprised. But you do know, don't you, that if the situation was reversed, and the man was denying sex for the same reasons, the men here would be loudly defending this bloke.

So if you were married and you needed something from your husband you would be content if he told you :"I'm too tired---go do it yourself "

Yep. I have no desire for sex anyway, but I would probably provide it if he wanted it - and asked nicely.

 

[Sgt_Gath]

As much as I love sex... I still totally agree with this. Marriage should be about so much more than that.

Of course it should be. However, that doesn't mean that sex isn't still important.

If, at the ripe old age of 26, my S.O. were to suddenly decide that sex was off the table, I'd be seriously questioning whether the marriage was worth preserving as well.

It's one thing to "lose the spark" in middle age after having had a life and a bunch of kids together. Losing it before the marriage has even really started is another entirely.

 

[Gracie]

I am really surprised at some of the men responding. Really surprised. But I shouldn't be.

I am not in the least surprised. But you do know, don't you, that if the situation was reversed, and the man was denying sex for the same reasons, the men here would be loudly defending this bloke.

So if you were married and you needed something from your husband you would be content if he told you :"I'm too tired---go do it yourself "

What do you think this is? A bill of sale of her body when she marries him? Geez!!!
Many times I asked hubby to do something and he said no. So yeah..I did it myself. If he is tired or aching or is watching a football game, you bet I will do whatever needs done. Unless it has to do with me being a piece of meat. And that is EXACTLY who you guys see this situation. She is meat. Her body parts are THINGS.

 

[dilloduck]

I am not in the least surprised. But you do know, don't you, that if the situation was reversed, and the man was denying sex for the same reasons, the men here would be loudly defending this bloke.

So if you were married and you needed something from your husband you would be content if he told you :"I'm too tired---go do it yourself "

Yep. I have no desire for sex anyway, but I would probably provide it if he wanted it - and asked nicely.

 

[Noomi]

As much as I love sex... I still totally agree with this. Marriage should be about so much more than that.

Of course it should be. However, that doesn't mean that sex isn't still important.

If, at the ripe old age of 26, my S.O. were to suddenly decide that sex was off the table, I'd be seriously considering whether the marriage was worth preserving as well.

It's one thing to "lose the spark" in middle age after having had a life and a bunch of kids together. Losing it before the marriage has even really started is another entirely.

I find it selfish that a man would divorce the woman he supposedly loves simply because she won't spread her legs for him. It really goes to show what you males think of marriage - a reason to bang the missus when you feel like it.

 

[Gracie]

Bah and bleh. I am thoroughly disgusted.

And very aware of what some of the ....cough cough....."men" are like.

/unsub

 

[Rikurzhen]

And that is EXACTLY who you guys see this situation. She is meat. Her body parts are THINGS.

Hey, two can play at the game of extreme reductionism. You sound like a husband is just a wallet for you to pluck.

Do I have a basis for making this accusation? I have just as much basis as you do when making your comment.

 

[bripat9643]

I am not in the least surprised. But you do know, don't you, that if the situation was reversed, and the man was denying sex for the same reasons, the men here would be loudly defending this bloke.

So if you were married and you needed something from your husband you would be content if he told you :"I'm too tired---go do it yourself "

What do you think this is? A bill of sale of her body when she marries him? Geez!!!
Many times I asked hubby to do something and he said no. So yeah..I did it myself. If he is tired or aching or is watching a football game, you bet I will do whatever needs done. Unless it has to do with me being a piece of meat. And that is EXACTLY who you guys see this situation. She is meat. Her body parts are THINGS.

You're obviously a dyke who hates men.

 

[dilloduck]

As much as I love sex... I still totally agree with this. Marriage should be about so much more than that.

Of course it should be. However, that doesn't mean that sex isn't still important.

If, at the ripe old age of 26, my S.O. were to suddenly decide that sex was off the table, I'd be seriously considering whether the marriage was worth preserving as well.

It's one thing to "lose the spark" in middle age after having had a life and a bunch of kids together. Losing it before the marriage has even really started is another entirely.

I find it selfish that a man would divorce the woman he supposedly loves simply because she won't spread her legs for him. It really goes to show what you males think of marriage - a reason to bang the missus when you feel like it.

Don't get married.

 

[Sgt_Gath]

I find it selfish that a man would divorce the woman he supposedly loves simply because she won't spread her legs for him. It really goes to show what you males think of marriage - a reason to bang the missus when you feel like it.

If she categorically refuses to be intimate with him, "love" wouldn't be the proper word to describe the dynamic in the first place.

I already have a mother, I already have sisters, and I already have platonic female friends.

Why on Earth would I want to be "married" to someone like that?