Why?I would vote for Rubio as well.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why?I would vote for Rubio as well.
Why?I'd almost certainly vote for him if he is the nominee.
No, people want the Donald.Did being a Canadian cost Cruz?I called itRubio will be the nominee.
It won't be Rubio.
If it is Sanders vs Trump,
General Election: Trump vs. Sanders FOX News Sanders 53, Trump 38 Sanders +15
If it is Clinton vs. Trump
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton Quinnipiac Clinton 44, Trump 43 Clinton +1
Why? No one I knows thinks Cruz should be running.Sure, it has cost him some votes. That's stupidity, but there it is.Did being a Canadian cost Cruz?I called itRubio will be the nominee.
It won't be Rubio.
If it is Sanders vs Trump,
General Election: Trump vs. Sanders FOX News Sanders 53, Trump 38 Sanders +15
If it is Clinton vs. Trump
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton Quinnipiac Clinton 44, Trump 43 Clinton +1
There are more rubio supporters.Rubio is no more experienced than Obama. We can't afford to have another President who needs such extensive on the job training.
Rubio supporters should vote Kasich.
Rubio will be the nominee.
I called itRubio will be the nominee.
I just saw him on The Tonight Show and Jimmy asked him if he would consider the VP slot. He said no but he'd love NFL Commissioner. Why? Because you can suspend people. He seems to think a commissioner has a lot of power when in reality, they work for the owners.
That guy doesn't know any more about the NFL than he does politics.
Republicans...
Rubio is a child.
He's older than Kennedy and Teddy Roosevelt was when they were President. He'll be two years younger than Obama when he was sworn in.
His age has nothing to do with it.
He's older than Kennedy and Teddy Roosevelt was when they were President. He'll be two years younger than Obama when he was sworn in.
He's older than Kennedy and Teddy Roosevelt was when they were President. He'll be two years younger than Obama when he was sworn in.
Kennedy had served in a war, 8 years in the Senate and 6 years in the House.
Teddy had served in a war, as Governor of New York and as Vice President. (And while he was a national hero, it is unlikely he'd have gotten elected had McKinley not gotten assassinated.)
So you really want to compare a guy like Rubio, a guy who doesn't even show up to his job in the Senate because he thinks it's "boring", to a couple of War Heroes and American greats?
Man, you establishment types are getting DESPERATE.
Rubio served six years as a Senator and was speaker of the Florida House.
Obama spent four years as a Senator and six years in the Illinois House.
Rubio had more political experience than Obama.
I guess Obama is also a child.
Rubio served six years as a Senator and was speaker of the Florida House.
Obama spent four years as a Senator and six years in the Illinois House.
Rubio had more political experience than Obama.
I guess Obama is also a child.
I didn't vote for Obama in 2008 for EXACTLY that reason. I probably wouldn't have voted for him in 2012 if you clowns hadn't tried to turn my country over to the Mormon Cult.
But to the point, since you guys have claimed (with some justification) that Obama's inexperience has hurt his effectiveness, why would you be so keen to repeat the same mistake with Robot Rubio?
Because 8 years of Democrat rule is enough, and Rubio has the best chance of beating them.
Rubio was Speaker of the House in Florida. It may have only been two years, but he has leadership skills legislatively. And he was a good Speaker, unlike a few of the Florida House leaders. Obama had zero, zip, nada legislative leadership experience anywhere in his life. And it showed. He has been one of the most divisive Presidents in my lifetime. Rubio will be better than Obama.
Going back to Kennedy, he served in the military, which is commendable, but after that, his legislative accomplishments wasn't particularly impressive either. He had a rich father with deep Democratic connections. Without him, he would never have been President.
Rubio isn't perfect - he has problems with his use of state Republican credit cards. But people have consistently under-estimated him through his political career. He's boot-strapped himself up. And his problems pale compared to those of Hillary.
You started that thread saying kasich would be potusI called itRubio will be the nominee.
Ha!
Beat you to it!
2016 Election Prediction Thread
I now think Rubio would beat Clinton, though I wouldn't put $1 on it.
I was also wrong about Trump dropping out. He's going right to the end.
I don't think so. Who is Rubio going to win over? Not Hispanics.
You started that thread saying kasich would be potus
I agree with the last paragraph. I voted for Obama twice but Hillary in the 2008 primaries.Rubio served six years as a Senator and was speaker of the Florida House.
Obama spent four years as a Senator and six years in the Illinois House.
Rubio had more political experience than Obama.
I guess Obama is also a child.
I didn't vote for Obama in 2008 for EXACTLY that reason. I probably wouldn't have voted for him in 2012 if you clowns hadn't tried to turn my country over to the Mormon Cult.
But to the point, since you guys have claimed (with some justification) that Obama's inexperience has hurt his effectiveness, why would you be so keen to repeat the same mistake with Robot Rubio?