Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Right, screw the will of the people (twice). Let 9 pompous assholes decide how the rest of us live.
No, 9 people whose job it is, will determine our constitutional rights were violated. That's how it works, Fishy.
I have asked several times and you always dodge, so once more. please quote the language in the constitution that guarantees the "right" of gay marriage.
no generalizations allowed, I want to see something that includes the words "gay marriage"
It would be interesting to see him post those comments IN CONTEXT and then comment on them.
Impossible. That wouldn't support his narrative.
Oh, BTW, IL might become the 13th state to approve gay marriage. Stay tuned.
That would be great but they'll have to be 14. CA is going to be lucky number 13 when the SCOTUS rules
Right, screw the will of the people (twice). Let 9 pompous assholes decide how the rest of us live.
Definition of insanity...repeating the same thing over and over expecting different results.
The facts don't support your conclusion.
It would be interesting to see him post those comments IN CONTEXT and then comment on them.
Impossible. That wouldn't support his narrative.
Oh, BTW, IL might become the 13th state to approve gay marriage. Stay tuned.
That would be great but they'll have to be 14. CA is going to be lucky number 13 when the SCOTUS rules
Right, screw the will of the people (twice). Let 9 pompous assholes decide how the rest of us live.
No, 9 people whose job it is, will determine our constitutional rights were violated. That's how it works, Fishy.
I have asked several times and you always dodge, so once more. please quote the language in the constitution that guarantees the "right" of gay marriage.
no generalizations allowed, I want to see something that includes the words "gay marriage"
It would be interesting to see him post those comments IN CONTEXT and then comment on them.
Impossible. That wouldn't support his narrative.
Oh, BTW, IL might become the 13th state to approve gay marriage. Stay tuned.
That would be great but they'll have to be 14. CA is going to be lucky number 13 when the SCOTUS rules
I think we might get their first. The IL House has to make a decision before business closes on May 31.
Yeah, I was too.Impossible. That wouldn't support his narrative.
That would be great but they'll have to be 14. CA is going to be lucky number 13 when the SCOTUS rules
I think we might get their first. The IL House has to make a decision before business closes on May 31.
Dammit! I had really wanted CA to be the Bakers Dozen state.
Right, screw the will of the people (twice). Let 9 pompous assholes decide how the rest of us live.
No, 9 people whose job it is, will determine our constitutional rights were violated. That's how it works, Fishy.
I have asked several times and you always dodge, so once more. please quote the language in the constitution that guarantees the "right" of gay marriage.
no generalizations allowed, I want to see something that includes the words "gay marriage"
If children did not need a mother and a father, then children who come from these dysfunctional arrangements would not be dysfunctional themselves.
According to Children-our investment.org, homes without fathers ultimately affect children in numerous tragic ways:
* 63 percent of youth suicides are from fatherless homes
* 90 percent of all homeless and runaway children are from fatherless homes
* 85 percent of all children who show behavior disorders come from fatherless homes
* 80 percent of rapists with anger problems come from fatherless homes
* 71 percent of all high school dropouts come from fatherless homes
* 75 percent of all adolescent patients in chemical-abuse centers come from fatherless homes
* 85 percent of all youths in prison come from fatherless homes
Single mothers have just been sooooo good for the country. Don't bat an eye about it.
72 Percent of African-American Children Born to Unwed Mothers
It would be interesting to see him post those comments IN CONTEXT and then comment on them.
Impossible. That wouldn't support his narrative.
Oh, BTW, IL might become the 13th state to approve gay marriage. Stay tuned.
That would be great but they'll have to be 14. CA is going to be lucky number 13 when the SCOTUS rules
Right, screw the will of the people (twice). Let 9 pompous assholes decide how the rest of us live.
If children did not need a mother and a father, then children who come from these dysfunctional arrangements would not be dysfunctional themselves.
According to Children-our investment.org, homes without fathers ultimately affect children in numerous tragic ways:
* 63 percent of youth suicides are from fatherless homes
* 90 percent of all homeless and runaway children are from fatherless homes
* 85 percent of all children who show behavior disorders come from fatherless homes
* 80 percent of rapists with anger problems come from fatherless homes
* 71 percent of all high school dropouts come from fatherless homes
* 75 percent of all adolescent patients in chemical-abuse centers come from fatherless homes
* 85 percent of all youths in prison come from fatherless homes
Single mothers have just been sooooo good for the country. Don't bat an eye about it.
72 Percent of African-American Children Born to Unwed Mothers
The high percentage of the fatherless homes are also the most uneducated populace. You can take out the variable "fatherless" and say the "least educated" and still be accurate. Possibly even the people with lowest IQ in our country.
The answer....educate our people and keep them in school. Stop the cycle of babies having babies.
Stop giving out ADC, food stamps and welfare. People have to be expected to get jobs.Right now, they think they can just grow up to 16 and have babies and wait for their checks. But if they are expected to get jobs to get a cash flow, perhaps having babies won't be their answer.
Not to mention that by fatherless it is indicating single parent homes. This really doesn't speak about children with 2 mothers or 2 fathers. Going by these stats then are you saying 2 fathers is better?If children did not need a mother and a father, then children who come from these dysfunctional arrangements would not be dysfunctional themselves.
According to Children-our investment.org, homes without fathers ultimately affect children in numerous tragic ways:
* 63 percent of youth suicides are from fatherless homes
* 90 percent of all homeless and runaway children are from fatherless homes
* 85 percent of all children who show behavior disorders come from fatherless homes
* 80 percent of rapists with anger problems come from fatherless homes
* 71 percent of all high school dropouts come from fatherless homes
* 75 percent of all adolescent patients in chemical-abuse centers come from fatherless homes
* 85 percent of all youths in prison come from fatherless homes
Single mothers have just been sooooo good for the country. Don't bat an eye about it.
72 Percent of African-American Children Born to Unwed Mothers
The high percentage of the fatherless homes are also the most uneducated populace. You can take out the variable "fatherless" and say the "least educated" and still be accurate. Possibly even the people with lowest IQ in our country.
The answer....educate our people and keep them in school. Stop the cycle of babies having babies.
Stop giving out ADC, food stamps and welfare. People have to be expected to get jobs.Right now, they think they can just grow up to 16 and have babies and wait for their checks. But if they are expected to get jobs to get a cash flow, perhaps having babies won't be their answer.
I am old fashioned and believe that marriage is between a man and a woman.
However, I am not going to judge someone if their preference of loving someone is that of the same sex, so they should have legal rights similar to that of married couples, so Civil Unions should be made legally available for them.
I am old fashioned and believe that marriage is between a man and a woman.
However, I am not going to judge someone if their preference of loving someone is that of the same sex, so they should have legal rights similar to that of married couples, so Civil Unions should be made legally available for them.
No, 9 people whose job it is, will determine our constitutional rights were violated. That's how it works, Fishy.
I have asked several times and you always dodge, so once more. please quote the language in the constitution that guarantees the "right" of gay marriage.
no generalizations allowed, I want to see something that includes the words "gay marriage"
There is no such thing as gay marriage, there is only marriage law as written by the states and administered by state courts.
The Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment requires that the states allow all persons equal access to a given states law, including marriage law.
The language in the Constitution:
Amendment XIV
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
I am old fashioned and believe that marriage is between a man and a woman.
However, I am not going to judge someone if their preference of loving someone is that of the same sex, so they should have legal rights similar to that of married couples, so Civil Unions should be made legally available for them.
I'm old fashioned, I think voting should be reserved for landowning white males.
I think we should have the exact same rights so if you don't want us to have civil marriage, take it out of the equation for everyone. Separate but equal isn't going to fly.
I am old fashioned and believe that marriage is between a man and a woman.
However, I am not going to judge someone if their preference of loving someone is that of the same sex, so they should have legal rights similar to that of married couples, so Civil Unions should be made legally available for them.
I'm old fashioned, I think voting should be reserved for landowning white males.
I think we should have the exact same rights so if you don't want us to have civil marriage, take it out of the equation for everyone. Separate but equal isn't going to fly.
You have to remember Jackson - Seawytch here is a libtard. Which means she is furious if she can't bilk the U.S. government for all it is worth. If she can't get tax breaks for being gay, if she can't get free property and money left in wills for being gay, if she can't get her greedy little hands on another gay persons pension, then she is being "oppressed"...
If you cared about someone, you would just hold a ceremony and be happy in life. The fact that the gay libtard feels they need to demand that government climb into their gay bed with them and recognize their gayness is indisputable glaring evidence that it's all about fucking the system for every penny.
I am old fashioned and believe that marriage is between a man and a woman.
However, I am not going to judge someone if their preference of loving someone is that of the same sex, so they should have legal rights similar to that of married couples, so Civil Unions should be made legally available for them.
I'm old fashioned, I think voting should be reserved for landowning white males.
I think we should have the exact same rights so if you don't want us to have civil marriage, take it out of the equation for everyone. Separate but equal isn't going to fly.
You have to remember Jackson - Seawytch here is a libtard. Which means she is furious if she can't bilk the U.S. government for all it is worth. If she can't get tax breaks for being gay, if she can't get free property and money left in wills for being gay, if she can't get her greedy little hands on another gay persons pension, then she is being "oppressed"...
If you cared about someone, you would just hold a ceremony and be happy in life. The fact that the gay libtard feels they need to demand that government climb into their gay bed with them and recognize their gayness is indisputable glaring evidence that it's all about fucking the system for every penny.
I'm old fashioned, I think voting should be reserved for landowning white males.
I think we should have the exact same rights so if you don't want us to have civil marriage, take it out of the equation for everyone. Separate but equal isn't going to fly.
You have to remember Jackson - Seawytch here is a libtard. Which means she is furious if she can't bilk the U.S. government for all it is worth. If she can't get tax breaks for being gay, if she can't get free property and money left in wills for being gay, if she can't get her greedy little hands on another gay persons pension, then she is being "oppressed"...
If you cared about someone, you would just hold a ceremony and be happy in life. The fact that the gay libtard feels they need to demand that government climb into their gay bed with them and recognize their gayness is indisputable glaring evidence that it's all about fucking the system for every penny.
But the government should cater to your beliefs?
I am old fashioned and believe that marriage is between a man and a woman.
However, I am not going to judge someone if their preference of loving someone is that of the same sex, so they should have legal rights similar to that of married couples, so Civil Unions should be made legally available for them.
I'm old fashioned, I think voting should be reserved for landowning white males.
I think we should have the exact same rights so if you don't want us to have civil marriage, take it out of the equation for everyone. Separate but equal isn't going to fly.
You have to remember Jackson - Seawytch here is a libtard. Which means she is furious if she can't bilk the U.S. government for all it is worth. If she can't get tax breaks for being gay, if she can't get free property and money left in wills for being gay, if she can't get her greedy little hands on another gay persons pension, then she is being "oppressed"...
If you cared about someone, you would just hold a ceremony and be happy in life. The fact that the gay libtard feels they need to demand that government climb into their gay bed with them and recognize their gayness is indisputable glaring evidence that it's all about fucking the system for every penny.
