Maybe the Sequester Wasn't So Overstated After All

Synthaholic

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2010
73,667
69,171
3,605
Madam President 2024
Maybe the Sequester Wasn't So Overstated After All



Not long ago, the emerging Beltway consensus was that the impact of the budget sequestration that went into effect last spring had been wildly overstated. The economic recovery was still ticking along, albeit too slowly for anyone's taste, and there were no reports of orphans being cast into the streets. The budget deficit was shrinking, thanks in part to the sequester cuts. There were even suggestions that President Obama had exaggerated the fallout from sequestration in order to force a deal to head it off.


Well, just in the past few days there've been several dings in that happy complacency as more and more people—including at least one esteemed conservative—become aware of sequestration's real and unexaggerated consequences.



Medical research. Even George Will is worried about this one:




.

A 2 percent reduction of federal spending would be easily manageable. It has, however, been made deliberately dumb by mandatory administrative rigidities intended to maximize pain in order to weaken resistance to any spending restraint. Spending on basic medical research is being starved as the river of agriculture subsidies rolls on.

For Francis Collins, being the NIH’s director is a daily experience of exhilaration and dismay. In the past 40 years, he says, heart attacks and strokes have declined 60 percent and 70 percent, respectively. Cancer deaths are down 15 percent in 15 years. An AIDS diagnosis is no longer a death sentence. Researchers are on the trail of a universal flu vaccine, based on new understandings of the influenza virus and the human immune system. Chemotherapy was invented here — and it is being replaced by treatments developed here. Yet the pace of public health advances, Collins says, is being slowed by the sequester.
.





It would be nice, of course, if Will acknowledged his and his fellow conservatives' role in bringing about this sorry state of affairs. But hey, we'll take what we can get. Because the budget cuts Will is now lamenting are having real costs, as the Baltimore Sun reported over the weekend:




.

Dr. Craig Hendrix is exploring a novel concept: whether antiviral drugs can be absorbed through certain areas of the body to prevent sexual transmission of HIV. To test such hypotheses, Hendrix and his Johns Hopkins colleagues typically can put up healthy test subjects in hospital beds overnight, which creates a more effective experiment by allowing for more data collection and limiting outside variables. But volunteers in Hendrix's study are sleeping in a hotel between two long days of blood-drawing and CT scans because of a funding squeeze in an innovative federal grant program.
.





Great! Volunteers in an intensive and important study, tripping around the Best Western after a long day of blood-drawing. Now that's the way to maintain our global edge in medical research.




*snip*






Government travel. Surely, you say, this is one area where we could cut back quite a bit without any real impact. After all, government officials only travel to absurd junkets like those General Service Administration clown shows, right? Well...
Geological visits to monitor volcanoes in Alaska have been scaled back. The defense secretary is traveling to Afghanistan two times a year instead of the usual four. For the first time in nearly three decades, NASA pulled out of the National Space Symposium, in Colorado Springs, even though representatives from France, Germany and China all made the trip...

Managers at the Food and Drug Administration have made it all but impossible for employees to receive approval for travel to conferences. The Consumer Product Safety Commission, in an effort to help supplement reduced travel budgets for field inspectors, cut back on a program aimed at drowning prevention. At the Pentagon, defense officials skipped meetings with the international Afghanistan coalition in London and Rome this year, and without secure conference equipment, they could not participate virtually, officials said.

*snip*




.

Yes, indeed it is. We have a chance to start running the federal government sensibly again this fall, if Obama can get Republicans to agree to a deal to end the sequestration cuts, while also lifting the debt limit and agreeing to regular budget levels for the year ahead. But the odds of that are rather low. So those Hopkins volunteers better hold onto their motel swipe cards, and the Air Force officer better just keep truckin' across the Appalachians.
 
When we can't pay for scientists to attend worldwide conferences on behalf of the United States Of America, that's pathetic.

And the House Republicans can end this sequestration whenever they want. They always have, yet let it go on, damaging America's reputation around the world.

And they got the balls to call Obama weak! :lol:
 
Teh budget deficit declined after the GOP House allowed sequestration. The GOP is the party of fiscal restraint! Go Republicans!
 
the sequester helped reduce the deficit. We need to get rid of it and raise the debt ceiling. If only republicans would cooperate.... :lmao:
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: kaz
Good Lord.. only in the mind of a brain-dead leftist can the reduction in the rate of increase in spending spell disaster.

:lol:
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: kaz
why exactly do you think that a universal flu vaccine is that important?

NIH is just whining about being cut off the feeding tube.

There is a lot of waste there, too.

I f you did not know that :D
 
When we can't pay for scientists to attend worldwide conferences on behalf of the United States Of America, that's pathetic.

if they are that representative they are able to pay for themselves.
 
Great! Volunteers in an intensive and important study, tripping around the Best Western after a long day of blood-drawing.

and what is the problem with THAT?

they should have a spa treatment?
 
When we can't pay for scientists to attend worldwide conferences on behalf of the United States Of America, that's pathetic.

And the House Republicans can end this sequestration whenever they want. They always have, yet let it go on, damaging America's reputation around the world.

And they got the balls to call Obama weak! :lol:

Obama insisted on the across the board cuts.

I guess making intelligent choices is above his pay grade
 
When we can't pay for scientists to attend worldwide conferences on behalf of the United States Of America, that's pathetic.

:

Obama insisted on the across the board cuts.

I guess making intelligent choices is above his pay grade

With all due respect - WHY on earth should the taxpayer pay for the conference attendance of the very high-payed researcher who can afford to pay it by himself?!?

That is absolutely the same as paying for conferences of those federal government workers everybody was so appalled last year.

Obama's intelligent choices have nothing to do with WASTE being cut.
 
When we can't pay for scientists to attend worldwide conferences on behalf of the United States Of America, that's pathetic.

And the House Republicans can end this sequestration whenever they want. They always have, yet let it go on, damaging America's reputation around the world.

And they got the balls to call Obama weak! :lol:

Too bad the administration can't prioritize.

Or perhaps it can, and it made sure to cause maximum pain as the article states.
 
Maybe the Sequester Wasn't So Overstated After All



Not long ago, the emerging Beltway consensus was that the impact of the budget sequestration that went into effect last spring had been wildly overstated. The economic recovery was still ticking along, albeit too slowly for anyone's taste, and there were no reports of orphans being cast into the streets. The budget deficit was shrinking, thanks in part to the sequester cuts. There were even suggestions that President Obama had exaggerated the fallout from sequestration in order to force a deal to head it off.


Well, just in the past few days there've been several dings in that happy complacency as more and more people—including at least one esteemed conservative—become aware of sequestration's real and unexaggerated consequences.



Medical research. Even George Will is worried about this one:




.

A 2 percent reduction of federal spending would be easily manageable. It has, however, been made deliberately dumb by mandatory administrative rigidities intended to maximize pain in order to weaken resistance to any spending restraint. Spending on basic medical research is being starved as the river of agriculture subsidies rolls on.

For Francis Collins, being the NIH’s director is a daily experience of exhilaration and dismay. In the past 40 years, he says, heart attacks and strokes have declined 60 percent and 70 percent, respectively. Cancer deaths are down 15 percent in 15 years. An AIDS diagnosis is no longer a death sentence. Researchers are on the trail of a universal flu vaccine, based on new understandings of the influenza virus and the human immune system. Chemotherapy was invented here — and it is being replaced by treatments developed here. Yet the pace of public health advances, Collins says, is being slowed by the sequester.
.





It would be nice, of course, if Will acknowledged his and his fellow conservatives' role in bringing about this sorry state of affairs. But hey, we'll take what we can get. Because the budget cuts Will is now lamenting are having real costs, as the Baltimore Sun reported over the weekend:




.

Dr. Craig Hendrix is exploring a novel concept: whether antiviral drugs can be absorbed through certain areas of the body to prevent sexual transmission of HIV. To test such hypotheses, Hendrix and his Johns Hopkins colleagues typically can put up healthy test subjects in hospital beds overnight, which creates a more effective experiment by allowing for more data collection and limiting outside variables. But volunteers in Hendrix's study are sleeping in a hotel between two long days of blood-drawing and CT scans because of a funding squeeze in an innovative federal grant program.
.





Great! Volunteers in an intensive and important study, tripping around the Best Western after a long day of blood-drawing. Now that's the way to maintain our global edge in medical research.




*snip*






Government travel. Surely, you say, this is one area where we could cut back quite a bit without any real impact. After all, government officials only travel to absurd junkets like those General Service Administration clown shows, right? Well...
Geological visits to monitor volcanoes in Alaska have been scaled back. The defense secretary is traveling to Afghanistan two times a year instead of the usual four. For the first time in nearly three decades, NASA pulled out of the National Space Symposium, in Colorado Springs, even though representatives from France, Germany and China all made the trip...

Managers at the Food and Drug Administration have made it all but impossible for employees to receive approval for travel to conferences. The Consumer Product Safety Commission, in an effort to help supplement reduced travel budgets for field inspectors, cut back on a program aimed at drowning prevention. At the Pentagon, defense officials skipped meetings with the international Afghanistan coalition in London and Rome this year, and without secure conference equipment, they could not participate virtually, officials said.

*snip*




.

Yes, indeed it is. We have a chance to start running the federal government sensibly again this fall, if Obama can get Republicans to agree to a deal to end the sequestration cuts, while also lifting the debt limit and agreeing to regular budget levels for the year ahead. But the odds of that are rather low. So those Hopkins volunteers better hold onto their motel swipe cards, and the Air Force officer better just keep truckin' across the Appalachians.

All the sequester was was a reduction in the planned increases in spending.

So run along now.
 
When we can't pay for scientists to attend worldwide conferences on behalf of the United States Of America, that's pathetic.

And the House Republicans can end this sequestration whenever they want. They always have, yet let it go on, damaging America's reputation around the world.

And they got the balls to call Obama weak! :lol:

Too bad the administration can't prioritize.

Or perhaps it can, and it made sure to cause maximum pain as the article states.
Do you check under your bed each night for boogiemen?
 

Forum List

Back
Top