Siete
Platinum Member
- May 19, 2014
- 34,325
- 3,988
- 1,130
Trump accused Obama. No evidence.McCain's comments seem more than reasonable to me:
"This whole issue of the relationship with the Russians and who communicated with them and under what circumstances clearly cries out for investigation," he said. "But I would also point out we should not assume guilt until we have a thorough investigation. I'm not judging anyone guilty."
The Arizona senator also dismissed Trump's unfounded claim last weekend that former President Barack Obama personally ordered the wiretapping of Trump Tower phones because of his suspected ties to Russia.
"President Trump has to provide the American people, not just the Intelligence Committee, but the American people, with evidence that his predecessor, former president of the United States, was guilty of breaking the law, because our director of national intelligence, General Clapper, testified that there was absolutely no truth to that allegation," McCain said.
He continued: "So, I think the president has one of two choices: either retract or to provide the information that the American people deserve. Because, if his predecessor violated the law, [if] President Obama violated the law, we have got a serious issue here, to say the least."
.
Trump doesn't need to provide the proof, he can make the accusation on the facts we already know: Flynn's communication was being monitored, and it was illegally used against him for political purposes even though he broke no laws. It's up to the Senate and House intelligence committees to do their job and find out how and why it happened.
The facts we know do NOT support Trump's impulsive childish rants.
Trump definitely is not Presidential, let alone mature in any way.
But they can accuse Trump of colluding with the Russian with no evidence?
Trump can accuse Obama with no evidence cant he.
He has all the evidence he needs, the illegal use of Flynn's communications.
illegal how