Men in women's bathrooms

Seems you think naked men will just be standing around watching women and girls undress?

That is a lie.
Man caught watching 10-year-old girl in bathroom charged with child porn

Man in Women's Locker Room: 'I Have a Right to Be Here'

Seems you haven't been paying attention.
It's BS, and you know it. We already have laws against such things, which is why it's news of a crime.

Your argument is BS. You said that men will be watching women and girls undress was a lie. In less than 30 seconds, I found an example of where a male doing just that said the law had changed and he could be there.
And he made the news because, he broke the law attempting to be cute.

End result is he was THERE doing what you said was a lie.
It is a lie, and they busted him.
 
Since I don't think marriage is a right, thinking that homos shouldn't marry isn't denying them of a right.

Until you can change the DNA, changing how it looks doesn't change biology.

I can take some chicken shit, put some spices, etc. on it making it look like and smell like chicken salad. Would you eat it?
DNA won't help you. We have XX males and XY females.

All you have to go on are looks, and we have the tools for that.

Again, you unsuccessfully try to use the .00001% minority. You fail freak.
So, you want to assign bathrooms based on XX or XY?

That will get very, very interesting. And, what bathrooms do XXY, XYY, XXXY, and X0 (just one X) use?

Check out picture number 2. Warning, graphic: xx male - Google Search

Still want to go with DNA? He'd be using the ladies room.

Still want to use that .0001% argument? You lose freak.
I lose? You just put a hairy man with a normal penis, in the girls' room.

You said things like that wouldn't happen. I proved they do.
 
There are to many perverts to have men in women's bathrooms.......a total bacchanalia!

Hope when Trump becomes President stops this madness.
Do the perverts only like little girls?

You don't seem to be worried about little boys with grown men?
 
It's BS, and you know it. We already have laws against such things, which is why it's news of a crime.

Your argument is BS. You said that men will be watching women and girls undress was a lie. In less than 30 seconds, I found an example of where a male doing just that said the law had changed and he could be there.
And he made the news because, he broke the law attempting to be cute.

End result is he was THERE doing what you said was a lie.
It is a lie, and they busted him.

If he was there doing what you said won't happen, it isn't a lie. The only liar is you, freak.
 
DNA won't help you. We have XX males and XY females.

All you have to go on are looks, and we have the tools for that.

Again, you unsuccessfully try to use the .00001% minority. You fail freak.
So, you want to assign bathrooms based on XX or XY?

That will get very, very interesting. And, what bathrooms do XXY, XYY, XXXY, and X0 (just one X) use?

Check out picture number 2. Warning, graphic: xx male - Google Search

Still want to go with DNA? He'd be using the ladies room.

Still want to use that .0001% argument? You lose freak.
I lose? You just put a hairy man with a normal penis, in the girls' room.

You said things like that wouldn't happen. I proved they do.
Happen? No, that only happened because some jerk ignored the obvious intent of the law, and got busted for it.
 
btw womens bathrooms have stalls....just in case you didnt know that.....
Someone born with a penis between their legs is male . . . just in case you don't know. That being a fact, whether or not women's restrooms have stalls is irrelevant if the freak that FEELS like a woman yet born with a penis goes in the restroom where HE belongs.
And if you are born with both a penis and a vagina?

They can go fuck themselves.

Funny how you want to ignore 99.9% and focus on the .1%.
You're way off base if you think this is a 99.9 to .1 argument. There's a set of principles at he center of the debate
 
Again, you unsuccessfully try to use the .00001% minority. You fail freak.
So, you want to assign bathrooms based on XX or XY?

That will get very, very interesting. And, what bathrooms do XXY, XYY, XXXY, and X0 (just one X) use?

Check out picture number 2. Warning, graphic: xx male - Google Search

Still want to go with DNA? He'd be using the ladies room.

Still want to use that .0001% argument? You lose freak.
I lose? You just put a hairy man with a normal penis, in the girls' room.

You said things like that wouldn't happen. I proved they do.
Happen? No, that only happened because some jerk ignored the obvious intent of the law, and got busted for it.

It happened and you said it wouldn't. Liar.
 
It's BS, and you know it. We already have laws against such things, which is why it's news of a crime.

Your argument is BS. You said that men will be watching women and girls undress was a lie. In less than 30 seconds, I found an example of where a male doing just that said the law had changed and he could be there.
And he made the news because, he broke the law attempting to be cute.

End result is he was THERE doing what you said was a lie.
It is a lie, and they busted him.

If he was there doing what you said won't happen, it isn't a lie. The only liar is you, freak.
Go check out XY females and XX males. warning - graphic xx male - Google Search


Then you won't be putting hairy men with normal penises in the girls' room.
 
btw womens bathrooms have stalls....just in case you didnt know that.....
Someone born with a penis between their legs is male . . . just in case you don't know. That being a fact, whether or not women's restrooms have stalls is irrelevant if the freak that FEELS like a woman yet born with a penis goes in the restroom where HE belongs.
And if you are born with both a penis and a vagina?

They can go fuck themselves.

Funny how you want to ignore 99.9% and focus on the .1%.
You're way off base if you think this is a 99.9 to .1 argument. There's a set of principles at he center of the debate

The principle is if you're born with male plumbing/DNA go to the men's restroom. Same for female plumbing/DNA. It's really THAT simple. Only freaks and their supporters are so stupid they don't get it.
 
So, you want to assign bathrooms based on XX or XY?

That will get very, very interesting. And, what bathrooms do XXY, XYY, XXXY, and X0 (just one X) use?

Check out picture number 2. Warning, graphic: xx male - Google Search

Still want to go with DNA? He'd be using the ladies room.

Still want to use that .0001% argument? You lose freak.
I lose? You just put a hairy man with a normal penis, in the girls' room.

You said things like that wouldn't happen. I proved they do.
Happen? No, that only happened because some jerk ignored the obvious intent of the law, and got busted for it.

It happened and you said it wouldn't. Liar.
He tried it and the law busted him. Relax, little drama queen.
 
btw womens bathrooms have stalls....just in case you didnt know that.....
Someone born with a penis between their legs is male . . . just in case you don't know. That being a fact, whether or not women's restrooms have stalls is irrelevant if the freak that FEELS like a woman yet born with a penis goes in the restroom where HE belongs.
And if you are born with both a penis and a vagina?

They can go fuck themselves.

Funny how you want to ignore 99.9% and focus on the .1%.
You're way off base if you think this is a 99.9 to .1 argument. There's a set of principles at he center of the debate

The principle is if you're born with male plumbing/DNA go to the men's restroom. Same for female plumbing/DNA. It's really THAT simple. Only freaks and their supporters are so stupid they don't get it.
There is no such things as male DNA. There is XY, normally male, but not always. And XX, normally female, but not always.
 
Your argument is BS. You said that men will be watching women and girls undress was a lie. In less than 30 seconds, I found an example of where a male doing just that said the law had changed and he could be there.
And he made the news because, he broke the law attempting to be cute.

End result is he was THERE doing what you said was a lie.
It is a lie, and they busted him.

If he was there doing what you said won't happen, it isn't a lie. The only liar is you, freak.
Go check out XY females and XX males. warning - graphic xx male - Google Search


Then you won't be putting hairy men with normal penises in the girls' room.

I still have that chicken shit, I mean salad for you. When you eat it, which means you truly support your argument, get back to me.
 
Still want to use that .0001% argument? You lose freak.
I lose? You just put a hairy man with a normal penis, in the girls' room.

You said things like that wouldn't happen. I proved they do.
Happen? No, that only happened because some jerk ignored the obvious intent of the law, and got busted for it.

It happened and you said it wouldn't. Liar.
He tried it and the law busted him. Relax, little drama queen.

He was THERE and you said it wouldn't happen, freak.
 
Someone born with a penis between their legs is male . . . just in case you don't know. That being a fact, whether or not women's restrooms have stalls is irrelevant if the freak that FEELS like a woman yet born with a penis goes in the restroom where HE belongs.
And if you are born with both a penis and a vagina?

They can go fuck themselves.

Funny how you want to ignore 99.9% and focus on the .1%.
You're way off base if you think this is a 99.9 to .1 argument. There's a set of principles at he center of the debate

The principle is if you're born with male plumbing/DNA go to the men's restroom. Same for female plumbing/DNA. It's really THAT simple. Only freaks and their supporters are so stupid they don't get it.
There is no such things as male DNA. There is XY, normally male, but not always. And XX, normally female, but not always.

Not that tired argument, either, freak.
 
You don't see. Try reading what I said again, you failed miserably the first time
You said, only the majority has rights.

You might not think that you did, but you did.

I said the majority has the right to not be oppressed by the minority and VICE VERSA. You haven't Googled "vice versa" to learn what it means yet, have you?
Do gays getting married "oppress" you?

I oppose all government marriage. You did also again demonstrate you don't know the difference between positive and negative rights

You are at the urinal and transgender male, who looks male, heads to a stall. How are you being oppressed?

Um ... you really can't read the English language, can you? If the owner of the bathroom doesn't want transgenders using their identity sex and government forces them to, then it oppresses the owner of the restroom, not me.

And BTW, since you're apparently a chick in a guys body, the last thing guys do at stalls is look at each other. First we don't want to and second it would totally creep the other guy out
So, a transgender male in your bathroom causes you no issues at all. TY.

I never argued that it did. You really have little reading comprehension at all.

What greatly causes me issues is government trying to dictate the use of private property to private property owners It's a flagrant violation of the 5th amendment
 
I don't give a shit where they shit in someone else's bathroom. It's up to the owner
So, Target, no problems. And Public schools, no problems, but not at your male only bathroom?

Fine.

As long as Target decided that itself.

Public schools are up to the State since the owner of the bathroom is the government

My bathroom? In my business, we have four bathrooms. They are all single use, so we don't have male or female bathrooms. You just pick an open one

Taxpayers own the public schools since we pay the taxes that fund them.

How is that different than what I said?

The government doesn't own the schools. I agree with you, for the most part, on what you've said.

Of course it does. The people fund the government, but they are government property. The people in theory can vote out whoever doesn't implement their will. But a government school bathroom is government property just like any other government building bathroom. I'm not clear what point you're making
 
So, Target, no problems. And Public schools, no problems, but not at your male only bathroom?

Fine.

As long as Target decided that itself.

Public schools are up to the State since the owner of the bathroom is the government

My bathroom? In my business, we have four bathrooms. They are all single use, so we don't have male or female bathrooms. You just pick an open one

Taxpayers own the public schools since we pay the taxes that fund them.

How is that different than what I said?

The government doesn't own the schools. I agree with you, for the most part, on what you've said.

Of course it does. The people fund the government, but they are government property. The people in theory can vote out whoever doesn't implement their will. But a government school bathroom is government property just like any other government building bathroom. I'm not clear what point you're making

The point is that without taxpayers the government wouldn't have something to claim is theirs.
 
btw womens bathrooms have stalls....just in case you didnt know that.....
Someone born with a penis between their legs is male . . . just in case you don't know. That being a fact, whether or not women's restrooms have stalls is irrelevant if the freak that FEELS like a woman yet born with a penis goes in the restroom where HE belongs.
And if you are born with both a penis and a vagina?

They can go fuck themselves.

Funny how you want to ignore 99.9% and focus on the .1%.
You're way off base if you think this is a 99.9 to .1 argument. There's a set of principles at he center of the debate

The principle is if you're born with male plumbing/DNA go to the men's restroom. Same for female plumbing/DNA. It's really THAT simple. Only freaks and their supporters are so stupid they don't get it.
Our current president, the DOJ, and both front runners for our next president disagree with you... That should at least give some awareness that there is more to this discussion than what you think. It's not just about human anatomy . It is a freedom, equality and sociological issue. You are the one that doesn't understand the scope of this thing
 
Can you see how the trans policy does improve privacy for those who are transgender and for those who understand and accept transgenders?

Can you see how profoundly fucked up you are to accept severe mental illness as not only the norm, but to then insist that society bend to that mental illness? What kind of a fucking tool does something like that? If right now conservatives were pitching a bill that said "society must accept schizophrenia and do whatever the schizophrenic says" because some schizophrenics were running around saying liberals were trying to destroy the earth and thus they must be exterminated, you would be incredulous.

It's unfathomable to a sane, rational person how the left has become so radicalized that they now believe mental illness trumps all medical science and societal norms.
Funny how you can't admit to any level of understanding of the other side. Shows how hard headed and out of touch you really are
Yeah....accepting medical science is sure "hard-headed" and "out of touch". I believe that's what's all of the Flat Earther's said centuries ago.
 

Forum List

Back
Top