Men in women's bathrooms

[Seawytch]

Dumb ass laws like you support would require that this person use the women's restroom.

Oh...you mean the woman with the giant scar across her chest because she was mutilated to satisfy her mental illness rather than to properly treat that mental illness.

Yes, puppy, we know how feel about transgendered people. Your feelings do not change reality. Your feelings about them don't make them disappear. They still exist, they still pee and unless you are lurking outside bathrooms like a perv, there isn't much you can do about them peeing where they feel most comfortable.

Although the hilarious irony of imagining you arrested outside for hanging outside women's bathrooms is amusing.

Born a boy...

Pees in women's restrooms...

Although the hilarious irony of imagining you arrested outside for hanging outside women's bathrooms is amusing.



What do you think guys don't have daughters or girlfriends/ wife's that were stuck waiting outside of the bathrooms for?




.




.

Guys waiting for female companions outside restrooms aren't checking birth certificates or "packages".

How old are you? I used to wait all the time for my daughter outside a restroom when she was little and still keep an eye on her when she vists or I go up to Chicago.

Dad's are like that.


.

Right. You waited patiently outside. You weren't conducting pecker checks outside the door.

Man follows woman into restroom just to make sure she's a woman

 

[Cecilie1200]

Would you want this person to use the men's room?

They want him in the women's restroom...according to the stupid laws they pass.

Whenever you tweekos are done presenting anecdotal red herrings to try to convince everyone that all trans people look like your carefully cherry-picked photos, perhaps the serious adults can get back to having a real discussion of the issue.

Just let us know when you children are ready to go play and take your distractions with you.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Coy Mathis was born a boy. But after just a few years, biology succumbed to a more powerful force.

Yeah...that "more powerful force" is called mental illness. Instead of indulging the mentally ill in their illness for you cheap deviant thrills and your political agenda, how about advocate for actually treating them? How about a little compassion for them, you sick bastard?

By the left's "compassionate" standards, the best way to treat paranoid schizophrenics is to issue birth certificates and Social Security cards for the voices in their heads. After all, they "feelz" the voices are real, so how DARE we insist that they aren't?

 

[Cecilie1200]

Actually the Nazis were at least curious about science while at the same time wanting to curb the freedoms of those they thought were 'perverts' such as homosexuals, like you want to do.

The Nazis were not wrong about everything. Homosexuals ARE perverts. In that time, everyone knew this, not just the Nazis. And I don't think anyone took transsexualism seriously enough back then to argue whether it was a perversion or not. Everyone knew the corrosive dangers of allowing such perversion to be “normalized” in a society. In many ways, we have gone very badly downhill since then. In this particular way, even the Nazis—along with all of the other societies of that time—were wiser than we are now.

You're seriously taking the Nazi position on homosexuality?

And, no, since the 1930s and 40s we as a society know a hell of a lot more than we did back then.

Jesus, defending fucking Nazis.

Yes, refusing to insist that because one dislikes someone, that makes everything they ever said automatically wrong is "defending" them.

Tell me, what is it like to live in a world where there is no reality other than what your hormones tell you at the moment? Are the unicorns pink or purple?

 

[HappyJoy]

Actually the Nazis were at least curious about science while at the same time wanting to curb the freedoms of those they thought were 'perverts' such as homosexuals, like you want to do.

The Nazis were not wrong about everything. Homosexuals ARE perverts. In that time, everyone knew this, not just the Nazis. And I don't think anyone took transsexualism seriously enough back then to argue whether it was a perversion or not. Everyone knew the corrosive dangers of allowing such perversion to be “normalized” in a society. In many ways, we have gone very badly downhill since then. In this particular way, even the Nazis—along with all of the other societies of that time—were wiser than we are now.

You're seriously taking the Nazi position on homosexuality?

And, no, since the 1930s and 40s we as a society know a hell of a lot more than we did back then.

Jesus, defending fucking Nazis.

Yes, refusing to insist that because one dislikes someone, that makes everything they ever said automatically wrong is "defending" them.

Tell me, what is it like to live in a world where there is no reality other than what your hormones tell you at the moment? Are the unicorns pink or purple?

The color of your imagination is of no consequence.

 

[JoeMoma]

It seems to me that transgenderism should be seen as a slap in the face to the "homosexual agenda" If it is perfectly natural and acceptable to have same sex sexual partners and same sex marriages and if we have gender equity in other areas, why in the hell would someone need to mutilate their bodies to "change genders"?

A man who is overwhelmed with anxiety because he thinks he should have a vagina instead of a penis is suffering from delusions from reality. Will those anxieties simply go away is a sex change is performed? The suicide rates of the fully transgendered suggest not.

Having said this, people are free to cater to their own delusions and become transsexuals if they like; however, they should not expect the rest of society to play along. Pre-op transsexuals need to understand there will be issues with gender specific areas like restrooms and locker rooms.

 

[JoeMoma]

Actually the Nazis were at least curious about science while at the same time wanting to curb the freedoms of those they thought were 'perverts' such as homosexuals, like you want to do.

The Nazis were not wrong about everything. Homosexuals ARE perverts. In that time, everyone knew this, not just the Nazis. And I don't think anyone took transsexualism seriously enough back then to argue whether it was a perversion or not. Everyone knew the corrosive dangers of allowing such perversion to be “normalized” in a society. In many ways, we have gone very badly downhill since then. In this particular way, even the Nazis—along with all of the other societies of that time—were wiser than we are now.

You're seriously taking the Nazi position on homosexuality?

And, no, since the 1930s and 40s we as a society know a hell of a lot more than we did back then.

Jesus, defending fucking Nazis.

Yes, refusing to insist that because one dislikes someone, that makes everything they ever said automatically wrong is "defending" them.

Tell me, what is it like to live in a world where there is no reality other than what your hormones tell you at the moment? Are the unicorns pink or purple?

The color of your imagination is of no consequence.

And the gender people imagine themselves to be when different from reality should be of no consequence to society.

 

[HappyJoy]

Actually the Nazis were at least curious about science while at the same time wanting to curb the freedoms of those they thought were 'perverts' such as homosexuals, like you want to do.

The Nazis were not wrong about everything. Homosexuals ARE perverts. In that time, everyone knew this, not just the Nazis. And I don't think anyone took transsexualism seriously enough back then to argue whether it was a perversion or not. Everyone knew the corrosive dangers of allowing such perversion to be “normalized” in a society. In many ways, we have gone very badly downhill since then. In this particular way, even the Nazis—along with all of the other societies of that time—were wiser than we are now.

You're seriously taking the Nazi position on homosexuality?

And, no, since the 1930s and 40s we as a society know a hell of a lot more than we did back then.

Jesus, defending fucking Nazis.

Yes, refusing to insist that because one dislikes someone, that makes everything they ever said automatically wrong is "defending" them.

Tell me, what is it like to live in a world where there is no reality other than what your hormones tell you at the moment? Are the unicorns pink or purple?

The color of your imagination is of no consequence.

And the gender people imagine themselves to be when different from reality should be of no consequence to society.

People aren't imagining anything other than a fixation by the right of little girls getting raped by men wearing dresses in the bathroom when it's just not happening.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Actually the Nazis were at least curious about science while at the same time wanting to curb the freedoms of those they thought were 'perverts' such as homosexuals, like you want to do.

The Nazis were not wrong about everything. Homosexuals ARE perverts. In that time, everyone knew this, not just the Nazis. And I don't think anyone took transsexualism seriously enough back then to argue whether it was a perversion or not. Everyone knew the corrosive dangers of allowing such perversion to be “normalized” in a society. In many ways, we have gone very badly downhill since then. In this particular way, even the Nazis—along with all of the other societies of that time—were wiser than we are now.

You're seriously taking the Nazi position on homosexuality?

And, no, since the 1930s and 40s we as a society know a hell of a lot more than we did back then.

Jesus, defending fucking Nazis.

Yes, refusing to insist that because one dislikes someone, that makes everything they ever said automatically wrong is "defending" them.

Tell me, what is it like to live in a world where there is no reality other than what your hormones tell you at the moment? Are the unicorns pink or purple?

The color of your imagination is of no consequence.

Only leftists refuse to grow out of the "I'm rubber, you're glue" stage of debate.

 

[HappyJoy]

Actually the Nazis were at least curious about science while at the same time wanting to curb the freedoms of those they thought were 'perverts' such as homosexuals, like you want to do.

The Nazis were not wrong about everything. Homosexuals ARE perverts. In that time, everyone knew this, not just the Nazis. And I don't think anyone took transsexualism seriously enough back then to argue whether it was a perversion or not. Everyone knew the corrosive dangers of allowing such perversion to be “normalized” in a society. In many ways, we have gone very badly downhill since then. In this particular way, even the Nazis—along with all of the other societies of that time—were wiser than we are now.

You're seriously taking the Nazi position on homosexuality?

And, no, since the 1930s and 40s we as a society know a hell of a lot more than we did back then.

Jesus, defending fucking Nazis.

Yes, refusing to insist that because one dislikes someone, that makes everything they ever said automatically wrong is "defending" them.

Tell me, what is it like to live in a world where there is no reality other than what your hormones tell you at the moment? Are the unicorns pink or purple?

The color of your imagination is of no consequence.

Only leftists refuse to grow out of the "I'm rubber, you're glue" stage of debate.

What stage? You haven't said much to respond to.

 

[Cecilie1200]

The Nazis were not wrong about everything. Homosexuals ARE perverts. In that time, everyone knew this, not just the Nazis. And I don't think anyone took transsexualism seriously enough back then to argue whether it was a perversion or not. Everyone knew the corrosive dangers of allowing such perversion to be “normalized” in a society. In many ways, we have gone very badly downhill since then. In this particular way, even the Nazis—along with all of the other societies of that time—were wiser than we are now.

You're seriously taking the Nazi position on homosexuality?

And, no, since the 1930s and 40s we as a society know a hell of a lot more than we did back then.

Jesus, defending fucking Nazis.

Yes, refusing to insist that because one dislikes someone, that makes everything they ever said automatically wrong is "defending" them.

Tell me, what is it like to live in a world where there is no reality other than what your hormones tell you at the moment? Are the unicorns pink or purple?

The color of your imagination is of no consequence.

And the gender people imagine themselves to be when different from reality should be of no consequence to society.

People aren't imagining anything other than a fixation by the right of little girls getting raped by men wearing dresses in the bathroom when it's just not happening.

As usual with you, your post is wrong in essentially every single word, including "the".

First of all, "people" like you are imagining that men are women simply because they "feelz" that they are. You are imagining that "feelz" trump biology when it comes to reality. You're imagining that you would recognize reality if it crawled up your pants leg and bit you on the left ass cheek. All these are figments of your imaginations, and egregiously incorrect.

Second, you are imagining that sexual predators will not take advantage of the opening you cheerfully demand by way of insisting that anyone should wander in and out of any bathroom they choose whenever they choose. You are imagining that this has never happened in the past, simply because you want to believe it's so. And you are imagining that the only standard of measurement applicable - and the only point at which this should be a problem - is for a little girl to be raped. Up to that point, apparently, anything else is no big deal. This is not only egregiously incorrect, it's as repugnant as you are.

 

[HappyJoy]

You're seriously taking the Nazi position on homosexuality?

And, no, since the 1930s and 40s we as a society know a hell of a lot more than we did back then.

Jesus, defending fucking Nazis.

Yes, refusing to insist that because one dislikes someone, that makes everything they ever said automatically wrong is "defending" them.

Tell me, what is it like to live in a world where there is no reality other than what your hormones tell you at the moment? Are the unicorns pink or purple?

The color of your imagination is of no consequence.

And the gender people imagine themselves to be when different from reality should be of no consequence to society.

People aren't imagining anything other than a fixation by the right of little girls getting raped by men wearing dresses in the bathroom when it's just not happening.

As usual with you, your post is wrong in essentially every single word, including "the".

First of all, "people" like you are imagining that men are women simply because they "feelz" that they are. You are imagining that "feelz" trump biology when it comes to reality. You're imagining that you would recognize reality if it crawled up your pants leg and bit you on the left ass cheek. All these are figments of your imaginations, and egregiously incorrect.

Once again, none of that is worth responding to other than to say, your "feelz" are showing.

Second, you are imagining that sexual predators will not take advantage of the opening you cheerfully demand by way of insisting that anyone should wander in and out of any bathroom they choose whenever they choose. You are imagining that this has never happened in the past, simply because you want to believe it's so. And you are imagining that the only standard of measurement applicable - and the only point at which this should be a problem - is for a little girl to be raped. Up to that point, apparently, anything else is no big deal. This is not only egregiously incorrect, it's as repugnant as you are.

But it's not happening to any large degree at all. Transgendered people are already using the bathroom of choice, you're most likely not aware of it.

But, please by all means let the right carry on with their victimhood by proxy campaign of raped little girls in bathrooms. I'm not exactly sure why it's so satisfying for wingnuts.

 

[JoeMoma]

Yes, refusing to insist that because one dislikes someone, that makes everything they ever said automatically wrong is "defending" them.

Tell me, what is it like to live in a world where there is no reality other than what your hormones tell you at the moment? Are the unicorns pink or purple?

The color of your imagination is of no consequence.

And the gender people imagine themselves to be when different from reality should be of no consequence to society.

People aren't imagining anything other than a fixation by the right of little girls getting raped by men wearing dresses in the bathroom when it's just not happening.

As usual with you, your post is wrong in essentially every single word, including "the".

First of all, "people" like you are imagining that men are women simply because they "feelz" that they are. You are imagining that "feelz" trump biology when it comes to reality. You're imagining that you would recognize reality if it crawled up your pants leg and bit you on the left ass cheek. All these are figments of your imaginations, and egregiously incorrect.

Once again, none of that is worth responding to other than to say, your "feelz" are showing.

Second, you are imagining that sexual predators will not take advantage of the opening you cheerfully demand by way of insisting that anyone should wander in and out of any bathroom they choose whenever they choose. You are imagining that this has never happened in the past, simply because you want to believe it's so. And you are imagining that the only standard of measurement applicable - and the only point at which this should be a problem - is for a little girl to be raped. Up to that point, apparently, anything else is no big deal. This is not only egregiously incorrect, it's as repugnant as you are.

But it's not happening to any large degree at all. Transgendered people are already using the bathroom of choice, you're most likely not aware of it.

But, please by all means let the right carry on with their victimhood by proxy campaign of raped little girls in bathrooms. I'm not exactly sure why it's so satisfying for wingnuts.

Then there need be no laws that allow for (pre-op) transgender people get to use restrooms of the opposite sex.

 

[HappyJoy]

The color of your imagination is of no consequence.

And the gender people imagine themselves to be when different from reality should be of no consequence to society.

People aren't imagining anything other than a fixation by the right of little girls getting raped by men wearing dresses in the bathroom when it's just not happening.

As usual with you, your post is wrong in essentially every single word, including "the".

First of all, "people" like you are imagining that men are women simply because they "feelz" that they are. You are imagining that "feelz" trump biology when it comes to reality. You're imagining that you would recognize reality if it crawled up your pants leg and bit you on the left ass cheek. All these are figments of your imaginations, and egregiously incorrect.

Once again, none of that is worth responding to other than to say, your "feelz" are showing.

Second, you are imagining that sexual predators will not take advantage of the opening you cheerfully demand by way of insisting that anyone should wander in and out of any bathroom they choose whenever they choose. You are imagining that this has never happened in the past, simply because you want to believe it's so. And you are imagining that the only standard of measurement applicable - and the only point at which this should be a problem - is for a little girl to be raped. Up to that point, apparently, anything else is no big deal. This is not only egregiously incorrect, it's as repugnant as you are.

But it's not happening to any large degree at all. Transgendered people are already using the bathroom of choice, you're most likely not aware of it.

But, please by all means let the right carry on with their victimhood by proxy campaign of raped little girls in bathrooms. I'm not exactly sure why it's so satisfying for wingnuts.

Then there need be no laws that allow for (pre-op) transgender people get to use restrooms of the opposite sex.

In a perfect world where the angry self righteous don't live vicariously through the sexuality of others, sure.

 

[P@triot]

They want him in the women's restroom...according to the stupid laws they pass.

Whenever you tweekos are done presenting anecdotal red herrings to try to convince everyone that all trans people look like your carefully cherry-picked photos, perhaps the serious adults can get back to having a real discussion of the issue.

You absolutely nailed it Cecilie1200. I know a person who just "came out" as a transgender. I cannot even tell you how horrifying the pictures are that this person posts. It looks like a creepy man in drag. Just like 99.98% of all "transgender" freaks do.

 

[P@triot]

The color of your imagination is of no consequence.

Much like your uninformed opinions.

 

[P@triot]

In a perfect world where the angry self righteous don't live vicariously through the sexuality of others, sure.

In a perfect world, you left-wing nut-jobs wouldn't deny science in favor of mental illness. Cecilie1200 already knocked it out of the park and shut all of you fools up:

By the left's "compassionate" standards, the best way to treat paranoid schizophrenics is to issue birth certificates and Social Security cards for the voices in their heads. After all, they "feelz" the voices are real, so how DARE we insist that they aren't?

See - rational people don't demand that society bend to the desires of the mentally ill. Rational people show true compassion for the mentally ill and get them the treatment they desperately need.

 

[P@triot]

By the left's "compassionate" standards, the best way to treat paranoid schizophrenics is to issue birth certificates and Social Security cards for the voices in their heads. After all, they "feelz" the voices are real, so how DARE we insist that they aren't?

 

[MaryL]

There has to be truth somewhere in all this. male and female , its not complicated. Someone once told on this board me there are like 15 different sexes. i took electronics in high school, and I get there is ambivalence in nature. But it all comes down to a binary equation when it comes to biological reproduction. It's not complicated. women or men want a restroom for them. Not a ambivalent unicorn rainbow restroom, the majority dosen't want THAT.

 

[HappyJoy]

In a perfect world where the angry self righteous don't live vicariously through the sexuality of others, sure.

In a perfect world, you left-wing nut-jobs wouldn't deny science in favor of mental illness. Cecilie1200 already knocked it out of the park and shut all of you fools up:

By the left's "compassionate" standards, the best way to treat paranoid schizophrenics is to issue birth certificates and Social Security cards for the voices in their heads. After all, they "feelz" the voices are real, so how DARE we insist that they aren't?

See - rational people don't demand that society bend to the desires of the mentally ill. Rational people show true compassion for the mentally ill and get them the treatment they desperately need.

Irrational fears is not science, son.